Effects on growth parameters of maize of hazelnut husk compost applications under water stress conditions

Öz

In this study, husk compost at various ratios (0, 3 ton da^-1, 6 ton da^-1, 8 ton da^-1  was applied to different textured soils (clay loam and sandy loam) and maize were grown under water-deficit stress (water applications 75%, 50% and 25% at the levels of field capacity). Plants were harvested bolting period and it was investigated root and shoot weight, shoot/root ratio, plant height, nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium contents in leaf. Soil texture was effective on the root weight, shoot/root ratio, plant height, and basic elements contents of leaf. Root dry weight (2.38g) and plant height (40cm) in clay loam soil; shoot/root ratio (0.55), nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium contents were higher in sandy loam soil. Husk compost did not impact the shoot/root ratio, each of the other parameters increased in parallel with the increase of compost doses and 8 ton da^-1 application gave the highest values. Water stress have been influential on basic macro element concentrations. The leaf nitrogen and phosphorus content (3.40% and 0.16%) increased at 50% water stress conditions. The water stress on the potassium content was effective depending on the texture, and it was determined as 3.99% for the plants grown on the sandy loam soil subjected to 50% water stress. When all data are taken into account, it can be said that irrigation at 50% of the field capacity is sufficient when the soil is mixed with 8 ton da^-1 compost.   

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Zea mays L.,compost,water stress,root-shoot,nutrient elements

Su stresi koşulları altında fındık zuruf kompostu uygulamalarının mısır bitkisinin gelişim parametreleri üzerine etkileri

Öz

Bu çalışmada, farklı tekstüre (killi tın ve kumlu tın) sahip topraklara değişik oranlarda zuruf kompostu uygulanmış (0, 3 ton da^-1, 6 ton da^-1, 8 ton da^-1) ve su noksanlık stresi (tarla kapasitesinin %75’i, %50’si ve %25’i düzeyi) altında mısır bitkisi yetiştirilmiştir. Bitki sapa kalkma döneminde hasat edilmiş, kök ve gövde kuru ağırlıkları, gövde/kök oranı, bitki boyu, yaprak azot, fosfor ve potasyum içerikleri incelenmiştir. Toprak tekstürü kök ağırlığı, gövde/kök oranı, bitki boyu, yapraktaki temel besin içerikleri üzerinde etkili olmuştur. Kök kuru ağırlığı (2.38 g), bitki boyu (40 cm), killi tın topraklarda, gövde/kök oranı (0.55), yaprak azot, fosfor ve potasyum içerikleri kumlu tın topraklarda daha yüksek bulunmuştur. Zuruf kompostunun gövde/kök oranı üzerine etkisi olmazken, diğer parametrelerin her biri kompost dozunun artışına paralel olarak artmış, 8 ton da^-1’lık uygulama en yüksek değerleri vermiştir. Su stresi temel makro element konsantrasyonlarını etkilemiştir. Yaprakta azot ve fosfor kapsamı (%3.40 ve %0.16) %50 su stresi koşullarında artmıştır. Potasyum içeriği üzerine su stresi tekstüre bağlı olarak etkili olmuş, %50 su stresi uygulanan kumlu tın toprakta yetişen bitkilerde %3.99 olarak belirlenmiştir. Tüm bulgular dikkate alındığında, toprağa 8 ton da^-1 kompost karıştırıldığı koşullarda tarla kapasitesinin %50’ si düzeyinde sulama yapılmasının yeterli olacağı söylenebilir

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Zea mays L.,kompost,su stresi,kök-gövde,besin elementi

Kaynakça

1. Akıncı S, Lösel DM, 2009. The soluble sugars determination in cucurbitaceae species under water stress and recovery periods. Advances in Enviromental Biology 3(2): 175-183.
2. Alagöz Z, Yılmaz E, Öktüren F, 2006. Organik materyal ilavesinin bazı fiziksel ve kimyasal toprak özellikleri üzerine etkileri. Akdeniz Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi 19(2): 245-254.
3. Bender Özenç D, 2006. Effects of composted hazelnut husk on growth of tomato plants. Compost Science and Utilization 14(4): 271-275.
4. Bender Özenç D, 2008. Growth and transpiration of tomato seedlings grown in hazelnut husk compost under water-deficit stress. Compost Science and Utilization 16(2): 125-131.
5. Bender Özenç D, Özenç N, 2009. Determination of hazelnut husk decomposition level and of the content of some plant nutrient elements under natural conditions. Proceedings of the Seventh International Congress on Hazelnut, 23-27 June, Viterbo, Italy. Acta Horticulturae 845-49, pp. 323-330.
6. Belyaeva ON, Haynes RJ, 2010. A comparison of the properties of manufactured soils produced from composting municipal green waste alone or with poultry manure or grease trap/septage waste. Biology and Fertility of Soils 46(3): 271-281.
7. Benjamin JG, Nielsen DC, Vigil MF, Mikha MM, Calderon F, 2014. Water deficit stress effects on corn (Zea mays L.) root:shoot ratio. Open Journal of Soil Science 4: 151-160.
8. Blake GR, Hartge KH, 1986. Bulk density, Particle density. In: Methods of soil analysis. Part I, ASA-SSSA, Madison, WI, 363-382.

9. Bouyoucos GJ, 1951. A recabliration of the hidrometer for marking mechanical analysis of soil. Agronomy Journal 43: 434-437.
10. Bozkurt Y, 2005. Çukurova koşullarında damla sulama yöntemiyle sulanan ikinci ürün mısır bitkisinde optimum lateral aralığının belirlenmesi. Yüksek lisans tezi, Çukurova Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Adana.
11. Bremner JM, 1965. Methods of soil analysis Part II. Chemical and Microbiologial Properties. In: (eds. Balack CA), American Society of Agronomy Include. Publish Agronomy Series. No:9 Madison USA.
12. Chapman HD, Pratt PF, Parker F, 1961. Methods of analysis for soils, Plant and Waters. University of California, Division of Agriculture Science, CA.
13. Cheng H, Xu W, Liu J, Zhao Q, He Y, Chen G, 2009. Application of composted sewage sludge (CSS) as a soil amendment for turfgrass growth. Ecological Engineering 29: 96-104.
14. Çalışkan N, Koç N, Kaya A, Şenses T, 1996. Fındık zurufundan kompost elde edilmesi. Sonuç Raporu, Fındık Araştırma Enstitüsü Müdürlüğü, Giresun, 41 s.
15. De Boodt M, Verdonck O, Cappaert I, 1973. Method for measuring the water release curve of organic substrates. Proc. Sym. Artificial Media in Horticulture, 2054-2062.
16. DIN 11542, 1978. Torf für gartenbau und landwirtshaft Germany. Drought tolerance. Tree Physiology 24(10): 1165-1172.
17. Gabriels R, Verdonck O, 1992. Reference methods for analysis of compost. In: Composting and compost quality assurance criteria. pp. 173-183.
18. Garg BK, 2003. Nutrient uptake and management under drought:nutrient-moisture interaction. Current Agriculture 27: 1–8.
19. Frederick JR, Camp CR, Bauer PJ, 2001. Drought-stress effects on branch and main stem seed yield and yield components of determinate soybean. Crop Science 41: 759–763.
20. Hanks RJ, Ashcroft GL, Rasmussen VP, Wilson GD, 1978. Corn production as influenced by irrigation and salinity-Utah Studies. Irrigation Science 1: 47-59.
21. Hussain M, Malik M A, Farooq M, Ashraf MY, Cheema MA, 2008. Improving drought tolerance by exogenous application of glycinebetaine and salicylic acid in sunflower. Journal of Agronomy Crop Science 194: 193-199.
22. İç S, Gülser C, 2008. Tütün atığının farklı bünyeli toprakların bazı kimyasal ve fiziksel özelliklerine etkisi. Ondokuz Mayıs Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi 23(2): 104-109.
23. Jones GV, White MA, Cooper OR, Storckmann K, 2005. Climate change and global wine quality. Climatic Change 73: 319-343. Kacar B, Katkat V, 2009. Bitki Besleme. Nobel Yayınları: 849, Ankara, 645 s.
24. Kacar B, Katkat V, Öztürk Ş, 2009. Bitki Fizyolojisi. Nobel Yayınları: 848, Ankara, 545 s.
25. Kaya M D, Okçu G, Atak M, Çıkılı Y, Kolsarıcı Ö, 2006. Seed treatments to overcome salt and drought stress during germination in sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.). European Journal of Agronmy 24(4): 291–295.
26. Klute A, 1986. Water retention. laboratory methods. In: Methods of Soil Analysis, Part II. ASA-SSSA, Madison, WI, pp. 635-662.
27. Knudsen D, Peterson GA, Pratt PF, 1982. Lithium, sodium and potassium. methods of soil analysis, Part II. ASA-SSSA, WI, pp. 225-245.
28. Kramer PJ, Boyer JS, 1995. Water relations of plants and Soils. Academic Press, San Diego.
29. Larcher W, 1995. Physiological plant ecology. Springer, Berlin.
30. Nasri M, Khalatbari M, Zahedi H, Paknejad F, Moghadam HR, 2008. Evaluation of micro and macro elements in drought stress condition in cultivars of rapeseed watermelon (Brassica napus L.). American Journal of Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3(3): 579-583.
31. Nejad TS, Bakhshande S, Nasab, SB, Payande K, 2014. The effect of drought stress on transport trend and nutritional elements accumulation in crop plant roots. Report and Opinion 6(9): 68-77.
32. Nelson DW, Sommers LE, 1982. Total carbon, organic carbon and soil organic matter. (Ed: A L Page) In: Methods of Soil Analysis, Part II. ASA-SSSA, Madison, WI, pp. 539-579.
33. Olsen SR, Watanable FS, 1957. A method to determine a phosphorus adsorpstion maximum for soils as measured by langmuir isoterm. Soil Science Society American Procceding (21): 144-149.
34. Öğretir K, 1993. Eskişehir koşullarında mısırın su-verim ilişkiler. Doktora Tezi, Çukurova Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Adana. Özenç BD, 2005. Usage of hazelnut husk compost as growing medium. Acta Horticulturae 686: 309-319.
35. Özenç N, Bender Özenç D, Çaycı G, 2006. Effects of hazelnut husk compost, peat, farmyard manure and chicken manure on soil organic matter and N nutrition and hazelnut yield. 18th International Soil Meeting (ISM) on Soil Sustaining Life Earth, Managing Soil and Technology. Proceeding (II), 22-26 May, Şanlıurfa, Turkey, pp. 937-945.
36. Öztürk M, Bildik B, 2005. Hayvan çiftliklerinde kompost üretimi. Çevre ve Orman Bakanlığı, Ankara.
37. Şeker C, Ersoy İ, 2005. Değişik organik gübreler ve leonarditin toprak özellikleri ve mısır bitkisinin (Zea mays L.) gelişimi üzerine etkileri. Selçuk Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi 19 (35): 46-50.
38. U.S. Salinity Laboratory Staff, 1954. Diasgnosis and improvement of saline and alkali soils. Agricultural Handbook, No: 60, U.S.D.A.
39. Verdonck OR, Pennick R, De Boodt M, 1984. The physical properties of different horticultural substrates. Acta Horticulture 150: 155-160.
40. Yıldız Ş, Ölmez E, Kiriş A, 2010. Kompost teknolojileri ve İstanbul’daki uygulamaları. Kompostlaştırma Sistemleri Ve Kompostun Kullanım Alanları Çalıştayı, İstanbul.
41. Yılmaz S, Bender Özenç D, 2012. Effects of hazelnut husk compost and tea waste compost on growth of Corn Plant (Zea mays L.). 8th International Soil Science Congress on "Land Degradation and Challenges in Sustainable Soil Management", 15- 17 May, İzmir, Turkey, pp. 620-626.
42. Zeytin S, Baran A, 2003. Influences of composted hazelnut husk on some physical properties of soils. Bioresource Technology 88 (3): 241–244.