Effects of sugar beet factory disposal of vinasse on some chemical and biochemical properties of soil during incubation period

Öz

In this study, the effects of sugar beet factory waste vinasse on some biochemical properties of soil have been evaluated with 6 months incubation experiment. Four different types of vinasse were applied to 300 g pots at 0, 2, 4, 8, 20 L/da doses. On the 15-30-60-120 and 180th days of incubation, β-glucosidase and alkaline phosphatase enzyme activities, soil respiration and microbial biomass were measured in soils. On the 15-60-120 and 180th days of incubation organic matter, pH and EC analysis was performed. As a result of the analysis, CO2 release enhanced with increasing vinasse dose. The microbial biomass carbon (MBC) content of the soils treated with vinas was higher than that of control. Beta glucosidase enzyme activity increased at the beginning of the incubation compared to the control, but there was no significant difference between control and applications depending on sampling time. Beta glucosidase activity decreased significantly at all sampling times in 20 L/da, which is the highest dose of all vinasse (P <0.05). Contrary to pH, the EC values of the soils increased depending on the incubation time and the application dose of vinasse (P<0.05). Due to the positive effect of the application of vinasse on the biochemical properties of soil, it is thought that it may be a suitable option for the safe disposal of this industrial waste, but the application level should be within certain limits in order to prevent the development of soil salinity in the long term.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Vinasse
• liquid organic fertilizer
• soil
• enzyme activity
• microbial biomass carbon

Şeker fabrikası atığı vinasın (şilempe) inkübasyon süresince toprağın bazı kimyasal ve biyokimyasal özellikleri üzerine etkileri

Öz

Bu çalışmada, şeker fabrikası atığı vinasın toprağın bazı kimyasal ve biyokimyasal özellikleri üzerine etkileri 6 ay süreli inkübasyon denemesiyle ortaya konulmuştur. Dört farklı vinas çeşidi 300 g’lık saksılara 0, 2, 4, 8, 20 L/da dozlarında uygulanmış ve inkübasyona tabi tutulmuştur. İnkübasyonun 15, 30, 60, 120 ve 180. günlerinde alınan toprak örneklerinde β-glukozidaz enzim aktivitesi, alkali fosfataz enzim aktivitesi, toprak solunumu (CO2 çıkışı) ve mikrobiyal biyokütle karbonu (MBC) analizleri yapılmıştır. İnkübasyonun 15, 60, 120 ve 180. günlerinde de organik madde, pH ve EC analizi yapılmıştır. Yapılan analizler sonucunda artan vinas dozuna bağlı olarak CO2 çıkışı artış göstermiştir. Vinas uygulanmış toprakların MBC içerikleri kontrole göre daha fazla olmuştur. Beta glukozidaz enzim aktivitesi inkübasyonun başlarında kontrole göre artış göstermiş ancak ilerleyen dönemlere bağlı olarak kontrol ile uygulamalar arasındaki fark önemli bulunmamıştır. Bütün vinas çeşitlerinin en yüksek dozu olan 20 L/da uygulamasında, tüm inkübasyon zamanlarında beta glukozidaz aktivitesi diğer dozlara göre önemli derecede azalmıştır (P<0.05). Toprakların EC değerleri, pH’nın aksine inkübasyon zamanına ve vinasın uygulama dozuna bağlı olarak artmıştır (P<0.05). Vinasın toprağa uygulanmasının biyokimyasal özelliklerinde olumlu etki etmesine bağlı olarak, bu endüstriyel atığın güvenli bir şekilde bertaraf edilmesi için uygun bir seçenek olabileceği, ancak uzun vadede toprak tuzluluğunun gelişmesini önlemek için uygulama seviyesinin belirli sınırlar içinde olması gerektiği düşünülmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Vinas
• sıvı organik gübre
• toprak
• enzim aktivitesi
• mikrobiyal biyokütle karbonu

Kaynakça

1. Alotaibi KD, Schoenau JJ, 2011. Enzymatic activity and microbial biomass in soil amended with biofuelproduction byproducts. Applied Soil Ecology, 48: 227-235.
2. Alotaibi KD, Schoenau JJ, 2018. The effect of thin stillage on the chemical and biological properties of a Chernozem in Western Canada. Geoderma Regional, 12: 65-71.
3. Anonim 2020. Türkiye Şeker Fabrikaları A.Ş. Sektör Raporu. https://www.turkseker.gov.tr/data/dokumanlar/2020_Sektor_Raporu.pdf (Alıntı tarihi: 07.06.2021)
4. AOAC, 1995. Official Methods of Analysis. Association of Official Analytical Chemists. USA.
5. APHA, 1992. Standard Methods. SM 4110-Determination of Anions by Ion Chromatography. American Public Health Association.
6. APHA, 2011. Standard Methods. SM 5210B-Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD). American Public Health Association.
7. APHA, 2011. Standard Methods. SM 5220 B-Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD). American Public Health Association.
8. Ar F, 2014. Biyoetanol kullanım zorunluluğunun Türk Ekonomisine Yaratacağı Etkiler. Pankobirlik / Dünya Enerji Konseyi Türk Milli Komitesi, Ankara.

9. Arafat, S. ve Yassen, A.E. 2002. Agronomic evaluation of fertilizing effiency ofvinasse, 17th World Congress of Soil Science (WCSS), 14-21 August, Paper No:1991, Bangkok, Tailand.
10. Arimi MM, Zhang Y, Götz G, Kiriamiti K, Geiben SU, 2014. Antimicrobial Colorants in Molasses Distillery Wastewater and Their Removal Technologies. International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation, 87: 34-43.
11. Babujia LC, Hungria M, Franchini JC, Brookes PC, 2010. Microbial biomass and activity at various soil depths in a Brazilian oxisol after two decades of no-tillage and conventional tillage. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 42: 2174- 2181.
12. Balota EL, Colozzi-Filho A, Andrad DS, Dick RP, 2003. Microbial biomass in soils under different tillage and crop rotation systems. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 38: 15-20.
13. Blake, G.R., Hartge, K.H. 1986. Bulk Density and Particle Density. In Methods of Soil Analysis, Part I, Physical and Mineralogical Methods. ASA and SSSA Agronomy Monograph (2nd ed) no 9, 363-381, Madison.
14. Bol R, Kandeler E, Amelung W, Glaser B, Marx MC, Preedy N, Lorenz K, 2003. Short-term effects of dairy slurryamendmenton carbon sequestration andenzyme activities in a temperate grassland. Soil Biol. Biochem. 35: 1411–1421.
15. Bouyoucous GOA, 1951. Recalibration of the hydrometer method for making mechanical analysis of soils. Agronomy Journal, 43: 434-38.
16. Bremner JM, 1965. Methods of soil analysis. Part 2. Chemical and Microbiological Properties. Ed. C.A. Black Amer. Soc. Of Agron. Inc. Pub. Agron. Series No: 9. Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
17. Cemeroğlu B, 2010. Gıda Analizleri, Gıda Teknolojileri Derneği Yayınları, No: 34, 657, Ankara.
18. Eivazi F, Zakaria A, 1993. β-Glucosidase in Soil Amended with Sewage Sludge. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 43 (2):155-161.
19. EPA, 1996. EPA Method 3050B- Acid Digestion of Sediments, Sludges, and Soils. Environmental Protection Agency. USA.
20. Espana-Gamboa E, Mijangos-Cortes J, Barahona-Perez L, Dominguez-Maldonado J, Hernández-Zarate G, Alzate-Gaviria L, 2011. Vinasse: characterization and treatments. Waste Manage, 29: 1235–1250.
21. FitzGibbon F, Singh D, McMullan G, Marchant R, 1998. The effect of phenolics acids and molasses spent wash concentration on dstillery wastewater remediation by fungi. Process Biochem. 33: 799–803.
22. Garcia C, Hernandez T. 1996. Effect of Bromecil and Sewage Sludge Addition on Soil Enzymatic Activity. Soil Sci. and Plant Nutrition. 42 (1): 191- 195.
23. Hati K, Biswas A, Bandyopadhyay K, Misra A, 2007. Soil properties and crop yieldson a vertisol in India with application of distillery effluent. Soil Tillage Res., 92: 60–68.
24. Isaac RA, Johnson WCJr, 1998. Elemental Determination by Inductively Coupled Plasma Atomic Emission Spectrometry. P.165-170. In: Y.P. Kalra (eds), Handbook of Reference Methods for Plant Analysis. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida, USA
25. Jackson ML, 1962. Soil chemical analysis. Prentice Hall Inc. Englewood. Cliffs, N.J
26. Joergensen RG, Meyer B, Mueller T, 1994. Time Course of The Soil Microbial Biomass Under Wheat. A One Year Field Study. Soil Biol. Biochem. 26: 987-994.
27. Kacar B, Kütük C, 2009. Gübre Analizleri. Nobel Bilim ve Araştırma Merkezi Yayınları, 382, Ankara.
28. Kuzyakov Y, Friedel JK, Stahr K, 2000. Review of mechanisms and quantification of priming effects. Soil Biol. Biochem. 32: 1485–1498.
29. Nannipieri P, 1994. The potential use of soil enzymes as indicators of productivity, sustainability and pollution. In: Pankhurst CE, Double BM, Gupta VVSR, Grace PR (eds) Soil biota: management in sustainable farming systems. CSIRO, Adelaide, pp 238–244
30. Olsen S, Cole C, Watanabe F, Dean L, 1954. Estimation of available phosphorus in soils by extraction with sodium bicarbonate. USDA Circular Nr 939, US Gov. Print. Office, Washington, D.C.
31. Oruç N., Gök, M. 1990. Eskişehir Şeker-Alkol Fabrikası Sıvı Atığı Şlempenin Tarım Topraklarında Yarattığı Kirlilik, Çevre Biyolojisi Sempozyumu, Hacettepe Üni.17-19 Ekim 1990.
32. Pant D, Adholeya A, 2007. Biological approaches for treatment of distillery wastewater: A review. Bioresource Technology, 98: 2321–2334.
33. Paul EA, Clark FE, 1996. Soil Microbiology and Biochemistry. 2nd Edition, Academic Press, London.
34. Richards LA, 1954. Diagnosis and Improvement of Saline and Alkali Soils. USDA Agriculture Handbook 60, Washington D. C.
35. Rivoira, L., Studzińska, S., Młyńska M.S., Bruzzoniti, M.C., Buszewski, B. 2017. New approaches for extraction and determination of betaine from Beta vulgaris samples by hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Anal Bioanal Chem, 409, 5133–5141.
36. Ros M, Pascua, JA, Garcia C, Hernandez MT, Insam H, 2006. Hydrolase activities, microbial biomass and bacterial community in a soil after long-term amendment with different composts. Soil Biol. Biochem., 38: 3443–3452.
37. Singh JS, Raghubanshi AS, Singh RS, Srivastava SC, 1989. Microbial biomass acts as a source of plant nutrients in dry tropical forest and savanna. Nature, 338: 499–500.
38. Tejada M, Gonzalez JM, 2005. Beet vinasse applied to wheat under dryland conditions affect soil properties and yield. Europ.J. Agronomy, 23, 336-347.
39. Tejada M, Moreno JL, Hernandez MT, Garcia C, 2007. Application of two beet vinasse forms in soil restoration: Effects on soil properties in an arid environment in southern Spain. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 119: 289–298.
40. TOB, 2021. Etil Alkol Sektöründe Piyasaya Arz Bilgileri. Tarım ve Orman Bakanlığı Tütün ve Alkollü İçkiler Daire Başkanlığı. https://www.tarimorman.gov.tr/TADB/Menu/23/Alkol-Ve-Alkollu-Ickiler-Daire-Baskanligi (Alıntı tarihi:07.06.2021).
41. TS 5869 ISO 5073, 2003. Kahverengi kömürler ve linyitler-Hümik asitlerin tayini. Türk Standartları Enstitüsü, Ankara.
42. TS 6236 ISO 3496, 1997. Hidroksiprolin Muhtevası Tayini. Türk Standartları Enstitüsü, Ankara.
43. TS EN 15475, 2010. Gübreler-Amonyak Azotu Tayini. Türk Standartları Enstitüsü, Ankara.
44. TS EN 15476, 2010. Gübreler-Devarda Yöntemine Göre Nitrik ve Amonyak Azotu Tayini. Türk Standartları Enstitüsü, Ankara.
45. TS EN 15478, 2010. Gübreler-Üredeki Toplam Azotun Tayini. Türk Standartları Enstitüsü, Ankara.
46. Wilkie A, Riedesel K, Owens J, 2000. Stillage characterization and anaerobic treatment of ethanol stillage from conventional and cellulosic feedstocks. Biomass and Bioenergy,19: 63–102.