Utilization of Demolition Waste for Treatment of Acid Mine Drainage and Immobilization of Heavy Metals Released from Copper Flotation Tailings

Abstract

In this study, the treatment of acid mine drainage (AMD) and immobilization of heavy metals released from CFT (copper flotation tailings) were investigated using strongly alkaline demolition waste (DW), collected from the urban renewal areas. Shake flask batch tests were conducted to assess the influence of time and different ratios of CFT/DW on the acidity and heavy metal release characteristics of the drainage water. During the tests, samples were collected from filtered leachates at regular intervals to monitor pH, SO42- and release of heavy metals. The results indicated that the pH increased from 2.21 (t=0) to 10.37 after 120 minutes of shaking in an orbital shaker. The highest SO42- release ([SO42-]=4558 mg L-1, t=0) was measured at 1:3 dose of CFT:DW application with 257 mg L-1 (pH=10.37) at the end of 120 minutes. The addition of DW almost completely reduced the release of heavy metals from CFT due to its high alkaline content. As a result, it was suggested that DW could effectively be used for the treatment of AMD and immobilization of heavy metals released from CFT.

Keywords

• Copper flotation tailings
• Demolition waste
• Acid mine drainage
• Urban renewal

Kaynakça

1. [1] Akcil A, Koldas S. Acid mine drainage (AMD): causes, treatment and case studies. J Clean Prod. 2006; 14: 1139-1145.
2. [2] Tozsin G, Arol AI, Cayci G. Evaluation of pyritic tailings from a copper concentration plant for calcareous sodic soil reclamation. Physicochem Probl Miner Process. 2014; 50 (2): 693-704.
3. [3] Pandey S, Kankeu EF, Redelinghuys J, Kim J, Kang M. Implication of biofilms in the sustainability of acid mine drainage and metal dispersion near coal tailings. Sci Total Environ. 2021; 788: 147851.
4. [4] Menzel K, Barros L, García A, Figueroa RR, Estay H. Metal sulfide precipitation coupled with membrane filtration process for recovering copper from acid mine drainage. Sep Purif Technol. 2021; 270: 118721.
5. [5] Silva D, Weber C, Oliveira C. Neutralization and uptake of pollutant cations from acid mine drainage (AMD) using limestones and zeolites in a pilot-scale passive treatment system. Miner Eng. 2021; 170: 107000.
6. [6] Alcolea A, Vazquez M, Caparros A, Ibarra I, Garcia C, Linares R, Rodriguez R. Heavy metal removal of intermittent acid mine drainage with an open limestone channel. Miner Eng. 2012; 26: 86-98.
7. [7] Valero AG, Martínez SM, Faz A, Rivera J, Acosta JA. Environmentally sustainable acid mine drainage remediation: use of natural alkaline material. J Water Process Eng. 2020; 33: 101064.
8. [8] Huang WL, Lin DH, Chang NB, Song K. Recycling of C&D waste via a mechanical sorting process. Resour Conserv Recycl. 2002; 37: 23-37.

9. [9] Marzouk M, Azab S. Environmental and economic impact assessment of construction and demolition waste disposal using system dynamics. Resour Conserv Recycl. 2014; 82: 41-49.
10. [10] EPA. Advancing sustainable materials management: 2015 fact sheet. Assessing trends in material generation, recycling, composting, combustion with energy recovery and landfilling in the United States, July, 1-23; 2018.
11. [11] Shi M, Ling TC, Gan B, Guo MZ. Turning concrete waste powder into carbonated artificial aggregates. Constr Build Mater. 2019; 199: 178-184.
12. [12] Gencel O, Erdugmus E, Sutcu M, Oren OH. 2020. Effects of concrete waste on characteristics of structural fired clay bricks. Constr Build Mater. 2020; 255: 119362.
13. [13] Sobek AA, Schuller WA, Freeman JR, Smith RM. Field and laboratory methods applicable to overburden and minesoils, EPA 600/2-78-054, 203; 1978.
14. [14] EPA. Acid mine drainage prediction. EPA Technical Document 530 R 94 036, NTIS PB94-201829, Washington DC, USA; 1994.
15. [15] EPA. Sulfate turbidimetric. Method 375.4, Methods for the chemical analysis of water and wastes, EPA/600/4–79/020. US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington DC, USA; 1979.
16. [16] Nelson RE. Carbonate and Gypsum. In: A.L. Page (Editor). Methods of soil analysis. Part 2. Chemical and microbiological properties. American Society of Agronomy. Soil Science Society of America. Publisher. Madison, Wisconsin; 1982. p. 181-196.
17. [17] Turkish Standards Institution (TSI). Copper and copper alloys, determination of sulfur content-combustion titrimetric method, Ankara, Turkey; 1987.
18. [18] Johnson DB, Hallberg KB. 2005. Acid mine drainage remediation options: a review. Sci Total Environ. 2005; 338 (1-2): 3-14.
19. [19] Zinck J, Griffith W. Review of mine drainage treatment and sludge management operations. Natural Resources Canada, Mine Environment Neutral Drainage Program. MEND Report 3.43.1; 2013.
20. [20] Madzivire G, Gitari WM, Vadapalli VRK, Ojumu TV, Petrik LF. Fate of sulphate removed during the treatment of circum-neutral mine water and acid mine drainage with coal fly ash: modelling and experimental approach. Miner Eng. 2011; 24: 1467-1477.
21. [21] Name T, Sheridan C. Remediation of acid mine drainage using metallurgical slags. Miner Eng. 2014; 64: 15-22.
22. [22] WHO. Guidelines for drinking-water quality. 4th ed. Incorporating the First Addendum, Geneva, Switzerland; 2017.
23. [23] Kjeldsen P, Barlaz MA, Rooker AP, Baun A, Ledin A, Christensen TH. Present and long-term composition of MSW landfill leachate: a review. Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol. 2002; 32 (4): 297-336.
24. [24] Szymanski K, Janowska B. Migration of pollutants in porous soil environment. Arch Environ Prot. 2016; 42 (3): 87–95.
25. [25] Tenodi S, Krcmar D, Agbaba J, Zrnic K, Mira R. Assessment of the environmental impact of sanitary and unsanitary parts of a municipal solid waste landfill. J Environ Manage. 2020; 258: 110019.
26. [26] Feng D, van Deventer JSJ, Aldrich C. Removal of pollutants from acid mine wastewater using metallurgical by-product slags. Sep Purif Technol. 2004; 40: 61-67.
27. [27] Rose AW. Advances in passive treatment of coal mine drainage 1998–2009. In: Proceedings of the 27th ASMR, Pittsburgh, PA; 2010. p. 847–887.
28. [28] Cui M, Jang M, Cho SH, Khim J, Cannon FS. A continuous pilot-scale system using coal-mine drainage sludge to treat acid mine drainage contaminated with high concentrations of Pb, Zn, and other heavy metals. J Hazard Mater. 2012; 215 (216): 122-128.
29. [29] Rodriguez-Jorda MP, Garrido F, Garcia-Gonzalez MT. Effect of the addition of industrial by-products on Cu, Zn, Pb and As leachability in a mine sediment. J Hazard Mater. 2012; 213 (214): 46-54.