Investigation of Bread Wheat Genotypes with Different Characteristics by Physiological and Quality Traits

Abstract

Instruments measuring spectral reflectance are extensively used by many researchers to determine the relationship between grain yield (GY), quality, and physiological traits of bread wheat genotypes at different developmental stages. This study was carried out under rain-fed conditions in 2019-2020 and 2020-2021 growing seasons in Muş province. The experiment was set up in a randomized block experimental design with 3 replicates. Except to flowering stage chlorophyll content (FSC), statistically significant differences were determined among genotypes at the level of p≤0.01 in all examined characteristics. More explicitly, G6, G8, G10, Müfitbey, Hanlı and Metin in terms of GY; Cemre, Kenanbey and Bezostaja 1 as regards quality traits; Ekiz, G8, and G9 with regard to physiological traits were found as significant genotypes. Biplot model analysis, used to determine genotype-trait and stability relationship, showed that thousand grain weight (TGW) and plant height (PH) were positively associated with both GY and Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI). GY was found to be related to canopy temperature (CT) and heading time (HT) negatively. Notably, NDVI were positively related to protein ratio. Hanlı, Metin, G6, G8, and G10 were established as the high-yielded stabile genotypes which are least affected from environmental conditions

Keywords

• Wheat
• stability
• correlation
• physiology
• quality

Kaynakça

1. [1] Güngör H, Dumlupınar Z. Evaluation of some bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cultivars for yield, yield components and quality traits in bolu conditions. Turkish J. of Agric. and Natural Sci. 2019;6(1):44-51.
2. [2] Çay F. Morphological and molecular characterization of synthetic hexaploid bread wheat lines and wheat varieties. Tekirdağ Namık Kemal University Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences Department of Field Crops. PhD Thesis. 157 p. 2020.
3. [3] Kahraman T, Güngör H, Öztürk İ, Yüce İ, Dumlupınar Z. Evaluating the effects of genotype and environment on yield and some quality parameters in bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) genotypes using principal component and GGE biplot analyses. KSU J. Agric Nat. 2021;24 (5):992-1002.
4. [4] Schular SF. Bacon RK. Gbur EE. Kernel and spike character influence on test weight of soft red winter wheat. Crop Sci. 1994;34:1309-1313.
5. [5] Miadenow N. Przulj N. Hristov N. Djuricand V. Milovanovic M. Cultivar by enviroment interactions for wheat quality traits in semiarid conditions. Cereal Chemistry. 2001;78:363-367.
6. [6] Aydoğan S, Soylu S. Determination of yield, yield components and some quality properties of bread wheat varieties. J. of Field Crop. Cent. Res. Inst. 2017;26(1):24-30.
7. [7] Jackson P, Robertson M, Cooper M, Hammer G. The role of physiological understanding in plant breeding. from a breeding perspective. Field Crops Res. 1996;49:11-37.
8. [8] Karaman M, Akıncı C, Yıldırım M. Investigation of the relationship between grain yield with physiological parameters in some bread wheat varieties. Trakya Univ. J. of Natural Sci. 2014;15(1):41-46.

9. [9] Giunta F, Motzo R, Deidda M. SPAD readings and associated leaf traits in durum wheat. barley and triticale cultivars. Euphytica. 2002;125(2):197-205.
10. [10] Yıldırım M, Akıncı C, Koç M, Barutçular C. Applicability of canopy temperature depression and chlorophyl content in durum wheat breeding. Anadolu J. Agric. Sci. 2009;24(3):158-166.
11. [11] Talebi R. Evaluation of chlorophyll content and canopy temperature as indicators for drought tolerance in durum wheat (Triticum durum Desf.). Aust. J. Basic Appl. Sci. 2011;5:1457-1462.
12. [12] Islam MR, Haque KMS, Akter N, Karim MA. Leaf chlorophyll dynamics in wheat based on SPAD meter reading and its relationship with grain yield. Sci Agric. (2014;4: 13-18.
13. [13] Kızılgeçi F, Yıldırım M. The relationship of some physiological traits measured at heading stage with yield and quality properties of durum wheat. Turkish J. of Agric. and Natural Sci. 2019;6(4):777-785.
14. [14] Rosyara URR, Sharma C, Duveiller E. Variation of canopy temperature depression and chlorophyll content in spring wheat genotypes and association with foliar blight resistance. J. of Plant Breeding Gr. 2006;1:45-52.
15. [15] Özseven İ, Gençtan T. The effect of long-term waterlogging on flag leaf chlorophyll content in some bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) genotypes. Anadolu, J. of AARI. 2018; 28(2):1-16.
16. [16] Reynolds MP, Singh RP, Ibrahim A, Ageeb OAA. Larqué-Saavedra A, Quick JS. Evaluating physiological traits to complement empirical selection for wheat in warm environments. Euphytica. 1998;100:84-95.
17. [17] Dalkılıç AY, Kara R, Yürürdurmaz C, Şimşek B, Aldemir Y, Akkaya A. The effects on sowing density to physiological parameters in durum wheat. J. of Field Crops Cent. Res. Inst. 2016;25(1):78-87.
18. [18] Zadoks JC, Chang TT, Konzak CF. A decimal code for the growth stages of cereals. Weed Res. 1974;14:415-421.
19. [19] Anonymous. Yıldız Plant Productions, Seed, and Agricultural Industry Corp weather station records. [cited 2022 January 07].
20. [20] Adamsen FJ, Pinter PJ, Barnes EM, Lamorte RL, Wall GW, Leavitt SW, Kimball BA. Measuring wheat senescence with a digital camera. crop ecology, production and management. Crop. Sci. 1999;39:719-724.
21. [21] Reynolds MP, Nagarajan S, Razzaque MA Ageeb OAA. Heat tolerance. application of physiology in wheat breeding. Mexico, DF, CIMMYT; 2001.
22. [22] Kalaycı M. Using JMP with examples and variance analysis models for agricultural research. anatolian agricultural research Institute Directorate Publications. Publication Number: 21, Eskişehir; 2005.
23. [23] Fagnano M, Fiorentino N, D'Egidio M, Quaranta F, Ritieni A., Ferracane R, Raimondi G. Durum wheat in conventional and organic farming: yield amount and pasta quality in Southern Italy. The Sci.World J. 2012;1-9.
24. [24] Ülker H. Genetic improvement in yield and some agronomic traits of bread wheat cultivars under Central Anatolian rainfed conditions. Ahi Evran University Institute of Science, Master of Science Thesis; 2017.
25. [25] Reif, JC, Maurer HP, Korzun V, Ebmeyer E, Miedaner T, Würschum T. Theor Appl. Genet. 2011;123:283-292.
26. [26] Aydın N, Bayramoğlu HO, Mut Z, Özcan H. Determination of yield and quality characters of bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cultivars and lines under Black Sea Region Conditions of Turkey. J. of Agric. Sci. 2005;11(3):257-262.
27. [27] Çağlar Ö, Öztürk A, Bulut S. Adaptation of some bread wheat cultivars in Erzurum plain conditions. J. of Atatürk Univ. Facult. of Agric. 2006;37(1):1-7.
28. [28] Demirel F, Kumlay AM, Yıldırım B. Evaluation of agromorphological characteristics of some bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) genotypes by biplot, clustering and path analysis methods. European J. of Sci. and Tech. 2021;23:304-311.
29. [29] Fischer RA. Yield potential in a dwarf spring wheat and theeffect of shading. Crop Sci. 1975;15(5):607–13.
30. [30] Lopresti MF, Di Bella CM, Degioanni AJ. Relationship between MODIS-NDVI data and wheatyield: A case study in Northern Buenos Airesprovince, Argentina. ELSEVIER, Information Processing in Agriculture. 2015;2:73-84.
31. [31] Fahliani RA, Assad MT. Evaluation of Three physiological criteria for selecting drought resistant wheat genotypes. Proceedings of the Tenth International Wheat Genetics Symposium. 1-6 September. Italy; 2003. p. 664-666.
32. [32] Koc M, Barutcular C, Tiryakioğlu M. Possible heat-tolerant cultivar improvement through the use of flag leaf gas exchange Traits in a Mediterranean Environment. J. Sci Food Agric. Res. 2008;88:1638-1647.
33. [33] Li P, Wu P, Chen J. Evaluation of flag leaf chlorophyll content index in 30 spring wheat genotypes under three irrigation regimes. Australian J. of Crop Sci. 2012;6(6):1123-1130.
34. [34] Mut Z, Erbaş Köse ÖD, Akay H. Determination of grain yield and quality traits of some bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) varieties. Anadolu J. of Agric. Sci. 2017; 32:85-95.
35. [35] Mut Z, Aydın N, Bayramoğlu HO, Özcan H. Investigation of yield and primary quality characteristics of some bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) genotypes. J. of Fac. of Agric., OMU. 2007; 22(2):193-201.
36. [36] Erdemci E, Aktaş H, Karaman M. Response of some facultative wheat genotypes to different environments. J. of Ege Univ. Fac. of Agric. 2021;58(3):421-430.
37. [37] Laidig F, Piepho HP, Hüsken A, Begemann J, Rentel, D, Drobek, T, Meyer U. Predicting loaf volume for winter wheat by linear regression models based on protein concentration and sedimentation value using samples from VCU trials and mills. J. of Cereal. Sci. 2018;84:132-141.
38. [38] Rapp M, Lein V, Lacoudre F, Lafferty J, Müller, E, Vida, G, Bozhanova V, Ibraliu A, Thorwarth P, Piepho HP, Leiser WL, Würschum T, Longin CFH. Simultaneous improvement of grain yield and protein content in durum wheat by different phenotypic indices and genomic selection. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2018;131:1315-1329.
39. [39] Ünal S. Importance of quality in wheat and methods used in determination. Cereal Products Technology Congress and Exhibition. 3-4 October, Gaziantep; 2002.
40. [40] Yan W, Tinker NA. An integrated biplot analysis system for displaying, interpreting, and exploring genotype× environment interaction. Crop Sci. 2005;45(3):1004-1016.
41. [41] Yan W, Kang MS. GGE biplot analysis: a graphical tool for breeders, geneticists, and agronomists. - (CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL); 2003.
42. [42] Yan W, Kang MS, Ma B, Wood S, Cornelius PL. GGE biplot vs. AMMI analysis of genotype by environment data. - Crop Sci. 2007;47:643-655.
43. [43] Aktaş H. Tracing Highly Adapted Stable Yielding Bread Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) Genotypes For Greatly Variable South-Eastern Turkey. Applied Ecol. and Env. Res. 2016;14(4):159-176.