EN
TR
WELL-BEING IN ACADEMIC LIFE: CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK, TERMINOLOGY, AND ITS STRATEGIC IMPORTANCE FOR MEDICAL EDUCATION
Öz
Objective:
Increasing levels of burnout, chronic stress, and psychological distress in academic environments have made well-being an important topic of discussion in medical education. However, the lack of conceptual consensus regarding well-being has led to the interchangeable use of theoretically distinct constructs such as well-being and wellness (and, in Turkish, to the use of multiple terms such as “iyilik hali,” “iyi oluş,” and “refah” to translate well-being), complicating the establishment of a unified terminology.
The aim of this review is to examine the concept of well-being in academic life within the context of medical education, to provide conceptual clarity regarding related terminology, and to discuss its strategic importance in terms of educational quality, patient safety, and institutional sustainability.
Methods:
This study was conducted as a classical review. Relevant literature was examined to synthesize the main theoretical approaches, conceptual distinctions, measurement perspectives, and reflections of well-being in academic life within an integrated framework.
Results:
The literature indicates that well-being in academic life cannot be explained solely as the absence of burnout, but should be understood as a multidimensional and dynamic construct. This multidimensionality is explained by the fact that well-being includes both hedonic (subjective well-being, life satisfaction) and eudaimonic (meaning, purpose, development) dimensions. In the literature, well-being is often assessed not as a holistic construct itself, but through related dimensions such as burnout, stress, depression, or life satisfaction. This contributes to heterogeneity in measurement approaches and limits the comparability of findings across studies. In addition, the lack of clearly defined conceptual frameworks in many studies complicates the interpretation of results. Together, these findings suggest that well-being in academic settings should be understood not merely as an individual condition, but as a multidimensional construct shaped by the interaction of structural factors such as workload, leadership, learning environment, and institutional culture.
Conclusion:
Academic well-being is a complex concept that goes beyond individual functioning and has a direct impact on professional development, institutional sustainability, and educational quality. Therefore, developing holistic approaches that incorporate both individual and institutional components, consistent and standardized usage of terminology, and better conceptual frameworks are all necessary to improve well-being.
Anahtar Kelimeler
Kaynakça
- 1. Shanafelt TD, Boone S, Tan L, Dyrbye LN, Sotile W, Satele D, et al. Burnout and satisfaction with work-life balance among US physicians relative to the general US population. Arch Intern Med. 2012 Oct 8;172(18):1377–85. doi:10.1001/archinternmed.2012.3199.
- 2. West CP, Dyrbye LN, Erwin PJ, Shanafelt TD. Interventions to prevent and reduce physician burnout: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet. 2016 Nov;388(10057):2272–81. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31279-X.
- 3. Dyrbye LN, Shanafelt TD. Physician burnout: a potential threat to successful health care reform. JAMA. 2011 May 18;305(19):2009–10. doi:10.1001/jama.2011.652.
- 4. Banerjee G, Mitchell JD, Brzezinski M, DePorre A, Ballard HA. Burnout in academic physicians. Perm J. 2023 Jun 15;27(2):142–9. doi:10.7812/TPP/23.032.
- 5. Paradis KC, Kerr EA, Griffith KA, Cutter CM, Feldman EL, Singer K, et al. Burnout among mid-career academic medical faculty. JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Jun;7(6):e2415593. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.15593.
- 6. Rotenstein LS, Ramos MA, Torre M, Segal JB, Peluso MJ, Guille C, et al. Prevalence of depression, depressive symptoms, and suicidal ideation among medical students: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA. 2016 Dec 6;316(21):2214–36. doi:10.1001/jama.2016.17324.
- 7. Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME). Common program requirements [Internet]. Chicago (IL): ACGME; [cited 2026 Apr 21]. Available from: https://www.acgme.org/programs-and-institutions/programs/common-program-requirements/
- 8. Tıp Eğitimi Programlarını Değerlendirme ve Akreditasyon Derneği (TEPDAD). Cumhuriyetin ikinci yüzyılında Türkiye’de tıp eğitiminin geleceği için hedefler [Internet]. İzmir: TEPDAD; 2025 Jun [cited 2026 Apr 21]. Available from: https://tepdad.org.tr/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/TEPDAD-Temel-Hedefler-2025.pdf
Ayrıntılar
Birincil Dil
İngilizce
Konular
Tıp Eğitimi
Bölüm
Derleme
Yayımlanma Tarihi
11 Ağustos 2026
Gönderilme Tarihi
16 Mayıs 2026
Kabul Tarihi
24 Temmuz 2026
Yayımlandığı Sayı
Yıl 2026 Cilt: 25 Sayı: 76
APA
Demirbaş Keskin, D., Koç, D., & Altıntaş, L. (2026). WELL-BEING IN ACADEMIC LIFE: CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK, TERMINOLOGY, AND ITS STRATEGIC IMPORTANCE FOR MEDICAL EDUCATION. Tıp Eğitimi Dünyası, 25(76), 45-55. https://doi.org/10.25282/ted.1951166
AMA
1.Demirbaş Keskin D, Koç D, Altıntaş L. WELL-BEING IN ACADEMIC LIFE: CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK, TERMINOLOGY, AND ITS STRATEGIC IMPORTANCE FOR MEDICAL EDUCATION. TED. 2026;25(76):45-55. doi:10.25282/ted.1951166
Chicago
Demirbaş Keskin, Duygu, Demet Koç, ve Levent Altıntaş. 2026. “WELL-BEING IN ACADEMIC LIFE: CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK, TERMINOLOGY, AND ITS STRATEGIC IMPORTANCE FOR MEDICAL EDUCATION”. Tıp Eğitimi Dünyası 25 (76): 45-55. https://doi.org/10.25282/ted.1951166.
EndNote
Demirbaş Keskin D, Koç D, Altıntaş L (01 Ağustos 2026) WELL-BEING IN ACADEMIC LIFE: CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK, TERMINOLOGY, AND ITS STRATEGIC IMPORTANCE FOR MEDICAL EDUCATION. Tıp Eğitimi Dünyası 25 76 45–55.
IEEE
[1]D. Demirbaş Keskin, D. Koç, ve L. Altıntaş, “WELL-BEING IN ACADEMIC LIFE: CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK, TERMINOLOGY, AND ITS STRATEGIC IMPORTANCE FOR MEDICAL EDUCATION”, TED, c. 25, sy 76, ss. 45–55, Ağu. 2026, doi: 10.25282/ted.1951166.
ISNAD
Demirbaş Keskin, Duygu - Koç, Demet - Altıntaş, Levent. “WELL-BEING IN ACADEMIC LIFE: CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK, TERMINOLOGY, AND ITS STRATEGIC IMPORTANCE FOR MEDICAL EDUCATION”. Tıp Eğitimi Dünyası 25/76 (01 Ağustos 2026): 45-55. https://doi.org/10.25282/ted.1951166.
JAMA
1.Demirbaş Keskin D, Koç D, Altıntaş L. WELL-BEING IN ACADEMIC LIFE: CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK, TERMINOLOGY, AND ITS STRATEGIC IMPORTANCE FOR MEDICAL EDUCATION. TED. 2026;25:45–55.
MLA
Demirbaş Keskin, Duygu, vd. “WELL-BEING IN ACADEMIC LIFE: CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK, TERMINOLOGY, AND ITS STRATEGIC IMPORTANCE FOR MEDICAL EDUCATION”. Tıp Eğitimi Dünyası, c. 25, sy 76, Ağustos 2026, ss. 45-55, doi:10.25282/ted.1951166.
Vancouver
1.Duygu Demirbaş Keskin, Demet Koç, Levent Altıntaş. WELL-BEING IN ACADEMIC LIFE: CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK, TERMINOLOGY, AND ITS STRATEGIC IMPORTANCE FOR MEDICAL EDUCATION. TED. 01 Ağustos 2026;25(76):45-5. doi:10.25282/ted.1951166