-

Öz

Background: The aim of this study was to evaluate the satisfaction rate of students from medical and dental schools with different parameters during the use of light and digital microscopy

Anahtar Kelimeler

• -

Geleneksel Mi̇kroskop Eği̇ti̇mi̇nden Di̇ji̇tal Mi̇kroskop Eği̇ti̇mine Geçiş

Öz

Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı Tıp ve Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi öğrencilerin oluşturduğu karma sınıfta verilen histoloji derslerinde, ışık ve dijital mikroskop kullanımı ile ilgili memnuniyet derecelerini farklı parametreler açısından değerlendirmektir.

Gereç ve Yöntem: Bu çalışmada Tıp ve Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi ikinci sınıf öğrencilerinden oluşan gruba memnuniyet anketi uygulandı. Öğrencilerin iki farklı mikroskop eğitimini “kullanım kolaylığı”, “kullanım keyfi”, “tercih edilirlik”, “görüntülerin netlik ve anlaşılırlığı” ve “sınavda kolaylık ve anlaşılırlık” açısından değerlendirmeleri istendi.

Bulgular: Dijital mikroskobun ışık mikroskobuna göre “kullanım kolaylığı”, “tercih edilirlik”, “görüntülerin netlik ve anlaşılırlığı” ve “sınavda kolaylık ve anlaşılırlık” yönlerinden anlamlı derecede yüksek puan aldığı (p<0.05); “kullanım keyfi” yönünden ise ışık mikroskobunun dijital mikroskoba göre daha yüksek puan aldığı saptanmıştır (p<0.05).

Sonuç: Bu çalışmanın sonuçları değerlendirildiğinde günümüzün teknolojik yenilikleri ile büyüyen öğrencilerin dijital mikroskop kullanımını daha çok tercih ettikleri ve bu görüntüler üzerinde daha rahat çalıştıkları anlaşılmaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Histoloji; Dijital Mikroskop; Işık Mikroskobu

Kaynakça

1. Paulsen FP, Eichhorn M, Bräuer L. Virtual microscopy-The future of teaching histology in the medical curriculum? Ann Anat. 2010;192(6):378-82.
2. Krippendorf BB, Lough J. Complete and rapid switch from light microscopy to virtual microscopy for teaching medical histology. Anat Rec B New Anat. 2005;285:19-25.
3. Randell R, Hutchins G, Sandars J, et al. Using a high-resolution wall-sized virtual microscope to teach undergraduate medical students in: Konstan JA; Chi EH; Höök K (editors) CHI Extended Abstracts, pp.2435-2440. ACM. 2012.
4. Romero E, Gómez F, Iregui M. Virtual Microscopy in Medical Images:a Survey. In Modern Research and Educational Topics in Microscopy A.Méndes-Vilas and J. Díaz, Formatex 2007.
5. Silva-Lopes V W, Monterio-Leal L H. Creating a Histology–Embryology Free Digital Image Database Using High-End Microscopy and Computer Techniques for On-Line Biomedical Education. The Anatomical Record (Part B: New Anat.) 2003; 273B:126–131.
6. Mendelsohn ML, Kolman WA, Perry B, Prewitt JM.Morphological analysis of cells and chromosomes by dijital computer. Methods Inf Med. 1965;4:163-7.
7. Silage DA, Gil J.J Dijital image tiles: a method for the processing of large sections. Microsc. 1985;138:221-7.
8. Genuth S, Caston D, Lindley B, Smith J. Review of three decades of laboratory exercises in the preclinical curriculum at the Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine. Acad Med. 1992;67:203-6.

9. Heidger PM Jr, Dee F, Consoer D, Leaven T, Duncan J, Kreiter C. Integrated approach to teaching and testing in histology with real and virtual imaging. Anat Rec. 2002;269:107-12.
10. Coleman R. Can histology and pathology be taught without microscopes? The advantages and disadvantages of virtual histology. Acta Histochem.2009;111:1-4.
11. Bloodgood RA1, Ogilvie RW. Trends in histology laboratory teaching in United States medical schools. Anat Rec B New Anat. 2006;289:169-75.
12. Wong G, Greenhalgh T, Pawson R. Internet based medical education: a realist review of what works, for whom and in what circumstances. BMC Medical Education. 2010;10:12.
13. Morales CR. Teaching Digital Histology. In: A.Mendez-Vilas (ed).Current Microscopy Contributions to Advances in Science and Technology. Formatex 2012;994-998.
14. Kumar RK1, Freeman B, Velan GM, et al. Integrating histology and histopathology teaching in practical classes using virtual slides. Anat Rec B New Anat. 2006;289:128-33.
15. Husmann PR, O’Loughlin VD, Braun MW. Quantitative and qualitative changes in teaching histology by means of virtual microscopy in an introductory course in human anatomy. Anat Sci Educ. 2009;2:218-26.
16. Triola MM, Holloway WJ. Enhanced virtual microscopy for collaborative education. BMC Med Educ. 2011;11-4.
17. Blake CA, Lavoie HA, Millette CF. Teaching medical histology at the University of South Carolina School of Medicine: Transition to virtual slides and virtual microscopes. Anat Rec B New Anat. 2003;275:196-206.
18. Harris T, Leaven T, Heidger P, Kreiter C, Duncan J, Dick. Comparison of a virtual microscope laboratory to a regular microscope laboratory for teaching histology. Anat Rec. 2001;265:10-4.
19. Gupta G, Chhabra S, Sıngh K. Innovative Method of Teaching Histology International Journal of Recent Advances in Pharmaceutical Research Gopal et al. Int J Recent Adv Pharm Res, 2012;2:33-6.
20. Braun MW, Kearns KD. Improved learning efficiency and increased student collaboration through use of virtual microscopy in the teaching of human pathology. Anat Sci Educ. 2008;1:240-6.
21. Merk M, Knuechel R, Perez-Bouza A. Web based virtual microscopy at the RWTH Aachen University: Didactic concept methods and analysis of acceptance by the students. Annals of Anatomy. 2010;383-7.
22. László Fónyad, László Gerely, Mária Cserneky, Béla Molnár, András Matolcsy. Shifting gears higher - dijital slides in graduate education - 4 years experience at Semmelweis University Diagnostic Pathology 2010;5-73.
23. Pinder KE, Ford JC, Ovalle WK. A new paradigm for teaching histology laboratories in Canada’s first distributed medical school. Anat Sci Educ. 2008;1:95-101.
24. Pospíšilová E, Černochová D, Lichnovská R, et al. Application and evaluation of teaching practical histology with the use of virtual microscopy.. Diagnostic Pathology 2013; 8;7