Ecofeminization of a Medieval Morality Play: Carol Ann Duffy’s Everyman (2015)

Öz

Carol Ann Duffy’s Everyman (2015) appropriates a medieval morality play for the contemporary stage by shifting the emphasis from religious morality to environmental ethics. Duffy’s ecofeminist rewriting of the allegorical play, in its contemporary setting, does not criticise consumerism for harming Everyman’s soul, who is gone off his religious track, but for harming his ties with his environment to the extent of destroying nature without noticing or caring about it. Duffy shows the interconnections between androcentrism, capitalism, and the abuse of women, nature, and other marginalised beings. Therefore, contemporary Everyman is both a criticism of anthropocentrism and androcentrism, and Everyman’s reckoning is no longer about religious immorality but about harming the environment and disregarding his part in it. This paper aims to scrutinise the transformation of a medieval morality play into an ecofeminist one, in which human’s role in the environmental crisis is questioned and criticised through the reuse of allegory and ecofeminist ethics.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Ecofeminism
• Rewriting
• Morality Play
• 21st Century British Drama
• Carol Ann Duffy

Kaynakça

1. Adams, Carol J. The Sexual Politics of Meat: A Feminist-Vegan Critical Theory. New York: Bloomsbury Publishing İne., [1990] 2024. google scholar
2. Adams, Carol J., and Lori Gruen. “Ecofeminist Footings." İn Ecofeminism: Feminist Intersections with Other Animals and the Earth, edited by Carol J. Adams and Lori Gruen, 1-43. New York: Bloomsbury, [2014] 2022. google scholar
3. Anonymous. “Everyman." İn Everyman and Other Miraele and Morality Plays, 36-59. New York: Dover Publieations, İne., 1995. google scholar
4. Arons, Wendy, and Theresa J. May. “İntroduetion." İn Readings in Performance and Ecology, edited by Wendy Arons and Theresa J. May, 1-10. New York: Palgrave Maemillan, 2012. google scholar
5. Barad, Karen. “Posthumanist Performativity: Toward an Understanding of How Matter Comes to Matter." İn Material Feminisms, edited by Staey Alaimo and Susan Hekman, 120-154. Bloomington: İndiana University Press, 2008. google scholar
6. Chaudhuri, Una. “Anthropo-Seenes: Theater and Climate Change." JCDE 3, no. 1 (2015): 12-27. google scholar
7. Colebrook, Claire. “We have Always Been Post-Anthropoeene: The Anthropoeene Counterfaetual." İn Anthropocene Feminism, edited by Riehard Grusin, 1-20. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2017. google scholar
8. Duffy, Carol Ann. Everyman. London: Faber & Faber, 2015. google scholar

9. Estok, Simon. Ecocriticism and Shakespeare: Reading Ecophobia. New York: Palgrave Maemillan, 2011. google scholar
10. Gaard, Greta. “Eeofeminism and Native Ameriean Cultures: Pushing the Limits of Cultural İmperialism?" İn Ecofeminism: Women, Animals, Nature, edited by Greta Gaard, 295-314. Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 1993. google scholar
11. Jain, Sunaina. “Aetivism and Eeofeminist Literature." İn the Routledge Handbook of Ecofeminism and Literature, edited by Douglas A. Vakoeh, 271-281. New York: Routledge, 2023. google scholar
12. Lotzof, Kerry. “Are we really made of stardust?" Natural History Museum Blog, (Aeeessed Oetober 10, 2021). https://www.nhm.ae.uk/ diseover/are-we-really-made-of-stardust.html google scholar
13. Love, Catherine. “From Faets to Feelings: The Development of Katie Mitehell’s Eeodramaturgy." Contemporary Theatre Review 30, no. 2 (2020): 226-235. google scholar
14. Morton, Timothy. Hyperobjects: Philosophy and Ecology After the End of the World. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2013. google scholar
15. Oppermann, Serpil. “Feminist Eeoeritieism: A Posthumanist Direetion in Eeoeritieal Trajeetory." İn International Perspectives in Feminist Ecocriticism, edited by Greta Gaard, Simon C. Estok, and Serpil Oppermann, 19-36. New York: Routledge, 2013. google scholar
16. Plumwood, Val. Feminism and the Mastery of Nature. London: Routledge, 1993. google scholar
17. Plumwood, Val. Environmental Culture: The ecological crisis of reason. London: Routledge, 2002. google scholar
18. Rosenthal, Sandra B. “Science, Nature, and Philosophic Foundations: Dewey and Heidegger.” In John Dewey and Continental Philosophy, edited by Paul Fairfield, 126-147. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press, 2010. google scholar
19. Shakespeare, William. King Lear. London: The Arden Shakespeare, [1997] 2003. google scholar
20. Shakespeare, William. The Tempest. London: The Arden Shakespeare, 1999. google scholar
21. Shepherd-Barr, Kirsten. “Everyman: A Play for the Anthropocene Age.” In Everyman Playbill. London: National Theatre, No page, 2015. google scholar
22. Sinatra, Frank. “My Way.” Track 6 on My Way. USA: Reprise Records, Long Play, 1969. google scholar
23. Thomas, Arden Ellzabeth. “Poisoning the Mother/Land: An Ecofeminist DramaturgY in Jose Rivera’s Marisol and Cherrîe Moraga’s Heroes and Saints.” Theatre History Studies 35 (2016): 143-160. google scholar
24. White, Laura. “Re-Imagining the Human: Ecofeminism, Affect, and Post-Colonial Narration.” In International Perspectives in Feminist Ecocriticism, edited by Greta Gaard, Simon C. Estok, and Serpil Oppermann, 137-147. New York: Routledge, 2013. google scholar
25. White Jr., Lynn. “The Historical Roots of Our Ecological Crisis.” In The Ecocriticism Reader: Landmarks in Literary Ecology, edited by Cheryll Glotfelty and Harold Fromm, 3-14. Georgia: The University of Georgia Press, 1996. google scholar
26. WoYnarski, Lisa. Ecodramaturgies: Theatre, Performance and Climate Change. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 2020. google scholar