FARKLI METOTLARDAKİ ÖN ERGEN KIZ PANTOLON KALIPLARININ KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI

Yıl 2008, Cilt: 18 Sayı: 3, 240 - 246, 01.12.2008

Neşe Yaşar Çeğindir

Öz

Bu araştırmanın amacı, farklı metotlarda hazırlanan ön ergen kız çocuğu temel pantolon kalıplarının karşılaştırılmasıdır. Örnek olay yönteminin kullanıldığı çalışmada, üç farklı metot incelenmiştir. Bu metotlar; System Müller & Sohn (M I), Winifred Aldrich (M II) ve Natalie Bray (M III) metotlarıdır. Kalıp karşılaştırmaları, 152 beden Türk kız çocuğu ölçülerinde hazırlanan 3 farklı temel pantolon kalıbı üzerinde yapılmıştır. Vücut ölçüsü ile karşılaştırıldığında; M I de kalça düşüklüğü, M II ve M III de diz yüksekliği fazla bulunmuştur. Kalça için gerekli ilaveleri M I karşılamamaktadır. Arka ütü hattının M III de bel ile diz arasında yan dikişe doğru kaydığı tespit edilmiştir. M I deki ΣAY diğerlerine oranla kısa, M II deki ΣAG diğerlerine oranla daha fazladır. Metotlar arası karşılaştırmalarda vücut derinliği en geniş M III de, en dar M I dedir. Araştırma sonucunda M II nin diğerlerine oranla ölçülen kriterleri daha fazla karşıladığı tespit edilmiştir

Anahtar Kelimeler

Çocuk pantolon kalıbı, Kalıp hazırlama, Çocuk giyimi, Kalıp karşılaştırma, Kalıp kontrolü

THE COMPARISON OF FEMALE PRETEEN PANTS PATTERNS IN DIFFERENT METHODS

Öz

The goal of the research is to compare female preteen pants patterns in different methods. Three methods System Müller & Sohn (M I), Winifred Aldrich (M II) and Natalie Bray (M III) are examined in the research in which exemplification way is used. The comparisons are made with three different basic pants patterns which were prepared for a 152-sized Turkish girl. Compared to the body measurement, the body rise in M I and waist to knee in M II and M III are found much more. M I does not provide the essential additions for hips. It is determined that back grain line slides towards side seam between waist and hips in M III. ΣCD in MI is shorter than the others. ΣCW in M II is near to the each other. It is proved at the end that M II has got more necessary qualifications when compared with the others

Anahtar Kelimeler

Child pants pattern, Pattern preparation, Children clothing, Pattern comparing, Pattern control

Kaynakça

• 1. “Çocuk Giyimi Hızlı Büyüyor”. Access Date: 10.03.2008. http://www.tekstilteknik.com/Haber/HaberDetay.asp?HaberNo=338&offsett=
• 2. “Çocuk Giyiminde Fransa Lider”. Radikal Gazetesi. 7.10.2005. http://www.radikal.com.tr/haber.php?haberno=166169 (Access date: 10 03 2008).
• 3. Ateş, R. 2007. “Çocuk Giyiminde Büyük Fırsatlar Var”. Şirket Doktoru. http://www.sirketdoktoru.net/content/view/162/27/ Access Date: 10.03.2008.
• 4. Key Note. 2007. Childrenswear-Executive Summary. Key Note Market Report. http://www.keynote.co.uk/GlobalFrame.htm Access Date: 10.03.2008.
• 5. “Preteens”. knowledgerush. http://www.knowledgerush.com/kr/encyclopedia/Teenage/ Access Date: 10.03.2008.
• 6. Cooklin, G., 1991, “The Growth and Development of Children”. Pattern Grading for Childrens’ Clothes. The Tecnology of Sizing. BSP Professional Books. Oxford. pp: 3-4.
• 7. Tselepis, T. and Klerk M. H., 2004, “Early Adolescent Girls’ Expectations about the Fit of Clothes: A Conceptual Framework, Journal of Family Ecology and Consumer Sciences. V: 32, pp: 83-93.
• 8. Schofield, N.A., and at all, 2006, “Improving Pant Fit for Women 55 and Older through an Exploration of Two Pant Shapes”, Clothing and Textiles Research Journal. V:24, N:2, p:147-160.
• 9. LaBat, K. and DeLong, M., 1990, “Body Cathexis and Satisfaction with Fit of Apparel”. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal. V: 8 (2), pp: 97-102.
• 10. Tate, S.L., 1989, “Children’s Wear”. Inside Fashion Design. Third Edition. Editor in Chief: Judy Rohman. Harper&Row, Publishers. Inc. New York. pp: 281-310.
• 11. Hong, M. K.,Bruce, M. and Hill, A.J., 1998, “Fashion Brand Preferences among Young Consumers”, International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management. V: 26 (8), pp: 293-300.
• 12. Simpson, L., Douglas, S., and Schimmel, J., 1998, “Tween Consumers: Catalog Clothing Purchase Behavior”. Adolescence. V: 33. pp: 637.
• 13. Dotson, M.J. and Hyatt, E. M., 2005, “Major İnfluence Factors in Children’s Consumer Socialization”. Journal of Consumer Marketing. V: 22 (1) pp: 35-42.
• 14. Chen, X., Au, W. and M., Li, K., 2004, “Consumption of Children’s Wear in A Big City in Central China: Zhengzhou”, Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management. V: 8 (2), pp: 154-165.
• 15. Grant, I. J. and Stephen, G. R., 2005, “Buying Behaviour of “Tweenage” Girls and Key Societal Communicating Factors Influencing Their Purchasing of Fashion Clothing”, Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management. V: 9 (4), pp: 450-467.
• 16. System M. Müler & Sohn, 1996, “Hosen”. Schnittkonstruktionnen für Röcke und Hosen. Editor: Deutsche Bekleidungs-Akademie München. Rundshau-Verlag Otto G. Königer GmbH&Co., München. pp:103-129.
• 17. Aldrich, W., 1991, “Introduction-Basic Principles”. Metric Pattern Cutting for Children’s Wear from 2-14 years. BSP Professional Books. Oxford. pp:1-17.
• 18. Bray, N., 1986, “Pattern Designing for Children”. More Dress Pattern Designing. Fourth Edition, BSP Professional Books. Great Britain. pp:156-171.
• 19. Erdoğan, Ç., 1999, “Bebek-Çocuk-Genç Yaş Gruplarında Vücut ve Giysi Ölçülerinin Standardizasyonu”, Tekstil ve Konfeksiyon Y: 9 (6), s: 453-460.
• 20. Taylor, P. J. and Shoben M. M.,1990, “Basic Principles for Grading”. Grading for The Fashion Industry, With Children's Wear and Men's Wear. Stanley Thornes (Publishers) Ltd. Second Edition. pp:1-73.
• 21. Rosen, S., 2004, “Introduction to Patterns and Patternmaking”. Patternmaking. A Comprehensive Reference for Fashion Design. Editor in Chief: Stephen Helba. Pearson Education, Inc., Upper Saddle River, New Jersey. pp: 1-15.
• 22. Bye, E., LaBat, K.L. and DeLong, M.R., 2006, “Analysis of Body Measurement Systems for Apparel”. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal. V: 24 (2), pp: 66-79.
• 23. Hiller, E., 2004, “Bayan Pantolon Ana Kalıp Çıkarma-Serileme ve Model Üzerinde Problem Çözme” Seminer Notları. 01-03 Mart 2004. İstanbul.