Realizm, Liberalizm ve İsrail-Filistin Çatışması

Öz

İsrail-Filistin çatışması, on yıllardır uluslararası ilişkiler alanındaki birçok teori ve yaklaşımı zorlayan karmaşık bir jeopolitik mücadele olarak görülmektedir. Uluslararası İlişkiler alanındaki iki baskın okul, liberalizm ve realizm, çatışmayı analiz etmek için farklı çerçeveler sunmaktadır. Realizm, uluslararası sistemin anarşi doğasını vurgular ve güvenlik, güç ve devletin ulusal çıkarlarının, Filistin ile İsrail arasındaki gerilimleri açıklamada öncelikli olduğunu savunur. Güç dengesi ve güvenlik ikilemi ilkelerinin, şiddet döngüsünü azaltacağı ve barışın sağlanabileceği inancını taşır. Buna karşılık, liberalizm iş birliğine odaklanır; uluslararası örgütlerin, ekonomik karşılıklı bağımlılığın ve demokrasinin çatışma çözümünde oynadığı rolleri vurgular. Realistler güç mücadelesini ön plana çıkarırken, liberalizm diplomatik ilişkiler ve kurumsal çerçevelere odaklanır. Bu makale, her iki teorinin de İsrail ve Filistin arasındaki çatışmayı anlamaya nasıl katkı sağladığını incelemekte, modern tarihin en uzun ve karmaşık çatışmalarından birini ele alırken güçlü ve zayıf yönlerini açıklamaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• security
• power
• Realism
• Liberalism
• Israeli-Palestinian Conflict
• Balance of Power
• Institutions

Realism, Liberalism and The Israeli- Palestinian Conflict

Öz

The Israeli-Palestinian conflict is seen as one of the complex geopolitical struggle that challenged many theories and approaches in international relations for decades. The two dominant schools in the field of International Relations, liberalism and Realism offer different frameworks that analyze the conflict. Realism highlights the nature of international system as anarchy, believing that security, power and national interests of the state shall be prioritized to explain the tensions between Palestine and Israel. The principles of balance of power and security dilemma will reduce the violent cycle and peace can be achieved. In contrary, liberalism shifts its focus to cooperation emphasizing the roles of international organizations and economic interdependence and democracy as a way for conflict resolution. While Realists emphasize on power struggle, Liberalism focuses on diplomatic relations and institutional frameworks. This article explores how both theories contribute to understanding the conflict between Israel and Palestine, explaining and illustrating their strengths and weaknesses in addressing one of the longgest and complex conflicts in modern history.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Security
• Balance of Power
• Israeli-Palestinian Conflict
• Liberalism
• Realism

Kaynakça

1. Abu-Lughod, L. (2007). Nakba: Palestine, 1948, and the Claims of Memory. New York: Columbia University Press.
2. Copeland, D.C. (1996). Economic Interdependence and Awar: A theory of Trade Expectations. International Security, 20(4), 5-41.
3. Doyle, M. W. (1986). Liberalism and World Politics. American Political Science Review, 80(4), 1151-1169.
4. Feldman, R. (2021). The Middle East and the United States: History, Politics, and Ideologies. Rowman & Littlefield.
5. Farsakh, L. (2005). Palestinian Identity and the Struggle for Self-Determination. Oxford University Press.
6. Gershoni, I., & Jick, E. (2004). The United States and Israel: Cultures in Conflict. Wiley.
7. Gordon, N. (2012). Israel's Occupation. University of California Press.
8. Grieco J.M. (1988). Anarchy and The Limits of Cooperation: A Realist Critique of the Newest Liberal Institutionalism. International Organization. 42(3), 485-507.

9. Hass, A. (2010). Drinking the Sea at Gaza: Days and Nights in a Land Under Siege. Metropolitan Books.
10. Herz, J. (1950). Idealist Internationalism and the Security Dilemma. World Politics, (2), 157-180.
11. Khalidi, R. (1997). Palestinian Identity: The Construction of Modern National Consciousness. New York: Columbia University Press.
12. Khalidi, R. (2006). The Iron Cage: The Story of the Palestinian Struggle for Statehood. Beacon Press.
13. Kaufman, R. (2017). Israel and Palestine: Peace or Apartheid. Palgrave Macmillan.
14. Keohane, R. O. (1984). After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy. Princeton University Press.
15. Keohane, R. O., & Nye, J. S. (2012). Power and Interdependence. Pearson.
16. Makovsky, D. (2009). The Peace Puzzle: America's Quest for Arab-Israeli Peace, 1989–2011. Brookings Institution Press.
17. Mearsheimer, J. J. (2001). The Tragedy of Great Power Politics. W.W. Norton & Company.
18. Mearsheimer, J., & Walt, S. (2006). The Israel Lobby and U.S. Foreign Policy. Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
19. Morgenthau, H. J. (1948). Politics Among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace. Alfred A. Knopf.
20. Morris, B. (2004). The Birth of the Palestinian Refugee Problem Revisited. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
21. Owen, J,M. (1994) How Liberalism Produces Democratic Peace. International Security, 19(2), 87-125
22. Pappe, I. (2006). The Ethnic Cleansing of Palestine. Oneworld Publications.
23. Pipes, D. (2010). Iran: A New Approach. Yale University Press.
24. Robinson, G. (2004). Building a Palestinian State: The Incomplete Revolution. Cambridge University Press.
25. Russett, B., & Oneal, J. (2001). Triangulating Peace: Democracy, Interdependence, and International Organizations. W.W. Norton & Company.
26. Sayigh, Y. (2011). The Palestinian Armed Struggle. Cambridge University Press.
27. Shalev, M. (2000). The Political Economy of Israel's Peace Process. Palgrave Macmillan.
28. Shlaim, A. (2001). The Iron Wall: Israel and the Arab World. W.W. Norton & Company.
29. Smith, C. D. (2009). Palestine and the Arab-Israeli Conflict: A History with Documents. Boston: Bedford/St. Martin’s.
30. Tessler, M. (1994). A History of the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
31. Tilly, C. (2003). The Politics of Collective Violence. Cambridge University Press.
32. Waltz, K. N. (1979). Theory of International Politics. McGraw-Hill.