Research Article

Pre-service Teachers’ Understanding of Graphs in Statistics in the Context of Lesson Study

Volume: 6 Number: 1 June 30, 2024
EN

Pre-service Teachers’ Understanding of Graphs in Statistics in the Context of Lesson Study

Abstract

This study aims to examine pre-service teachers’ understandings of graphs and how their understandings about graphs have transformed into instructional practices as they participated in a lesson study. It was employed case study and three pre-service teachers participated. They initially viewed graphs as tools for organizing and representing data. As the lesson study progressed, they began to view graphs as tools to answer statistical questions. This fundamental transformation in their understanding resulted in a change in how they designed and implemented their lesson plans. They designed tasks around a statistical question and made connections with this question while deciding the type of graph and interpreting the graph. In addition, they anticipated students’ possible conceptions. Hence, for these pre-service teachers, understanding the role graphs as tools to answer statistical questions can be considered as a key development understanding (KDU), which was built on multiple experiences of designing, implementing and evaluating lessons.

Keywords

Pre-service teachers, key developmental understandings, graphs, lesson study.

Supporting Institution

Tübitak

Project Number

2211-A

References

  1. Ader, E. (2018). Programlardaki veri ve olasılık öğrenme alanı içeriklerine karşılaştırmalı bir bakış” [A comparative look at data and probability learning area contents in programs] In M. F. Özmantar, H. Akkoç, B. Kuşdemir Kayıran, & M. Özyurt (Ed.) Ortaokul Matematik Öğretim Programları: Tarihsel bir İnceleme (pp. 275-306). Pegem Akademi.
  2. Ari, E. (2010). The difficulties in learning the subject of probability and statistics in maths lessons of 6th, 7th and 8th grades in primary school and suggestions on solution. [Unpublished master thesis]. Afyon Kocatepe University.
  3. Bargagliotti, A., Franklin, C., Arnold, P., Gould, R., Johnson, S., Perez, L., and Spangler, D. (2020). Pre-K-12 Guidelines for assessment and instruction in statistics education (GAISE) report II. American Statistical Association and National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
  4. Ben-Zvi, D. (2011). Statistical reasoning learning environment. Revista de Educação Matemática e Tecnológica Iberoamericana, 2, 1-13.
  5. Boote, S. K. (2014). Assessing and understanding line graph interpretations using a scoring rubric of organized cited factors. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 25(3), 333–354. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-012-9318-8.
  6. Bright, G. W. & Friel, S. N. (2011). Graphical Representations: Helping students interpret data. In S. P. Lajoie (Ed.) Reflections on statistics: Learning, teaching, and assessment in grades K-12. (pp. 63-88). Routledge.
  7. Buforn, A. & Fernández, C. (2014). The role of prospective teachers’ mathematical knowledge in recognizing students’ understanding: the process of unitizing, G. Adams. (Ed.) Proceedings of the British Society for Research into Learning Mathematics 34(3) November 2014.
  8. Burgess, T. A. (2007). Investigating the nature of teacher knowledge needed and used in teaching statistics. [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Massey University.
  9. Chick, H. L. 2004. Tools for transnumeration: Early stages in the art of data representation. In I. Putt, R. Faragher, & M. McLean (Eds.), Mathematics Education for the Third Millennium: Towards 2010. Proceedings of the Twenty-seventh Annual Conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia (pp. 167–174). MERGA.
  10. Chick, H. L. & Pierce, R. U. (2008). Teaching statistics at the primary school level: Beliefs, affordances, and pedagogical content knowledge. In C. Batanero, G. Burrill, C. Reading & A. Rossman (Ed.), Joint ICMI/IASE study: Teaching statistics in school mathematics. Challenges for teaching and teacher education. Proceedings of the ICMI Study 18 and 2008IASE Round Table Conference. Monterrey: ICMI and IASE.
APA
Yılmaz, N., & Yetkin, İ. (2024). Pre-service Teachers’ Understanding of Graphs in Statistics in the Context of Lesson Study. Journal of Teacher Education and Lifelong Learning, 6(1), 16-29. https://doi.org/10.51535/tell.1318693
AMA
1.Yılmaz N, Yetkin İ. Pre-service Teachers’ Understanding of Graphs in Statistics in the Context of Lesson Study. TELL. 2024;6(1):16-29. doi:10.51535/tell.1318693
Chicago
Yılmaz, Nadide, and İffet Yetkin. 2024. “Pre-Service Teachers’ Understanding of Graphs in Statistics in the Context of Lesson Study”. Journal of Teacher Education and Lifelong Learning 6 (1): 16-29. https://doi.org/10.51535/tell.1318693.
EndNote
Yılmaz N, Yetkin İ (June 1, 2024) Pre-service Teachers’ Understanding of Graphs in Statistics in the Context of Lesson Study. Journal of Teacher Education and Lifelong Learning 6 1 16–29.
IEEE
[1]N. Yılmaz and İ. Yetkin, “Pre-service Teachers’ Understanding of Graphs in Statistics in the Context of Lesson Study”, TELL, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 16–29, June 2024, doi: 10.51535/tell.1318693.
ISNAD
Yılmaz, Nadide - Yetkin, İffet. “Pre-Service Teachers’ Understanding of Graphs in Statistics in the Context of Lesson Study”. Journal of Teacher Education and Lifelong Learning 6/1 (June 1, 2024): 16-29. https://doi.org/10.51535/tell.1318693.
JAMA
1.Yılmaz N, Yetkin İ. Pre-service Teachers’ Understanding of Graphs in Statistics in the Context of Lesson Study. TELL. 2024;6:16–29.
MLA
Yılmaz, Nadide, and İffet Yetkin. “Pre-Service Teachers’ Understanding of Graphs in Statistics in the Context of Lesson Study”. Journal of Teacher Education and Lifelong Learning, vol. 6, no. 1, June 2024, pp. 16-29, doi:10.51535/tell.1318693.
Vancouver
1.Nadide Yılmaz, İffet Yetkin. Pre-service Teachers’ Understanding of Graphs in Statistics in the Context of Lesson Study. TELL. 2024 Jun. 1;6(1):16-29. doi:10.51535/tell.1318693