Judicial Borrowing- A comparative analysis of the situation in North America

Yıl 2014, Cilt: 1 Sayı: 2, 65 - 80, 21.08.2014

Berkant Zeyrek

Öz

However, according to Justice La Forest the repeatedly recourse to American constitutional material is simply an aspect of a more general “trend”. According to him, this trend is proved by the frequent reference

Anahtar Kelimeler

-

Adil Borçlanma - Kuzey Amerika'daki Durumun Karşılaştırmalı Analizi

Öz

Anahtar Kelimeler

-

Kaynakça

• Alford, Roger P. (2005). In Search of a Theory for Constitutional Comparativism, University of California Los Angeles Law Review, vol.52:639.
• Beaulac, Stéphane. (2003). National Application of International Law: The Statutory Interpretation Perspective, Canadian Year Book of International Law, vol.41:225.
• Bilder, Richard B. (1981). Integrating International Human Rights Law into Domestic LawUS. Experience, Houston Journal of International Law, vol.4:1.
• Day O’Connor, Sandra. (2003). Remarks at the Southern Center for International Studies, available at http://http://www.southerncenter.org/OConnor_transcript.pdf [last view 02011].
• Days, Drew S. (2007). III International and Foreign Law North of the Border: The Canadian Experience, Faculty Scholarship Series, Paper 1464, available at: http://digitalcommons. law.yale.edu/fss_papers/1464 [last view 12.06.2011].
• Fontana, David. (2001). Refined Comparativism in Constitutional Law, University of California Los Angeles Law Review, vol.49:539.
• Glendon, Mary. Ann Judicial Tourism, Wall Street Journal, [16.10.2005].
• Hart v. Massanari 266 F. 3d 1155 (9th Cit. 2001)
• Harvie, Robert / Foster, Hamor. (1992). Different Drummers, Different Drums: The Supreme Court of Canada, American Jurisprudence and the Continuing Revision of Criminal Law Under the Charter, Ottawa Law Review, vol.24:39.
• Jackson, Vicki C. Ambivalent. (1999). Resistance and Comparative Constitutionalism: Opening Up the Conversation on “Proportionality,” Rights and Federalism, University of Pennsylvania Journal of Constitutional Law, vol.1:583.
• Knight v. Florida 528 U.S. 990 (1999) (Breyer, J., dissenting from denial of certiorari) (quoting The Declaratıon Of Independence para. 1 (U.S. 1776)).
• Knop, Karen. (2000). Here and There: International Law in Domestic Courts, New York University Journal for International Law & Politics, vol.32:501.
• Kochan, Daniel. (2005-2006). Sovereignty and the American Courts at the Cocktail Party of International Law: The Dangers of Domestic Judicial Invocations of Foreign and International Law, 29 Fordham International Law Journal, vol.29:508.
• La Forest, Gerard V. (1994). The Use of American Precedents in Canadian Courts, Maine Law Review, vol.46:211.
• Larsen, Joan L. (2004). Importing Constitutional Norms from a “Wider Civilization”: Lawrence and the Rehnquist Court’s Use of Foreign and International Law in Domestic Constitutional Interpretation, Ohio State Law Journal, vol.65:1283.
• Lawrence v Texas 539 U.S. 558 (2003)
• L’Heureux-Dubd, Claire. (1993). Two Supreme Courts: A Study in Contrast, in: The Canadıan And Amerıcan Constıtutıons In Comparatıve Perspectıve 149, 164 (Marian C. McKenna ed.). McCormick, Peter. (2009-2010). Waiting for Globalization: An Empirical Study of the McLachlin Court’s Foreign Judicial Citations, Ottawa Law Review, vol.41:209.
• McCrudden, Christopher. (2000). A Part of the Main? The Physician-Assisted Suicide Cases and Comparative Law Methodology in the United States Supreme Court, in: Law At The End Of Lıfe 125, 128 (Carl E. Schneider ed.).
• Murphy, Randall R. (1991). The Framers’ Evolutionary Perception of Rights: Using International Human Rights Norms as a Source for Discovery of Ninth Amendment Rights, Stetson Law Review, vol.21:423.
• Perry, Michael J. (1981). Interpretivism, Freedom of Expression, and Equal Protection, Ohio State Law Journal, vol.42:261Printz v. United States 521 U.S. 898 (1997).
• Raines v. Byrd 521 U.S. 811 (1997)
• Roper v Simmons 543 U.S. 551 (2005)
• R. v Keegstra [1990] 3 S.C.R. 697 (Canada)
• R. v Rahey [1987] 1 S.C.R. 588 (Canada)
• Slaughter, Anne-Marie. (2003). A Global Community of Courts, Harvard International Law Journal, vol.44:191.
• Smith v California 361 U.S. 147 (1959) (Frankfurter, J., concurring)
• Smithey, Shannon I. (2001). A Tool, Not a Master: The Use of Foreign Case Law in Canada and South Africa, Comparative Political Studies, vol.34:1188.
• Sosa v. Alvarez-Machain, 124 S. Ct. 2739 (2004)
• Strossen, Nadine.(1990). Recent US. and International Judicial Protection of Individual Rights: A Comparative Legal Process Analysis and Proposed Synthesis, Hastings Law Journal, vol.41:805.
• Toope, S.J. (2001). Inside and Out: The Stories of International Law and Domestic Law, University of New Brunswick Law Journal, vol.50:11.
• Tushnet, Mark. (1999). The Possibilities of Comparative Constitutional Law, Yale Law Journal, vol.108:1225.
• United States v. Then 56 F. 3d 464, 469 (2d Cir. 1995) (Calabresi J.concurring) cited in Zubaty
• Washington v. Glucksberg 521 U.S. 702 (1997)
• Zubaty, Rebecca. (2006-2007). Foreign Law and the U.S. Constitution: Delimiting the Range Of Persuasive Authority, University of California Los Angeles Law Review, vol.54:1413.