A MULTIDISCIPLINARY ASSESSMENT OF CAPITAL ACCUMULATION AND POSTMODERN HAPPINESS

Öz

While the modern world prioritizes continued capital accumulation and economic gain-driven growth, postmodern society now tries to make people happy by valuing environmental protection, diversity and cultural identity. The old paradigm suggested that happiness would occur when the mind was based on natural law and not biased toward a particular idea. While all pure celestial religions suggest sharing and helping the poor leaning on the argument that everything is transient in this world, the practice does not seem to be in compliance with the theory due to human greed and tendency towards capital accumulation and self-satisfaction with egoistic characteristics. This study, as multidisciplinary research on economics, psychology, and theology aims to answer, ‘Does joy require objectivity according to postmodern philosophy?’. We try to ask some key questions around the keywords and thus make assessments on the pursuit of happiness suitable in the cyber-capitalist and digital era in the light of literature knowledge. It is argued if it is necessary to adapt creational objectives and logical ideas to our understanding of ‘real happiness’ to make the most appropriate use of life capital that is the sole source of happiness from point of view of Divine bounty particularly in the Islamic references.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• multidisciplinary approach
• capital accumulation
• happiness
• Divine bounty
• Post-modernism

SERMAYE BİRİKİMİ VE POSTMODERN MUTLULUĞUN ÇOK DİSİPLİNSEL BİR DEĞERLENDİRMESİ

Öz

Modern dünya sürekli sermaye birikimine ve ekonomik kazanç odaklı büyümeye öncelik verirken, postmodern toplum artık çevrenin korunmasına, çeşitliliğe ve kültürel kimliğe değer vererek insanları mutlu etmeye önem vermektedir. Eski paradigma, zihnin doğal yasaya dayandığı ve belirli bir fikre karşı önyargılı olmadığı zaman mutluluğun gerçekleşeceğini öne sürmekteydi. Bütün saf semavi dinler, bu dünyada her şeyin geçici olduğu argümanına dayanarak paylaşmayı ve yardım etmeyi önerirken, insan açgözlülüğü ve sermaye birikimi ve egoist özelliklerle kendini tatmin etme eğilimi nedeniyle uygulamalar teoriyle uyumlu olmamıştır. Ekonomi, psikoloji ve teoloji üzerine multidisipliner bir araştırma olan bu çalışma, postmodern felsefeye göre ‘mutluluk nesnellik gerektirir mi?’ sorusunu yanıtlamayı amaçlamaktadır. Anahtar kelimeler etrafında bazı anahtar sorular sorarak literatür bilgisi ışığında siber-kapitalist ve dijital çağa uygun mutluluk arayışı üzerine genel değerlendirmeler yapılmaktadır. Bilhassa İslami referanslarda, mutluluğun yegâne kaynağı olan hayat sermayesini bir ilahi lütuf açısından en uygun şekilde kullanmak için yaratılış amaçlarını ve mantıklı düşünceleri ‘gerçek mutluluk’ anlayışına uyarlamanın gerekli olup olmadığı çok boyutlu olarak tartışılmaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• multidisipliner yaklaşım
• sermaye birikimi
• mutluluk
• ilahi lütuf
• Postmodernizm

Kaynakça

1. Berger, P. L. (1967). The Sacred Canopy: Elements of a Sociological Theory of religion. New York: Anchor Books.
2. Buğra, A. (1989). İktisatçılar ve İnsanlar. İstanbul: Remzi Kitabevi.
3. Buğra, A. and Irzik, G. (1999). “Human needs, consumption, and social policy”. Economics & Philosophy, 15 (2), 187-208.
4. Charles R. Noback, N.L. Strominger and R. J. Demarest, (1991). The Human Nervous System, Introduction and Review. 4th ed., Philadelphia: Lea and Febiger.
5. Congar, K. (2020) Dünyanın en mutlu ülkesi Finlandiya'da intihar oranı neden bu kadar yüksek?, https://tr.euronews.com/2020/01/21/dunyanin-en-mutlu-ulkesi-finlandiya-da-intihar-oran-neden-bu-kadar-yuksek (04.12.2022).
6. Değirmenci, K. (2017). “Revisiting the Issue of Interdisciplinarity and Disciplinary Distinctions in Social Sciences”. European Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies, 2 (6), 45–50.
7. Durkheim, E. (1965). The Elementary Forms of the Religious Life. (Trans. J. W. Swain,). New York: The Free Press.
8. Efe, A. (2022). “How to Approach the Innovative Economies at the Conjecture of Religion, Faith, And Ethics?”. Disiplinlerarası Yenilik Araştırmaları Dergisi, 2 (2), 121-132.

9. Fromm, E. (1941). Escape From Freedom. New York: Owl Books.
10. Geertz, C. (1973). The Interpretation of Cultures: Selected Essays. New York: Basic Books.
11. Gross M. G., (1993). Oceanography: A View of Earth, 6th ed. Englewood Cliffs, New York: Prentice-Hall Inc.
12. Hanisch, T. E. and V. Wolfgang (1983). Interdisciplinarity in Higher Education. Bucharest: United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization.
13. Hick, J. (2004). An Interpretation of Religion: Human Responses to the Transcendent. New York: Yale University Press.
14. Hunt, E. K. (1992). History of Economic Thought: A Critical Perspective, 2nd edition, New York: Harper Collins Publishers.
15. Kelley, D. (1997). The Problem of Knowledge and the Concept of Discipline. History and the Disciplines: The Reclassification of Knowledge in Early Modem Europe. Rochester: University of Rochester Press.
16. Klein, J. T. and H. N. William (1998). Advancing Interdisciplinary Studies. Interdisciplinarity: Essays from the Literature. New York: College Entrance Examination Board.
17. Koenig, H. G. (2012). “Religion, Spirituality, and Health”, The Research and Clinical Implications. ISRN Psychiatry, 12, 1-34.
18. Marcuse, H. (1964). One Dimensional Man: Studies in the Ideology of Advanced Industrial Society. Boston: Beacon Press.
19. Marx, K. (1976). Capital I. (Translated: B. Fowkes), Harmondsworth London: Penguin.
20. Nursi, B.S. (1960). The Words. Istanbul: Sözler Publications.
21. Pargament, K. I. (2013). Searching for the sacred: Toward a nonreductive approach to spirituality. APA handbooks in psychology. APA handbook of psychology, religion, and spirituality (Vol. 1): Context, theory, and research. (Ed. K. I. Pargament, J. J. Exline, & J. W. Jones). Washington: American Psychological Association
22. Rod R. Seeley, T. D. Stephens and P. Tate (1996). Essentials of Anatomy and Physiology, 2nd ed., St. Louis New York: McGrow Hill
23. Taylor, C. (1985a). Human Agency and Language. (vol. 1 of) Philosophical Papers, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
24. Taylor, C. (1985b). Philosophy and the Human Sciences. (vol. 2 of) Philosophical Papers, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
25. Taylor, C. (1991). The Ethics of Authenticity. Cambridge (Mass.): Harvard University Press.