Relationship between activities of daily living, quality of life and mobility in older people with low vision: a comparative study

Yıl 2012, Cilt: 23 Sayı: 1, 36 - 43, 01.04.2012

Öz

Anahtar Kelimeler

-

Az gören yaşlı bireylerde günlük yaşam aktiviteleri ve yaşam kalitesinin mobilite ile ilişkisi: karşılaştırmalı bir çalışma

Öz

Amaç: Bu çalışma az gören yaşlı bireylerde günlük yaşam aktiviteleri ve yaşam kalitesinin mobilite ile ilişkisini incelemek amacıyla planlandı. Yöntem: Çalışmaya 60 yaş ve üzeri 30 az gören ve 30 normal görmeye sahip yaşlı birey katıldı. Çalışmaya dahil edilen bireylerin mobilite fonksiyonu Tinetti’nin Performansa Dayalı Mobilite Değerlendirmesi ile, günlük yaşam aktiviteleri Günlük Görme Aktiviteleri Skalası ile, yaşam kaliteleri Kısa Form–36 Yaşam Kalitesi Anketi ile değerlendirildi. Sonuçlar: Normal görmeye sahip bireylerin mobilite fonksiyonları, günlük yaşam aktiviteleri ve yaşam kalitesi az görenlerle karşılaştırıldığında normal görenlerin lehine istatistiksel olarak anlamlı fark bulundu (p

Anahtar Kelimeler

Yaşlı , Az görme , Mobilite limitasyonu , Yaşam kalitesi , Günlük yaşam aktiviteleri

Kaynakça

• Berger S, Porell F. The association between low vision and function. J Aging Health. 2008;20:504- 525.
• Metz DH. Mobility of older people and their quality of life. Transport Policy 2000; 7(2): 149-152.
• Warren M, Lampert J. Considerations in addressing the daily living needs in older persons with low vision. Ophthalmol Clin North Am. 1994;7:187-195.
• Donat H, Belhan ZB, Yıldırım Y. Relation of history of falls among the elderly to functional ability measurements. Fizyoter Rehabil. 2003;14:115-120.
• Patel VK, Coppin AK, Manini TM, et al. Midlife Physical Activity and Mobility in Older Age: The InCHIANTI study. Am J Prev Med. 2006; 31: 217- 224.
• Yücel H, Kayıhan H. Huzurevinde ve evde çok amaçlı aktivite eğitiminin geriatrik depresyona etkisi. Fizyoter Rehabil. 2008;19:74-78.
• Hassan SE, Lovie-Kitchin JE, Woods RL. Vision and Mobility Performance of Subjects with Age-Related Macular Degenerasyon. Optom Vis Sci. 2002;79:697- 707.
• Walsh K, Roberts J, Bennett G. Mobility in old age. Geroontology. 1999;16:69-74.
• Tinetti ME. Performance-oriented assessment of mobility problems in elderly patients. J Am Geriatr Soc 1986;34:119-126.
• Lin M, Hwang H, Hu M, et al. Psychometric comparisons of the timed up and go, one-leg stand, functional reach and Tinetti balance measures in community-dwelling older people. J Am Geriatr Soc 2004;52:1343–1348.
• Kamel HK, Guro-Razuman S, Shareeff M. The activities of daily vision scale: a useful tool to assess fall risk in older adults with vision impairment. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2000;48:1474-1477.
• Freeman EE, Muñoz B, West SK, et al. Glaucoma and quality of life: The Salisbury Eye Evaluation. Ophthalmology. 2008;115:233-238.
• Mangione CM, Phillips RS, Seddon JM, et al. Development of the “Activities of Daily Vision Scale”. A measure of visual functional status. Med Care. 1992;30:1111–1126.
• Pesudovs K, Garamendi E, Keeves JP, et al. The activities of daily vision scale for cataract surgery outcomes: re-evaluating validity with Rasch analysis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2003;44:2892-2899.
• Ware JE, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short- form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care. 1992;30:473-483.
• Hayes V, Morris J, Wolfe C, et al. The SF-36 Health Survey Questionnaire: is it suitable for use with older adults? Age Aging. 1995;24:120-125.
• Koçyiğit H, Aydemir Ö, Fişek G, et al. Kısa Form-36 (KF- 36)'nın Türkçe versiyonunun güvenilirliği ve geçerliliği. İlaç ve Tedavi Dergisi. 1999;12:102-106.
• Bussmann BJ, Stam HJ. Techniques for measurement and assessment of mobility in rehabilitation: a theoretical approach. Clin Rehabil. 1998;12:455-464.
• Turano KA, Rubin GS, Quigley HA. Mobility performance in glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1999;40:2803-2809.
• Bibby SA, Maslin RE, McIIraith R, et al. Vision and self-reported mobility performance in patients with low vision. Clin Exp Optom. 2007;90:115-123.
• Owsley C, McGwin G Jr, Sloane ME, et al. Timed instrumental activities of daily living tasks: relationship to visual function in older adults. Optom Vis Sci: 2001;78:350-359.
• Stelmack J. Quality of life of low vision patients and outcomes of low vision rehabilitation. Optom Vis Sci 2001;78:335-342.
• Gothwal VK, Wright TA, Lamoureux EL, et al. Rasch Analysis of the quality of life and vision function questionnaire. Optom Vis Sci. 2009;86:836- 844.
• Scott IU, Smiddy WE, Schiffman J, et al. Quality of life of low-vision patients and the impact of low- vision services. Am J Ophthalmol. 1999;128:54-62.
• Broman AT, Munoz B, Rodriguez J, et al. The impact of visual impairment and eye disease on vision-related quality of life in a Mexican-American population: proyecto VER. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2002;43:3393-3398.
• Williams RA, Brody BL, Thomas RG, et al. The psychosocial impact of macular degeneration. Arch Ophthalmol. 1998; 116:514-520.