BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

Comparison of European Stroke Scale and Allen Prognostic in predicting functional outcomes in stroke patients

Yıl 2008, Cilt: 19 Sayı: 1, 3 - 9, 01.04.2008

Sevil Çuvalcı A. Saadet Otman Nezire Köse

Öz

Anahtar Kelimeler

-

Kaynakça

  • Lindley RI. Community care after stroke. Aust Fam Physician. 200î;36:914-917.
  • Gilman 5. Time course anti orcome of recovey from stroke: relevance to stem cell treatment. Exp Neurol. 2006;l99:37-41.
  • Mandava P, Kent TA. Reversal of dense signs predicts recovery in acute ischemic stroke. Stroke. 2t)l)5;36:2490-2492,
  • Arboix A, Garcia-Ernie's L, (lorries E, et al. Predicting spontaneous early neurological recovery after acute ischemic stroke. Eur] Neurol. 2003;10: 429—435.
  • Dohkin Bl-I. Strategies for stroke rehabilitation. Lancet Neurol. 2004;25:528-536.
  • Patel AT, Duncan PW, Lai SM, et al. The relation between impairments and functional outcomes poststroke. Arch Phys Med Reh. 200ll;81:1357-1363.
  • Kwakkel G, Kollen B, Twisk j. impact of time on improvement of outcome after stroke. Stroke. 2006;37:2348- 2353.
  • B. Paolucci S, Gmsso MG, Antonucci CS, et al. Onc- year follow-up in stroke patients discharged from rehabilitation hospital. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2000;10:25— 32.
  • Cote R, Battista RN, Wolfson C, eL al. The Canadian Neurological Scale: validation and reliability assessment. Neurology. 1989;39:638-643.
  • Wright CJ, Swinton LC, Green TL, er al. Predicting Şnal disposition after stroke using the Orpington Prognosuc Score. Can] Neurol Sci. 2004;31:494-498.
  • Kaim L, Cromc P. The role of prognostic scores in targeting stroke rehabilitation in elderly patients. _I Am Geriatr Soc. 1993;41:396-490.
  • Salgado AV, Ferro _]M, Gouveia-Oiiveira A. Long- tcrm prognosis of Şrst-ever lacunar Strokes: a hospital-based study. Stroke. 1996;27:661-666.
  • Kasner SF., Cl'lalela jA, Luciano _]M, et al. Reliability and validity of estimating the NIH Stroke Scale score from medical records. Stroke. 1999;30:1534-1537.
  • Mikulik R, Ribo M, Hill MD, et al. Accuracy of serial National institutes of Health Stroke Scale scores to identify artery status in acute ischemic stroke. Circulation. 2007;115:2660-2665.
  • l-iantson L, De Weerdt W, De Keyser ], et al. 'The European Stroke Scale. Stroke. 1994;25:2215-2219.
  • WWW. ŞzyoterapŞ org/jauma
  • Rüyamı-api Rehabllt‘t‘asyon. 2008
  • D‘Olhabcrriaguc L, Litvan ], Mitsias P, ct al. A
  • reappraisal of reliability and validity studies in stroke.
  • Weller P, Wittsack H], Siebler M, et a1. Motor
  • Allen (IM. Predicting the outcome of acute Stroke: a
  • prognostic score. ] Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry.
  • Shelton ["D, Volpc BT, Reding M. Moror
  • impairment as a predictor of Functional recovery and
  • Sumer MM, Ozdemir ], Tascilat N. Predictors of
  • Bagg S, Pombo AP, Hopman W. Effect of age on
  • Inouye M. Predicting models of outcome stratiŞed
  • by age after first stroke rehabilitation in japan. Am]
  • Nepomuceno (25, Hamilton S, Kelly PA, et al. The
  • triad of left hemiplegia, hemihypesthesia, and homonymous hemianopsia: implications for rehabilitation. South Med]. 1994;87:905-908.
  • wwwŞzyoterapi. org/Journal

Hemiplejik hastalarda fonksiyonel sonuçları tahmin eden European Stroke Skalası ve Allen Prognostik Skalalarının karşılaştırılması

Yıl 2008, Cilt: 19 Sayı: 1, 3 - 9, 01.04.2008

Sevil Çuvalcı A. Saadet Otman Nezire Köse

Öz

Amaç: Bu çalışma European Stroke Skalası (ESS) ve Allen Prognostik Skalası (APS)’nın Barthel Indeksi (BI) ile belirlenen fonksiyonel sonuçları tahmin edebilme yeteneğini karşılaştırmaktadır. Yöntem ve gereç: Bu çalışmaya 24 hasta dahil edildi. Yaş ortalamaları 62.17±13.71 yıldı. Olgular hastaneye yattıklarında, taburcu olduklarında ve bunu takip eden 3. ve 6. aylarda ESS, APS ve BI ile değerlendirildi. Sonuçlar: İstatistiksel analiz sonucunda ESS ve BI’nin 1. ve 2. değerlendirmeleri arasındaki fark anlamlı bulunurken (p < 0.05), 3. ve 4. değerlendirmeler arasında anlamlı fark bulunmadı (p > 0.05). Ayrıca, APS ve BI’nin 1. değerlendirme sonuçları arasındaki fark anlamlı iken (p < 0.05), 2., 3. ve 4. değerlendirmeler arasında anlamlı fark bulunmadı (p > 0.05). ESS, APS ve BI arasında bir ilişki bulundu. Bu korelasyon ESS ve BI arasında daha kuvvetliydi. Olguların yaşları ile sadece APS’nin 3. ve 4. değerlendirmeleri arasında ilişki bulundu. Tartışma: Sonuçlar, ESS’nin kullanımının kolay ve fonksiyonel sonuçları 3 aydan sonra daha iyi tahmin edebildiğini gösterdi. Ancak inmeden sonraki 1-30. günlerde APS, ESS’den daha iyi fonksiyonel kapasiteyi tahmin etmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

İnme European Stroke Scale Allen Prognosis Scale Barthel Index

Kaynakça

  • Lindley RI. Community care after stroke. Aust Fam Physician. 200î;36:914-917.
  • Gilman 5. Time course anti orcome of recovey from stroke: relevance to stem cell treatment. Exp Neurol. 2006;l99:37-41.
  • Mandava P, Kent TA. Reversal of dense signs predicts recovery in acute ischemic stroke. Stroke. 2t)l)5;36:2490-2492,
  • Arboix A, Garcia-Ernie's L, (lorries E, et al. Predicting spontaneous early neurological recovery after acute ischemic stroke. Eur] Neurol. 2003;10: 429—435.
  • Dohkin Bl-I. Strategies for stroke rehabilitation. Lancet Neurol. 2004;25:528-536.
  • Patel AT, Duncan PW, Lai SM, et al. The relation between impairments and functional outcomes poststroke. Arch Phys Med Reh. 200ll;81:1357-1363.
  • Kwakkel G, Kollen B, Twisk j. impact of time on improvement of outcome after stroke. Stroke. 2006;37:2348- 2353.
  • B. Paolucci S, Gmsso MG, Antonucci CS, et al. Onc- year follow-up in stroke patients discharged from rehabilitation hospital. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2000;10:25— 32.
  • Cote R, Battista RN, Wolfson C, eL al. The Canadian Neurological Scale: validation and reliability assessment. Neurology. 1989;39:638-643.
  • Wright CJ, Swinton LC, Green TL, er al. Predicting Şnal disposition after stroke using the Orpington Prognosuc Score. Can] Neurol Sci. 2004;31:494-498.
  • Kaim L, Cromc P. The role of prognostic scores in targeting stroke rehabilitation in elderly patients. _I Am Geriatr Soc. 1993;41:396-490.
  • Salgado AV, Ferro _]M, Gouveia-Oiiveira A. Long- tcrm prognosis of Şrst-ever lacunar Strokes: a hospital-based study. Stroke. 1996;27:661-666.
  • Kasner SF., Cl'lalela jA, Luciano _]M, et al. Reliability and validity of estimating the NIH Stroke Scale score from medical records. Stroke. 1999;30:1534-1537.
  • Mikulik R, Ribo M, Hill MD, et al. Accuracy of serial National institutes of Health Stroke Scale scores to identify artery status in acute ischemic stroke. Circulation. 2007;115:2660-2665.
  • l-iantson L, De Weerdt W, De Keyser ], et al. 'The European Stroke Scale. Stroke. 1994;25:2215-2219.
  • WWW. ŞzyoterapŞ org/jauma
  • Rüyamı-api Rehabllt‘t‘asyon. 2008
  • D‘Olhabcrriaguc L, Litvan ], Mitsias P, ct al. A
  • reappraisal of reliability and validity studies in stroke.
  • Weller P, Wittsack H], Siebler M, et a1. Motor
  • Allen (IM. Predicting the outcome of acute Stroke: a
  • prognostic score. ] Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry.
  • Shelton ["D, Volpc BT, Reding M. Moror
  • impairment as a predictor of Functional recovery and
  • Sumer MM, Ozdemir ], Tascilat N. Predictors of
  • Bagg S, Pombo AP, Hopman W. Effect of age on
  • Inouye M. Predicting models of outcome stratiŞed
  • by age after first stroke rehabilitation in japan. Am]
  • Nepomuceno (25, Hamilton S, Kelly PA, et al. The
  • triad of left hemiplegia, hemihypesthesia, and homonymous hemianopsia: implications for rehabilitation. South Med]. 1994;87:905-908.
  • wwwŞzyoterapi. org/Journal
Toplam 31 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil Türkçe
Yazarlar

Bu kişi benim

Sevil Çuvalcı Bu kişi benim

A. Saadet Otman Bu kişi benim

Nezire Köse Bu kişi benim

Yayımlanma Tarihi 1 Nisan 2008
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2008 Cilt: 19 Sayı: 1