ADDITIONAL EFFECTS OF KINESIOTAPING TO MOBILIZATION TECHNIQUES IN CHRONIC MECHANICAL NECK PAIN

Cilt: 26 Sayı: 3 11 Haziran 2016
PDF İndir
TR

ADDITIONAL EFFECTS OF KINESIOTAPING TO MOBILIZATION TECHNIQUES IN CHRONIC MECHANICAL NECK PAIN

Öz

Objectives: The aim of this study was to investigate the additional e ects of kinesio taping to mobilization techniques on muscle activation of deep cervical exors and neck pain in chronic mechanical neck pain.

Methods: Twenty-eight participants with mechanical neck pain were included in this study. The participants were randomized into two groups: mobilization group (Group 1) and kinesio taping group (Group 2). Treatment for Group 1 (Mean age: 25.71±8.39 yrs) included scapular mobilization, ischemic compression for trigger points and Cyriax mobilization techniques for cervical region. Treatment for Group 2 (Mean age: 30.29±12.92 yrs) included kinesio taping, additionally. Head and neck pain were assessed by Visual Analog Scale, while the muscle activation of deep neck cervical exors was assessed by Craniocervical Flexion Test, using “Stabilizer Pressure Biofeedback” device before treatment and four days a er treatment. Inter-group di erences were analyzed by Mann Whitney U Test, and intra-group changes were analyzed by Wilcoxon Test. Also the e ect sizes of intra-group changes were analyzed.

Results: There was no significant di erence between the groups for any outcome (p>0.05). Endurance of deep cervical exors improved (Group 1, p=0.018; Group 2, p=0.004), and inten- sity of headache reduced significantly, in both groups (Group 1, p=0.038; Group 2, p<0.001). E ect sizes of changes in activation of deep cervical exor muscles were d: 0.68 and d: 0.863 in Group 1 and 2, respectively. E ect sizes of changes in headache intensity were d: 0.86 and 0.83 in Group 1 and 2, respectively.

Conclusions: When e ect size di erences were analyzed, it was considered that kinesio taping could be used in addition to mobilization techniques in the treatment of mechanical neck pain. 

Kaynakça

  1. Cote P, Cassidy JD, Carroll L. The Saskatchewan Health and Back Pain Survey. The prevalence of neck pain and related disability in Saskatchewan adults. Spine. 1998;23(15):1689-98.
  2. Falla D, Rainoldi A, Merletti R, Jull G. Spatio-temporal evalua- tion of neck muscle activation during postural perturbations in healthy subjects. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2004;14(4):463-74.
  3. O’Leary S, Falla D, Jull G. The relationship between super - cial muscle activity during the cranio-cervical exion test and clinical features in patients with chronic neck pain. Man Ther. 2011;16(5):452-5.
  4. Watson DH, Trott PH. Cervical headache: an investigation of natural head posture and upper cervical exor muscle perfor- mance. Cephalalgia. 1993;13(4):272-84.
  5. O’Leary S, Jull G, Kim M, Uthaikhup S, Vicenzino B. Training mode-dependent changes in motor performance in neck pain. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2012;93(7):1225-33.
  6. Youssef EF, Shanb AS. Mobilization versus massage therapy in the treatment of cervicogenic headache: A clinical study. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2013;26(1):17-24.
  7. Masaracchio M, Cleland JA, Hellman M, Hagins M. Short-term combined e ects of thoracic spine thrust manipulation and cer- vical spine nonthrust manipulation in individuals with mechan- ical neck pain: a randomized clinical trial. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2013;43(3):118-27.
  8. Montanez-Aguilera FJ, Valtuena-Gimeno N, Pecos-Martin D, Ar- nau-Masanet R, Barrios-Pitarque C, Bosch-Morell F. Changes in a patient with neck pain a er application of ischemic compres- sion as a trigger point therapy. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2010;23(2):101-4.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

Türkçe

Konular

-

Bölüm

-

Yayımlanma Tarihi

11 Haziran 2016

Gönderilme Tarihi

11 Haziran 2016

Kabul Tarihi

-

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2015 Cilt: 26 Sayı: 3

Kaynak Göster

APA
Kılınç, H. E. (2016). ADDITIONAL EFFECTS OF KINESIOTAPING TO MOBILIZATION TECHNIQUES IN CHRONIC MECHANICAL NECK PAIN. Fizyoterapi Rehabilitasyon, 26(3). https://izlik.org/JA68DM25BC
AMA
1.Kılınç HE. ADDITIONAL EFFECTS OF KINESIOTAPING TO MOBILIZATION TECHNIQUES IN CHRONIC MECHANICAL NECK PAIN. Fizyoterapi Rehabilitasyon. 2016;26(3). https://izlik.org/JA68DM25BC
Chicago
Kılınç, H. Erkan. 2016. “ADDITIONAL EFFECTS OF KINESIOTAPING TO MOBILIZATION TECHNIQUES IN CHRONIC MECHANICAL NECK PAIN”. Fizyoterapi Rehabilitasyon 26 (3). https://izlik.org/JA68DM25BC.
EndNote
Kılınç HE (01 Haziran 2016) ADDITIONAL EFFECTS OF KINESIOTAPING TO MOBILIZATION TECHNIQUES IN CHRONIC MECHANICAL NECK PAIN. Fizyoterapi Rehabilitasyon 26 3
IEEE
[1]H. E. Kılınç, “ADDITIONAL EFFECTS OF KINESIOTAPING TO MOBILIZATION TECHNIQUES IN CHRONIC MECHANICAL NECK PAIN”, Fizyoterapi Rehabilitasyon, c. 26, sy 3, Haz. 2016, [çevrimiçi]. Erişim adresi: https://izlik.org/JA68DM25BC
ISNAD
Kılınç, H. Erkan. “ADDITIONAL EFFECTS OF KINESIOTAPING TO MOBILIZATION TECHNIQUES IN CHRONIC MECHANICAL NECK PAIN”. Fizyoterapi Rehabilitasyon 26/3 (01 Haziran 2016). https://izlik.org/JA68DM25BC.
JAMA
1.Kılınç HE. ADDITIONAL EFFECTS OF KINESIOTAPING TO MOBILIZATION TECHNIQUES IN CHRONIC MECHANICAL NECK PAIN. Fizyoterapi Rehabilitasyon. 2016;26. Available at https://izlik.org/JA68DM25BC.
MLA
Kılınç, H. Erkan. “ADDITIONAL EFFECTS OF KINESIOTAPING TO MOBILIZATION TECHNIQUES IN CHRONIC MECHANICAL NECK PAIN”. Fizyoterapi Rehabilitasyon, c. 26, sy 3, Haziran 2016, https://izlik.org/JA68DM25BC.
Vancouver
1.H. Erkan Kılınç. ADDITIONAL EFFECTS OF KINESIOTAPING TO MOBILIZATION TECHNIQUES IN CHRONIC MECHANICAL NECK PAIN. Fizyoterapi Rehabilitasyon [Internet]. 01 Haziran 2016;26(3). Erişim adresi: https://izlik.org/JA68DM25BC