BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

Turkish version of the Simple Shoulder Test: a reliability and validity study

Yıl 2010, Cilt: 21 Sayı: 2, 68 - 74, 01.08.2010

Öz

Anahtar Kelimeler

-

Kaynakça

  • Beaton DE, Richards RR. Measuring function of the shoulder: A cross-sectional comparison of five questionnaires. J Bone Joint Surg. 1996;78A:882-890.
  • Binkley J. Functional outcome measures in clinical practice. In: Tovin BJ, Greenfield BH, eds. Treatment and evaluation of the shoulder. F.A. Davis Company, Philadelphia; 2001: 132-146.
  • Romeo AA, Bach BR Jr, O’Halloran KL. Scoring systems for shoulder conditions. Am J Sports Med. 1996;24:472-476.
  • Ayhan Ç. Omuzu içeren üst ekstremite fonksiyon bozukluklarında kullanılan farklı anketlerin güvenirliğinin karşılaştırılması. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü Bilim Uzmanlığı Tezi, Ankara, 2004.
  • Lippitt SB, Harryman DT II, Matsen FA III. A practical tool for evaluating function: the Simple Shoulder Test. In: Matsen FA III, Fu FH, Hawkins RJ, eds. The Shoulder: a Balance of Mobility and Stability. Rosemont, Illinois: The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons; 1993: 501-518.
  • Matsen FA III, Smith KL. Effectiveness evaluation and the shoulder. In: Rockwood CA, Matsen FA III, eds. The Shoulder. Philadephia: WB Saunders Company; 1998: 1313-1339.
  • Matsen FA III. Early effectiveness of shoulder arthroplasty for patients who have primary glenohumeral degenerative joint disease. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1996;78:260-264.
  • Matsen FA III, Smith KL, DeBartolo SE, et al. A comparison of patients with late-stage rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis of the shoulder using self- assessed shoulder function and health status. Arthritis Care Res. 1997;10:43-47.
  • Kirkley A, Griffin S, Dainty K. Scoring systems for functional assessment of the shoulder. Arthroscopy. 2003;19:1109-1120.
  • Roddey TS, Olson SL, Cook KF, et al. Comparison of the University of California-Los Angeles Shoulder Scale and Simple Shoulder Test with the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index: Single-administration reliability and validity. Phys Ther. 2000;80:759-768.
  • Rozencwaig R, Noort AV, Moskal MJ, et al. The correlation of comorbidity with function of the shoulder and health status of patients who have glenohumeral degenerative joint disease. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1998;80:1146-1153.
  • Skutek M, Fremerey RW, Zeichen J, et al. Outcome analysis following open rotator cuff repair. Early effectiveness validated using four different shoulder assessment scales. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2000;120:432-436.
  • Goldberg BA, Smith K, Janckins S, et al. The magnitude and durability of functional improvement after total shoulder arthroplasty for degenerative joint disease. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2001;10:464- 469.
  • Romeo AA, Mazzocca A, Hang DW, et al. Shoulder scoring scales for the evaluation of rotator cuff repair. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;427:107-114.
  • O'Kane JW, Jackins S, Sidles JA, et al. Simple home program for frozen shoulder to improve patients’ assessment of shoulder function and health status. J Am Board Fam Pract. 1999;12:270-277.
  • Roy JS, Macdermid JC, Faber KJ. The simple shoulder test is responsive in assessing change following shoulder arthroplasty. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2010;40:413-421.
  • Otman S, Demirel H, Sade A. Tedavi Hareketlerinde Temel Değerlendirme Prensipleri. Ankara: Hacettepe Üniversitesi Fizik Tedavi ve Rehabilitasyon Yüksekokulu Yayınları; 1995: 55-60.
  • Kendall FP, McCreary EK, Provance PG. Upper extremity and shoulder girdle strength tests. In: Butler JP, eds. Muscles Testing and Function. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins; 1993: 235-299.
  • Dixon JS, Bird HA. Reproducibility along a 10 cm vertical visual analogue scale. Ann Rheum Dis. 1981;40:87-89.
  • Sriwatanakul K, Kelvie W, Lasagna L, et al. Studies with different types of visual analog scales for measurement of pain. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1983;34:234-239.
  • Skutek M, Fremery RW, Zeichen J, et al. Outcome analysis following open rotor cuff repair: Early effectiveness validated using four different shoulder assessment scales. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2000;120:432-436.
  • Cook KF, Gartsman GM, Roddey TS, et al. The measurement level and trait-specific reliability of 4 scales of shoulder functioning: An empiric investigation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2001;82:1558- 1565.
  • Scott DL, Garrood T. Quality of life measures: use and abuse. Baillieres Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2000;14;663-687.
  • Shrout PE, Fleiss J. Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol Bull. 1979;86:420- 428.
  • Cronbach LJ. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika 1951;16:297-334.
  • Bellamy N. Musculoskeletal Clinical Metrology. Boston: Klumer Academic Publishers; 1993:11-43.
  • Feise RJ, Menke JM. Functional Rating Index: A new valid and reliable instrument to measure the magnitude of clinical change in spinal conditions. Spine. 2001;26:78-87.
  • Düger T, Yakut E, Öksüz Ç, ve ark. Kol, Omuz, El
  • Sorunları (Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand-DASH) Anketi Türkçe uyarlamasının güvenirliği ve geçerliği. Fizyoter Rehabil. 2006;17:99- 107.
  • Roach KE, Budiman-Mak E, Songsiridej N, et al. Development of a Shoulder Pain and Disability Index. Arth Care Res. 1991;4:143-149.
  • Heald SL, Riddle DL, Lamb RL. The Shoulder Pain and Disability Index: The construct validity and responsiveness of a region-specific disability measure. Phys Ther. 1997;77:1079-1089.
  • Godfrey J, Hammam R, Lowenstein S et al. Reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the simple shoulder test: Psychometric properties by age and injury type. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2007;16:260-267.
  • Ek. Basit Omuz Testi’nin Türkçe versiyonu. Evet Hayır 1.
  • Kolunuz vücudunuzun yanında hareketsiz dururken omzunuz rahat mı? O O O O O O O O O O O O O 12.
  • Etkilenen uzvunuzla 9 kg’ı vücudunuzun yanında taşıyabiliyor musunuz?

Basit Omuz Testi'nin Türkçe versiyonu: güvenirlik ve geçerlik çalışması

Yıl 2010, Cilt: 21 Sayı: 2, 68 - 74, 01.08.2010

Öz

Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı, Basit Omuz Testi’nin (Simple Shoulder Test, BOT) Türkçe versiyonunu yapmak, geçerlik ve güvenirlik özelliklerini göstermekti. Gereç ve yöntem: Çalışmaya 65 omuz patolojisi olan birey alındı. Bireylerin aktif normal eklem hareketleri, kas kuvvetleri ve ağrıları değerlendirildi. Fonksiyonel sonuç ölçümleri için, BOT ve Kol, Omuz ve El Sorunları Anketi (DASH) uygulandı. Sonuçlar: BOT’un test-tekrar test güvenirliği ICC=0.743 bulundu. İç tutarlılıkta, Cronbach alfa değeri, test için 0.726 ve tekrar test için 0.754 olarak belirlendi. Ölçütsel geçerlik yönünden, BOT ve DASH arasındaki ilişki iyi düzeyde bulundu. Yapı geçerliğinde, BOT ile eklem hareketi (r=0.452), kas kuvveti (r=0.440), ve ağrı (r=0.436) ölçümleri arasında iyi düzeyde ilişki saptandı. Tartışma: Bu çalışma, BOT’un Türkçe versiyonunun iyi derecede güvenilir ve geçerli bir fonksiyonel sonuç ölçümü olduğunu gösterdi

Anahtar Kelimeler

Basit Omuz Testi Güvenirlik Geçerlik

Kaynakça

  • Beaton DE, Richards RR. Measuring function of the shoulder: A cross-sectional comparison of five questionnaires. J Bone Joint Surg. 1996;78A:882-890.
  • Binkley J. Functional outcome measures in clinical practice. In: Tovin BJ, Greenfield BH, eds. Treatment and evaluation of the shoulder. F.A. Davis Company, Philadelphia; 2001: 132-146.
  • Romeo AA, Bach BR Jr, O’Halloran KL. Scoring systems for shoulder conditions. Am J Sports Med. 1996;24:472-476.
  • Ayhan Ç. Omuzu içeren üst ekstremite fonksiyon bozukluklarında kullanılan farklı anketlerin güvenirliğinin karşılaştırılması. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü Bilim Uzmanlığı Tezi, Ankara, 2004.
  • Lippitt SB, Harryman DT II, Matsen FA III. A practical tool for evaluating function: the Simple Shoulder Test. In: Matsen FA III, Fu FH, Hawkins RJ, eds. The Shoulder: a Balance of Mobility and Stability. Rosemont, Illinois: The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons; 1993: 501-518.
  • Matsen FA III, Smith KL. Effectiveness evaluation and the shoulder. In: Rockwood CA, Matsen FA III, eds. The Shoulder. Philadephia: WB Saunders Company; 1998: 1313-1339.
  • Matsen FA III. Early effectiveness of shoulder arthroplasty for patients who have primary glenohumeral degenerative joint disease. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1996;78:260-264.
  • Matsen FA III, Smith KL, DeBartolo SE, et al. A comparison of patients with late-stage rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis of the shoulder using self- assessed shoulder function and health status. Arthritis Care Res. 1997;10:43-47.
  • Kirkley A, Griffin S, Dainty K. Scoring systems for functional assessment of the shoulder. Arthroscopy. 2003;19:1109-1120.
  • Roddey TS, Olson SL, Cook KF, et al. Comparison of the University of California-Los Angeles Shoulder Scale and Simple Shoulder Test with the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index: Single-administration reliability and validity. Phys Ther. 2000;80:759-768.
  • Rozencwaig R, Noort AV, Moskal MJ, et al. The correlation of comorbidity with function of the shoulder and health status of patients who have glenohumeral degenerative joint disease. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1998;80:1146-1153.
  • Skutek M, Fremerey RW, Zeichen J, et al. Outcome analysis following open rotator cuff repair. Early effectiveness validated using four different shoulder assessment scales. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2000;120:432-436.
  • Goldberg BA, Smith K, Janckins S, et al. The magnitude and durability of functional improvement after total shoulder arthroplasty for degenerative joint disease. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2001;10:464- 469.
  • Romeo AA, Mazzocca A, Hang DW, et al. Shoulder scoring scales for the evaluation of rotator cuff repair. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;427:107-114.
  • O'Kane JW, Jackins S, Sidles JA, et al. Simple home program for frozen shoulder to improve patients’ assessment of shoulder function and health status. J Am Board Fam Pract. 1999;12:270-277.
  • Roy JS, Macdermid JC, Faber KJ. The simple shoulder test is responsive in assessing change following shoulder arthroplasty. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2010;40:413-421.
  • Otman S, Demirel H, Sade A. Tedavi Hareketlerinde Temel Değerlendirme Prensipleri. Ankara: Hacettepe Üniversitesi Fizik Tedavi ve Rehabilitasyon Yüksekokulu Yayınları; 1995: 55-60.
  • Kendall FP, McCreary EK, Provance PG. Upper extremity and shoulder girdle strength tests. In: Butler JP, eds. Muscles Testing and Function. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins; 1993: 235-299.
  • Dixon JS, Bird HA. Reproducibility along a 10 cm vertical visual analogue scale. Ann Rheum Dis. 1981;40:87-89.
  • Sriwatanakul K, Kelvie W, Lasagna L, et al. Studies with different types of visual analog scales for measurement of pain. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1983;34:234-239.
  • Skutek M, Fremery RW, Zeichen J, et al. Outcome analysis following open rotor cuff repair: Early effectiveness validated using four different shoulder assessment scales. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2000;120:432-436.
  • Cook KF, Gartsman GM, Roddey TS, et al. The measurement level and trait-specific reliability of 4 scales of shoulder functioning: An empiric investigation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2001;82:1558- 1565.
  • Scott DL, Garrood T. Quality of life measures: use and abuse. Baillieres Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2000;14;663-687.
  • Shrout PE, Fleiss J. Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol Bull. 1979;86:420- 428.
  • Cronbach LJ. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika 1951;16:297-334.
  • Bellamy N. Musculoskeletal Clinical Metrology. Boston: Klumer Academic Publishers; 1993:11-43.
  • Feise RJ, Menke JM. Functional Rating Index: A new valid and reliable instrument to measure the magnitude of clinical change in spinal conditions. Spine. 2001;26:78-87.
  • Düger T, Yakut E, Öksüz Ç, ve ark. Kol, Omuz, El
  • Sorunları (Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand-DASH) Anketi Türkçe uyarlamasının güvenirliği ve geçerliği. Fizyoter Rehabil. 2006;17:99- 107.
  • Roach KE, Budiman-Mak E, Songsiridej N, et al. Development of a Shoulder Pain and Disability Index. Arth Care Res. 1991;4:143-149.
  • Heald SL, Riddle DL, Lamb RL. The Shoulder Pain and Disability Index: The construct validity and responsiveness of a region-specific disability measure. Phys Ther. 1997;77:1079-1089.
  • Godfrey J, Hammam R, Lowenstein S et al. Reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the simple shoulder test: Psychometric properties by age and injury type. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2007;16:260-267.
  • Ek. Basit Omuz Testi’nin Türkçe versiyonu. Evet Hayır 1.
  • Kolunuz vücudunuzun yanında hareketsiz dururken omzunuz rahat mı? O O O O O O O O O O O O O 12.
  • Etkilenen uzvunuzla 9 kg’ı vücudunuzun yanında taşıyabiliyor musunuz?
Toplam 35 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil Türkçe
Bölüm Makaleler
Yazarlar

Bu kişi benim

Yayımlanma Tarihi 1 Ağustos 2010
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2010 Cilt: 21 Sayı: 2