STROKE RESEARCH PRODUCTIVITY BETWEEN THE YEARS OF 2009-2013 IN TURKEY: A BIBLIOMETRIC ANALYSIS

Arzu Razak Özdinçler; Burcu Ersöz Hüseyinsinoğlu; Ayşe Zengin Alpözgen; Ela Tarakçı

doi:10.21653/tfrd.272982

Araştırma Makalesi

STROKE RESEARCH PRODUCTIVITY BETWEEN THE YEARS OF 2009-2013 IN TURKEY: A BIBLIOMETRIC ANALYSIS

Yıl 2016, Cilt: 27 Sayı: 2, 72 - 80, 15.08.2016

Arzu Razak Özdinçler Burcu Ersöz Hüseyinsinoğlu Ayşe Zengin Alpözgen Ela Tarakçı

https://doi.org/10.21653/tfrd.272982

Öz

Purpose: Stroke becomes increasingly important disease which threatens public health in
Turkey as in all over the world. Our objective with this study was to examine the trends of
literature about stroke among journals published in Turkey over the past five years.

Methods: This bibliometric analysis of stroke related articles included 102 journals indexed in
ULAKBIM Turkish Medical Database between 2009 and 2013. Journals were held preliminary
elimination by issues and 807 volumes of 52 journals within the General Medical Journals
were examined one by one. Turkish Journal of Neurology, Turkish Journal of Cerebrovascular
Disease, Turkish Neurosurgery, Journal of Neurological Sciences-Turkish, Turkish Journal of
Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation and Turkish Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
were examined as site-specific journals and total volume was 98 in these journals. Studies
were analyzed by type of study, issue and department.

Results: While 52 journals have a total of 807 volumes and 10146 articles, only 66 studies
(28 original articles, 11 reviews, 17 case reports) were found related to the stroke within the
General Medical Journals. While site-specific journals have 92 volumes and 1714 articles, the
number of stroke related researches was 98.

Discussion: Although there are some studies related to the stroke in Turkey, it has been seen
that the number of these studies is not enough when its public and health related importance
is considered. It has been thought that the factors which cause these results are needed
further investigation to increase the number of qualified researches in our country.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Stroke, publications, research, Turkey

Kaynakça

1. World Health Organization. World Health Statistics [homepage on the Internet]. Switzerland:WHO;c2014.Availablefrom:http://apps. who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/112738/1/9789240692671_eng. pdf.
2. Feign VL. Stroke epidemiology in the developing world. Lancet. 2005;365(9478):2160-1.
3. Öztürk Ş. Epidemiology of Cerebrovascular Diseases and Risk Factors-Perspectives of The World and Turkey. Turk J Geriatr. 2009;13(1):51-8.
4. Feigin VL, Lawes CM, Bennett DA, Barker-Collo SL, Parag V. Worldwide stroke incidence and early case fatality reported in 56 population-based studies: a systematic review. Lancet Neu- rol. 2009;8(4):355-69.
5. Hashmi M, Khan M, Wasay M. Growing burden of stroke in Pakistan: a review of progress and limitation. Int J Stroke. 2013;8(7):575-81.
6. Towfighi A, Saver JL. Stroke declines from third to fourth leading cause of death in the United States: Historical perspective and challenges ahead. Stroke. 2011;42(8):2351-5.
7. Ünüvar N, Mollahaliloğlu S, Yardım N. Turkey Burden of Disease Study 2004. Ankara: Aydoğdu Ofset Matbaacılık, 2006; p. 2-12.
8. Tabanlıoğlu S, Soyuyüce Aydın E. Tübitak Ulakbim Ulusal Atıf Veri Tabanı. In: Yılmaz O, editor. Sağlık Bilimlerinde Süreli Yayıncılık. Ankara: Aves Yayıncılık, 2011; p. 41-4.
9. Chow DS, Hauptman JS, Wong TT, Gonzalez NR, Martin NA, Lignelli AA, et al. Changes in stroke research productivity: A global perspective. Surg Neurol Int. 2012;3:27.
10. Stroke Unit Trialists’ Collaboration. Organised inpatient (stroke unit) care for stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;11:9:CD000197.
11. Intercollegiate Stroke Working Party. National clinical guideline for stroke. 4th ed. London: Royal College of Physicians; 2012.
12. Fens M, Vluggen T, van Haastregt JC, Verbunt JA, Beusmans GH, van Heugten CM. Multidisciplinary care for stroke patients living in the community: a systematic review. J Rehabil Med. 2013;45(4):321-30.
13. McKevitt C, Redfern J, Mold F, Wolfe C. Qualitative studies of stroke: a systematic review. Stroke. 2004;35(6):1499-505.
14. Kidwell CS, Liebeskind DS, Starkman S, Saver JL. Trends in acute ischemic stroke trials through the 20th century. Stroke. 2001;32(6):1349-59.
15. Chuang KY, Huang YL, Ho YS. A bibliometric and citation analysis of stroke-related research in Taiwan. Scientometrics. 2007;72(2):201-12.
16. Whitall J. Stroke rehabilitation research: time to answer more specific questions? Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2004;18(1):3-8.
17. Pollock A, Baer G, Campbell P, Choo PL, Forster A, Morris J, et al. Physical rehabilitation approaches for the recovery of function and mobility following stroke. Cochrane Database of Syst Rev. 2014;(4):CD001920.
18. Balcı B, Ertekin E, Kara B, Yaka E. The Effects of Inpatient Rehabilitation Program in Acute Stroke Patients. J Neurol Sci Turk. 2011;28(2):142-54.
19. Fearon P, Langhorne P. Early Supported Discharge Trialists. Services for reducing duration of hospital care for acute stroke patients. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012; (9):CD000443.
20. Cavalcante TF, Moreira RP, Guedes NG, Araujo TL, Lopes MVO, Damasceno MMC, et al. Nursing interventions for stroke pa- tients: an integrative literature review. Rev Esc Enferm USP.
21. Johnston SC. The 2008 William M. Feinberg lecture: prioritizing stroke research. Stroke. 2008;39(12):3431-6.

TÜRKİYE’DE 2009-2013 YILLARI ARASINDA İNME ARAŞTIRMA ÜRETKENLİĞİ: BİBLİYOMETRİK ANALİZ

Yıl 2016, Cilt: 27 Sayı: 2, 72 - 80, 15.08.2016

Arzu Razak Özdinçler Burcu Ersöz Hüseyinsinoğlu Ayşe Zengin Alpözgen Ela Tarakçı

https://doi.org/10.21653/tfrd.272982

Öz

Amaç: İnme tüm dünyada olduğu gibi Türkiye’de de halk sağlığını tehdit eden bir sorun olması
nedeniyle önemi giderek artan bir hastalıktır. Çalışmamızın amacı Türkiye’de son beş yılda
yayınlanan dergilerde inme ile ilgili literatür eğiliminin gözden geçirilmesidir.

Yöntemler: İnme ile ilişkili araştırmaların bibliyometrik analizinin yapıldığı bu çalışma kap-
samında 2009-2013 yılları arasında ULAKBIM Türk Tıp Dizini ’ne giren 102 dergi tarandı.
Bu kapsamda Genel Tıp Dergileri içeriğindeki 52 dergide 807 cilt tek tek gözden geçirildi.
Ayrıca alana özgü dergiler kapsamında Türk Nöroloji Dergisi, Türk Serebrovasküler Hastalıklar
Dergisi, Türk Nöroşirurji Dergisi, Journal of Neurological Science (Turkish), Türk Fizyoterapi
ve Rehabilitasyon Dergisi ve Türkiye Fiziksel Tıp ve Rehabilitasyon Dergisi’nde toplam 98 cilt
tarandı. İnme ile ilgili tüm araştırmaların araştırma tipi, konusu ve yürütüldüğü bölüm bazında
analizleri yapıldı.

Sonuçlar: Taranan 52 dergide toplam 807 cilt ve 10146 makale bulunmaktaydı. Bunlar ara-
sında Genel Tıp Dergileri içerisinde inme ile ilişkili sadece 66 araştırma (28 orijinal makale, 11
derleme, 17 olgu sunumu) vardı. Alana özgü dergilerde ise 92 cilt tarandı; 1714 çalışmadan
sadece 98’i inme ile ilişkiliydi.

Tartışma: Türkiye’de inme konulu araştırmalar yapılıyor olsa da konunun toplumsal ve sağlık
alanındaki önemi düşünüldüğünde çalışma sayısının yeterli olmadığı görüldü. Ülkemizde inme
konusunda nitelikli çalışma sayısının arttırılması için bu sonuca neden olan faktörlerin daha
detaylı incelenmesi gerektiği düşünüldü.

Anahtar Kelimeler

İnme, yayınlar, araştırma, Türkiye

Kaynakça

1. World Health Organization. World Health Statistics [homepage on the Internet]. Switzerland:WHO;c2014.Availablefrom:http://apps. who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/112738/1/9789240692671_eng. pdf.
2. Feign VL. Stroke epidemiology in the developing world. Lancet. 2005;365(9478):2160-1.
3. Öztürk Ş. Epidemiology of Cerebrovascular Diseases and Risk Factors-Perspectives of The World and Turkey. Turk J Geriatr. 2009;13(1):51-8.
4. Feigin VL, Lawes CM, Bennett DA, Barker-Collo SL, Parag V. Worldwide stroke incidence and early case fatality reported in 56 population-based studies: a systematic review. Lancet Neu- rol. 2009;8(4):355-69.
5. Hashmi M, Khan M, Wasay M. Growing burden of stroke in Pakistan: a review of progress and limitation. Int J Stroke. 2013;8(7):575-81.
6. Towfighi A, Saver JL. Stroke declines from third to fourth leading cause of death in the United States: Historical perspective and challenges ahead. Stroke. 2011;42(8):2351-5.
7. Ünüvar N, Mollahaliloğlu S, Yardım N. Turkey Burden of Disease Study 2004. Ankara: Aydoğdu Ofset Matbaacılık, 2006; p. 2-12.
8. Tabanlıoğlu S, Soyuyüce Aydın E. Tübitak Ulakbim Ulusal Atıf Veri Tabanı. In: Yılmaz O, editor. Sağlık Bilimlerinde Süreli Yayıncılık. Ankara: Aves Yayıncılık, 2011; p. 41-4.
9. Chow DS, Hauptman JS, Wong TT, Gonzalez NR, Martin NA, Lignelli AA, et al. Changes in stroke research productivity: A global perspective. Surg Neurol Int. 2012;3:27.
10. Stroke Unit Trialists’ Collaboration. Organised inpatient (stroke unit) care for stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;11:9:CD000197.
11. Intercollegiate Stroke Working Party. National clinical guideline for stroke. 4th ed. London: Royal College of Physicians; 2012.
12. Fens M, Vluggen T, van Haastregt JC, Verbunt JA, Beusmans GH, van Heugten CM. Multidisciplinary care for stroke patients living in the community: a systematic review. J Rehabil Med. 2013;45(4):321-30.
13. McKevitt C, Redfern J, Mold F, Wolfe C. Qualitative studies of stroke: a systematic review. Stroke. 2004;35(6):1499-505.
14. Kidwell CS, Liebeskind DS, Starkman S, Saver JL. Trends in acute ischemic stroke trials through the 20th century. Stroke. 2001;32(6):1349-59.
15. Chuang KY, Huang YL, Ho YS. A bibliometric and citation analysis of stroke-related research in Taiwan. Scientometrics. 2007;72(2):201-12.
16. Whitall J. Stroke rehabilitation research: time to answer more specific questions? Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2004;18(1):3-8.
17. Pollock A, Baer G, Campbell P, Choo PL, Forster A, Morris J, et al. Physical rehabilitation approaches for the recovery of function and mobility following stroke. Cochrane Database of Syst Rev. 2014;(4):CD001920.
18. Balcı B, Ertekin E, Kara B, Yaka E. The Effects of Inpatient Rehabilitation Program in Acute Stroke Patients. J Neurol Sci Turk. 2011;28(2):142-54.
19. Fearon P, Langhorne P. Early Supported Discharge Trialists. Services for reducing duration of hospital care for acute stroke patients. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012; (9):CD000443.
20. Cavalcante TF, Moreira RP, Guedes NG, Araujo TL, Lopes MVO, Damasceno MMC, et al. Nursing interventions for stroke pa- tients: an integrative literature review. Rev Esc Enferm USP.
21. Johnston SC. The 2008 William M. Feinberg lecture: prioritizing stroke research. Stroke. 2008;39(12):3431-6.

Toplam 21 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Konular	Sağlık Kurumları Yönetimi
Bölüm	Makaleler
Yazarlar	Arzu Razak Özdinçler Burcu Ersöz Hüseyinsinoğlu Ayşe Zengin Alpözgen Ela Tarakçı
Yayımlanma Tarihi	15 Ağustos 2016
Yayımlandığı Sayı	Yıl 2016 Cilt: 27 Sayı: 2

Kaynak Göster

APA	Razak Özdinçler, A., Ersöz Hüseyinsinoğlu, B., Zengin Alpözgen, A., Tarakçı, E. (2016). STROKE RESEARCH PRODUCTIVITY BETWEEN THE YEARS OF 2009-2013 IN TURKEY: A BIBLIOMETRIC ANALYSIS. Fizyoterapi Rehabilitasyon, 27(2), 72-80. https://doi.org/10.21653/tfrd.272982
AMA	Razak Özdinçler A, Ersöz Hüseyinsinoğlu B, Zengin Alpözgen A, Tarakçı E. STROKE RESEARCH PRODUCTIVITY BETWEEN THE YEARS OF 2009-2013 IN TURKEY: A BIBLIOMETRIC ANALYSIS. Fizyoterapi Rehabilitasyon. Ağustos 2016;27(2):72-80. doi:10.21653/tfrd.272982
Chicago	Razak Özdinçler, Arzu, Burcu Ersöz Hüseyinsinoğlu, Ayşe Zengin Alpözgen, ve Ela Tarakçı. “STROKE RESEARCH PRODUCTIVITY BETWEEN THE YEARS OF 2009-2013 IN TURKEY: A BIBLIOMETRIC ANALYSIS”. Fizyoterapi Rehabilitasyon 27, sy. 2 (Ağustos 2016): 72-80. https://doi.org/10.21653/tfrd.272982.
EndNote	Razak Özdinçler A, Ersöz Hüseyinsinoğlu B, Zengin Alpözgen A, Tarakçı E (01 Ağustos 2016) STROKE RESEARCH PRODUCTIVITY BETWEEN THE YEARS OF 2009-2013 IN TURKEY: A BIBLIOMETRIC ANALYSIS. Fizyoterapi Rehabilitasyon 27 2 72–80.
IEEE	A. Razak Özdinçler, B. Ersöz Hüseyinsinoğlu, A. Zengin Alpözgen, ve E. Tarakçı, “STROKE RESEARCH PRODUCTIVITY BETWEEN THE YEARS OF 2009-2013 IN TURKEY: A BIBLIOMETRIC ANALYSIS”, Fizyoterapi Rehabilitasyon, c. 27, sy. 2, ss. 72–80, 2016, doi: 10.21653/tfrd.272982.
ISNAD	Razak Özdinçler, Arzu vd. “STROKE RESEARCH PRODUCTIVITY BETWEEN THE YEARS OF 2009-2013 IN TURKEY: A BIBLIOMETRIC ANALYSIS”. Fizyoterapi Rehabilitasyon 27/2 (Ağustos 2016), 72-80. https://doi.org/10.21653/tfrd.272982.
JAMA	Razak Özdinçler A, Ersöz Hüseyinsinoğlu B, Zengin Alpözgen A, Tarakçı E. STROKE RESEARCH PRODUCTIVITY BETWEEN THE YEARS OF 2009-2013 IN TURKEY: A BIBLIOMETRIC ANALYSIS. Fizyoterapi Rehabilitasyon. 2016;27:72–80.
MLA	Razak Özdinçler, Arzu vd. “STROKE RESEARCH PRODUCTIVITY BETWEEN THE YEARS OF 2009-2013 IN TURKEY: A BIBLIOMETRIC ANALYSIS”. Fizyoterapi Rehabilitasyon, c. 27, sy. 2, 2016, ss. 72-80, doi:10.21653/tfrd.272982.
Vancouver	Razak Özdinçler A, Ersöz Hüseyinsinoğlu B, Zengin Alpözgen A, Tarakçı E. STROKE RESEARCH PRODUCTIVITY BETWEEN THE YEARS OF 2009-2013 IN TURKEY: A BIBLIOMETRIC ANALYSIS. Fizyoterapi Rehabilitasyon. 2016;27(2):72-80.