Determıning The Effect of Health Literacy On Healthy Life Style And Rational Drug Use By Path Analysis

Öz

Purpose: The main purpose of this study is; to determine the effect of health literacy on healthy lifestyle and rational drug use by path analysis. Material and Methods: The universe of the research consists of patients and their relatives who receive health services from pharmacies operating in the city center of Bolu. The total number of questionnaires evaluated and used in data analysis is 400. SPSS 26 and AMOS 24 package programs were used in the analysis of the data. For reliability, item analysis based on item-total correlation was performed. Factors were determined by explanatory factor analysis (EFA), and the effect of health literacy on healthy lifestyle and rational drug use was determined with path analysis. With item analysis based on item-total correlation, it was seen that the data met the reliability requirement. The construct validity revealed by the explanatory factor analysis was also confirmed by path analysis. Results: Ensuring validity and reliability; shows the existence of a structural relationship in the effect of health literacy on healthy lifestyle and rational drug use. It was determined that health literacy has a positive effect on rational drug use (β=1.055; p<0,05) and healthy lifestyle (β=0.496; p<0,05). Conclusion: For the model, the effect of a healthy lifestyle on rational drug use, the effect of rational drug use on a healthy lifestyle, and also whether the indirect effect of health literacy on rational drug use through healthy lifestyle was examined, and it was determined that there was no effect.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Health literacy
• Healthy lifestyle
• Rational drug use
• Path Analiysis

Kaynakça

1. Abacıgil, F., Turan, S.G., Adana, F., Okyay, P. & Demirci, B. (2019). Rational use of drugs among ınpatients and ıts association with health literacy. Meandros Med Dent J, 20:64-73.
2. Berkman, N.D., Sheridan, S.L., Donahue, K.E., Halpern, D.J. & Crotty, K. (2011). Low health literacy and health outcomes: an updated systematic review. Ann Intern Med, 155(2):97–107.
3. Desalegn, A.A. (2013). Assessment of drug use pattern using WHO prescribing indicators at Hawassa University teaching and referral hospital, south Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study. BMC Health Serv Res, 13:170.
4. DeWalt, D.A., Berkman, N.D., Sheridan, S., Lohr, K.N. & Pignone, M.P. (2004). Literacy and health outcomes: a systematic review of the literature. J Gen Intern Med, 19(12):1228–1239.
5. Easton, P., Entwistle, V.A. & Williams, B. (2013). How the stigma of low literacy can impair patient-professional spoken interactions and affect health: Insights from a qualitative investigation. BMC Health Serv Res, 13(1):319.
6. Geboers, B., Brainard, J.S., Loke, Y.K., Jansen, C.J., Salter, C., Reijneveld, S.A., et al. (2015). The association of health literacy with adherence in older adults, and its role in interventions: a systematic meta-review. BMC Public Health, 15:1091.
7. Haaijer-Ruskamp, F. M. (1997). Rational drug use in Europe-Challenges for the 21 (st) century-Report from the 1st Meeting of EURO DURG, the European Drug Utilization Research Group. European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 52(3), R3-R5.
8. Hersh, L., Salzman, B. & Snyderman, D. (2015). Health literacy in primary care practice. Am Fam Physician, 92(2):118–124.

9. HLS-EU Consortium (2012). Comparative report on health literacy in eight EU member states the European health literacy survey.Retrived: http://www.health-literacy.eu Retrived date:10.05.2021.
10. Kickbusch, I.P.J., Apfel, F. & Agis, T. (2013). Health literacy: the solid facts, 1st edition. World Health Organisation Regional Office for Europe, Copenhagen.
11. McCray, A. T. (2005). Promoting health literacy. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 12(2), 152-163.
12. Nutbeam, D. (2008). The evolving concept of health literacy. Soc Sci Med, 67(12):2072–2078.
13. Ratzan, S.C. & Parker, R.M. (2000). Introduction. In: Selden CR, Zorn M, Ratzan SC, Parker RM, editors. National library of medicine current bibliagraphies in medcine: health literacy. Volume NLB pub. No. CBM 2000-1, edn. Bethesda: National Institute of Health, U.S. Department of heath and human services.
14. Speros, C. (2005). Health literacy: concept analysis. Journal of advanced nursing, 50(6), 633-640.
15. Song, L., Mishel, M., Bensen, J.T., Chen, R.C., Knafl, G.J., Blackard, B., et al. (2012). How does health literacy affect quality of life among men with newly diagnosed clinically localized prostate cancer?: Findings from the North Carolina Louisiana Prostate Cancer Project (PCaP). Cancer, 118(15):3842–3851.
16. Tosun, N., Tosun, M., ve Gökalp, Y. (2018). İkinci basamak sağlık kurumuna başvuran hastaların akılcı ilaç kullanım durumlarının belirlenmesi. Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi / The Journal of Social Science, 5(27), 370-385.
17. Wang HM, Beyer M, Gensichen J, Gerlach FM. (2008). Health-related quality of life among general practice patients with differing chronic diseases in Germany: cross sectional survey. BMC Public Health, 8:246.
18. Wang, C., Li, H., Li, L., Xu, D., Kane, R.L. & Meng, Q. (2013). Health literacy and ethnic disparities in health-related quality of life among rural women: Results from a Chinese poor minority area. Health Qual Life Outcomes, 11:153.
19. Weiss B.D., Schwartzberg J.G., Davis T.C., Parker R.M., WilliamsM.V. & Wang C.C. (2003) Health Literacy: A Manual for Clinicians. American Medical Association Foundation and AmericanMedical Association, Chicago, IL
20. WHO (1985). The rational use of drugs: Report of the Conference of Experts Nairobi, 25-29 November.