Distribution of Candida species isolated from Nosocomial infections of Ankara Numune Training and Research Hospital 2010-2015

Yıl 2018, Cilt: 75 Sayı: 1, 21 - 28, 01.03.2018

Gülşen Hazırolan

Öz

Objective: In the recent years, the epidemiology of nosocomial Candida infections and antifungals used in the treatment have changed significantly. Although Candida albicans is the most frequently identified species, but incidence of non-albicans Candida species are increased lately. In this study, it is aimed to contribute to the epidemiological database of our hospital and country by evaluating the distribution of Candida species isolated from nosocomial Candida infections. Methods: It was evaluated that agents isolated from 3840 nosocomial infections that detected in patients hospitalized in intensive care units and clinical departments of Ankara Research and Training Hospital during January 2010 and December 2015. Candida species isolated from various clinical specimens were evaluated by Infection Control Committee according to the “Centers for Disease Control and Prevention CDC ” criteria. Distrubition of 350 Candida species isolated from nosocomial infections were investigated. Results: During the study period, the number of nosocomial infections determined among the patients hospitalized at the intensive care units and clinical departments of Ankara Research and Training Hospital were 2559 and 1281 respectively. The rate of Candida species detected from nosocomial infections in intensive care units and clinical departments were 11.2%, 3.7% respectively. The most common Candida species identified as an agent of nosocomial Candida infections was Candida albicans 39.7% . Among the non-albicans Candida group, C. parapsilosis 20.9% was the most common agent followed by C. glabrata 17.4% and C. tropicalis 15.1% . The most common nosocomial Candida infections were detected as Urinary tract infections. Conclusion: Epidemiology of nosocomial Candida infections can change to years and by hospital. Epidemiological studies should be performed at regular intervals in all hospitals in order to appropriate control of nosocomial Candida infections.

Anahtar Kelimeler

nosocomial infection, Candida species, candidemia, epidemiology

Ankara Numune Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi’nde Hastane Enfeksiyonu Etkeni Olarak İzole Edilen Candida Suşlarının Dağılımı 2010-2015

Öz

Amaç: Son yıllarda nozokomiyal Candida enfeksiyonlarının epidemiyolojisinde ve tedavisinde kullanılan antifungallerle ilgili önemli değişiklikler ortaya çıkmıştır. Nozokomiyal Candida enfeksiyonlarının en sık etkeni Candida albicans olmakla birlikte, son zamanlarda albicans dışı Candida türlerinin de sıklığı artmaktadır. Bu çalışmada nozokomiyal Candida enfeksiyonlarından izole edilen Candida türlerinin dağılımı değerlendirilerek hastanemiz ve ülkemiz epidemiyolojik verilerine katkı sağlanması amaçlanmıştır. Yöntem: Çalışmada Ocak 2010-Aralık 2015 tarihleri arasında Ankara Numune Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi yoğun bakım ve klinik sevislerinde yatarak tedavi gören hastalarda gelişen 3840 nozokomiyal enfeksiyondan izole edilen etkenler değerlendirilmiştir. Çeşitli klinik örneklerden izole edilen Candida suşları Hastane Enfeksiyon Kontrol Komitesi tarafından Hastalık Kontrol ve Önleme Merkezi CDC kriterlerine göre nozokomiyal enfeksiyon etkeni olarak kabul edilmiştir. Nozokomiyal enfeksiyon etkeni olarak tespit edilen 350 Candida suşunun dağılımı incelenmiştir.Bulgular: İzlenen dönem içinde Ankara Numune Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi yoğun bakım ünitelerinde 2559, klinik ünitelerinde 1281 nozokomiyal enfeksiyon tespit edilmiştir.Nozokomiyal enfeksiyon etkenleri içinde Candida türleri, yoğun bakım ünitelerinde %11,2, klinik ünitelerde %3,7 oranında olarak saptanmıştır. Candida albicans %39,7 , nozokomiyal kandida enfeksiyonlarına neden olan türler arasında en sık görülen etken olarak tespit edilmiştir. Albicans dışı kandida türleri arasında ise en sık görülen etkenin C. parapsilosis %20,9 olduğu saptanmış, bunu C. glabrata %17,4 ve C. tropicalis %15,1 izlemiştir. En sık karşılaşılan nozokomiyal kandida enfeksiyonu, üriner sistem enfeksiyonu olarak tespit edilmiştir.Sonuç: Nozokomiyal Candida enfeksiyonlarının epidemiyolojisi yıllara göre ve merkezlere göre değişebilmektedir. Nozokomiyal Candida enfeksiyonlarının uygun yönetilebilmesi için hastanelerde düzenli aralıklarla epidemiyolojik çalışmaların yapılması gereklidir

Anahtar Kelimeler

nozokomiyal enfeksiyon, Candida türleri, kandidemi, epidemiyoloji

Kaynakça

• 1. Eggimann P, Que YA, Revelly JP, Pagani JL. Preventing invasive candida infections. Where could we do better? J Hosp Infect, 2015; 89 (4): 302-8.
• 2. Kauffman CA. Fungal Infections. Proc Am Thorac Soc, 2006; 3 (1): 35-40.
• 3. Khan ZU, Chandy R, Metwali KE. Candida albicans strain carriage in patients and nursing staff of an intensive care unit: a study of morphotypes and resistotypes. Mycoses, 2003; 46 (11-12): 479-86.
• 4. Tiraboschi IN, Bennett JE, Kauffman CA, Rex JH, Girmenia C, Sobel JD et al. Deep Candida infections in theneutropenic and on-neutropenic host: an ISHAM symposium. Med Mycol, 2000; 38(1): 199- 204.
• 5. Brown GD, Denning DW, Gow NA, Levitz SM, Netea MGWhite TC. Hidden killers: human fungal infections. Science translational medicine, 2012; 4(165): 165rv13.
• 6. Vincent JL, Rello J, Marshall J, Silva E, Anzueto A, Martin CD, et al. International study of the prevalence and outcomes of infection in intensive care units. JAMA, 2009; 302 (23): 2323-29.
• 7. Pfaller MA, Castanheira M. Nosocomial Candidiasis: Antifungal Stewardship and the Importance of Rapid Diagnosis . Medical Mycology, 2016; 54(1): 1-22.
• 8. Horan TC, Andrus M, Dudeck MA. CDC/NHSN surveillance definition of healthcare-associated infection and criteria for specific types of infections in the acute care setting. Am J Infect Control, 2008; 36(5): 309-32.
• 9. Fridkin SK, Jarvis WR. Epidemiology of nosocomial fungal infections. Clin Microbiol Rev, 1996; 9(4): 499-511.
• 10. Horasan EŞ, Ersöz G, Göksu M, Otag F, Kurt AO, Karaçorlu S.ve ark. Increase in Candida parapsilosis fungemia in critical care units: a 6-years study. Mycopathologia, 2010; 170(4): 263-8.
• 11. Otağ F, Aslan G, Şen S, Özturhan H, Emekdaş G. 2003-2005 süresinde klinik örneklerden izole edilen maya türlerinin değerlendirilmesi. Infeks Derg, 2005; 19:435-43.
• 12. Pfaller MA, Castanheira M, Messer AS, Moet GJ, Jones RN. Variation in Candida spp. distribution and antifungal resistance rates among bloodstream infection isolates by patient age: report from the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program (2008- 2009). Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis, 2010; 68(3): 278- 83.
• 13. Kibbler CC, Seaton S, Barnes RA, Gransden WR, Holliman RE, Johnson EM. et al. Management and outcome of bloodstream infections due to Candida species in England and Wales. J Hosp Infect, 2003; 54(1): 18-24.
• 14. Vincent JL, Bihari DJ, Suter PM, Bruining HA, White J, Nicolas-Chanoin MH, et al. The prevalence of nosocomial infection in intensive care units in Europe. Results of the European Prevalence of Infection in Intensive Care (EPIC) Study. EPIC International Advisory Committee. JAMA, 1995; 274(8): 639-44
• 15. Bougnoux ME, Kac G, Aegerter P, d’Enfert C, Fagon JY; CandiRea Study Group. Candidemia and candiduria in critically ill patients admitted to intensive care units in France: incidence, molecular diversity, management and outcome. Intensive Care Med, 2008; 34(2): 292-9
• 16. Comert F, Kulah C, Aktas E, Eroglu O, Ozlu N. Identification of Candida species isolated from patients in intensive care unit and in vitro susceptibility to fluconazole for a 3-year period. Mycoses, 2006; 50(1): 52-7
• 17. Erdem F, Tuncer Ertem G, Oral B, Karakoç E, Demiröz AP, Tülek N. Epidemiological and microbiological evaluation of nosocomial infections caused by Candida species. Mikrobiyol Bul, 2012; 46(4):637-48.
• 18. Pfaller MA, Diekema DJ, Newell VA, Ellis D, Tullio V, Rodloff A. Results from the ARTEMIS DISK Global Antifungal Surveillance Study, 1997 to 2007: a 10.5- Year Analysis of Susceptibilities of Candida Species to Fluconazole and Voriconazole as Determined by CLSI Standardized Disk Diffusion. J Clin Microbiol, 2010; 48(4): 1366–1377.
• 19. Phaller MA, Jones RN, Doern GV, Sader HS, Messer SA. International surveillance of bloodstream infections due to Candida species: frequency of occurrence and antifungal susceptibilities of isolates collected in1997 in the United States, Canada and South America for the SENTRY program. J Clin Microbiol, 1998; 36 (7): 1886-9.
• 20. St-Germain G, Laverdie M, Pelletier R, A.- M. Bourgault, M. Libman, C. Lemieux, et al. Prevalence and antifungal susceptibility of 442 Candida isolatesfrom blood and other normally sterile sites: results of a 2-year (1996 to 1998) multicenter surveillance study in Quebec, Canada. J Clin Microbiol, 2001; 39(3): 949-53.
• 21. Acar A, Oncul O, Kucukardalı Y, Ozyurt M, Haznedaroğlu T, Cavuşlu Ş. Yoğun bakım unitelerinde saptanan Candida enfeksiyonlarının epidemiyolojik özellikleri ve mortaliteye etki eden risk faktorleri. Mikrobiyol Bul, 2008; 42(3): 451-61.
• 22. Snydman DR. Shifting patterns in the epidemiology of nosocomial Candida infections. Chest, 2003; 123 (5 Suppl): 500-3.
• 23. Guinea J. Global trends in the distribution of Candida species causing candidemia. Clin Microbiol Infect, 2014;(20): 5-10.
• 24. Pfaller MA, Diekema DJ. Epidemiology of invasive candidiasis: a persistent public health problem. Clin Microbiol Rev, 2007; 20(1): 133–163.
• 25. Yapar N, Pullukcu H, Avkan-Oguz V, Sayin-Kutlu S, Ertugrul B, Sacar S, et al. Evaluation of species distribution and risk factors of candidemia: a multicenter case-control study. Med Mycol, 2011; 49(1): 26-31.
• 26. Bakir M, Cerikcioglu N, Barton R, Yagci A. Epidemiology of candidemia in a Turkish tertiary care hospital. APMIS, 2006; 114(9): 601-10.
• 27. Adiloğlu AK, Şirin MC, Cicioglu-Arıdoğan B, Can R, Demirci M. Çeşitli klinik örneklerden izole edilen Candida kökenlerinin identifikasyonu ve antifungal duyarlılıklarının araştırılması. ADÜ Tıp Fak Derg, 2004; 5(3):33-6.