A PechaKucha and Infographics Presentations among the Nursing Students: A Quasi-Experimental Study

Öz

Aim: This study aims to compare the effects of creating PechaKucha (PK) versus infographics presentations of a Gestatinal Diabetes Mellitus (GDM) and Gestational Hypertension (GHT) on nursing students' learning performance and satisfaction. Material and Methods: This quasi-experimental study was conducted during the 2022-2023 academic year in a nursing school with 30 students in Ankara, Turkey. Students created two presentations, one using the PK format and the other using infographic presentation format. In the study, GDM Knowledge Test and GHT Knowledge Test were used to evaluate the students' learning performance, and The PK and Infographics Presentation Methods Scale and The Evaluation Form for Experience with PK and Infographics Methods were used to evaluate their satisfaction levels. Results: The results of the study indicated that there were no significant differences in both the knowledge levels (p > 0.05) and the satisfaction levels (p = 0.161) between the groups where PK and infographic techniques were used. However, it was observed that students were highly satisfied with using these methods, and they expressed their desire to actively incorporate these techniques into their coursework. Conclusion: In nursing education, integrating tailored PK and infographic methods alongside traditional approaches is crucial for enhancing both students' knowledge and satisfaction levels.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Education
• nursing
• infographics
• PechaKucha
• high risk pregnancies

Hemşirelik Öğrencilerinde PechaKucha ve İnfografik Sunumları: Yarı Deneysel Bir Çalışma

Öz

Amaç: Bu çalışmada, Gestasyonel Diyabetis Mellitus ve Gestasyonel Hipertansiyon konularında hazırlanan PechaKucha (PK) ve infografik sunumlarının hemşirelik öğrencilerinin öğrenme performansını ve memnuniyetlerini karşılaştırmak amaçlanmıştır. Gereç ve Yöntem: Bu yarı deneysel çalışma 2022-2023 eğitim-öğretim yılında Ankara'daki bir hemşirelik bölümünde gerçekleştirilmiştir. Araştırma çalışmaya katılmayı kabul eden 30 öğrenci ile yürütülmüştür. Öğrenciler, birinde PK formatını ve diğerinde ise infografik sunum formatını kullanarak iki sunum hazırlamışlardır. Öğrencilerin öğrenme performansını değerlendirmek için GHT Bilgi Testi ve GDM Bilgi Testi, memnuniyet düzeylerini değerlendirmek için PK ve İnfografik Sunum Metodları Ölçeği ve PK ve İnfografik Methodları Deneyimleri Değerlendirme Formu kullanılmıştır. Bulgular: Araştırmanın sonuçları, PK ve infografik tekniklerinin kullanıldığı gruplar arasında hem bilgi düzeyleri (p > 0.05) hem de memnuniyet düzeyleri (p = 0.161) açısından anlamlı bir fark olmadığını gösterdi. Ancak öğrencilerin bu yöntemleri kullanmaktan oldukça memnun kaldıkları ve bu teknikleri derslerine aktif olarak dâhil etme isteklerini dile getirdikleri gözlenmiştir. Sonuç: Farklı öğretim tekniklerinin kullanılması yalnızca öğrencilerin bilgi düzeylerinin geliştirilmesi için değil aynı zamanda memnuniyet düzeyleri açısından da önemlidir. Hemşirelik eğitiminde geleneksel öğrenme yöntemlerinin yanı sıra öğrenme hedeflerine uygun PK ve infografik yöntemlerin de kullanılması önerilmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Eğitim
• hemşirelik
• infografikler
• PechaKucha
• yüksek riskli gebelikler

Kaynakça

1. Mirzakhani K, Ebadi A, Faridhosseini F, Khadivzadeh T. Well-being in high-risk pregnancy: an integrative review, BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. doi:2020;6:1–14, 10.1186/s12884-020-03190-6.
2. Moreira MWL, Rodrigues JJPC, Carvalho FHC, Chilamkurti N, Al-Muhtadi J, Denisov V. Biomedical data analytics in mobile-health environments for high-risk pregnancy outcome prediction. J Ambient Intell Humaniz Comput. 2019 Oct 1;10(10):4121–34. doi: 10.1007/s12652-019-01230-4.
3. Anwar A, Ahmad K, Karagianni E, Lindow S. Medical management of gestational diabetes. Open J Obstet Gynecol. 2018;8(4):400–7. doi: 10.4236/ojog.2018.84045.
4. Saeedi M, Cao Y, Fadl H, Gustafson H, Simmons D. Increasing prevalence of gestational diabetes mellitus when implementing the IADPSG criteria: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2021;172:108642. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2020.108642.
5. Telatar B, Guducu Kut N. Dünyada ve Ülkemizde Gestasyonel Diyabet Epidemiyolojisi (Epidemiology of Gestational Diabetes in the World and in Turkey). Orbay E, editor. Aile Hekimliğinde Gestasyonel Diyabet Yönetimi (Gestational Diabetes Management in Family Medicine). Ankara: Türkiye Klinikleri; 2020. 1–5 p.
6. Gudeta TA, Regassa TM. Pregnancy Induced Hypertension and Associated Factors among Women Attending Delivery Service at Mizan-Tepi University Teaching Hospital, Tepi General Hospital and Gebretsadik Shawo Hospital, Southwest, Ethiopia. Ethiop J Health Sci. 2019 Jan 1;29(1):831–40. doi: 10.4314/ejhs.v29i1.4.
7. Magee LA, Nicolaides KH, von Dadelszen P. Preeclampsia. New Eng J Med. 2022 May 11;386(19):1817–32. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra2109523.
8. Doğan Yüksekol Ö, Başer M. The Use of Music in Reducing The Anxiety and Regulation of Blood Pressure in Preeclamptic Pregnant. JAREN. 2021;7(1):36–40. doi: 10.1016/j.eujim.2020.101093.

9. Ko JK, Chung MS, Choe MA, Park YI, Bang KS, Kim JA, et al. Modeling of Nursing Competencies for Competency-Based Curriculum Development. J Korean Acad Soc Nurs Educ. 2013 Feb 28;19(1):87–96. doi: 10.5977/jkasne.2013.19.1.87.
10. Wolf LA, Delao AM, Evanovich Zavotsky K, Baker KM. Triage decisions involving pregnancy-capable patients: educational deficits and emergency nurses’ perceptions of risk. J Contin Educ Nurs. 2021;52(1):21–9. doi: 10.3928/00220124-20201215-07.
11. Chicca J, Shellenbarger T. Connecting with Generation Z: Approaches in Nursing Education. Teach Learn Nurs. 2018;13(3):180–4. doi: 10.1016/j.teln.2018.03.008.
12. Hampton D, Welsh D, Wiggins AT. Learning Preferences and Engagement Level of Generation Z Nursing Students. Nurse Educ. 2020;45(3):160–4. doi: 10.1097/NNE.0000000000000710.
13. Jowsey T, Foster G, Cooper-Ioelu P, Jacobs S. Blended learning via distance in pre-registration nursing education: A scoping review. Nurse Educ Pract. 2020;44(October 2018):102775. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2020.102775.
14. Buchko AA, Buchko KJ, Meyer JM. Is there power in PowerPoint? A field test of the efficacy of PowerPoint on memory and recall of religious sermons. Comput Human Behav. 2012;28(2):688–95. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2011.11.016.
15. Joseph MA, Natarajan J. A comparison of students’ satisfaction, performance, and preferences regarding PowerPoint and PechaKucha presentations: A quasi-experimental study. Nurse Educ. Today. 2022;116(June). doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2022.105425.
16. Liangyu LIU. Design of the infographic templates for health education and nursing of children with medulloblastoma. Chin J Integr Med. 2022;8(2):108. doi: 10.55111/j.issn2709-1961.202201055
17. Warmuth KA, Caple AH. Differences in Instructor, Presenter, and Audience Ratings of PechaKucha and Traditional Student Presentations. Teach Psychol. 2022;49(3):224–35. doi: 10.1177/00986283211006389.
18. Byrne MM. Presentation innovations: Using Pecha Kucha in nursing education. Teach Learn Nurs. 2016;11(1):20–2. doi: 10.1016/j.teln.2015.10.002.
19. McDonald RE, Derby JM. Active Learning to Improve Presentation Skills: The Use of Pecha Kucha in Undergraduate Sales Management Classes. Mark. Educ. Rev. 2015;25(1):21–5. doi: 10.1080/10528008.2015.999593.
20. Ave JS, Beasley D, Brogan A. A Comparative Investigation of Student Learning through PechaKucha Presentations in Online Higher Education. Innov High Educ. 2020;45(5):373–86. doi: 10.1007/s10755-020-09507-9.
21. Beyer AA, Gaze C, Lazicki J. Comparing students’ evaluations and recall for student Pecha Kucha and PowerPoint presentations. J. Technol. Educ. 2012;1(2):26–42.
22. Bradshaw MJ, Porter S. Infographics: A new tool for the nursing classroom. Nurse Educ. 2017;42(2):57–9. doi: 10.1097/NNE.0000000000000316.
23. Naparin H, Saad AB. Infographics in education: Review on infographics design. IJMA. 2017;9(4):5. doi: 10.5121/ijma.2017.9602.
24. Jillian Ruth Yarbrough WTAU. Infographics: in Support of Online Visual Learning. AELJ. 2019;23(2):1–15.
25. Tarkhova L, Tarkhov S, Nafikov M, Akhmetyanov I, Gusev D, Akhmarov R. Infographics and their application in the educational process. IJET. 2020;15(13):63–80. doi: 10.3991/ijet.v15i13.14647.
26. Chunta K, Shellenbarger T, Chicca J. Generation Z Students in the Online Environment: Strategies for Nurse Educators. Nurse Educ. 2021;46(2):87–91. doi: 10.1097/NNE.0000000000000872.
27. Chicca J, Chunta K. Engaging Students with Visual Stories: Using Infographics in Nursing Education. Teach Learn Nurs. 2020;15(1):32–6. doi: 10.1016/j.teln.2019.09.003.
28. Oliver J, Kowalczyk C. Improving Student Group Marketing Presentations: A Modified Pecha Kucha Approach. Mark. Educ. Rev. 2013 Apr;23(1):55–8. doi: 10.2753/MER1052-8008230109.
29. Chu CH, Jibb LA, Macinnes N, Beekhoo ZD. Innovation Center A New Age of Health Promotion: The Use of Digital Infographics in Nursing Education. Nurs Educ Perspect. 2023; Available from: http://links.lww.com/NEP/. doi: 10.1097/01.NEP.0000000000001142.
30. Reem X, Abraham R, Torke S, Gonsalves J, Narayanan N, Kamath MG, et al. Modified directed self-learning sessions in physiology with prereading assignments and Pecha Kucha talks: perceptions of students. Adv Physiol Educ [Internet]. 2018;42:26–31. Available from: http://advan.physiology.org. doi: 10.1152/advan.00048.2017.
31. Joseph MA, Natarajan J. A comparison of students’ satisfaction, performance, and preferences regarding PowerPoint and PechaKucha presentations: A quasi-experimental study. Nurse Educ Today. 2022 Sep 1;116. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2022.105425.
32. Naparin H, Binti Saad A. Infographics in Education : Review on Infographics Design. IJMA. 2017 Dec 30;9(4/5/6):15–24. doi: 10.5121/ijma.2017.9602.
33. Byrne MM. Presentation innovations: Using Pecha Kucha in nursing education. Teach Learn Nurs. 2016 Jan 1;11(1):20–2. doi: 10.1016/j.teln.2015.10.002.
34. Bakcek O, Tastan S, Iyigun E, Kurtoglu P, Tastan B. Comparison of PechaKucha and traditional PowerPoint presentations in nursing education: A randomized controlled study. Nurse Educ Pract. 2020;42. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2020.102695.
35. Warmuth KA, Caple AH. Differences in Instructor, Presenter, and Audience Ratings of PechaKucha and Traditional Student Presentations. Teach Psychol. 2022;49(3):224–35. doi: 10.1177/00986283211006389.
36. Elaldi, Senel, and Taner Çifçi. The Effectiveness of Using Infographics on Academic Achievement: A Meta-Analysis and a Meta-Thematic Analysis J. Pedagog. 2021; 5(4):92-118. doi: 10.33902/JPR.2021473498.
37. Jaleniauskiene, E.; Kasperiuniene, J. Visual Literacy Development Through Infographics. In: ECIL Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2021. 189-200.
38. Falk, Nancy L. Infographic development by accelerated bachelor of Science in Nursing students: an innovative technology-based approach to public health education. Nurs. Educ. Perspect. 2016; (37): 299-301. doi: 10.1097/01.NEP.0000000000000066.
39. Hsiao, Pao Ying, et al. Using infographics to teach the evidence analysis process to senior undergraduate studentsJ Acad Nutr Diet 2018; (119): 26-30. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2017.10.022.
40. Alyahya, Dalia M. Infographics as a learning tool in higher education: The design process and perception of an instructional designer." Int. J. Learn. Teach. Educ. Res. 2019: 1-15. doi: 10.26803/ijlter.18.1.1.n