Bending Before Power: A Review on Power Relations, Ethical Dilemmas, and the Culture of Silence in Academia

Öz

Although academic institutions are traditionally regarded as spaces where knowledge is freely produced and critical thinking is nurtured, they are not immune to the influence of power, authority, and hierarchy. These dynamics shape institutional culture and individual behaviors, exerting a profound impact on the ethical climate. Within academia, job insecurity, publication pressure, and intense competition often compel individuals to remain silent or conform to authority. This tendency represents not only a personal coping mechanism but also a reflection of organizational silence and a culture of fear. This review explores how power dynamics are formed within academic settings, how individuals respond to these structures, and the roles of phenomena such as mobbing, exclusion, and ethical dilemmas in these processes. The misuse of power and its consequences for institutional justice, meritocracy, and ethical values are examined from sociological and psychological perspectives. The article concludes that power relations in academia affect not only individual behavior but also the overall ethical climate, scientific productivity, and institutional sustainability.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Academia
• Ethical Climate
• Mobbing
• Organizational Silence
• Power Relations

Destekleyen Kurum

no

Etik Beyan

no

Teşekkür

no

Gücün Karşısında Eğilip Bükülenler: Akademide Güç İlişkileri, Etik İkilemler ve Sessizlik Kültürü Üzerine Bir Derleme

Öz

Akademik kurumlar, bilginin özgürce üretildiği ve eleştirel düşüncenin beslendiği alanlar olarak kabul edilse de güç, otorite ve hiyerarşi ilişkilerinden tamamen bağımsız değildir. Bu ilişkiler, zamanla kurum kültürünü ve bireysel davranış biçimlerini şekillendirerek etik iklim üzerinde belirleyici bir etki yaratır. Akademide kadro güvencesizliği, yayın baskısı ve rekabetin yoğunluğu, bireyleri çoğu zaman güç karşısında sessiz kalmaya veya uyum göstermeye yönlendirir. Bu durum, yalnızca bireysel bir savunma mekanizması değil, aynı zamanda örgütsel sessizlik ve korku kültürünün bir yansımasıdır. Derleme kapsamında, akademik yapılarda güç dinamiklerinin nasıl oluştuğu, bireylerin bu dinamiklere nasıl tepki verdiği ve mobbing, dışlanma ya da etik ikilemler gibi olguların bu süreçteki rolü tartışılmaktadır. Gücün yanlış kullanımının kurumsal adalet, liyakat ve etik değerlere olan etkisi sosyolojik ve psikolojik açıdan ele alınmıştır. Makale, akademideki güç ilişkilerinin sadece bireysel davranışları değil, bilimsel üretkenliği ve kurumsal sürdürülebilirliği de derinden etkilediğini ortaya koymaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Akademi
• Etik İklim
• Güç İlişkileri
• Mobing
• Örgütsel Sessizlik

Destekleyen Kurum

yok

Etik Beyan

yok

Teşekkür

yok

Kaynakça

1. 1. Leymann H. Mobbing and psychological terror at workplaces. Violence and Victims. 1990;5(2):119–126.
2. 2. Detert JR, Edmondson AC. Implicit voice theories: Taken-for-granted rules of self-censorship at work. Academy of Management Journal. 2011;54(3):461–488. doi: 10.5465/amj.2011.61967925.
3. 3. Morrison EW. Employee voice and silence. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior. 2014;1:173–197. doi: 10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-031413-091328.
4. 4. Morrison EW, Milliken FJ. Organizational silence: A barrier to change and development in a pluralistic world. Academy of Management Review. 2000;25(4):706–725. doi: 10.5465/amr.2000.3707697.
5. 5. Paull M, Omari M, Standen P. When is a bystander not a bystander? A typology of bystanders to workplace bullying. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources. 2012;50(3):351–366. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-7941.2012.00027.x. 6. Keashly L, Neuman JH. Faculty experiences with bullying in higher education. Administrative Theory & Praxis. 2010;32(1):48–70. doi: 10.2753/ATP1084-1806320103.
6. 7. Minibas-Poussard J, Seckin-Celik T, Bingol HB. Mobbing in Higher Education: Descriptive and Inductive Case Narrative Analyses of Mobber Behavior, Mobbee Responses, and Witness Support. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice. 2018;18:471–494. doi: 10.12738/estp.2018.2.0018.
7. 8. Bentley PJ, Coates H, Dobson IR, Goedegebuure L, Meek VL. Job satisfaction around the academic world. Springer; 2013.
8. 9. Toker Gökçe A. Mobbing iş yerinde yıldırma kavramsal çerçeve. Üniversite ve Toplum. 2009:1–9.

9. 10. Yar AM. Mobbing in higher education: Practitioners, victims and audiences. The Journal of Academic Social Science Studies. 2013;6(2):603–621.
10. 11. Weber M. The theory of social and economic organization. Oxford University Press; 1947.
11. 12. Foucault M. Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings. Pantheon; 1980.
12. 13. Milgram S. Obedience to authority. Harper & Row; 1974.
13. 14. Asch SE. Opinions and social pressure. Scientific American. 1955;193(5):31–35. doi: 10.1038/scientificamerican1155-31.
14. 15. Keltner D, Gruenfeld DH, Anderson C. Power, approach, and inhibition. Psychological Review. 2003;110(2):265–284. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.110.2.265.
15. 16. Edmondson A. Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly. 1999;44(2):350–383. doi: 10.2307/2666999.
16. 17. Edmondson A. The fearless organization: Creating psychological safety in the workplace for learning, innovation, and growth. Wiley; 2018.
17. 18. Brown ME, Treviño LK. Ethical leadership: A review and future directions. The Leadership Quarterly. 2006;17(6):595–616. doi: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2006.10.004.
18. 19. Treviño LK, Hartman LP, Brown M. Moral person and moral manager: How executives develop a reputation for ethical leadership. California Management Review. 2000;42(4):128–142. doi: 10.2307/41166057.
19. 20. Einarsen SV, Hoel H, Zapf D, Cooper CL. Bullying and harassment in the workplace: Developments in theory, research, and practice. CRC Press; 2020.
20. 21. Ashforth BE, Anand V. The normalization of corruption in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior. 2003;25:1–52. doi: 10.1016/S0191-3085(03)25001-2.
21. 22. Salin D. Ways of explaining workplace bullying: A review of enabling, motivating and precipitating structures and processes in the work environment. Human Relations. 2003;56(10):1213–1232. doi: 10.1177/00187267035610003.
22. 23. Niedhammer I, David S, Degioanni S. Association between workplace bullying and depressive symptoms in the French working population. Journal of Psychosomatic Research. 2006;61(2):251–259. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2006.03.051.
23. 24. Greenberg J. Organizational justice: Yesterday, today, and tomorrow. Journal of Management. 1990;16(2):399–432. doi: 10.1177/014920639001600208.
24. 25. Ashforth BE. Petty tyranny in organizations. Human Relations. 1994;47(7):755–778. doi: 10.1177/001872679404700701.
25. 26. De Hoogh AH, Den Hartog DN. Ethical and despotic leadership, relationships with leader’s social responsibility, top management team effectiveness and subordinates’ optimism: A multi-method study. The Leadership Quarterly. 2008;19(3):297–311. doi: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2008.03.002.
26. 27. Rosenthal SA, Pittinsky TL. Narcissistic leadership. The Leadership Quarterly. 2006;17(6):617–633. doi: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2006.10.005.
27. 28. Hannah ST, Avolio BJ, Walumbwa FO. Relationships between authentic leadership, moral courage, and ethical and pro-social behaviors. Business Ethics Quarterly. 2011;21(4):555–578. doi: 10.5840/beq201121436.
28. 29. Hemmings C. Why stories matter: The political grammar of feminist theory. Duke University Press; 2012.
29. 30. Bandura A. Moral disengagement in the perpetration of inhumanities. Personality and Social Psychology Review. 1999;3(3):193–209. doi: 10.1207/S15327957PSPR0303_3.
30. 31. Kish-Gephart JJ, Harrison DA, Treviño LK. Bad apples, bad cases, and bad barrels: Meta-analytic evidence about sources of unethical decisions at work. Journal of Applied Psychology. 2010;95(1):1–31. doi: 10.1037/a0017103.
31. 32. Treviño LK, Weaver GR, Reynolds SJ. Behavioral ethics in organizations: A review. Journal of Management. 2006;32(6):951–990. doi: 10.1177/0149206306294258.
32. 33. Carmeli A, Gittell JH. High-quality relationships, psychological safety, and learning from failures in work organizations. Journal of Organizational Behavior. 2009;30(6):709–729. doi: 10.1002/job.565.
33. 34. Detert JR, Bruno EA. Workplace courage: Review, synthesis, and future agenda for a complex construct. Academy of Management Annals. 2017;11(2):593–639. doi: 10.5465/annals.2015.0155.
34. 35. Kaptein M. Understanding unethical behavior by unraveling ethical culture. Human Relations. 2011;64(6):843–869. doi: 10.1177/0018726710390533.
35. 36. Aquino K, Reed A. The self-importance of moral identity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2002;83(6):1423–1440. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.83.6.1423.
36. 37. Solomon RC. Ethics and excellence: Cooperation and integrity in business. Oxford University Press; 1992.
37. 38. Burns JM. Leadership. Harper & Row; 1978.