Whitehead’s Idea of God: A Metaphysical Principle or the God of Religion?

Yıl 2025, Cilt: 9 Sayı: 4, 1634 - 1654, 31.12.2025

Münteha Beki

https://doi.org/10.32711/tiad.1782084

Öz

This article examines Alfred North Whitehead’s conception of God within the framework of process metaphysics, focusing on the question of whether his God should be regarded as a “metaphysical principle” or as “the God of religion.” Whitehead grounds his system on becoming and process rather than existence and portrays God as a dipolar entity: on the one hand, the primordial nature, the organizer of eternal forms and the principle of limitation ensuring cosmic order; on the other, the consequent nature, a changing, feeling, and actual entity interacting with the world. Such a dipolar conception of God departs from the immutable and absolute God of traditional theism. However, the limitations of God's creative power, the absence of efficient causality, and the controversial nature of the dimensions of transcendence and personality reinforce the interpretation that Whitehead's model represents a cosmic consciousness or functional principle rather than the God of religion. This study aims to evaluate the ontological status of God—whether it is a metaphysical principle or an entity compatible with religious expectations—from the perspective of process metaphysics. In this regard, God's position in process ontology, the dialectic of transcendence-immanence, the problem of personality, and religious significance are examined.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Philosophy of Religion , Whitehead , God , Actuality , Transcendence , Personality , Religion

Whitehead’in Tanrı Anlayışı: Metafizik İlke mi Dinin Tanrı’sı mı?

Öz

Bu çalışma, Alfred North Whitehead’in Tanrı anlayışını süreç metafiziği bağlamında ele almakta ve onun Tanrı’yı “metafizik ilke mi yoksa dinin Tanrı’sı mı?” olarak konumlandırdığı sorusunu tartışmaktadır. Whitehead, varlık kavramı yerine oluş ve süreç kavramı üzerine inşa ettiği sistemde Tanrı’yı dipolar bir varlık olarak tasvir eder: bir yandan ezelî formların düzenleyicisi, kozmik sürecin sınırlayıcı ilkesi ve düzen kaynağıdır; diğer yandan ise değişen, hisseden ve âlemle bağ kuran bir aktüel varlıktır. Dipolar karakterli bir Tanrı anlayışı, geleneksel teizmin mutlak ve değişmez Tanrı anlayışından ayrışır. Ancak, Tanrı’nın yaratıcı kudretinin sınırlılığı, fail neden olmaması, aşkınlık ve kişilik boyutunun tartışmalı oluşu, Whitehead’in modelinin dinin Tanrı’sı olmaktan çok kozmik bir bilinç veya işlevsel bir ilke olduğu yorumunu güçlendirmektedir. Bu çalışma, Tanrı’nın ontolojik statüsünün -metafiziksel ilke mi yoksa dini beklentilerle uyumlu bir varlık mı olduğunun- süreç metafiziği perspektifinden değerlendirilmesini amaçlamaktadır. Bu doğrultuda, Tanrı’nın süreç ontolojisindeki konumu, aşkınlık-içkinlik diyalektiği, kişilik problemi ve dini açıdan önemi irdelenmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Din Felsefesi , Tanrı , Aktüellik , Aşkınlık , Kişilik , Din , Whitehead

Kaynakça

• Aydın, Mehmet S. “Süreç (Proses) Felsefesi Işığında Tanrı-Âlem İlişkisi”. Âlemden Allah’a: Makaleler I. Mehmet S. Aydın. 35-108. İstanbul: Ufuk Yayınları, 2001.
• Bloesch, Donald. “Process Theology and Reformed Theology”. Process Theology. ed. Ronald H. Nash. 31-56. Grand Rapids: Baker Book House, 1987.
• Burrell, David B. “Does Process Theology Rest on a Mistake?”. Theological Studies 43/1 (1982), 125-135.
• Christian, William A. An Interpretation of Whitehead’s Metaphysics. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1959.
• Clarke, Bowman L. “Two Process Views of God”. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 38/1-3 (1995), 61-74.
• Conner, David E. “Whitehead the Naturalist”. American Journal of Theology & Philosophy 30/2 (2009), 168-186.
• Epperly, Bruce. Process Theology: A Guide for the Perplexed. New York: T&T Clark, 2011.
• Griffin, David G. “Whitehead’s Contribution to a Theology of Nature”. The Bucknell Review 20/3 (1972), 3-24.
• Griffin, David R. Reenchanment without Supernaturalism: A Process Philosophy of Religion. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2001.
• Hartshorne, Charles. “On Some Criticisms of Whitehead’s Philosophy”. The Philosophical Review 44/4 (1935), 323-344.
• Hartshorne, Charles. “Whitehead’s Idea of God”. The Philosophy of Alfred North Whitehead. ed. Paul A. Schilpp. 515-559. Chicago: Northwestern University Press, 1941.
• Hartshorne, Charles. “Is Whitehead’s God the God of Religion?”. Ethics 53/3 (1943), 219-227.
• Hartshorne, Charles. Omnipotence and Other Theological Mistakes. Albany: State University of New York, 1948.
• Hartshorne, Charles. “The Dipolar Conception of Deity”. The Review of Metaphysics 21/2 (1967), 273-289.
• Hartshorne, Charles – Reese, William L. Philosophers Speak of God. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1953.
• Hartshorne, Charles. “Whitehead in Historical Context”. Whitehead’s View of Reality. Charles Hartshorne – W. Creighton Peden. 7-30. New Castle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 2010.
• Holmes, Arthur F. “Why God Cannot Act”. Process Theology. ed. Ronald H. Nash. 177-195. Grand Rapids: Baker Book House, 1987.
• Lowe, Victor. Understanding Whitehead. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins Press, 1962.
• MacCormac, Earl R. “Whitehead's God: Categoreally Derived or Reformulated as a "Person", or Neither?”. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 3/2 (1972), 66-82.
• Mellert, Robert B. What is Process Theology?. New York: Paulist Press, 1975.
• Mesle, C. Robert. Process-Relational Philosophy: An Introduction to Alfred North Whitehead. West Conshohocken: Templeton Foundation Press, 2008.
• Nash, Ronald H. “Process Theology and Classical Theism”. Process Theology. ed. Ronald H. Nash. 3-29. Grand Rapids: Baker Book House, 1987.
• Neville, Robert C. Creativitiy and God: A Challenge to Process Theology. New York: The Seabury Press, 1980.
• Onur, Ferhat. “Süreç Metafiziği ve Teolojik İçerimleri”. Dört Öge 12/23 (2023), 117-133.
• Owen, H. P. Concepts of Deity. London: Plagrave Macmillan, 1971.
• Peden, W. Creighton. “Whitehead’s Philosophy: An Exposition”. Whitehead’s View of Reality. Charles Hartshorne – W. Creighton Peden. 31-89. New Castle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 2010.
• Pinnock, Clark H. “Between Classical and Process Theism”. Process Theology. ed. Ronald H. Nash. 309-327. Grand Rapids: Baker Book House, 1987.
• Sherburne, Donald W. “Whitehead without God”. The Christian Scholar 50/3 (1967), 251-272.
• Taylor, A. E. “Some Thoughts on Process and Reality”. Theology 21/122 (1930), 66-79.
• Whitehead, A. North. Religion in the Making. New York: Fordham University Press, 1926.
• Whitehead, A. North. Science and the Modern World. New York: The New American Library, 1948.
• Whitehead, Alfred North. Process and Reality: An Essay in Cosmology. ed. D. R. Griffin – D. W. Sherburne. New York: The Free Press, 1978.
• Wieman, Henry Nelson – Meland, Bernard Eugene. American Philosophies of Religion. Chicago: Willett, Clark & Company, 1936.