Toplumun İHA’lara Karşı Algısının Sistematik Literatür Analizi

Öz

Bu çalışmanın amacı, çeşitli alanlarda kullanılan İnsansız Hava Araçları (İHA) hakkındaki toplumsal algıya ilişkin sistematik bir literatür taraması yapmaktır. Araştırma, İHA'lara yönelik toplumsal tutumları ve bu tutumların altında yatan nedenleri anlamaya çalışmaktadır. Çalışma kapsamında, Scopus ve Google Akademik veri tabanlarında belirli anahtar kelimeler kullanılarak ayrıntılı bir arama yapılmıştır. Veritabanı sorguları için kullanılan arama dizeleri belirlenmiş ve yayın taraması için dışlama kriterleri oluşturulmuştur. Kayıtlar veritabanı aramaları yoluyla belirlenmiş ve PRISMA akış şeması izlenerek tekrarlar kaldırılmıştır. Yayınlar uygunluk açısından yeniden değerlendirilmiş ve senteze dahil edilen çalışmalar belirlenmiştir. Çalışma, İHA teknolojisinin toplumsal etkisini ve gelecekteki yörüngesini anlamak için önemli bulgular ortaya koymuştur. İHA'lara ilişkin toplumsal algı çeşitli faktörlerden etkilenmektedir ve bu algının sonuçları, bireylerin ve toplumların teknolojiyi nasıl benimsediğiyle doğrudan ilişkilidir. Bu bağlamda, paydaşların İHA kullanımına ilişkin kararlar alırken toplumsal algıları dikkate almaları gerektiği açıktır. İHA'lara ilişkin mahremiyet endişelerinin kamuoyunda tartışmalara yol açabileceği göz önüne alındığında, risklerin yönetilmesi ve toplumla iletişim stratejilerinin geliştirilmesi de faydalı olabilir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Gizlilik
• İnsansız hava araçları
• kamu algısı
• risk yönetimi
• sosyal kabul.

A Systematic Literature Analysis of the Public Perception of UAVs

Abstract

This study aims to conduct a systematic literature review of the public perception of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) used in various fields. The research seeks to understand public attitudes toward UAVs and the underlying reasons for these attitudes. The study did a detailed search using specific keywords in the Scopus and Google Scholar databases. The search strings used for database queries were determined, and exclusion criteria for article screening were established. Records were identified through database searches, and duplicates were removed following the PRISMA flow diagram. Articles were re-evaluated for eligibility, and the studies included in the synthesis were identified. The study yielded important findings for understanding the societal impact of UAV technology and its future trajectory. Various factors affect the public perception of UAVs, and the consequences of this perception are directly related to how individuals and societies adopt the technology. In this respect, it is evident that stakeholders should consider public perceptions when making decisions regarding UAV usage. Given that privacy concerns surrounding UAVs may lead to public debate, managing risks and developing communication strategies with the public may also be beneficial.

Keywords

• Privacy
• unmanned aerial vehicles
• public perception
• risk management
• societal acceptance

Kaynakça

1. Aydin, B. (2019). Public acceptance of drones: Knowledge, attitudes, and practice. Technology in Society, 59, 101180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2019.101180
2. Chung, S. H., Sah, B., & Lee, J. (2020). Optimization for drone and drone-truck combined operations: A review of the state of the art and future directions. Computers & Operations Research, 123, 105004. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cor.2020.105004
3. Cogent Business & Management | Taylor & Francis Online. (2024). https://www.tandfonline.com/journals/oabm20
4. Del-Real, C., & Díaz-Fernández, A. M. (2021). Lifeguards in the sky: Examining the public acceptance of beach-rescue drones. Technology in Society, 64, 101502. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101502
5. Drones | An Open Access Journal from MDPI. (2024). https://www.mdpi.com/journal/drones
6. Eißfeldt, H., Vogelpohl, V., Stolz, M., Papenfuß, A., Biella, M., Belz, J., & Kügler, D. (2020). The acceptance of civil drones in Germany. CEAS Aeronautical Journal, 11(3), 665–676. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13272-020-00447-w
7. Elmeseiry, N., Alshaer, N., & Ismail, T. (2021). A detailed survey and future directions of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) with potential applications. Aerospace, 8(12), 363. https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace8120363
8. Google Scholar. (2024). https://scholar.google.com.tr/

9. Göktaş, E. (2018). Bir eğitim politikası belirleme yöntemi: Meta analiz. Medeniyet Eğitim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 1(2), 35–54.
10. International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications: Vol 27, No 12 (Current issue). (2024). https://www.tandfonline.com/toc/cjol20/current
11. Kellermann, R., Biehle, T., & Fischer, L. (2020). Drones for parcel and passenger transportation: A literature review. Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives, 4, 100088. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trip.2019.100088
12. Komasová, S., Tesař, J., & Soukup, P. (2020). Perception of drone-related risks in Czech society. Technology in Society, 61, 101252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101252
13. Mohamed, N., Al-Jaroodi, J., Jawhar, I., Idries, A., & Mohammed, F. (2020). Unmanned aerial vehicles applications in future smart cities. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 153, 119293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.05.004
14. Mohsan, S. A. H., Khan, M. A., Noor, F., Ullah, I., & Alsharif, M. H. (2022). Towards the unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs): A comprehensive review. Drones, 6(6), 147. https://doi.org/10.3390/drones6060147
15. Mohsan, S. A. H., Othman, N. Q. H., Li, Y., Alsharif, M. H., & Khan, M. A. (2023). Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs): Practical aspects, applications, open challenges, security issues, and future trends. Intelligent Service Robotics, 16(1), 109–137. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11370-022-00452-4
16. Nakamura, H., & Kajikawa, Y. (2018). Regulation and innovation: How should small unmanned aerial vehicles be regulated? Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 128, 262–274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.06.015
17. Nelson, J. R., Grubesic, T. H., Wallace, D., & Chamberlain, A. W. (2019). The view from above: A survey of the public’s perception of unmanned aerial vehicles and privacy. Journal of Urban Technology, 26(1), 83–105. https://doi.org/10.1080/10630732.2018.1551106
18. Osakwe, C. N., Hudik, M., Říha, D., Stros, M., & Ramayah, T. (2022). Critical factors characterizing consumers’ intentions to use drones for last-mile delivery: Does delivery risk matter? Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 65, 102865. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2021.102865
19. Pençe, O. S. (2024). Türkiye’de uzaktan eğitim ve yeni eğitimsel eşitsizlikler: Meta-anlatı yöntemini kullanan sistematik bir literatür derlemesi. Trakya Eğitim Dergisi, 14(3), 1435–1458.
20. PRISMA. (2024). PRISMA flow diagram. https://www.prisma-statement.org/prisma-2020-flow-diagram
21. Rao, B., Gopi, A. G., & Maione, R. (2016). The societal impact of commercial drones. Technology in Society, 45, 83–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2016.02.009
22. Richards, D. (2018). The role of the media in the public perception of unmanned aerial vehicles. In 2018 Aviation Technology, Integration, and Operations Conference. Atlanta, Georgia. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2018-3514
23. Sabino, H., Almeida, R. V., de Moraes, L. B., da Silva, W. P., Guerra, R., Malcher, C., Passos, D., & Passos, F. G. (2022). A systematic literature review on the main factors for public acceptance of drones. Technology in Society, 71, 102097. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2022.102097
24. Sah, B., Gupta, R., & Bani-Hani, D. (2021). Analysis of barriers to implement drone logistics. International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications, 24(6), 531–550. https://doi.org/10.1080/13675567.2020.1782862
25. Scopus | Abstract and citation database | Elsevier. (2024). https://www.elsevier.com/products/scopus
26. Tan, L. K. L., Lim, B. C., Park, G., Low, K. H., & Yeo, V. C. S. (2021). Public acceptance of drone applications in a highly urbanized environment. Technology in Society, 64, 101462. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101462
27. Technology in Society. (2024). https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/technology-in-society
28. Toraman, Y., & Öz, T. (2023). The use of new technologies in logistics: Drone (UAV) use in last mile delivery. Sosyoekonomi, 31(58), 105–124. https://doi.org/10.17233/sosyoekonomi.2023.04.05
29. Wang, N., Mutzner, N., & Blanchet, K. (2023). Societal acceptance of urban drones: A scoping literature review. Technology in Society, 102377. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2023.102377
30. Yoo, W., Yu, E., & Jung, J. (2018). Drone delivery: Factors affecting the public’s attitude and intention to adopt. Telematics and Informatics, 35(6), 1687–1700. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2018.04.014