Comparison of New Multi-Mission Satellite Altimeter Wave Height Estimates with Era5 Wave Datasets in the Mediterranean Sea

Öz

In this study, the new multi-mission satellite altimeter wave height (Hm0) estimates were compared with the latest reanalysis significant wave height (Hm0) data from the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF), specifically the ERA5 wave datasets, in the Mediterranean Sea. For this purpose, the ERA5 Hm0 datasets with hourly temporal and 0.5°x0.5° spatial resolutions from the ECMWF and the new multi-mission satellite altimeter wave height estimates with monthly temporal and 1.0°x1.0° spatial resolutions from the European Space Agency for Sea State Climate Change Initiative (ESA CCI-SS) were downloaded for the entire Mediterranean Sea. Analyses were performed for 20 years (20022021) available in both databases. It was found that the ESA CCI-SS Hm0 estimates generally overestimated the wave height compared to the ERA5 datasets, and the discrepancy reached a maximum, especially at the sea-land boundaries. In general, the ESA CCI-SS Hm0 estimates were greater than ERA5 by 0.30 m in the Alboran Sea, 0.67 m in the Algerian Basin, 0.52 m in the Tyrrhenian Sea, 0.54 m in the Ionian Sea, 0.47 m in the Adriatic Sea, 0.47 m in the north of the Aegean Sea and 0.46 m in the Levantine Basin. On the other hand, the ESA CCI-SS underestimated Hm0 along the southern coast of the Mediterranean basin compared to the ERA5 datasets.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Significant wave height
• satellite altimeter data
• Mediterranean wave climate
• ERA5
• ESA CCI-SS

Yeni Çok Amaçlı Uydu Altimetre Dalga Yüksekliği Tahminleriyle ERA5 Dalga Verilerinin Akdeniz Çalışma Alanında Karşılaştırılması

Öz

Bu çalışmada, yeni çok amaçlı uydu altimetre dalga yüksekliği (Hm0) tahminleri, Avrupa Orta Menzilli Hava Tahminleri Merkezi’nin (ECMWF) en yeni yeniden analiz dalga verileri olan ERA5 belirgin dalga yüksekliği (Hm0) verileriyle, Akdeniz çalışma alanında, karşılaştırılmıştır. Bu amaçla, ECMWF veri tabanından 1 saat zamansal ve 0,5°x0,5° uzamsal çözünürlüklü ERA5 Hm0 verileri ve Avrupa Uzay Ajansı İklim Değişikliği Girişimi Deniz Durumu (ESA CCI-SS) veri tabanından aylık zamansal ve 1,0°x1,0° uzamsal çözünürlüklü yeni çok amaçlı uydu altimetre Hm0 tahminleri Akdeniz çalışma alanı için indirilmiştir. Analizler, her iki veri tabanında da mevcut olan 20022021 yılları kapsayan 20 yıl için gerçekleştirilmiştir. Yeni çok amaçlı uydu altimetre Hm0 tahminlerinin, ERA5 yeniden analiz Hm0 verilerine göre daha büyük tahmin ettiği ve bu farkların özellikle kara-deniz birleşim yerlerinde maksimuma ulaştığı saptanmıştır. Genel olarak, ESA CCI-SS Hm0 tahminleri, ERA5 verilerine göre dalga yüksekliğini; Alboran Denizi’nde 0,30 m, Cezayir Havzası’nda 0,67 m, Tiren Denizi’nde 0,52 m, İyonya Denizi’nde 0,54 m, Adriyatik Denizi’nde 0,47 m, Ege Denizi’nin kuzeyinde 0,47 m ve Levantin Havzası’nda 0,46 m daha büyük tahmin etmiştir. Diğer taraftan Akdeniz havzasının güney kıyı bölgelerinde ESA CCI-SS tahminlerinin, ERA5 verilerine kıyasla daha küçük Hm0 önerdiği belirlenmiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Belirgin dalga yüksekliği
• uydu altimetre dalga yüksekliği tahminleri
• Akdeniz dalga iklimi
• ERA5
• ESA CCI-SS

Kaynakça

1. Cavaleri, L. ve Sclavo M. The calibration of wind and wave model data in the Mediterranean Sea. Coastal Engineering, 53(7), 613627, 2006.
2. Shaltout, M. ve Omstedet, A. Recent sea surface temperature trends and future scenarios for the Mediterranean Sea. Oceanologia, 53(3), 411443, 2014.
3. Gökgöz, T., Erdoğan, M., Seyrek, K., Ozulu, İ.M. Batı Akdeniz Havzası Sınırlarının Yüksek Doğrulukla Belirlenmesi. Teknik Dergi, 9073-9105, Yazı 535, 2019.
4. IPCC. Climate Change 2022: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change; Pörtner, H.-O., Roberts, D.C., Tignor, M., Poloczanska, E.S., Mintenbeck, K., Alegr, A., Eds.; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK; New York, NY, USA, 2022. https://www.ipcc.ch/report/sixth-assessment-report-working-group-ii/
5. Yuksel, Y., Yuksel, Z.T., Islek, F., Sahin C., Ari Guner, H.A. Spatiotemporal long-term trends of wind and wave climate and extreme characteristics over the Sea of Marmara. Ocean Engineering, 228, 108946, 2021.
6. Islek, F., Yuksel, Y., Sahin, C., Ari Guner, H.A. Long-term analysis of extreme wave characteristics based on the SWAN hindcasts over the Black Sea using two different wind fields. Dynam. Atmos. Oceans, 94, 101165, 2021.
7. Islek, F., Yuksel Y., Ozdemir, A. Performance evaluation of spectral wave model forced by ERA-Interim, ERA5, and CFSR wind fields in the Black Sea. Seatific, 2, 5272, 2022.
8. Tüzün, C., Eröz, M., Cimilli, T., Erdik, M. Evaluation of Wind Power Plants from the Aspect of Earthquake Design. Turkish Journal of Civil Engineering, 36(3), 109–125, 807, Technical Note, 2025.

9. Swain, J. Simulation of Wave Climate for the Arabian Sea and Bay of Bengal, PhD Thesis. Naval Physical and Oceanographic Laboratory, Kochi, 1997.
10. Nacar, S., Kankal, M., Okkan, U. Doğu Karadeniz Havzası Lokal Meteorolojik Değişkenleri İçin Bir Ölçek İndirgeme Uygulaması ve Senaryo Esaslı Öngörüler. Teknik Dergi, Yazı 709, 12877–12911, 2022.
11. WAMDI Group. The WAM model – a third generation ocean wave prediction model. Journal of Physical Oceanography, 18(12), 1775–1810, 1988.
12. Booij, N., Ris, R.C., Holthuijsen, L.H. A third-generation wave model for coastal regions: 1. Model description and validation. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 104 (C4), 7649–7666, 1999.
13. DHI (2007). MIKE 21-Spectral Wave Module- Scientific Document, 42, 2007.
14. Mahmoodi, K., Ghassemi, H., Razminia, A. Temporal and spatial characteristics of wave energy in the Persian Gulf based on the ERA5 reanalysis dataset. Energy, 187, 115991, 2019.
15. Muhammed Naseef T., Sanil Kumar, V. Climatology and trends of the Indian Ocean surface waves based on 39-year long ERA5 reanalysis data. Int J Climatol., 40, 979–1006, 2020.
16. Shi, H., Cao, X., Li, Q., Li, D., Sun, J., You, Z., Sun, Q. Evaluating the Accuracy of ERA5 Wave Reanalysis in the Water Around China. J. Ocean Univ. China 20(1), 1–9, 2021.
17. Takbash, A., ve Young, I.R. Long-Term and Seasonal Trends in Global Wave Height Extremes Derived from ERA-5 Reanalysis Data. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 8(12), 1015, 2020.
18. Aboobacker, V.M., Shanas, P.R., Al-Ansari, E.M.A.S., Kumar, V.S., Vethamony, P. The maxima in northerly wind speeds and wave heights over the Arabian Sea, the Arabian/Persian Gulf and the Red Sea derived from 40 years of ERA5 data. Clim Dyn 56, 1037–1052, 2021.
19. Barbariol F, Davison S, Falcieri FM, Ferretti R, Ricchi A, Sclavo M and Benetazzo A. Wind Waves in the Mediterranean Sea: An ERA5 Reanalysis Wind-Based Climatology. Front. Mar. Sci. 8, 760614, 2021.
20. Wang, J., ve Wang Y. Evaluation of the ERA5 Significant Wave Height against NDBC Buoy Data from 1979 to 2019, Marine Geodesy, 45(2), 151165, 2022.
21. Karathanasi, F.E., Soukissian, T.H., Hayes, D.R. Wave Analysis for Offshore Aquaculture Projects: A Case Study for the Eastern Mediterranean Sea. Climate, 10, 2, 2022.
22. Kozyrakis, G.V., Spanoudaki, K., Varouchakis, E.A. Long-term wave energy potential estimation in the Aegean and Ionian seas using dynamic downscaling and wave modelling techniques. Renewable Energy, 131, 103446, 2023.
23. Acar, E., Akpınar, A., Kankal, M., Amarouche, K. Wave Power Trends over the Mediterranean Sea Based on Innovative Methods and 60-Year ERA5 Reanalysis. Sustainability, 15, 8590, 2023.
24. Kardakaris, K., Boufidi, I., Soukissian, T. Offshore Wind and Wave Energy Complementarity in the Greek Seas Based on ERA5 Data. Atmosphere, 12, 1360, 2021.
25. Ozbahceci, B.O. Extreme value statistics of wind speed and wave height of the Marmara Sea based on combined radar altimeter data. Advance in Space Research, 66(10), 2302–2318.
26. Akpınar, A., Kutupoğlu, V., Bingölbali, B., ve Çalışır, E. Spatial characteristics of wind and wave parameters over the Sea of Marmara. Ocean Engineering, 222, 108640, 2021.
27. Çalışır, E., Soran, M.B., ve Akpınar, A. Quality of the ERA5 and CFSR winds and their contribution to wave modelling performance in a semi-closed sea. Journal of Operational Oceanography, 16(2), 106130, 2021.
28. Amarouche, K., Bingölbali, B., ve Akpinar, A. New wind-wave climate records in the Western Mediterranean Sea. Climate Dynamics, 58, 1899–1922, 2022.
29. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mediterranean_Sea (Erişim2 Haziran 2023).
30. Lionello, P., Malanotte-Rizzoli, P., Boscolo, R., Alpert, P., Artale, V., Li, L., Luterbacher, J., May, Trigo, R., Tsimplis, M., Ulbrich, U., Xoplaki, E. The Mediterranean climate: an overview of the main characteristics and issues. Developments in Earth and Environmental Sciences. 4, 126, 2006.
31. Rusu, L., Bernardino, M., Guedes Soares, C. Influence of wind resolution on the prediction of waves generated in an Estuary. J. Coast Res. 56, 1419–1423, 2009.
32. Islek, F. ve Yuksel, Y. Evaluation of future wind power potential and their projected changes in the Black Sea and possible stable locations for wind farms. Ocean Engineering, 266, 112832, 2022.
33. Hersbach, H., Bell, B., Berrisford, P., Hirahara, vd., The ERA5 global reanalysis. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 146, 1999–2049, 2020.
34. https://confluence.ecmwf.int/display/CKB/ERA5%3A+data+documentation (ECMWF, ERA5; Erişim2 Haziran 2023)
35. Piolle, J.-F., Dodet, G., Quilfen, Y. ESA Sea State Climate Change Initiative (Sea_State_cci): Global remote sensing merged multi-mission monthly gridded significant wave height from altimetry, L4 product, version 3. NERC EDS Centre for Environmental Data Analysis, 11 October 2022.
36. Islek, F., Yuksel, Y., Sahin, C. Spatiotemporal long-term trends of extreme wind characteristics over the Black Sea. Dynamics of Atmospheres and Oceans, 90, 101132, 2020.
37. Islek, F. ve Yuksel, Y. Inter-comparison of long-term wave power potential in the Black Sea based on the SWAN wave model forced with two different wind fields. Dynam. Atmos. Oceans, 93, 101192, 2021.
38. Santer, B.D., Wigkey, T.M.L., Boyle, J.S., Gaffen, J.S., Hnilo, J.J., Nychka, D., Parker, D.E., Taylor, K.E. Statistical significance of trends and trend differences in layer-average atmospheric temperature time series, Journal of Geophysical Research, 105, D6. 7337−7356, 2000.
39. Enomoto, T. Bicubic interpolation with spectral derivatives. SOLA, 4, 5–8, 2008.
40. Park, S. K., ve Schowengerdt, R.A. Image reconstruction by parametric cubic convolution. Computer Vision, Graphics, and Image Processing, 23(3), 258–272, 1983.
41. Keys, R. G. Cubic convolution interpolation for digital image processing. IEEE Transactions on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, 29(6), 1153–1160, 1981.
42. Chiggiato, J., Jarosz, E., Book, J. W., Dykes, J., Torrisi, L., Poulain, P.-M., Gerin, R., Horstmann, J., ve Beşiktepe, Ş. Dynamics of the circulation in the Sea of Marmara: Numerical modeling experiments and observations from the Turkish Straits System experiment. Ocean Dynamics, 62(1), 139–159, 2011.
43. Pettitt, A.N. A Non-Parametric Approach to the Change-Point Problem. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series C (Applied Statistics), 282, 126135, 1979.
44. Sotillo, M.G., Ratsimandresy, A.W., Carretero, J.C., Bentamy, A., Valero, F., Gonzalez-Rouco, F. A high-resolution 44-year atmospheric hindcast for the Mediterranean Basin: contribution to the regional improvement of global reanalysis. Climate Dynamics, 25, 219–236, 2005.
45. Soukissian, T., Sotiriou, M.A. Long-Term Variability of Wind Speed and Direction in the Mediterranean Basin. Wind, 2(3), 513–534, 2022.
46. Rusu, L., ve Rusu, E. Evaluation of the Worldwide Wave Energy Distribution Based on ERA5 Data and Altimeter Measurements. Energies, 14(2), 394, 2021.
47. Afolabi, L.A., Russo, S., Lo Re, C., Ludeno, G., Nardone, G., Vicinanza, D., Contestabile, P. Underestimation of Wave Energy from ERA5 Datasets: Back Analysis and Calibration in the Central Tyrrhenian Sea. Energies, 18(1), 3, 2025.
48. Young, I.R., ve Ribal, A. Can Multi-Mission Altimeter Datasets Accurately Measure Long-Term Trends in Wave Height? Remote Sensing, 14(4), 974, 2022.
49. ECMWF (European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts) IFS documentation -Cy43r1, Part VII: ECMWF Wave Model (WAM), 2016. https://www.ecmwf.int/sites/default/files/elibrary/2016/79992-ifs-documentation-cy43r1-part-vii-ecmwf-wave-model_1.pdf
50. Dentale, F., Furcolo, P., Pugliese Carratelli, E., Reale, F., Contestabile, P., Tomasicchio, G.R. Extreme Wave Analysis by Integrating Model and Wave Buoy Data. Water, 10(4), 373, 2018.
51. Fanti, V., Ferreira, O., Kümmerer, V., ve Loureiro, C. Improved estimates of extreme wave conditions in coastal areas from calibrated global reanalyses. Communications Earth Environment, 4, 151, 2023.