Effect of Void Geometry on the Structural Behavior of Biaxial Voided Slabs: A Nonlinear Finite Element Analysis

Öz

This study examines the influence of void geometry on the structural performance of biaxial voided reinforced concrete slabs using nonlinear finite element (FE) analysis in ANSYS Workbench 2022 R1. Seven void configurations—spherical, cubic, elliptical, ellipsoidal, capsule, biaxial capsule, and donut—were evaluated under identical material properties, loading, boundary conditions, and equivalent total concrete volume. This approach ensures that performance differences arise from geometric material distribution rather than increased material quantity. This controlled framework enables the isolated assessment of geometric effects on slab stiffness, load capacity, and deflection behavior. In addition, a solid slab with equivalent concrete volume, achieved by reducing its thickness, was analyzed as a reference case to evaluate the structural benefits of void incorporation. All voided slabs were subjected to incremental loading up to a maximum load of 1500 kN and maintained adequate structural performance throughout the loading process. Among the investigated configurations, the ellipsoidal and elliptical void geometries exhibited the most favorable response, characterized by the smallest midspan deflections of 19.79 mm and 20.38 mm, respectively. These results confirm that void geometry plays a significant role in governing slab stiffness and structural efficiency. In contrast, the solid slab with equivalent concrete volume failed at a load of 895 kN and exhibited the largest midspan deflection of 52.93 mm, indicating lower stiffness and reduced load-carrying capacity compared to the voided configurations. Overall, elongated void shapes—particularly ellipsoidal, elliptical, capsule, and biaxial capsule—provide an effective balance between stiffness and strength, offering practical guidance for the design of lightweight, material-efficient biaxial voided slab systems.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Biaxial voided slab
• reinforced concrete slab
• void geometry
• finite element analysis
• uniformly distributed load.

Kaynakça

1. Ching, F. D., Onouye, B. S., Zuberbuhler, D. Building structures illustrated: patterns, systems, and design. John Wiley & Sons, 2014.
2. Kamara, M., Mahamid, M., Novak, L. C., Historical perspective on the evolution of two-way slab design. Special Publication, 287, 1-10, 2012.
3. Van Acker, A., Maas, S., Historical development of Hollow Core slabs. Concrete Plant International, 2, 112-123, 2021.
4. Lai, T., Structural behavior of BubbleDeck® slabs and their application to lightweight bridge decks (Doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology), 2010.
5. Churakov, A., Biaxial hollow slab with innovative types of voids. Stroitel'stvo Unikal'nyh Zdanij i Sooruzenij, (6), 70, 2014.
6. Midkiff, C. J., Plastic voided slab systems: applications and design, M.Sc. Thesis, Kansas State University USA, 2013.
7. Suman, S., Mukherjee, S., Roy, D. K. S., A comparative review on bubble-voided reinforced concrete slab–An innovative concept for lightweight concreting. Materials Today: Proceedings, 2023.
8. Cobiax USA Inc., Environmental product declaration: In-situ concrete slab with void formers (CLS-range). Cobiax USA Inc., 2023, https://www.arcat.com/certificates /cobiax_usa/Cobiax_USA_EPD_07122023_Cradle_to_Gate.pdf

9. BubbleDeck. (n.d.). Environmental. Retrieved October 28, 2025, https://www.bubbledeck.com/environmental
10. Daniel Beutelhauser, Michal Venglar, Norbert Jendzelovsky., Comparison of various methods for determining dynamic behavior of voided floor slabs. Buildings, 15(16), Article 2950, 2025.
11. Sagadevan, R., Rao, B. N., Flexural behavior of reinforced concrete biaxial voided square slabs. ACI Structural Journal, 117(5), 3-14, 2020.
12. Khouzani, M. A., Study on shear behavior and capacity of biaxial ellipsoidal voided slabs. Structures, 30, 100728, 2021.
13. Sagadevan, R., Rao, B. N., Effect of void former shapes on one-way flexural behaviour of biaxial hollow slabs. International Journal of Advanced Structural Engineering, 11(3), 297-307, 2019.
14. Pawar, A. J., Patil, S. R., Kumbhar, S. S., Investigating the flexural behaviour of biaxial voided slab systems. Materials Today: Proceedings, 44, 2227–2233, 2024.
15. Aziz, Z. A., Heng, C. L., Bubble deck slab system: a review on the design and performance. Int. J. Innov. Educ. Res, 9(9), 575-588, 2011.
16. Ibrahim, A. M., Ismael, M. A., Hussein, H. A. S. A., The effect of balls shapes and spacing on structural behaviour of reinforced concrete bubbled slabs. Journal of Engineering and Sustainable Development, 23(2), 56-65, 2019.
17. Shetkar, A., Hanche, N., An experimental study on bubble deck slab system with elliptical balls. Indian J. Sci. Res, 12(1), 21-27, 2015.
18. Hai, L. V., Hung, V. D., Thi, T. M., Nguyen-Thoi, T., Phuoc, N. T., The experimental analysis of bubbledeck slab using modified elliptical balls. In Proceedings of the Thirteenth East Asia-Pacific Conference on Structural Engineering and Construction (EASEC-13) (pp. G-6). The Thirteenth East Asia-Pacific Conference on Structural Engineering and Construction (EASEC-13), 2013.
19. Jamal, J., Jolly, J., A study on structural behaviour of bubble deck slab using spherical and elliptical balls. Int. Res. J. Eng. Technol, 4(5), 2090-2095, 2017.
20. ANSYS Workbench, 2022R1, User’s Guide, ANSYS, Inc., 2022.
21. Mahdi, A. S., Mohammed, S. D., Structural behavior of BubbleDeck slab under uniformly distributed load. Civil Engineering Journal, 7(2), 304-319, 2021.
22. Hognestad, E.: Study of combined bending and axial load in reinforced concrete members. University of Illinois. Engineering Experiment Station. Bulletin; no. 399, 1951.
23. EN 1992-1-1, Eurocode 2: Design of concrete structures—Part 1-1: General rules and rules for buildings, London: BSI, 37, 2004.
24. William, K. J., Warnke, E. P.: Constitutive model for the triaxial behavior of concrete. Proceedings of the International Association for Bridge and Structural Engineering, 19, 174, 1975.
25. Singha, B., Chowdhury, N. N., Sakib, M. A. R., Efficient Design of Reinforced Columns: Insights into Lateral Confinement and Performance. International Journal of Applied Sciences and Smart Technologies, 7(1), 67-82, 2025.
26. Çankaya, M. A., Akan, Ç. An experimental and numerical investigation on the bending behavior of fiber reinforced concrete beams. Turkish Journal of Civil Engineering, 34(1), 59-78, 2023.
27. EN 1993-1-1, Eurocode 3: Design of steel structures — Part 1-1: General rules and rules for buildings, European Committee for Standardization, 2005.
28. BubbleDeck International. Technical documentation and project case studies. https://www.bubbledeck.com
29. Oukaili, N., Merie, H. On the advantages in sustainability of structural concrete bubbled deck slabs’, presented at the IABSE symposium, Guimarães 2019: towards a resilient built environment risk and asset management, Guimarães, Portugal, 2019.
30. Medeiros, R. L. Proposal for Replacing Plastic Spheres in the BubbleDeck Slab System -Scenario Study. Brazilian Journal of Development, 7(3), 23832-23910, 2021.
31. Kurnia, R. M., Andreas, A., Tinumbia, N. Comparison of cost and time of floor slab works on conventional and bubble deck slab methods: Case Study of Central Control Building, Muara Tawar Power Plant Project, Bekasi, West Java. Jurnal Infrastruktur, 8(2), 117-125, 2022.