STRATEGIC ORIENTATIONS IN CONTINUUM: RESILIENCE AND AGILITY PATHWAYS TO COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE

Yıl 2026, Cilt: 9 Sayı: 19, 1 - 19, 31.01.2026

Imran Wajid , Nurgül Keleş Tayşir

https://doi.org/10.55830/tje.1675706

Öz

Developing economies, marked by resource constraints, institutional voids, escalated international rivalry, political instability, market and industry volatility, encounter distinct competitive dilemmas, intensifying operational challenges for organisations seeking competitive advantage, yet limited research addresses how strategic orientations function in such contexts. This theoretical study, derived from dynamic capabilities, ambidexterity and contingency theories, examines how exploration and exploitation distinctly influence competitive advantage, investigating mediating and moderating relationships and institutional mechanisms thereof, within the developing economy context. The theoretical framework demonstrates that exploration driven resilience fosters competitive advantage through adaptive strategic competencies, knowledge diversification, situational responsiveness and strategic alignment, whereas exploitation driven strategic agility facilitates positional leverage through procedural and operational optimisation, and structured resource realignment, while competitive intensity and market turbulence act as critical boundary conditions amplifying the theorised relationships. This framework, through distinct capability fostering pathways configured for regulatory and contextual intricacy, advances ambidexterity theory as balancing exploration and exploitation in continuum rather than the simultaneous pursuit thereof, yielding actionable insights, and guiding capability development parameters amidst structural and capability limitations.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Strategic Orientations , Competitive Advantage , Organisational Resilience , Strategic Agility , Market Turbulence

STRATEJİK YÖNELİMLERİN SÜREKLİLİĞİ: REKABET ÜSTÜNLÜĞÜNE GİDEN YOLDA DAYANIKLILIK VE ÇEVİKLİK

Öz

Kaynak kısıtlamaları, kurumsal boşluklar, artan uluslararası rekabet, politik istikrarsızlık, pazar ve endüstri dalgalanmaları ile karakterize edilen gelişmekte olan ekonomiler, rekabet avantajı arayan organizasyonlar için operasyonel zorlukları yoğunlaştıran farklı rekabet ikilemleri ile karşılaşmaktadır, ancak stratejik yönelimlerin bu tür bağlamlarda nasıl işlev gördüğüne ilişkin sınırlı araştırma bulunmaktadır. Dinamik yetenekler, çift yönlülük ve durumsallık teorilerinden türetilen bu teorik çalışma, keşif ve sömürünün rekabet avantajını nasıl farklı şekillerde etkilediğini incelemekte, gelişmekte olan ekonomi bağlamında aracı ve düzenleyici ilişkileri ve kurumsal mekanizmaları araştırmaktadır. Teorik çerçeve, keşif odaklı dayanıklılığın adaptif stratejik yetkinlikler, bilgi çeşitlendirmesi, durumsal duyarlılık ve stratejik uyum yoluyla rekabet avantajı sağladığını, buna karşın sömürü odaklı stratejik çevikliğin prosedürel ve operasyonel optimizasyon ve yapılandırılmış kaynak yeniden düzenlemesi aracılığıyla konumsal avantaj oluşturduğunu, rekabet yoğunluğu ve pazar çalkantısının ise teorileştirilen ilişkileri güçlendiren kritik sınır koşulları olarak işlev gördüğünü göstermektedir. Bu çerçeve, düzenleyici ve bağlamsal karmaşıklık için yapılandırılmış farklı yetenek geliştirme yolları aracılığıyla, çift yönlülük teorisini keşif ve sömürünün eşzamanlı takibi yerine bir süreklilik içinde dengelenmesi olarak ilerletmekte, uygulanabilir içgörüler sağlamakta ve yapısal ve yetenek sınırlamaları içinde yetenek geliştirme parametrelerine rehberlik etmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Stratejik Oryantasyonlar , Rekabet Avantajı , Örgütsel Dayanıklılık , Stratejik Çeviklik , Pazar Türbülansı

Kaynakça

• Abdalla, S., Amankwah-Amoah, J., Khan, Z., & Hirekhan, M. (2025). Strategic agility in the B2B sharing economy ecosystem of emerging economies: Empirical insights from the Middle East. Industrial Marketing Management, 125, 431-445.
• Abeysekara, N., Wang, H., & Kuruppuarachchi, D. (2019). Effect of supply-chain resilience on firm performance and competitive advantage: A study of the Sri Lankan apparel industry. Business Process Management Journal, 25(7), 1673-1695.
• Abiad, A. G., Bluedorn, J. C., Guajardo, J., & Topalova, P. B. (2012). The rising resilience of emerging market and developing economies (IMF Working Paper No. 12/300). International Monetary Fund.
• Adomako, S., Amankwah-Amoah, J., Donbesuur, F., Ahsan, M., Danso, A., & Uddin, M. (2022). Strategic agility of SMEs in emerging economies: Antecedents, consequences and boundary conditions. International Business Review, 31(6), 102032.
• Ahammad, M. F., Basu, S., Munjal, S., Clegg, J., & Shoham, O. B. (2021). Strategic agility, environmental uncertainties and international performance: The perspective of Indian firms. Journal of World Business, 56(4), 101218.
• Amankwah-Amoah, J., Khan, Z., Wood, G., & Knight, G. (2021). COVID-19 and digitalization: The great acceleration. Journal of business research, 136, 602-611.
• Annarelli, A., Battistella, C., & Nonino, F. (2020). Competitive advantage implication of different Product Service System business models: Consequences of ‘not-replicable’capabilities. Journal of Cleaner Production, 247, 119121.
• Anwar, M., & Ali Shah, S. Z. (2020). Managerial networking and business model innovation: Empirical study of new ventures in an emerging economy. Journal of Small Business & Entrepreneurship, 32(3), 265-286.
• Anwar, M., Khan, S. Z., & Khan, N. U. (2018). Intellectual capital, entrepreneurial strategy and new ventures performance: Mediating role of competitive advantage. Business & Economic Review, 10(01), 63-94.
• Asian Development Bank. (2021). Pakistan: Country partnership strategy (2021-2025). Asian Development Bank.
• Auh, S., & Menguc, B. (2005). Balancing exploration and exploitation: The moderating role of competitive intensity. Journal of Business Research, 58(12), 1652-1661.
• Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99-120.
• Bashir, M., & Verma, R. (2019). Internal factors & consequences of business model innovation. Management Decision, 57(1), 262-290.
• Benner, M. J., & Tushman, M. L. (2003). Exploitation, exploration, and process management: The productivity dilemma revisited. Academy of Management Review, 28(2), 238-256.
• Clauss, T., Abebe, M., Tangpong, C., & Hock, M. (2019). Strategic agility, business model innovation, and firm performance: An empirical investigation. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 68(3), 767-784.
• Clauss, T., Kraus, S., Kallinger, F. L., Bican, P. M., Brem, A., & Kailer, N. (2021). Organizational ambidexterity and competitive advantage: The role of strategic agility in the exploration-exploitation paradox. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 6(4), 203-213.
• D'Aveni, R. A., Dagnino, G. B., & Smith, K. G. (2010). The age of temporary advantage. Strategic Management Journal, 31(13), 1371-1385.
• Delechat, C. C., Melina, G., Newiak, M., Papageorgiou, C., & Spatafora, N. (2024). Economic diversification in developing countries: Lessons from country experiences with broad-based and industrial policies. International Monetary Fund.
• Dess, G. G., & Beard, D. W. (1984). Dimensions of organizational task environments. Administrative science quarterly, 52-73.
• Doz, Y. L., & Kosonen, M. (2010). Embedding strategic agility: A leadership agenda for accelerating business model renewal. Long Range Planning, 43(2-3), 370-382.
• Duchek, S. (2020). Organizational resilience: A capability-based conceptualization. Business Research, 13(1), 215-246.
• Duncan, R. B. (1972). Characteristics of organizational environments and perceived environmental uncertainty. Administrative science quarterly, 313-327.
• Eisenhardt, K. M., & Martin, J. A. (2000). Dynamic capabilities: What are they? Strategic Management Journal, 21(10-11), 1105-1121.
• EY. (2025). 2025 global economic outlook: Momentum and uncertainty. Ernst & Young.
• Feldman, M. S., & Pentland, B. T. (2003). Reconceptualizing organizational routines as a source of flexibility and change. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48(1), 94-118.
• Ferraris, A., Degbey, W. Y., Singh, S. K., Bresciani, S., Castellano, S., Fiano, F., & Couturier, J. (2022). Microfoundations of strategic agility in emerging markets: Empirical evidence of Italian MNEs in India. Journal of World Business, 57(2), 101272.
• Fourné, S. P., Jansen, J. J., & Mom, T. J. (2014). Strategic agility in MNEs: Managing tensions to capture opportunities across emerging and established markets. California Management Review, 56(3), 13-38.
• Fratto, C., Vannier, B. J., Mircheva, B., de Padua, D., & Poirson, H. (2021). Unconventional monetary policies in emerging markets and frontier countries. IMF Working Paper, 21/14.
• Grant, R. M. (1996). Toward a knowledge‐based theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17(S2), 109-122.
• Guillén Mondragón, Irene Juana, Araceli Rendón Trejo, and Andrés Morales Alquicira. "Is organizational resilience a competitive advantage?." Mercados y negocios 23, no. 46 (2022): 57-82.
• Hamel, G., & Välikangas, L. (2003). The quest for resilience. Harvard Business Review, 81(9), 52-63.
• He, Z., Huang, H., Choi, H., & Bilgihan, A. (2023). Building organizational resilience with digital transformation. Journal of Service Management, 34(1), 147-171.
• Hillmann, J., & Guenther, E. (2021). Organizational resilience: a valuable construct for management research?. International journal of management reviews, 23(1), 7-44.
• Holland, J. H. (1995). Hidden order: How adaptation builds complexity. Addison-Wesley.
• Indriyani, E. P., Suhariadi, F., Lestari, Y. D., Aldhi, I. F., Rahmawati, E., & Hardaningtyas, D. (2025). Sustaining infrastructure firm performance through strategic orientation: Competitive advantage in dynamic environments. Sustainability, 17(3), 1194.
• Jansen, J. J., Van Den Bosch, F. A., & Volberda, H. W. (2006). Exploratory innovation, exploitative innovation, and performance: Effects of organizational antecedents and environmental moderators. Management Science, 52(11), 1661-1674.
• Jaworski, B. J., & Kohli, A. K. (1993). Market orientation: Antecedents and consequences. Journal of Marketing, 57(3), 53-70.
• Jurado-Salgado, J. I., Naranjo-Valencia, J. C., & Osorio-Londoño, A. A. (2024). Incidence of exploration and exploitation capabilities in innovation: The role of cultural factors. Innovation, 26(1), 58-84.
• Kale, E., Aknar, A., & Başar, Ö. (2019). Absorptive capacity and firm performance: The mediating role of strategic agility. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 78, 276-283.
• Kantur, D., & İşeri-Say, A. (2012). Organizational resilience: A conceptual integrative framework. Journal of Management & Organization, 18(6), 762-773.
• Kauffman, S. A. (1993). The origins of order: Self-organization and selection in evolution. New York, NY: Oxford Academic. Online edition published October 31, 2023.
• Khan, Z., & Lew, Y. K. (2018). Post-entry survival of developing economy international new ventures: A dynamic capability perspective. International Business Review, 27(1), 149-160.
• Khan, Z., Amankwah-Amoah, J., Lew, Y. K., Puthusserry, P., & Czinkota, M. (2022). Strategic ambidexterity and its performance implications for emerging economies multinationals. International Business Review, 31(3), 101762.
• Khanna, T., & Palepu, K. (1997). Why focused strategies may be wrong for emerging markets. Harvard Business Review, 75(4), 41-51.
• Khanna, T., & Palepu, K. G. (2010). Winning in emerging markets: A road map for strategy and execution. Harvard Business Press.
• Kim, W. C., & Mauborgne, R. (2005). Blue ocean strategy. Harvard Business School Press.
• Kogut, B., & Zander, U. (1992). Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology. Organization science, 3(3), 383-397.
• Lavie, D., Stettner, U., & Tushman, M. L. (2010). Exploration and exploitation within and across organizations. The Academy of Management Annals, 4(1), 109-155.
• Lawrence, P. R., & Lorsch, J. W. (1967). Organization and environment: Managing differentiation and integration. Division of Research, Graduate School of Business Administration, Harvard University.
• Lengnick-Hall, C. A., Beck, T. E., & Lengnick-Hall, M. L. (2011). Developing a capacity for organizational resilience through strategic human resource management. Human Resource Management Review, 21(3), 243-255.
• Lewis, M. W., Andriopoulos, C., & Smith, W. K. (2014). Paradoxical leadership to enable strategic agility. California Management Review, 56(3), 58-77.
• Linnenluecke, M. K. (2017). Resilience in business and management research: A review of influential publications and a research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews, 19(1), 4-30.
• Mair, J., & Marti, I. (2009). Entrepreneurship in and around institutional voids: A case study from Bangladesh. Journal of business venturing, 24(5), 419-435.
• Malik, O. R., & Kotabe, M. (2011). Dynamic capabilities, government policies, and performance in firms from emerging economies: Evidence from India and Pakistan. In The Future of Global Business (pp. 195-238). Routledge.
• March, J. G. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2(1), 71-87.
• Martínez-Román, J. A., Gamero, J., Tamayo, J. A., & Delgado-González, M. D. L. (2025). Empirical analysis of the technological exploration–exploitation balance and its impact on organizational performance under uncertainty. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 12(1), 1-12.
• Meyer, A. D., Tsui, A. S., & Hinings, C. R. (1993). Configurational approaches to organizational analysis. Academy of Management Journal, 36(6), 1175-1195.
• Musa, S., & Enggarsyah, D. T. (2025). Absorptive capacity, organizational creativity, organizational agility, organizational resilience and competitive advantage in disruptive environments. Journal of Strategy and Management, 18(2), 303-325.
• Nelson, R. R., & Winter, S. G. (1982). An evolutionary theory of economic change. Harvard University Press.
• Nonaka, I. (1994). A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organization science, 5(1), 14-37.
• Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1996). The knowledge-creating company: How Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation. Long range planning, 29(4), 592.
• O'Cass, A., Heirati, N., & Ngo, L. V. (2014). Achieving new product success via the synchronization of exploration and exploitation across multiple levels and functional areas. Industrial Marketing Management, 43(5), 862-872.
• O'reilly Iii, C. A., & Tushman, M. L. (2008). Ambidexterity as a dynamic capability: Resolving the innovator's dilemma. Research in Organizational Behavior, 28, 185-206.
• Ortiz‐de‐Mandojana, N., & Bansal, P. (2016). The long‐term benefits of organizational resilience through sustainable business practices. Strategic Management Journal, 37(8), 1615-1631.
• Parida, V., Lahti, T., & Wincent, J. (2016). Exploration and exploitation and firm performance variability: A study of ambidexterity in entrepreneurial firms. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 12(4), 1147-1164.
• Patel, P. C., Terjesen, S., & Li, D. (2012). Enhancing effects of manufacturing flexibility through operational absorptive capacity and operational ambidexterity. Journal of Operations Management, 30(3), 201-220.
• Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. R. (1978). The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. Harper & Row.
• Pilav–Velic, A., Jahic, H., & Krndzija, L. (2024). Firm resilience as a moderating force for SMEs’ innovation performance: Evidence from an emerging economy perspective. Regional Science Policy & Practice, 16(8), 100033.
• Porter, M. E. (1985). The competitive advantage: Creating and sustaining superior performance. Free Press.
• Purnomo, B. R., Adiguna, R., Widodo, W., Suyatna, H., & Nusantoro, B. P. (2021). Entrepreneurial resilience during the Covid-19 pandemic: Navigating survival, continuity and growth. Journal of Entrepreneurship in Emerging Economies, 13(4), 497-524.
• Raisch, S., & Birkinshaw, J. (2008). Organizational ambidexterity: Antecedents, outcomes, and moderators. Journal of Management, 34(3), 375-409.
• Rizki, L. T., Lisdiono, P., & Said, J. (2023). Entrepreneurial Leadership Capability on Sustained Competitive Advantage with Strategic Agility Mediation Factor. European Proceedings of Social and Behavioural Sciences.
• Sirmon, D. G., Hitt, M. A., Ireland, R. D., & Gilbert, B. A. (2011). Resource orchestration to create competitive advantage: Breadth, depth, and life cycle effects. Journal of Management, 37(5), 1390-1412.
• Sondhi, S. S., Salwan, P., Behl, A., Niranjan, S., & Hawkins, T. (2024). Evaluation of strategic orientation-led competitive advantage: The role of knowledge integration and service innovation. Journal of Knowledge Management, 28(7), 1850-1876.
• Suarez, F. F., & Lanzolla, G. (2007). The role of environmental dynamics in building a first mover advantage theory. Academy of Management Review, 32(2), 377-392.
• Sutcliffe, K. M., & Vogus, T. J. (2003). Organizing for resilience. In K. S. Cameron, J. E. Dutton, & R. E. Quinn (Eds.), Positive organizational scholarship: Foundations of a new discipline (pp. 94-110).
• Teece, D. J., Peteraf, M., & Leih, S. (2016). Dynamic capabilities and organizational agility: Risk, uncertainty, and strategy in the innovation economy. California Management Review, 58(4), 13-35.
• Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509-533.
• Treacy, M., & Wiersema, F. (1993). Customer intimacy and other value disciplines. Harvard Business Review, 71(1), 84-93.
• Trieu, H. D., Nguyen, P. V., Tran, K. T., Vrontis, D., & Ahmed, Z. (2024). Organisational resilience, ambidexterity and performance: the roles of information technology competencies, digital transformation policies and paradoxical leadership. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 32(7), 1302-1321.
• Tufan, C., Kartal, C., & Simșek, H. (2023). The sequential effect of absorptive capacity, strategic agility, and sustainable competitive advantage on sustainable business performance of SMEs. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30(19), 55958-55973.
• UNDP. (2022). Strategic plan 2022-2025. United Nations Development Programme.
• van Lieshout, J. W., Van Der Velden, J. M., Blomme, R. J., & Peters, P. (2021). The interrelatedness of organizational ambidexterity, dynamic capabilities and open innovation: a conceptual model towards a competitive advantage. European Journal of Management Studies, 26(2/3), 39-62.
• Wang, C. L., & Ahmed, P. K. (2007). Dynamic capabilities: A review and research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews, 9(1), 31-51.
• Wang, H., Zhang, L., & Xu, D. (2025). Breakthrough technological innovation, market competition, and corporate competitive advantage. Finance Research Letters, 76, 107030.
• Weber, M. M., Pedell, B., & Rötzel, P. G. (2024). Resilience-oriented management control systems: a systematic review of the relationships between organizational resilience and management control systems. Journal of Management Control, 1-58.
• Weber, Y., & Tarba, S. Y. (2014). Strategic agility: A state of the art introduction to the special section on strategic agility. California Management Review, 56(3), 5-12.
• Weick, K. E., & Sutcliffe, K. M. (2011). Managing the unexpected: Resilient performance in an age of uncertainty (Vol. 8). John Wiley & Sons.
• Wernerfelt, B. (1984). A resource‐based view of the firm. Strategic management journal, 5(2), 171-180.
• Wilden, R., & Gudergan, S. P. (2015). The impact of dynamic capabilities on operational marketing and technological capabilities: Investigating the role of environmental turbulence. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43, 181-199.
• Williams, T. A., Gruber, D. A., Sutcliffe, K. M., Shepherd, D. A., & Zhao, E. Y. (2017). Organizational response to adversity: Fusing crisis management and resilience research streams. Academy of Management Annals, 11(2), 733-769.
• Xiao, Y., Cen, J., & Soberg, P. (2021). The impact of disruption on the relationship between exploitation, exploration, and organizational adaptation. Frontiers in sociology, 6, 757160.
• Yang, M., Jaafar, N., Al Mamun, A., Salameh, A. A., & Nawi, N. C. (2022). Modelling the significance of strategic orientation for competitive advantage and economic sustainability: the use of hybrid SEM–neural network analysis. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 11(1), 44.
• Yasmin, M., Tatoglu, E., Kilic, H. S., Zaim, S., & Delen, D. (2020). Big data analytics capabilities and firm performance: An integrated MCDM approach. Journal of Business Research, 114, 1-15.
• Yuan, C., Li, Y., Vlas, C. O., & Peng, M. W. (2018). Dynamic capabilities, subnational environment, and university technology transfer. Strategic Organization, 16(1), 35-60.
• Zahra, S. A., & George, G. (2002). Absorptive capacity: A review, reconceptualization, and extension. Academy of Management Review, 27(2), 185-203.
• Zeb, A., Akbar, F., Hussain, K., Safi, A., Rabnawaz, M., & Zeb, F. (2021). The competing value framework model of organizational culture, innovation and performance. Business Process Management Journal, 27(2), 658-683.
• Zhang, C., Lu, H., Zhou, C., & Gan, C. (2025). Role of digital innovation's moderating effect on the relationship between organizational resilience and corporate risk-taking. Finance Research Letters, 79, 107331.
• Zhang, H., Wang, Y., & Song, M. (2019). Does competitive intensity moderate the relationships between sustainable capabilities and sustainable organizational performance in new ventures?. Sustainability, 12(1), 253.
• Zhang, R., Lin, J., Li, S., & Cai, Y. (2024). Addressing the loss of exploratory innovation: The roles of organizational foresight and strategic orientation. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 39(13), 27-48.
• Zhong, X., Chen, W., & Ren, G. (2022). The effects of performance shortfalls on firms’ exploitation and exploration R&D internationalization decisions: does industry environmental matter?. Technovation, 112, 102408.
• Zhou, K. Z., & Li, C. B. (2012). How knowledge affects radical innovation: Knowledge base, market knowledge acquisition, and internal knowledge sharing. Strategic Management Journal, 33(9), 1090-1102.