STI SUSTAINABILITY AND NATIONAL INNOVATION SYSTEM

Öz

Science, Innovation, and Technology are important dimensions for a country looking to achieve their socio-economic goals. It is essential that STI policies must align with sustainability goals of the country especially moving forward since a lot of emphasis is put on sustainable energy and eco-friendly practices. Different international organizations such as OECD, UNESCO, and World Bank have also emphasized the use of eco-friendly practices when dealing with STI policies. Green growth and green innovation have been discussed among these organizations as a way forward for innovation around the globe. National Innovation Systems must be formed in order to pursue STI policies, these systems can successfully integrate STI policies into the economic system of a country and also ensure a high potential for growth. OECD continues to develop and improve indicators to measure STI policies; the measurement of such policies can help countries in improving their policies and achieving their STI goals more efficiently and effectively

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Science,Technology,Innovation Policy

BİLİM TEKNOLOJİ YENİLİK VE SÜRDÜRÜLEBİLİRLİK POLİTİKALARI VE ULUSAL YENİLİK SİSTEMİ

Öz

Bilim, Teknoloji ve Yenilik bir ülkenin sosyoekonomik hedeflerini başarabilmesi için önemli unsurlardır. Bilim Teknoloji Yenilik Politikaları ülkenin sürdürülebilir amaçları ile uyumlu olmalıdır, özellikle sürdürülebilir enerji ve çevre dostu enerji uygulamalarına büyük önem verilmelidir. OECD, UNESCO, Dünya Bankası gibi farklı uluslararası organizasyonlar da Bilim Teknoloji Yenilik Politikaları üzerinde çalışırken çevre dostu uygulamaların kullanımının altını çizmişlerdir. Yeşil büyüme ve yeşil yenilik, bu organizasyonlar arasında inovasyon yolunda tüm dünyada ilerlemenin yolu olarak görülmüştür. Ulusal Yenilik Sistemi Bilim Teknoloji Yenilik Politikalarını yürütmek amaçlı şekillendirilmeli, bu sistemler Bilim Teknoloji Yenilik Politikalarını başarılı bir şekilde ülkenin ekonomik sistemine entegre edebilir bu şekilde gelişim için yüksek potansiyel sağlayabilirler. OECD Bilim Teknoloji Yenilik Politikalarını ölçmek için göstergeler ortaya çıkarmaya ve ilerletmeye devam etmektedir. Bu tarz politikaların ölçülmesi ülkelerin kendi politikalarını geliştirmeye ve Bilim Teknoloji Yenilik hedeflerine daha verimli ve etkin bir biçimde ulaşmalarına yardımcı olmaktadır

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Bilim Teknoloji Yenilik Politikaların

Kaynakça

1. Arond, E. Rodríguez, I., Arza, V., Herrera, F., & Sánchez, M. (2011). Innovation, sustainability, development and social inclusion: Lessons from Latin America.
2. Bechmann, G. (Ed.). (2009). The social integration of science: Institutional and epistemological aspects of the transformation of knowledge in modern society (Vol. 12). edition sigma
3. Borlaug, N. E. (2000). Ending world hunger. The promise of biotechnology and the threat of antiscience zealotry. Plant physiology, 124(2), 487-490
4. Buttel, F. H. (2000). Ecological modernization as social theory. Geoforum, 31(1), 57-65.
5. Fagerberg, J., Mowery, D. C., & Nelson, R. R. (Eds.). (2005). The Oxford handbook of innovation. Oxford university press.
6. Freeman, C. (1987). Technology and Economic Performance: Lessons from Japan, edn. London: Pinter.
7. Freeman, C. (1995). The ‘National System of Innovation’in historical perspective. Cambridge Journal of economics, 19(1), 5-24.
8. Hajer, M. A. (1995). The politics of environmental discourse: ecological modernization and the policy process (p. 40). Oxford: Clarendon Press.

9. Hornidge, A. K. (2011). ‘Knowledge Society’as Academic Concept and Stage of Development: A Conceptual and Historical Review. In Beyond the Knowledge Trap: Developing Asia's Knowledge-Based Economies (pp. 87-127).
10. ISSC, U. (2013). World social science report 2013: Changing global environments.
11. Leggewie, C. & Messner, D. (2012). The low-carbon transformation—A social science perspective. Journal of Renewable and Sustainable Energy, 4(4), 041404.
12. Lundvall, B. A. (1992). National innovation system: towards a theory of innovation and interactive learning. Pinter, London.
13. Lundvall, B. Å., Johnson, B., Andersen, E. S., & Dalum, B. (2002). National systems of production, innovation and competence building. Research policy, 31(2), 213-231
14. Mattelart, A. (2003). Kleine Geschichte der Informationsgesellschaft. AvinusVerlag. Metcalfe, S. (1995). The economic foundations of technology policy. Handbook of the economics of innovation and technological change, 409-512.
15. Mol, A. P. (2010). Environmental Sociology Mowery, D. & Rosenberg, N. (1979). The influence of market demand upon innovation: a critical review of some recent empirical studies. Research policy, 8(2), 102-153.
16. Nelson, R. R. (Ed.). (1993). National innovation systems: a comparative analysis. Oxford University Press on Demand
17. OECD. (1997). National Innovation Systems. Organısatıon For Economıc CoOperatıon And Development. Accessed from https://www.oecd.org/science/inno/2101733.pdf.
18. OECD. (1999). Managing National Innovation Systems. OECD Publication.
19. OECD. (2011). Fostering Innovation for Green Growth. OECD Green Growth Studies. Paris: OECD Publishing.
20. OECD. (2013a). “OECD Science, Technology and Industry Policy Papers.” OECD iLibrary. http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/science-and-technology/oecd-science-technologyandindustrypolicy-papers_23074957
21. OECD. (2013b). Putting Green Growth at the Heart of Development. Paris: OECD Publishing.
22. Patel, P. (1994). The nature and economic importance of national innovation systems. STI review, 14, 9-32.
23. Ruivo, B. (1994). ‘Phases’ or ‘paradigms’ of science policy?. Science and public policy, 21(3), 157-164.
24. Ruttan, V. W. (2000). Technology, growth, and development: an induced innovation perspective. OUP Catalogue.
25. Saclı, A. Küreselleşme, Ulusal Yenilik Sistemleri ve Çevre İlişkisi. Ufuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi/ Journal of Ufuk University Institute of Social Sciences Cilt/Vol: 2 Sayı/No: 2 Yıl/Year: 2012
26. Sarewitz, D. Foladori, G., Invernizzi, N., & Garfinkel, M. S. (2004). Science policy in its social context. Philosophy Today, 48(Supplement), 67-83
27. Sumner, A., Ishmael‐Perkins, N., & Lindstrom, J. (2009). Making science of influencing: Assessing the impact of development research. IDS Working Papers, 2009(335), 01-45.
28. Taymaz, E. (2001). Ulusal yenilik sistemi: Türkiye imalat sanyiinde teknolojik değişim ve yenilik süreçleri. TÜBİTAK.
29. Tratnyek, P. G., & Johnson, R. L. (2006). Nanotechnologies for environmental cleanup. Nano today, 1(2), 44-48.
30. UNESCO. (2010). Science Policy for Sustainable Development. The Power of Science to Empower Society. Paris: UNESCO
31. UNESCO. (2013). “Global Observatory of Science, Technology and Innovation Policy Instruments.” Science Policy and Capacity-Building. http://www.unesco.org/new/en/naturalsciences/sciencetechnology/ sti-policy/
32. Weingart, P. (2011). Wissenschaftspolitik als Innovationspolitik: Anspruch und Wirklichkeit.
33. World Bank. (2010). “Global Forum Action Plan. Science, Technology and Innovation Capacity Building Partnerships for Sustainable Development.” Washington D.C. World Bank.
34. World Bank. (2012). “Inclusive Green Growth: The Pathway to Sustainable Development.” Washington D.C. World Bank.