Effectiveness of the pelvic floor awareness education program in rural women
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of a pelvic floor awareness education program (PFAEP) among women living in rural areas who experience pelvic floor symptoms.
Method: The study included 75 women. The women randomly divided into the intervention group (n=37) and control groups (n=38). Women in the intervention group received comprehensive PFAEP for 2 hours, while the control group received no intervention but they were given an informational brochure on pelvic floor health. Pelvic floor symptom severity with the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory-20 (PFDI-20), health literacy (HL) with the Turkish Health Literacy Scale-32 (THLS-32), and knowledge about pelvic floor health with the Pelvic Floor Health Knowledge Quiz (PFHKQ) was evaluated. Evaluations were made before and after the education program.
Results: It was observed that the urinary symptom complaints were high in the intervention group (32.37) and the control group (33.22). Women's HL levels were found that 76.5% of the intervention group and 79% of the control group were below the adequate level. It was determined that both groups' PFHKQ scores were quite (2.78; 3.92) before intervention. After the program, a greater increase was observed in the PFHKQ total score and sub-scales of the intervention group compared to the control group (p<0.001).
Conclusion: The pelvic floor awareness education program was effective in increasing women's knowledge about pelvic floor function/dysfunction, risk/etiology and diagnose/treatment. To improve and maintain pelvic health, education programs should be organized taking into account women's knowledge levels.
Keywords
Supporting Institution
Ethical Statement
References
- 1. Ashton‐miller JA, DeLANCEY JO. Functional anatomy of the female pelvic floor. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2007;1101(1):266-96.
- 2. de Tayrac R, Jundt K, Letouzey V, et al. Anatomy and physiology of the pelvic floor. In: Khaled M.K. I,editor. Perineal Trauma at Childbirth: Springer; 2017. p. 17-39.
- 3. Haylen BT, Maher CF, Barber MD, et al. An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA)/International Continence Society (ICS) joint report on the terminology for female pelvic organ prolapse (POP). Int Urogynecol J. 2016;27(2):165-94.
- 4. Long C-Y, Chen G-D, Rogers RG. Can the mini-sling become the golden standard for treating stress urinary incontinence?Int Urogynecol J. 2021;32(1):1-2.
- 5. Nygaard I, Barber MD, Burgio KL, Kenton K, Meikle S, Schaffer J, et al. Prevalence of symptomatic pelvic floor disorders in US women. Jama. 2008;300(11):1311-6.
- 6. Lawson S, Sacks A. Pelvic floor physical therapy and women's health promotion. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2018;63(4):410-7.
- 7. Hagen S, Stark D. Conservative prevention and management of pelvic organ prolapse in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011(12).
- 8. McDowell D, Gobert D. Patient Access to Pelvic Floor Dysfunction Physical Therapy: Challenging Trends to Adequate Patient Care. Medical Research Archives. 2020;8(4).
- 9. Fante JF, Silva TD, Mateus-Vasconcelos ECL, Ferreira CHJ, Brito LGO. Do women have adequate knowledge about pelvic floor dysfunctions? A systematic review. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet 2019;41(08):508-19.
- 10. Charrié M, Billecocq S. Knowledge of pelvic floor disorders in peripartum women: a systematic review. Prog Urol: Journal de L'association Francaise D'urologie et de la Societe Francaise D'urologie. 2020;31(4):204-14.