THE ROLE OF EVIDENCE-BASED PRACTICE IN THE FIELD OF PHYSIOTHERAPY AND REHABILITATION IN TÜRKİYE FROM THE PERSPECTIVES OF STUDENTS, ACADEMICIANS, AND CLINICIANS: A PILOT STUDY

Abstract

Purpose: Evidence-based practice (EBP) is a method based on high-quality clinical research and practice. According to the World Confederation for Physical Therapy, EBP training should be at the forefront of physiotherapy practice recommendations. The aim of our study is to investigate the place of EBP and the barrier to it in the field of physiotherapy and rehabilitation in Türkiye from the perspective of students, academicians and clinicians. Methods: The study was planned as a pilot study. The study was carried out with all students, academicians and clinicians in the field of physiotherapy and rehabilitation that could be reached during the study. In the evaluation, the “EBP Scale” consisting of 28 questions and a form prepared by the researchers questioning the opinions, knowledge level and obstacles to EBP were used. The study data were collected by creating a web-based form. Results: Our study was conducted with a total of 97 people, 44 students, 22 academicians and 31 clinicians. In the responses to the factors that prevent EBP, “Obtaining an order (doctor’s instructions for treatment)” was stated as the first obstacle by 51.06% of students, 31.57% of academicians and 33.33% of clinicians. When the total EBP scale scores were compared between the three groups, statistically significant differences were found (p=0.000). Conclusion: When the results of our study were examined, it was seen that the knowledge and attitudes of physiotherapists in different fields regarding EBP varied, but in common, the main factor that made EBP difficult for students, clinicians and academicians in the field of physiotherapy and rehabilitation in Türkiye was the “taking orders” factor.

Keywords

• Clinicians
• Evidence-based practice
• Physical therapy
• Rehabilitation

TÜRKİYE’DE FİZYOTERAPİ VE REHABİLİTASYON ALANINDA, ÖĞRENCİ, AKADEMİSYEN VE KLİNİSYEN BAKIŞ AÇISIYLA KANITA DAYALI UYGULAMANIN YERİ: PİLOT ÇALIŞMA

Öz

Amaç: Kanıta dayalı uygulama (KDU), yüksek kaliteli klinik araştırmalara ve uygulamalara dayanan bir yöntemdir. Dünya Fizyoterapi Konfederasyonu’na göre KDU eğitimi fizyoterapi uygulama önerilerinin başında gelmelidir. Çalışmamızın amacı Türkiye’de fizyoterapi ve rehabilitasyon alanında, öğrenci, akademisyen ve klinisyen bakış açısıyla KDU’nun yerini ve önündeki engelleri araştırmaktır. Yöntem: Çalışma pilot çalışma olarak planlanmıştır. Çalışma süresince ulaşılabilecek bütün fizyoterapi ve rehabilitasyon alanında olan öğrenci, akademisyen ve klinisyenler ile çalışma gerçekleştirilmiştir. Değerlendirmede 28 sorudan oluşan “KDU Ölçeği” ve çalışmacılar tarafından hazırlanan KDU konusundaki görüşler, bilgi seviyesi, önündeki engellerin sorgulandığı bir form kullanılmıştır. Çalışma verileri web tabanlı bir form oluşturularak toplanmıştır. Bulgular: Çalışmamız 44 öğrenci, 22 akademisyen ve 31 klinisyen olmak üzere toplam 97 kişi ile gerçekleştirilmiştir. KDU’yu engelleyen faktörler cevaplarında “Order (tedavide hekim talimatı) almak” öğrencilerde %51,06, akademisyenlerde ve %31,57 klinisyenlerde %33,33 oranla ilk engel olarak belirtilmiştir. KDU ölçeği toplam puanları üç grup arasında karşılaştırıldığında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı farklar olduğu tespit edilmiştir (p=0,000). Sonuç: Çalışmamızın sonuçlarına bakıldığında farklı alanlarda bulunan fizyoterapistlerin KDU bilgi ve tutumlarının farklılıklar gösterdiği fakat ortak olarak Türkiye’de fizyoterapi ve rehabilitasyon alanında, öğrencilerin, klinisyenlerin ve akademisyenlerin KDU zorlaştırıcılarının başında “Order almak” faktörünün olduğu görülmüştür.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Klinisyen
• Kanıta dayalı uygulama
• Fizik tedavi
• Rehabilitasyon

Kaynakça

1. Herbert R, Jamtvedt G, Hagen KB, Elkins MR. Practical Evidence-Based Physiotherapy-E-Book. Elsevier Health Sciences; 2022.
2. Sackett DL. Evidence-based medicine. Seminars in perinatology: Elsevier; 1997.
3. Alcan V. A systematic review of the evidence-based implementation approach in physiotherapy and rehabilitation education. Sağlık Bilimlerinde Eğitim Dergisi. 2021;3(1):13-23.
4. Ceylan BK, Mete M. The concept of evidence-based nursing and evidencegeneration situations. Akşehir Meslek Yüksekokulu Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi. 2023(15):121-32.
5. World Confederation for Physical Therapy. Policy statement: Education [Internet]. London (UK): WCPT; 2019 [updated 2019, cited; 2024 Mar. 25] Available from: www.wcpt.org/policy/ps-education
6. World Confederation for Physical Therapy. Declaration of Principle: Evidence Based Practice [Internet]. London (UK): WCPT; 2019 [updated 2019, cited; 2024 Mar. 25] Available from: http://www.wcpt.org/node/29552
7. Kurulu Y. Fizyoterapi ve Rehabilitasyon Çekirdek Eğitim Programı FTRÇEP 2016. Ankara; 2016.
8. Olsen NR, Bradley P, Lomborg K, Nortvedt MW. Evidence based practice in clinical physiotherapy education: a qualitative interpretive description. BMC Med Educ. 2013;13:52.

9. Karin H, Filip S, Jo G, Bert A. Obstacles to the implementation of evidence-based physiotherapy in practice: a focus group-based study in Belgium (Flanders). Physiother Theory Pract. 2009;25(7):476-88.
10. Gleadhill C, Bolsewicz K, Davidson SRE, Kamper SJ, Tutty A, Robson E, et al. Physiotherapists’ opinions, barriers, and enablers to providing evidence-based care: a mixed-methods study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2022;22(1):1382.
11. Alshehri MA, Alalawi A, Alhasan H, Stokes E. Physiotherapists’ behaviour, attitudes, awareness, knowledge and barriers in relation to evidence-based practice implementation in Saudi Arabia: a cross-sectional study. Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2017;15(3):127-41.
12. Scurlock-Evans L, Upton P, Upton D. Evidence-based practice in physiotherapy: a systematic review of barriers, enablers and interventions. Physiotherapy. 2014;100(3):208-19.
13. Ayberk B, Özgül B, Bury J, Polat MG. Rotator cuff disorders: a survey of current physiotherapy practice in Turkiye. Turk J Physiother Rehabil. 2023;34(3):346-5.
14. Arslan Taş F, Akkoyun S, Muslu Karayağız G. Teaching evidence-based practice in nursing undergraduate and graduate programs in Turkey: a descriptive and cross-sectional study. Suleyman Demirel University Journal of Health Sciences. 2023;14(3):406-15.
15. Şahin AN, Acar M. Evidence-based practice in physiotherapy and rehabilitation. Baskent University Journal of Health Sciences. 2023;8(3):258-74.
16. Ulaş Karaahmetoğlu G, Kaçan Softa H. Investigation of nursing students’ attitudes towards evidence-based nursing. Journal of Nursology. 2018;21(4):256-63.
17. Çay M, Daşbaş S. Kanıta dayalı uygulama ölçeğinin türkçeye uyarlanması: geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Toplum Ve Sosyal Hizmet. 2020;31(4):1514-46.
18. Morgan GA, Leech NL, Gloeckner GW, Barrett KC. SPSS for Introductory Statistics: Use and Interpretation, Second Edition (2nd ed.). Psychology Press. 2004.
19. Morales-Osorio MA, Ordoñez-Mora LT, Gutiérrez-Espinoza H, Araya-Quintanilla F, Bays-Moneo A, Ramírez-Vélez R. A survey of beliefs, attitudes, knowledge, and behaviors about evidence-based practice in physical therapists of Latin America: a cross-sectional study. Scientific Reports. 2024;14(1):27404.
20. Cardoso D, Couto F, Cardoso AF, Bobrowicz-Campos E, Santos L, Rodrigues R, et al. The effectiveness of an evidence-based practice (EBP) educational program on undergraduate nursing students’ ebp knowledge and skills: a cluster randomized control trial. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(1):293.
21. Awedew AF, Abera EG. Effectiveness of clinical integrated short course training of evidence based medicine for postgraduate medical specialty students in Ethiopia in 2022: a randomized control trial. PLoS One. 2023;18(1):e0277886.
22. Sancho I, Araolaza-Arrieta M, Villanueva-Ruiz I, Arbillaga-Etxarri A. Undergraduate research implementation in physiotherapy: a hands-on and real experience of a randomised controlled trial. BMC Med Educ. 2023;23(1):736.
23. Helgøy KV, Bonsaksen T, Røykenes K. Research-based education in undergraduate occupational therapy and physiotherapy education programmes: a scoping review. BMC Med Educ. 2022;22(1):358.
24. Chang ZF, Zhu C, Tao DY, Feng XP, Lu HX. [A survey on knowledge, attitude and practice related to evidence-based dentistry among dental students]. Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue. 2017;26(2):204-8.
25. Aldugieman TZ, Alanezi RS, Alshammari WMG, Al-Shamary YWZ, Alqahtani MM, Alreshidi FS. Knowledge, attitude and perception toward evidence-based medicine among medical students in Saudi Arabia: Analytic cross-sectional study. J Family Med Prim Care. 2018;7(5):1026-31.
26. Aldajah S, Etoom M, Mysore SB, Alawneh A, Hadoush H, Al Jarrah M, et al. Evidence- based physiotherapy practice in Jordan: evaluation and identification of implementation factors. Physiother Theory Pract. 2023;39(12):2723-39.
27. ShahAli S, Kajbafvala M, Fetanat S, Karshenas F, Farshbaf M, Hegazy F, et al. Barriers and facilitators of evidence-based physiotherapy practice in Iran: a qualitative study. Musculoskeletal Care. 2023;21(4):1507-28.
28. Boshnjaku A, Arnadottir SA, Pallot A, Wagener M, Äijö M. Improving the evidence-based practice skills of entry-level physiotherapy students through educational interventions: a scoping review of literature. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023;20(16):6605.
29. McEvoy MP, Lewis LK, Luker J. Changes in physiotherapy students’ knowledge and perceptions of EBP from first year to graduation: a mixed methods study. BMC Med Educ. 2018;18(1):109.
30. Olsen NR, Lygren H, Espehaug B, Nortvedt MW, Bradley P, Bjordal JM. Evidence-based practice exposure and physiotherapy students’ behaviour during clinical placements: a survey. Physiother Res Int. 2014;19(4):238-47.
31. Eek F, Åsenlöf P, Stigmar K. Scientific approach and attitudes among clinically working physiotherapists in Sweden -a cross sectional survey. Arch Physiother. 2023;13(1):20.
32. Dizon JM, Grimmer-Somers K, Kumar S. Effectiveness of the tailored Evidence Based Practice training program for Filipino physical therapists: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Med Educ. 2014;14:147.
33. Dao HT, Pichaiyongwongdee S, Sullivan PE, Prasertsukdee S, Apinonkul B. Are physical therapists in Viet Nam ready to implement evidence-based practice? A survey. BMC Med Educ. 2018;18(1):317.
34. Yahui HC, Swaminathan N. Knowledge, attitudes, and barriers towards evidence-based practice among physiotherapists in Malaysia. Hong Kong Physiother J. 2017;37:10-8.
35. AlKetbi H, Hegazy F, Alnaqbi A, Shousha T. Evidence-based practice by physiotherapists in UAE: Investigating behavior, attitudes, awareness, knowledge and barriers. PLoS One. 2021;16(6):e0253215.
36. Castellini G, Corbetta D, Cecchetto S, Gianola S. Twenty-five years after the introduction of evidence-based medicine: knowledge, use, attitudes and barriers among physiotherapists in Italy - a cross-sectional study. BMJ Open. 2020;10(6):e037133.
37. Bevacqua N, Intelangelo L. Evidence-based practice in physiotherapy in Argentina: Barriers, perceptions and behaviors. Physiother Res Int. 2023;28(4):e2034.
38. Muntessu DLN, Ghassi HT, Buh FC, Nietho AW, Siewe JR, Mpatoutou MM. Assessment of Evidence-Based Practice (EBP) among physiotherapists in Cameroon: a cross-sectional survey. BMC Med Educ. 2024;24(1):332.