FAMILY-CENTRED, GOAL-DIRECTED MULTIDISCIPLINARY APPROACH FOR LOWER EXTREMITY BOTULINUM TOXIN WITH PHYSICAL THERAPY AND REHABILITATION IN CEREBRAL PALSY
Abstract
Purpose: This study aimed to investigate lower extremity botulinum toxin (BT) and physical therapy
and rehabilitation (PTR) application scoping “family-centered, goal-directed multidisciplinary approach
(FGMA)” in the children with cerebral palsy (CP) and to assess the satisfaction of parents and children
from this approach.
Methods: A physician and physiotherapist evaluated 30 children (age=6.33±2.38 years) with ambulatory
CP and their parents using the FGMA. Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS), Manual
Ability Classification System (MACS), and Communication Function Classification System (CFCS)
were used to define the functionality of children. Selectivity was assessed using the Selective Control
Assessment of the Lower Extremity (SCALE). Walking was evaluated using the Observational Gait Scale
(OGS) and the Gillette Functional Assessment Questionnaire (FAQ). Satisfaction levels marked on the
Visual Analogue Scale.
Results: Nineteen (63%) children were GMFCS level III, 16 (53%) children were MACS level I, 19 (63.33%)
children were CFCS level I. Half of children had visual problems. While the most preferred muscles were
hamstring and gastrocnemius for BT, the most common device was ankle-foot orthosis. The median score
of SCALE, OGS, and FAQ, and the satisfaction of parents and children were 8 (4-17), 12 (2-24), 2 (1-10),
9 (7-10), and 7 (6-10) points, respectively. The satisfaction level of parents with the new approach was
higher than the previous traditional approach (p<0.001).
Conclusions: Both the parents and children may be satisfied with the FGMA for BT with the PTR program.
Clinicians should take into account lower extremity selectivity, walking performance, and satisfaction
levels as much as muscle tone or range of motion.
Key Words: Botulinum Toxin; Cerebral Palsy; Parent; Physical Therapy.
Keywords
Kaynakça
- 1. Rosenbaum P, Paneth N, Leviton A, Goldstein M, Bax M, Damiano D, et al. A report: the definition and classification of cerebral palsy April 2006. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2007;109(suppl 109):8-14.
- 2. Sankar C, Mundkur N. Cerebral palsy-definition, classification, etiology and early diagnosis. Indian J Pediatr. 2005;72(10):865-8.
- 3. Kahraman A, Seyhan K, Değer Ü, Kutlutürk S, Mutlu A. Should botulinum toxin A injections be repeated in children with cerebral palsy? A systematic review. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2016;58(9):910-7.
- 4. Boyd R, Graham HK, editors. Botulinum toxin A in the management of children with cerebral palsy: indications and outcome. Eur J Neurol; 1997: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
- 5. Heinen F, Desloovere K, Schroeder AS, Berweck S, Borggraefe I, van Campenhout A, et al. The updated European Consensus 2009 on the use of Botulinum toxin for children with cerebral palsy. Eur J Paediatr Neurol. 2010;14(1):45-66.
- 6. Molenaers G, Van Campenhout A, Fagard K, De Cat J, Desloovere K. The use of botulinum toxin A in children with cerebral palsy, with a focus on the lower limb. J Child Orthop. 2010;4(3):183-95.
- 7. Scholtes VA, Dallmeijer AJ, Knol DL, Speth LA, Maathuis CG, Jongerius PH, et al. The combined effect of lower-limb multilevel botulinum toxin type A and comprehensive rehabilitation on mobility in children with cerebral palsy: a randomized clinical trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2006;87(12):1551-8.
- 8. Schasfoort F, Dallmeijer A, Pangalila R, Catsman C, Stam H, Becher J, et al. Value of botulinum toxin injections preceding a comprehensive rehabilitation period for children with spastic cerebral palsy: A cost-effectiveness study.J Rehabil Med. 2018;50(1):22-9.
Ayrıntılar
Birincil Dil
İngilizce
Konular
Rehabilitasyon
Bölüm
Araştırma Makalesi
Yazarlar
Kübra Seyhan
*
0000-0001-7943-4255
Türkiye
Mintaze Kerem Günel
Türkiye
Ece Ünlü Akyüz
Bu kişi benim
Türkiye
Yayımlanma Tarihi
13 Nisan 2020
Gönderilme Tarihi
28 Mart 2019
Kabul Tarihi
30 Aralık 2019
Yayımlandığı Sayı
Yıl 2020 Cilt: 31 Sayı: 1