TÜRK ÜNİVERSİTELERİNDE FARKLI EĞİTİM MODELLERİNİN SAĞLIK ÖĞRENCİLERİNİN FİZİKSEL AKTİVİTE DÜZEYLERİ VE SAĞLIK PROFİLLERI ÜZERİNE ETKİLERİ

Öz

Amaç: Çalışmamızın amacı üniversitelerde sağlık eğitimi alan öğrencilerde farklı eğitim modellerinin fiziksel aktivite ve sağlık profili üzerindeki etkilerini karşılaştırmaktır. Yöntemler: Çalışmamıza 17-25 yaş arası Türkiye üniversitelerinde eğitim gören 600 sağlık öğrencisi dahil edildi. Katılımcılar üniversitede aldıkları eğitim modeline göre hibrit (n = 300, 246 kız, 54 erkek) ve uzaktan (n = 300, 258 kız, 42 erkek) olmak üzere 2 gruba ayrıldı. Ölçümler Google Formlar aracılığıyla çevrimiçi olarak uygulandı. Katılımcıların Fiziksel Aktivitelerini (FA) değerlendirmek için Uluslararası Fiziksel Aktivite Anketi Kısa Formu (UFAA-KF) kullanıldı. Katılımcıların sağlık profilleri hakkında veri toplamak için Nottingham Sağlık Profili (NSP) envanteri kullanıldı. Sonuçlar: Hibrit eğitim modeli uygulanan öğrenciler, uzaktan eğitim modelini uygulaNan öğrencilere göre daha yüksek FA ve daha iyi sağlık porofiline sahipti (p ˂ 0,01). Tartışma: Hibrit eğitim modelini uygulanan sağlık öğrencileri fiziksel olarak daha aktiftir ve daha iyi bir sağlık profiline sahiptir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Eğitim Modeli
• Fiziksel Aktivite
• Sağlık Profili
• Eğitim Modeli, Fiziksel Aktivite, Sağlık Profili

The Effects of Different Education Models on the Physical Activity and Health Profile of Healthcare Students in Turkish University

Abstract

Purpose: Hybrid and distance educational models can lead to different levels of physical activity among students. The aim of our study is to compare the effects of different education models on physical activity and health profile of university healthcare students. Methods: Six hundred healthcare students at Turkish universities between the ages of 17-25 were included in our study. Participants were divided into 2 groups as hybrid (n = 300, 246 females, 54 males) and distance (n = 300, 258 females, 42 males) according to the education model they received at the university. Measurements were applied online via Google Forms. The Physical Activity (PA) of the participants were assessed with Physical Activity Questionnaire-Short Form (IPAQ-SF) and the health profiles of the participants were assessed with The Nottingham Health Profile (NHP) inventory. Results: The students in the hybrid education model had significantly higher physical activity level (p=0.001) and a better health profile (p=0.001) compared to the students who were in distance education model. Conclusions: Students with hybrid education model are more physically active and have a better health profile than students with distance education model because they go to university more than students with distance education model.

Keywords

• Education model
• physical activity
• healh profile
• Education model, physical activity, healh profile

Kaynakça

1. Referans1 ERKAL E, SES A, AYDIN S, ÇALIŞKAN D. COVID-19’un Toplumda Yayılımını Önlemeye Yönelik İlaç Dışı Halk Sağlığı Önlemleri. Eskişehir Türk Dünyası Uygul ve Araştırma Merk Halk Sağlığı Derg. 2020;
2. Referans2 Moore MG, Kearsley G. Distance Education:A Systems View. In: Distance Education. 1996. p. 1–18.
3. Referans3 YÖK. Press briefing. YÖK. 2020. p. www.yok.gov.tr.
4. Referans4 Korucu AT, Kabak K. Türkiye’de hibrit öğrenme uygulamaları ve etkileri: bir meta analiz çalışması. Bilgi ve İletişim Teknol Derg. 2020;
5. Referans5 Kwok S, Adam S, Ho JH, Iqbal Z, Turkington P, Razvi S, et al. Obesity: A critical risk factor in the COVID ‐19 pandemic . Clin Obes. 2020;
6. Referans6 Lippi G, Sanchis-Gomar F. An Estimation of the Worldwide Epidemiologic Burden of Physical Inactivity-Related Ischemic Heart Disease. Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 2020;,
7. Referans7 Pugliese G, Vitale M, Resi V, Orsi E. Is diabetes mellitus a risk factor for COronaVIrus Disease 19 (COVID-19)? Acta Diabetologica. 2020.
8. Referans8 Hossain MM, Sultana A, Purohit N. Mental health outcomes of quarantine and isolation for infection prevention: a systematic umbrella review of the global evidence. Epidemiol Health. 2020;

9. Referans9 Brooks SK, Webster RK, Smith LE, Woodland L, Wessely S, Greenberg N, et al. The psychological impact of quarantine and how to reduce it: rapid review of the evidence. The Lancet. 2020.
10. Referans10 Tang W, Hu T, Hu B, Jin C, Wang G, Xie C, et al. Prevalence and correlates of PTSD and depressive symptoms one month after the outbreak of the COVID-19 epidemic in a sample of home-quarantined Chinese university students. J Affect Disord. 2020;
11. Referans11 Graig C, Marshall A, Sjostrom M, Bauman A, Booht M, Ainsowrth B, et al. International Physical Activity Questionnaire: 12-Country Re... : Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise. Med Sci Sport Exerc. 2003;
12. Referans12 Saglam M, Arikan H, Savci S, Inal-Ince D, Bosnak-Guclu M, Karabulut E, et al. International physical activity questionnaire: Reliability and validity of the Turkish version. Percept Mot Skills. 2010;
13. Referans13 Hunt SM, McKenna SP, McEwen J, Williams J, Papp E. The Nottingham health profile: Subjective health status and medical consultations. Soc Sci Med Part A Med Psychol Med. 1981;
14. Referans14 Kücükdeveci AA, Mckenna SP, Kutlay S, Gürsel Y, Whalley D, Arasil T. The development and psychometric assessment of the Turkish version of the Nottingham Health Profile. Int J Rehabil Res. 2000;
15. Referans15 Pİrİnççİ CŞ, Cİhan E, Yildirim NÜ. Üniversite Öğrencilerinde Fiziksel Aktivite Düzeyinin Yaşam Kalitesi , Kronik Hastalık Varlığı , Sigara Kullanımı ve Akademik Başarıyla Olan İlişkisi The Relationship Between Physical Activity Level and Quality of Life , Presence of Chronic Disease , Smok. 2020;1:15–23.
16. Referans16 World Health Organization. Global Recommendations on Physical Activity for Health WHO, Geneva 2010. Global Recommendations on Physical Activity for Health. 2010.
17. Referans17 Hamer M, Kivimäki M, Gale CR, Batty GD. Lifestyle risk factors, inflammatory mechanisms, and COVID-19 hospitalization: A community-based cohort study of 387,109 adults in UK. Brain Behav Immun. 2020;
18. Referans18 Aytar A, Altintaş A, Aytar A. EXERCISE THERAPY AND REHABILITATION Effects of posture and ergonomics training for students receiving distance education during the covid-19 pandemic on musculoskeletal pain, exercise behavior decision-making balance, and physical activity level. J Exerc Ther Rehabil. 2020;7(2):137–44.
19. Referans19 Cihan E, Pirinççi CŞ. COVİD-19 Pandemi Sürecinde Genç Popülasyonun Yaşam Kalitesinin Fiziksel Aktivite Seviyesi ve Depresyon Düzeyi ile İlişkisi. Selçuk Sağlık Derg. 2020;1:41,53.
20. Referans20 Ölçücü B, Vatansever Ş, Özcan G, Çelik A, Paktaş Y. Üniversite Öğrencilerinde Fiziksel Aktivite Düzeyi İle Depresyon ve Anksiyete İlişkisi. Uluslararası Türk Eğitim Bilim Derg. 2015;2015(4):294–303.
21. Referans21 Huckins JF, da Silva AW, Wang W, Hedlund E, Rogers C, Nepal SK, et al. Mental health and behavior of college students during the early phases of the COVID-19 pandemic: Longitudinal smartphone and ecological momentary assessment study. J Med Internet Res. 2020;
22. Referans22 Luciano F, Cenacchi V, Vegro V, Pavei G. COVID-19 lockdown: Physical activity, sedentary behaviour and sleep in Italian medicine students. Eur J Sport Sci. 2020;
23. Referans23 Melero-Cañas D, Morales-Baños V, Manzano-Sánchez D, Navarro-Ardoy D, Valero-Valenzuela A. Effects of an Educational Hybrid Physical Education Program on Physical Fitness, Body Composition and Sedentary and Physical Activity Times in Adolescents: The Seneb’s Enigma. Front Psychol. 2021;11(January):1–11.
24. Referans24 Liu CH, Stevens C, Conrad RC, Hahm HC. Evidence for elevated psychiatric distress, poor sleep, and quality of life concerns during the COVID-19 pandemic among U.S. young adults with suspected and reported psychiatric diagnoses. Psychiatry Res. 2020;
25. Referans25 Villanueva EW, Meissner H, Walters RW. Medical Student Perceptions of the Learning Environment, Quality of Life, and the School of Medicine’s Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Single Institution Perspective. Med Sci Educ. 2021;
26. Referans26 Epifanio MS, Andrei F, Mancini G, Agostini F, Piombo MA, Spicuzza V, et al. The Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic and Lockdown Measures on Quality of Life among Italian General Population. J Clin Med. 2021;