PANDEMİDE FİZYOTERAPİ VE REHABİLİTASYON ÖĞRENCİLERİ ONLINE ÖĞRENME HAKKINDA NE DÜŞÜNÜYOR?

Öz

Amaç: Online öğrenme, öğretmen ve öğrencinin fiziksel olarak ayrı ortamlarda olduğu kapsamlı bir eğitim türüdür. Fizyoterapi ve rehabilitasyon öğrencilerinin gözünden online öğrenmenin nasıl değerlendirildiğini öğrenmek istedik. Yöntem: Fizyoterapi ve rehabilitasyon bölümünden 283 öğrenci dahil edildi. Öğrencilere 45 çoktan seçmeli soru ve 2 açık uçlu sorudan oluşan bir anket uygulandı. Öğrencinin daha önce herhangi bir online öğrenme programına katılıp katılmadığı, online öğrenmeye erişimi olup olmadığı ve erişim sırasında yaşanan teknik sorunlar ile ilgili sorular soruldu. Sonuçlar: Çalışmamıza 210 (74,20%) kadın ve 73 (25,80%) erkek dahil edildi. Pandemi öncesi online eğitim alma durumunu sorguladık ve öğrencilerin %49,82'si daha önce online eğitim almadıklarını bildirdi. Öğrencilerin %21,55'inin kendilerini motive edemediğini gördük. Öğrencilerin %30,39'u çevrimiçi eğitim nedeniyle uygulamalı derslerde yetersiz eğitim aldığını düşünmektedir. Öğrencilerin %10,25'i çevrimiçi öğrenme için gerekli donanıma ulaşamadıklarını belirtmiştir. Online eğitim ile kaliteli eğitim aldıklarına ilişkin soruda; Öğrencilerin %21,55'i bu görüşe hiç katılmadığını belirtmiştir. Tartışma: Bazı uygulamalı olmayan derslerin online ve senkronize, uygulamalı derslerin yüz yüze yapılmasının daha faydalı olduğunu düşünmekteyiz. Bu nedenle pandemi nedeniyle yüz yüze yapılamayan uygulamalı derslerin ertelenmesinin ve pandemi sürecinden sonra bu derslerin yüz yüze verilmesinin faydalı olacağını düşünmekteyiz.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Pandemi
• Eğitim
• Online öğrenme
• Öğrenci
• Pratik Ders

WHAT DO PHYSIOTHERAPY AND REHABILITATION STUDENTS THINK ABOUT ONLINE LEARNING DURING THE PANDEMIC?

Abstract

Purpose: Online learning is a comprehensive type of education in which the teacher and the student are physically separated. We wanted to know how online learning was evaluated through the view of physiotherapy and rehabilitation students. Methods: We included 283 students from department of physiotherapy and rehabilitation in the study. A questionnaire that consisted of 45 multiple-choice questions and 2 open-ended questions was applied to the students. The questions involved whether the student has previously participated in any online learning program, has had access to online learning and technical problems experienced during access. Results: Our study included 210 (74.20%) women and 73 (25.80%) men. We questioned status of having online learning before the pandemic and 49.82% of the students reported that they did not receive online learning before. We found that 21.55% of the students could not motivate themselves. 30.39% of the students thought having insufficient education in the practical courses due to online education. 10.25% of the students stated that they could not access the necessary equipment for online learning. In the question about they received high-quality education with online learning; 21.55% of the students stated that they did not agree at all. Conclusion: We think that it is more beneficial to give some theoretical courses online and synchronized, and practical courses face to face. Therefore, we think that it will be beneficial to postpone the practical courses that cannot be done face to face due to the pandemic and to give those courses face to face after the pandemic process.

Keywords

• Online Learning
• Pandemic
• Education
• Student
• Practical course

Kaynakça

1. Mahase E. China coronavirus: WHO declares international emergency as death toll exceeds 200. BMJ. 2020;368:m408.
2. Cucinotta D, Vanelli M. WHO Declares COVID-19 a Pandemic. Acta Biomed. 2020;91(1):157–60.
3. Turkish Health Ministry. (2020, September 10). Statistics of COVID-19 pandemic. https://covid19.saglik.gov.tr/
4. World Health Organization. (2020, September 10) Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) Situation Report 46. https://www. who.int/docs/default-source/coronaviruse/situation reports/20200306-sitrep-46-covid-19.pdf?sfvrsn=96b04adf_4 Paraskevopoulos E, Papandreou M. Physiotherapy clinical placement during the COVID-19 pandemic. Educ Health (Abingdon). 2020;33(1):30–31.
5. Palloff R, Pratt H. Lessons from the cyberspace classroom: The realities of online teaching. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 2001.
6. Appana S. A review of benefits and limitations of online learning in the context of the student, the instructor, and the tenured faculty. International Jl. on E-Learning 2008;7(1), 5-22.
7. Patterson BJ, Krouse AM, Roy L. Student outcomes of distance learning in nursing education: An integrative review. CIN: Computers, Informatics, Nursing. 2012;30(9):475–88.
8. Billings DM. A framework for assessing outcomes and practices in web-based courses in nursing. J Nurs Educ. 2000 Feb;39(2):60–7.

9. MacDonald CW, Lonnemann E, Petersen SM, Rivett DA, Osmotherly PG, Brismée JM. COVID 19 and manual therapy: international lessons and perspectives on current and future clinical practice and education. J Man Manip Ther. 2020;28(3):134–45.
10. Hashim A, Mustafa I, Shahid S, Butt SS, Ali A. Student’s satisfaction in online education programs among undergraduate physiotherapy students of Lahore during covid-19. RMJ. 2020;45(3):3.
11. Zhou T, Huang S, Cheng J, Xiao Y. The distance teaching practice of combined mode of massive open online course micro-video for interns in emergency department during the COVID-19 epidemic period. Telemed E-Health. 2020;26(5):584–8.
12. Baykal D, Koc Tutuncu S. Online education experiences of the students studying in health care departments during the covid-19 pandemic. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education-TOJDE. 2022; 23,131-143.
13. Sahin M. Opinions of university students on effects of distance learning in Turkey during the Covid-19 pandemic African Educational Research Journal. 2021; 9(2), 526-543. DOI: 10.30918/ AERJ.92.21.082.
14. Rumble G. The planning and management of distance education. 2019.
15. Van Bruggen J. Theory and practice of online learning. Br J Educ Technol. 2005;36(1):111–2.
16. Choy S, McNickle C, Clayton B, National Centre for Vocational Education Research L. Learner expectations and experiences an examination of student views of support in online learning. Australia: ERIC Clearinghouse; 2002.
17. Van Duijn AJ, Swanick K, Donald EK. Student learning of cervical psychomotor skills via online video instruction versus traditional face-to-face instruction. J Phys Ther Educ. 2014;28(1):94–102.
18. Kuo Y-C, Walker AE, Belland BR, Schroder KEE. A predictive study of student satisfaction in online education programs. IRRODL. 2013;14(1):16.
19. Karabatak S, Alanoglu M, Karabatak M. Effects of homework supported distance education on academic satisfaction, academic achievement, and attitude towards distance education. In: 2020 8th International Symposium on Digital Forensics and Security (ISDFS). Beirut, Lebanon: IEEE; 2020. p. 1–5. https://doi. org/10.1109/ISDFS49300.2020.9116372
20. Kreonidou G, Kazamia V. Assignment feedback in distance education: How do students perceive it?. Res Pap Lang Teach Learn. 2019;10(1):134-153.
21. Panigrahi R, Srivastava PR, Sharma D. Online learning: Adoption, continuance, and learning outcome—A review of literature. Int J Inf Manage. 2018;43:1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2018.05.005
22. Adu Henaku E, Agormedah EK, Ayite DMK, Apori Ansah E. Online learning in higher education during COVID-19 pandemic: A case of Ghana. JETOL. 2020;3(3):183-210. https://doi.org/10.31681/ jetol.726441
23. Telli‐ SG, Altun D. Coronavirüs ve Çevrimiçi (Online) Eğitimin Önlenemeyen Yükselişi. Üniversite Araştırmaları Dergisi. 2020;3(1):25–34. https://doi.org/10.32329/uad.711110