KARDİYOPULMONER RESÜSİTASYON VE MEKANİK KOMPRESYON CİHAZLARI

Öz

Kardiyopulmoner resüsitasyon esnasında etkin göğüs kompresyonu yapılan hastalar sekelsiz olarak hayata dönme şansları daha yüksektir. Bu amaçla bilim adamları mekanik göğüs kompresyon cihazları geliştirmişlerdir. Bu editöriyel yazıda manuel göğüs kompresyonu ile mekanik göğüs kompresyonlarının birbirlerine üstünlükleri ve güncel kılavuz önerilerinden bahsedilmiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Kardiyopulmoner Resüsitasyon
• Göğüs Kompresyonu
• Mekanik Kompresyon Cihazı

CARDIOPULMONARY RESUSITATION AND MECHANICAL COMPRESSION DEVICES

Öz

Patients who receive effective chest compressions during cardiopulmonary resuscitation have a higher chance of returning to life without sequelae. For this purpose, scientists have developed mechanical chest compression devices. In this editorial article, the advantages of manual chest compressions and mechanical chest compressions over each other and current guideline recommendations are discussed.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• CARDIOPULMONARY RESUSITATION
• CHEST COMPRESSION
• MECHANICAL COMPRESSION DEVICES

Kaynakça

1. Soar J, Böttiger BW, Carli P, Couper K, Deakin CD, Djarv T, et all. European Resuscitation Council Guidelines 2021: Adult advanced life support. Resuscitation 2021; 95: 115-151.
2. Safar P, Harris L. The beck-Rand external cardiac compression machine. Anesthesiology 1963; 24: 586-588.
3. Barlett RL, Stewart NJ, Raymond J, Anstadt GL, Martin SD. Comparative study of three methods of resuscitation: Closed-chest, open-chest manual and direct mechanical ventricular assistance. Ann Emerg Med 1984: 13; 773-779.
4. Lafuente CL, Bascones MM. Active chest compression-decompression for cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 20; CD002751.doi:10.1002/14651858.CD002751
5. Obermaier M, Zimmermann JB, Popp E, Weigand MA, Weiterer S, Lambracht AD. Automated mechanical cardiopulmonary resuscitation devices versus manual chest compressions in the treatment of cardiac arrest: protocol of a systematic review and metaanalysis comparing machine to human. BMJ Open 2021;11:e042062. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2020-042062
6. Wik L, Olsen J-A, Persse D, Sterz F, Lozano M Jr, Brouwer MA, et al. Manual vs. integrated automatic load-distributing band CPR with equal survival after out of hospital cardiac arrest. The randomized CIRC trial. Resuscitation 2014;85:741–8.
7. Rubertsson S, Lindgren E, Smekal D, Östlund O, Silfverstolpe J, Lichtveld RA, et al. Mechanical chest compressions and simultaneous defibrillation vs conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. JAMA 2014;311:53–61.
8. Perkins GD, Lall R, Quinn T, Deakin CD, Cooke MW, Horton J, et al. Mechanical versus manual chest compression for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (PARAMEDIC): a pragmatic, cluster randomised controlled trial. The Lancet 2015;385:947–55.