Hidrojel ve Silikon Hidrojel Yumuşak Kontakt Lenslerin Optiksel Karakterizasyonu

Abstract

Kontakt lensler, görme kusurlarını düzeltmede gözlük alternatifi olarak ortaya çıkan biyomalzemelerdir. Bu çalışmada, Nesofilcon A (Hidrojel-Hy) ve Delefilcon A (Silikon Hidrojel-SiHy) günlük tek kullanımlık yumuşak kontakt lensler UV-görünür ışık spektroskopisi kullanılarak optiksel olarak incelenmiştir. Lenslerin optik soğurma ve geçirgenlik ölçümleri UV-görünür ışık spektrofotometresi ile alınarak, göze gelen radyasyonun zararlı kısmını bloke etme ve zararsız kısmını geçirme özellikleri incelenmiştir. Soğurma spektrumundan, Nesofilcon A lensinin ultraviyole ışığı daha iyi emdiği görülmüştür. Nesofilcon A ve Delefilcon A lenslerinin optik soğurma katsayısı spektrumlarından soğurma kenarları 386 ve 325 nm, optik bant aralığı değerleri ise sırasıyla 3.34 ve 3.98 eV olarak elde edilmiştir. Ayrıca lenslerin kırılma indisi profilleri çizilmiştir. 550 nm dalga boyunda lenslerin kırılma indeksleri Nesofilcon A ve Delefilcon A için sırasıyla 1.55 ve 1.77 olarak hesaplandı. Delefilcon A lensi görünür ışığı iyi iletirken, Nesofilcon A lensi UV ışığını daha iyi bloke ettiği ve kırılma indeksinin üretici tarafından belirtilen 1.40 değerine daha yakın olduğu belirlendi.

Keywords

• Yumuşak kontakt lens
• UV-Görünür spektroskopi
• Optik özellikler
• Silikon-Hidrojel

Optical Characterization of Hydrogel and Silicone Hydrogel Soft Contact Lenses

Abstract

Contact lenses are biomaterials that have emerged as an alternative to glasses in correcting vision defects. In this study, Nesofilcon A (Hydrogel-Hy) and Delefilcon A (Silicone Hydrogel-SiHy) daily disposable soft contact lenses were optically examined using UV-visible light spectroscopy. Optical absorption and transmittance measurements of the lenses were taken with a UV-visible spectrophotometer, and their properties of blocking the harmful part of the radiation to the eye and transmitting the harmless part were investigated. From the absorption spectrum, it was seen that the Nesofilcon A lens absorbed ultraviolet light better. From the optical absorption coefficient spectra of Nesofilcon A and Delefilcon A lenses, the absorption edges were obtained as 386 and 325 nm, and the optical band gap values were 3.34 and 3.98 eV, respectively. Additionally, the refractive index profiles of the lenses were plotted. The refractive indices of the lenses at 550 nm wavelength were calculated as 1.55 and 1.77 for Nesofilcon A and Delefilcon A, respectively. While the Delefilcon A lens transmitted visible light well, the Nesofilcon A lens blocked UV light better and its refractive index was determined to be closer to the 1.40 the value specified by the manufacturer.

Keywords

• Soft contact lens
• UV-Visible spectroscopy
• Optical properties
• Silicone-Hydrogel

References

1. Elsherif M, Salih AE, Alam F, Yetisen AK, Ramadi KB, Butt H. Plasmonic contact lenses based on silver nanoparticles for blue light protection. ACS Appl Nano Mater 2024; 7: 5956−5966.
2. Schafer J, Steffen R, Reindel W, Chinn J. Evaluation of surface water characteristics of novel daily disposable contact lens materials, using refractive index shifts after wear. Clinical Ophthalmology 2015; 1973-1979.
3. Lira M, Lourenço C, Silva M, Botelho G. Physicochemical stability of contact lenses materials for biomedical applications. Journal of Optometry 2020; 13: 120-127.
4. Mutlu Z, Es-haghi SS, Cakmak M. Recent Trends in Advanced Contact Lenses. Adv. Healthcare Mater 2019; 8: 1801390.
5. Alam F, Elsherif M, AlQattan B, Ali M, Ahmed IMG, Salih A, Antonysamy DS, Yetisen AK, Park S, and Butt H. Prospects for Additive Manufacturing in Contact Lens Devices. Adv Eng Mater 2021; 23: 2000941.
6. Guillon M. Are Silicone Hydrogel Contact Lenses More Comfortable Than Hydrogel Contact Lenses?. Eye & Contact Lens 2013; 39: 86-92.
7. Moreddu R, Vigolo D, Yetisen AK. Contact Lens Technology: From Fundamentals to Applications. Adv Healthcare Mater 2019; 8: 1900368.
8. Musgrave CSA, Fang F. Contact Lens Materials: A Materials Science Perspective. Materials 2019; 12, 261.

9. Shihab AH, Eliasy A, Lopes BT, Wu R, White L, Jones S, Geraghty B, Joda A, Elsheikh A, and Abass A. Compressive behaviour of soft contact lenses and its effect on refractive power on the eye and handling off the eye. Plos One 2021; 16(2): e0247194.
10. Zhu Y, Li S, Li J, Falcone N, Cui Q, Shah S, Hartel MC, Yu N, and et al. Lab-on-a-Contact Lens: Recent Advances and Future Opportunities in Diagnostics and Therapeutics. Adv Mater 2022; 34: 2108389.
11. Ishihara K, Shi X, Fukazawa K, Yamaoka T, Yao G, and Wu JY. Biomimetic-Engineered Silicone Hydrogel Contact Lens Materials. ACS Appl Bio Mater 2023; 6: 3600−3616.
12. Güngör İU, Erkan D. Kontakt Lensler: Materyallerin Fiziksel Özellikleri ve Çeşitleri. OMÜ Tıp Dergisi 2004; 21(4): 195–200.
13. Rex J, Knowles T, Zhao X, Lemp J, Maissa C, Perry SS. Elemental Composition at Silicone Hydrogel Contact Lens Surfaces. Eye & Contact Lens 2018; 44: 221–226.
14. Toshida H, Takahashi K, Sado K, Kanai A, Murakami A. Bifocal contact lenses: History, types, characteristics, and actual state and problems. Clinical Ophthalmology 2008; 2(4): 869-877.
15. Alves ME, Castanheira MS, Lira M. Interactions between contact lenses and lens care solutions: Influence in optical properties. Contact Lens and Anterior Eye 2021; 44: 101414.
16. Osuagwu UL, Ogbuehi KC. UV–vis light transmittance through tinted contact lenses and the effect of color on values. Contact Lens & Anterior Eye 2014; 37: 136–143.
17. Barlık A, Ateş G. Measurement of Ultraviolet Light Transmittance of Different Contact Lens Types. Turkish Journal of Science & Technology 2023: 18(2): 379-385.
18. Ateş G, Bilici S. Investigation of Spectral and Optical Properties of Some Organic Eyeglass Lenses. Journal of Inonu University Health Services Vocational School 2023, 11(1): 1042-1053.
19. Ateş G. Investigation of Spectral and Optical Properties of Color Polarization Lenses. Journal of Physical Chemistry and Functional Materials 2023; 6(2): 15-20.
20. Jez K, Nabıalek M, Gruszka K, Deka M, Letkıewıcz S, Jez B. Light Transmittance by Organic Eyeglass Lenses According to their Class. Materiale Plastice 2018; 55(3): 438-441.
21. Schafer J, Steffen R, Reindel W, Chinn J. Evaluation of surface water characteristics of novel daily disposable contact lens materials, using refractive index shifts after wear. Clinical Ophthalmology 2015; 9: 1973-1979.
22. Özmenteş R. Synthesis and Characterization of Stannic Oxide (SnO2) Thin Film. Yuzuncu Yil University Journal of the Institute of Natural & Applied Sciences 2024; 29(1): 88-96.
23. Jime´nez-Flores Y, Sua´rez-Quezada M, Rojas-Trigos JB, Lartundo-Rojas L, Sua´rez V, and Mantilla A. Characterization of Tb-doped hydroxyapatite for biomedical applications: optical properties and energy band gap determination. J Mater Sci 2017; 52: 9990–10000.
24. Gomaa HM, Yahia I.S, Yousef ES, Zahren HY, Makram BMA, Saudi HAA. Novel Correction Method Toward Extraction of Reflectance and Linear Refractive Index of Some Borosilicate Glasses Doped with BaTiO3. Journal of Electronic Materials 2022; 51: 6347–6355.
25. Childs A, Li H, Lewittes DM, Dong B, Liu W, Shu X, Sun C and Zhang HF. Fabricating customized hydrogel contact lens. Sci Rep 2016; 6: 34905.