İnşaat Sektöründe Döngüselliği Teşvik Etmek için Dijital Teknolojilerin Kullanımına yönelik bir Araştırma

Öz

İnşaat sektörü, doğal kaynakları önemli ölçüde tüketmesi ve küresel ölçekte yüksek miktarda atık üretmesi nedeniyle döngüsel ekonomi ilkelerini dikkate alması gereken sektörlerden biridir. Döngüsellik, sınırlı kaynakların daha verimli ve yeniden kullanımı stratejileri ile ilişkilendirilmektedir. Dijital teknolojiler ise süreçleri iyileştirerek verimliliği arttırma ve inşaat sektörünün sürdürülebilirlik hedeflerini destekleme potansiyeline sahiptir. Süreçlerini dijital teknolojiler ile geliştiren organizasyonlar, inşaat sektöründe döngüselliğin geliştirilmesine katkıda bulunabilir. Örneğin, YBM (Yapı Bilgi Modelleme, BIM- Building Information Modelling) ve dijital fabrikasyon, inşaat projelerinin verimliliğini arttırma, maliyetleri düşürme, tasarım esnekliğini geliştirme gibi avantajlar sunmaktadır. Güncel literatür benzer şekilde sanal gerçeklik (VR-virtual reality), arttırılmış gerçeklik (AR- augmented reality), yapay zeka (artificial intelligence), dijital ikiz (digital twin) vs. gibi diğer dijital teknolojilerin de inşaat sektöründe döngüselliği teşvik etme potansiyeli bulundurduğunu göstermektedir. Bu çalışma, güncel literatürü incelemeyi ve inşaat sektöründe döngüselliği teşvik etmek için dijital teknolojilerin kullanımına ilişkin bir araştırma yapmayı amaçlamaktadır. Çalışma, iki aşamalı olarak ele alınmış olup, ilk aşamada bibliyometrik analizlerle literatürün mevcut durumu ortaya konmuştur. Çalışmanın ikinci aşamasında ise kapsamlı bir içerik analizi yapılmıştır. Çalışmanın bulguları, dijital teknolojilerin inşaat sektöründe döngüselliği arttırmada çeşitli fırsatlar sunduğunu, ancak dijital teknolojilerin döngüsellik bağlamında benimsenmesinin önünde engeller bulunduğunu göstermektedir. Bu çalışma, engellerin üstesinden gelmeyi hedefleyen uygun stratejilerin geliştirilmesinin, döngüsel inşaat 4.0'ın benimsenmesini kolaylaştırabileceğini vurgulamaktadır. Ayrıca çalışma, sektör profesyonellleri, akademisyenler ve politika yapıcılar gibi inşaat sektöründeki çeşitli paydaşların iş birliği ve desteğinin önemine dikkat çekmiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Dijital Teknolojiler
• Döngüsel ekonomi
• Döngüsel inşaat sektörü 4.0
• Döngüsel inşaat proje yönetimi
• İnşaat sektörü

An Investigation -into the Use of Digital Technologies to Promote Circularity in the Construction Industry

Öz

The construction industry (CI) is one of the sectors that needs to adopt circular economy principles due to its significant consuption of natural resources and the high amount of waste it generates globally. Circularity involves more efficient and reusable strategies for limited resources. Digital technologies have the potential to improve processes, increase efficiency, and support the sustainability goals of the CI. Organizations that enhance their processes through digital technologies can contribute to the development of circularity in the CI. For example, BIM (Building Information Modeling) and digital fabrication have advantages such as increased construction projects efficiency, cost reduction, and improved design flexibility. Similarly, current literature shows that other digital technologies, including virtual reality (VR), augmented reality (AR), artificial intelligence (AI), and digital twins also have the potential to promote circularity in the CI. This paper aims to investigate the use of digital technologies to promote circularity in the CI. The research was conducted in two phases. The first phase has involved a bibliometric anaylsis to reveal the current state of the literature. The second phase has consisted of a comprehensive content analysis. The finding indicate that digital technologies provide various opportunities to promote circularity in the CI, but there are also barriers to their adoption. This study also emphasizes that developing appropriate strategies specifically aimed at overcoming barriers can facilitate the adoption of circular construction 4.0. Furthermore, the paper highlights the importance of collaboration and support from stakeholders in the CI, including industry professionals, academics, and policymakers.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Digital technologies
• Circular economy
• Circular construction industry 4.0
• Circular construction project management
• Construction industry

Kaynakça

1. Alkılınç, E. & Palabıyık, S. (2023). Bibliyometrik Analiz Yöntemi Üzerinden Yer Seçimi ile İlgili Karar Destek Sistemi Yöntemlerinin İncelenmesi, International Journal of Social and Humanities Sciences Research, 10(98), 2016-2026. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8306910
2. Abioye, S. O., Oyedele, L. O., Akanbi, L., Ajayi, A., Delgado, J. M. D., Bilal, M., Akinade, O. O., ve Ahmed, A. (2021). Artificial intelligence in the construction industry: A review of present status, opportunities and future challenges, Journal of Building Engineering, 44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2021.103299
3. Adams, K. T., Osmani, M., Thorpe, T., ve Thornback, J. (2017). Circular economy in construction:current awareness, challenges and enablers, Waste and resource management, 170,WR1, 15-24. https://doi.org/10.1680/jwarm.16.00011
4. Adekunle, P., Aigbavnoa, C., Oke, A., Akinradewo, O., ve Otasowie, O. (2023). Application of big data and internet of things in the built environment: a bibliometric review, Proceedings of the 31st Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction, 50–58. https://doi.org/10.24928/2023/0138
5. Akanbi, L. A., Oyedele, L. O., Akinade, O. O., Ajayi, A. O., Delgado, M. D., Bilal, M., ve Bello, S. A. (2018). Salvaging building materials in a circular economy: A BIM-based whole-life performance estimator, Resources, conservation and recycling, 129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.10.026
6. Akinade, O. O., Oyedele, L. O., Ajayi, S. O., Bilal, M., Alaka, H. A., Owalabi, H. A., ve Arawomo, O. O. (2018). Designing out construction waste using BIM technology: Stakeholder’s expectations for industry deployment, Journal of cleaner production, 180, 375-385. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.01.022
7. Al Jaber, A., Alasmari, E., Martinez-Vazquez, P., ve Baniotopoulos, C. (2023). Life Cycle Cost in Circular Economy of Buildings by Applying Building Information Modeling (BIM): A State of the Art, Buildings, 13(7), 1858. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13071858
8. Al-Raeei, M. (2024). The smart future for sustainable development: Artificial intelligence solutions for sustainable urbanization, Sustainable development, 33(1), 508-517. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.3131

9. Albsoul, H., Doan, D. T., Aigwi, I. E., ve Ghaffaria, H. A. A. (2024). Review of extant literature and recent trends in residential construction waste reduction, Waste Management and Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734242X241241607
10. Anastasiades, K., Dockx, J. V. B. M., Rinke M, Blom J, ve Audenaert A. (2023). Stakeholder perceptions on implementing design for disassembly and standardisation for heterogeneous construction components, Waste Management & Research: The Journal for a Sustainable Circular Economy, 41(8):1372-1381. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734242X231154140
11. Askar, R., Karaca, F., Bragança, L., ve Gervásio, H. (2024a). The Role of BIM in Supporting Circularity: A Conceptual Framework for Developing BIM-Based Circularity Assessment Models in Buildings. In: Ungureanu, V., Bragança, L., Baniotopoulos, C., Abdalla, K.M. (eds) 4th International Conference "Coordinating Engineering for Sustainability and Resilience" & Midterm Conference of CircularB Implementation of Circular Economy in the Built Environment, Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering, 489. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-57800-7_60
12. Askar, R., Karaca, F., Salles, A., Lukyanenko, A., Puma, G. C. C., Tavares, V., Khaidarova, A., Nadazdi, A., Martos, R. P., Cabrera, J. M. D., Honic, M., Wolf, C., Resulogulari, E. C., Karatas, I., Gervasio, H., ve Bragança, L.(2024b). Driving the built environment twin transition: synergising circular economy and digital tools, Circular economy design and management in the built environment, 459-505. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-73490-8_17
13. Atik, Ş., Aparisi, T. D., ve Raslan, R. (2024). Mind the gap: Facilitating early design stage building life cycle assessment through a co-production approach, Journal of Cleaner Production. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.142803
14. Atta, I., Bakhaum, E. S., ve Marzouk, M. M. (2021). Digitizing material passport for sustainable construction projects using BIM, Journal of building engineering, 43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2021.103233
15. Aune, K. ve Ghattas, S. (2025). Sustainability and virtual reality: the impact of immersive technology on behaviours and attitudes, Son erişim tarihi: 24.12.2025. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12380/307081
16. Ayuk, M. N., ve Jrade A. (2023). Integrating Building Information Modeling (BIM), GIS, and Circular Economy (CE) for the Construction and Deconstruction Waste Based on Construction Methods at the Conceptual Design Stage of Buildings. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering, 498, 343-356. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-0968-9_6
17. Banihashemi, S., Meskin, S., Sheikhkhoskar, M., Mohandes, S. R., Hajirasouli, A. ve LeNguyen, K. (2024). Circular economy in construction: The digital transformation perspective, Cleaner engineering and technology, 18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clet.2023.100715
18. Beach, T., Petri, I., Rezgui, Y., ve Rana, O. (2017). Management of collaborative BIM data by federating distributed BIM Models, Journal of computing civil engineering, 31 (4). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CP.1943-5487.0000657
19. Benachio, G. L., Freitas, M. C. D., ve Tavares, S. F. (2020). Circular economy in the construction industry: A systematic literature review, Journal of cleaner production, 260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121046
20. Bilal, M., Oyedele, L. O., Akinade, O. O., Ajayi, S. O., Alaka, H. A., Owolabi, H. A., Quadir, J., Pasha, M., ve Bello, S. A. (2016). Big data architecture for construction waste analytics (CWA): A conceptual framework, Journal of Building Engineering, 6, 144-156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2016.03.002
21. Byers, B., Cheriyamulla, S., Ewason, J., Hall, D., ve Wolf, C. D. (2022). Using engraved QR codes to connect building components to materials passports for circular construction, European conference on computing in construction, Ixia, Rhodes, Greece. http://doi.org/10.35490/EC3.2022.226
22. Charef, R. (2022). The use of Building Information Modelling in the circular economy context: Several models and a new dimension of BIM (8D), Cleaner Engineering and Technology, 7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clet.2022.100414
23. Charef, R. A. (2024). A Digital Framework for the Implementation of the Circular Economy in the Construction Sector: Expert Opinions, Sustainability, 16(14). http://doi.org/10.3390/su16145849
24. Chibesakunda, E. (2023). Circular strategies for sustainable construction and building management, son erişim tarihi: 19.12.2025. https://www.pwc.de/en/sustainability/circular-economy/circular-strategies-for-sustainable-construction-and-building-management.html
25. Dereli, A. B. (2024). WOSviewer ile Bibliyometrik Analiz. Communicata, 28, 1-7. https://doi.org/10.32952/communicata.1517725
26. Duran, V. N., Garcia, R. A., ve Vega, M. C. (2024). Integration of circularity strategies into architectural design through BIM, Habitat Sustentable, 14(1), 118-131. https://doi.org/10.22320/07190700.2024.14.01.09
27. Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., Lim, W. M. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines, Journal of Business Research, 133, 285-296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070
28. Eftekhari, A. F., Khodabakhshian, A., Cecconi, F. R., ve Daniotti, B. (2024). Earth and Environmental Science Reviewing the critical factors for circular building design and construction, Improving Circularity in Construction Through a BIM-Based Waste Management Framework Reviewing the critical factors for circular building design and construction. http://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1363/1/012042
29. Elghaish, F., Matarneh, S. T., Edwards, D. J., Pour, Rahimian, F., El-Gohary, H., ve Ejohwomu, O. (2022). Applications of Industry 4.0 digital technologies towards a construction circular economy: gap analysis and conceptual framework, Construction Innovation: Information Process Management, 22(3), 647–670. https://doi.org/10.1108/CI-03-2022-0062
30. Elmualim, A., Mostafa, S., Chileshe, N., ve Rameezdeen R. (2018). Construction and the circular economy: Smart and industrialised prefabrication. Unmaking Waste in Production and Consumption: Towards The Circular Economy, 323-336. http://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-78714-619-820181025
31. European comission. (2024). Circular construction and materials for a sustainable building sector, son erişim tarihi: 10.12.2025. https://build-up.ec.europa.eu/en/resources-and-tools/articles/circular-construction-and-materials-sustainable-building-sector
32. Eze, E. C., Sofolahan, O., Omoboye, O. G., ve Ameyaw, E. E. (2025). Drivers of digital technologies-driven circular economy in the Nigerian construction industry: a PLS-SEM approach, Smart and Sustainable Built Environment. https://doi.org/10.1108/SASBE-10-2024-0438
33. Fahfouhi, K., Craveiro, F., ve Bartolo, H. (2024). The Role of Construction 3D Printing in Advancing Sustainability and Digitalization in Africa, Springer Proceedings in Earth and Environmental Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-48532-9_57
34. Fahfouhi, K., Freitas, D., Poullain, P., Craveiro, F., ve Bartolo, H. (2022). Digital Fabrication in Construction Industry in Africa, Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Water Energy Food and Sustainability, 470-479. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-26849-6_48 Farhadi, F. (2024). What is Circular Construction?, son erişim tarihi: 20.12.2025. https://neuroject.com/circular-construction/
35. Fereydooni, E. A., Khodabakhshian, A., Iuorio, O., Re, C. F. ve Daniotti, B. A. (2024). A New Building Information Modelling-Based Approach to Automate Recyclability Rate Calculations for Buildings, Buildings, 14(6). https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14061521
36. Fico, D., Rizzo, D., Carolis, V., Montagna, F., Palumba, E. ve Corcione, C. E. (2022). Development and characterization of sustainable PLA/Olive wood waste composites for rehabilitation applications using Fused Filament Fabrication, Journal of Building Engineering, 56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2022.104673
37. Finamore, M., ve Dumbrava, C. O. (2024). Circular economy in construction- findings from a literatüre review. Heliyon, 10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e34647. Gasparri, E., Arasteh, S., Kuru, A., Stracchi, P., ve Brambilla, A. (2023). Circular economy in construction: A systematic review of knowledge gaps towards a novel research framework, Frontiers in built environment, 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbuil.2023.1239757
38. Hernández, H. (2025). Circular Industrialized Construction: A Perspective Through Design for Manufacturing, Assembly, and Disassembly, Buildings, 15(13), 2174. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15132174
39. Irish Green Building Council. (2025).Circularity in the built environment. son erişim tarihi: 20.12.2025. https://www.igbc.ie/circularity-built-environment/
40. Jegen, P., Huber, O., Gast, L., ve Faulstich, M. (2025). Mapping urban building material stocks to understand potentials for circular construction: A case study in Germany’S Ruhr area, Sustainable cities and society, 135, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2025.106942
41. Keles, C., Cruz, R. F., ve Hoque, S. (2025). Digital Technologies and Circular Economy in the Construction Sector: A Review of Lifecycle Applications, Integrations, Potential, and Limitations, Buildings, 15(4), 553. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15040553
42. Keshtkar, M., Danies, E., ve Gyoh, L. (2023). The impacts of digital fabrication on the construction industry: a systematic review, Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Construction Applications of Virtual Reality, 605-615. https://doi.org/10.36253/979-12-215-0289-3.59
43. Khan, S. A., Jassim, M., Ilcan, H., Sahin, O., Bayer, I. R., Sahmaran, M., ve Koc, M. (2023). 3D printing of circular materials: Comparative environmental analysis of materials and construction techniques, Case Studies in Construction Materials, 18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2023.e02059
44. Kio, P. N., Anumba, C. J., ve Ali, A. K. (2022). Circular Economy Trends- Potential Role of Emerging Technologies. IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1101. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1101/6/062005
45. Kısmet, B. ve Çolakoğlu, M. B. (2025). Circular Built Environment During the Digital Age: A Systematic Review, Journal of Computational Design, 6(2), 365-390. https://doi.org/10.53710/jcode.1618537
46. Krajewska, A., ve Siewczyńska, M. (2025). Circular Economy in the Construction Sector in Materials, Processes, and Case Studies: Research Review, Sustainability, 17(15). https://doi.org/10.3390/su17157029
47. Kuzminykh, A., Granja, J., Parente, M., ve Azenha, M. (2024). Promoting circularity of construction materials through demolition digitalisation at the preparation stage: Information requirements and open BIM-based technological implementation, Advanced Engineering Informatics, 62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2024.102755
48. Li, R. Y. M., ve Leung, T. H. (2017). Sustainable construction waste management in Adelaide, Proceedings of 22nd International Conference on Advancement of Construction Management and Real Estate, 1138 – 1146.
49. Liu, Z., Liu, Y., ve Osmani, M. (2024). Integration of Smart Cities and Building Information Modeling (BIM) for a Sustainability Oriented Business Model to Address Sustainable Development Goals, Buildings, 14(5). https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14051458
50. Luo, J., Yu, B., Jiang, Y. (2021). Upcycling of regular wood trunks and logs using wave function collapse (WFC), augmented reality (AR), and mixed reality (MR) technologies for circular design, Sci Rep., 15, 36599. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-20398-8
51. Mandicak, T., Spisakova, M., ve Mesaros, P. (2024). Sustainable Design and Building Information Modeling of Construction Project Management towards a Circular Economy, Sustainability, 16(11). https://doi.org/10.3390/su16114376
52. Mohseni, A., Vieira, F. R., ve Pecchia, J. A. (2023). Three-Dimensional Printing of Living Mycelium-Based Composites: Material Compositions, Workflows, and Ways to Mitigate Contamination, Biomimetics, 8(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/biomimetics8020257
53. Nie, P., Dahanayake, K. C., ve Sumanarathna, N. (2024). Exploring UAE's transition towards circular economy through construction and demolition waste management in the pre-construction stage–A case study approach, Smart and Sustainable Built Environment, 13(2), 246-266. https://doi.org/10.1108/SASBE-06-2022-0115
54. Norouzi, M., Chafer, M., Cabeza, L. F., Jimenez, L., ve Boer, D. (2021). Circular economy in the building and construction sector: A scientific evolution analysis, Journal of building engineering, 44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2021.102704
55. Nourjalili, S., ve Forouzannia, F. (2025). The role of BIM in sustainable construction Project delivery methods with focus on circular economy, Engineering reports 2025; https://www.researchgate.net/deref/https%3A%2F%2F
56. O’Grady, T. M., Brajkovich, N., Minunno, R., Chong, H. Y., ve Morrison, G. M. (2021). Circular Economy and Virtual Reality in Advanced BIM-Based Prefabricated Construction, Energies, 14(13), 4065. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14134065
57. Oluwapelumi, A., Mohamed, A., Obuks, E., ve Patrick, M. (2024). Dimensions of maturity model for institutionalising smart circular construction: A systematic literatüre review, Association of researchers in construction management, Proceedings of the 40th annual conference, London, UK. https://www.arcom.ac.uk/-docs/proceedings/87c4eab8ba77d475a96e63d42be2107e.pdf
58. Passas, I. (2024). Bibliometric Analysis: The Main Steps, Encyclopedia, 4(2), 1014-1025. https://doi.org/10.3390/encyclopedia4020065
59. Purchase, C. K., Al Zulayq, D. M., O’Brien, B. T., Kowalewski, M. J., Berenjian, A., Tarighaleslami, A. H., ve Seifan, M. (2022). Circular Economy of Construction and Demolition Waste: A Literature Review on Lessons, Challenges, and Benefits. Materials, 15(1), 76. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15010076.
60. Rashidian, S., Hossain, S. K. T., Volz, K., ve Teo M. (2025). Enabling circularity in construction: A technology-phase alignment of construction 4.0 and circular economy, Sustainable production and consumption, 60, 245-259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2025.10.004
61. Rigillo, M., Galluccio, G., ve Paragliola, F. (2024). Digital and circularity in building: KETs for waste management in European Union, Agathon, 13, 247-258. https://doi.org/10.19229/2464-9309/13212023
62. Sahebzamani, E., ve Forcada, N. (2025). Enhancing sustainable construction decisions: integrating BIM and VR for circular economy assessment, Building Research & Information, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/09613218.2024.2449441
63. Sajid, Z. W., Hussian, A., Khan, M. U. A., Alqahtani, F. K., ve Ullah, F. (2024). Technical, Economic, and Environmental Sustainability Assessment of Reclaimed Asphalt and Waste Polyethylene Terephthalate Pavements, Sustainability, 16(12). https://doi.org/10.3390/su16124911
64. Sanchez, B., Herthogs, P., ve Stouffs, R. (2023). Identfying for BIM-based disassembly planning, 40th international symposium on automation and robotics in construction. https://doi.org/10.22260/ISARC2023/0007
65. Sudarsan, J. S., ve Gavali, H. (2024). Application of BIM in conjunction with circular economy principles for sustainable construction, Environment, Development and Sustainability, 26(3), 7455-7468. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-023-03015-4
66. Sul, B., Fawad, M., Chen, Q., ve Salamak, M. (2025). Mixed reality-based digital twinning of building circularity: A co-design approach for sustainable buildings, Waterloo: IAARC Publications. https://www.proquest.com/conference-papers-proceedings/mixed-reality-based-digital-twinning-building/docview/3240509079/se-2.
67. SWECO. (2025). Circular construction-an opportunity we can’t waste, son erişim tarihi: 20.12.2025. https://www.swecogroup.com/urban-insight/circularity/circular-construction-an-opportunity-we-cant-waste/
68. Tam, V. W., Zhou, Y., Illıankoon, C., ve Le, K. N. A (2022). Critical review on BIM and LCA integration using ISO 14040 framework, Building and environment, 213, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2022.108865
69. Timm, J. F. G., Maciel, V. G., ve Passuello, A. (2023). Towards Sustainable Construction: A Systematic Review of Circular Economy Strategies and Ecodesign in the Built Environment, Buildings, 13(8), 2059. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13082059 Topraklı, A. Y. (2024). Enabling circularity in Turkish construction: a case of BIM-based material management utilizing material passports, Smart and Sustainable Built Environment. https://doi.org/10.1108/SASBE-05-2024-0199.
70. Wolf, C. D., Byers, B. S., ve Raghu, D. (2024a). A 5D Digital Circular Workflow: Digital Transformation Towards Matchmaking of Environmentally Sustainable Building Materials through Reuse from Disassembly. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-4349460/v1
71. Wolf, C. D., Çetin, S., ve Bocken, N. A. (2024b). Circular built environment in the digital age. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-39675-5
72. Yu, Y., Yazan, D. M., Junjan, V., ve Iacob, M. E. (2022). Circular economy in the construction industry: A review of decison support tools based on Information&communication Technologies, Journal of cleaner production, 349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131335