Determination of the Weed Flora and the Efficacy of Some Herbicides on Weeds and Yield in Maize Fields of Iğdır Province, Türkiye

Öz

Maize is a very important food crop worldwide. Weed surveys and effective weed management practices are crucial for maintaining high crop yields and quality. The aim of the study was to assess the distribution and relative abundance of weed species in maizeproduction areas of Igdir Province and evaluate the effectiveness of different herbicides in controlling weeds and improving maize yield. The experiment employed a Completely Randomized Block Design, consisting of 7 treatments with 4 replications. The treatments included 330 g/l pendimethalin, 225 g/l isoxaflutole + 90 g/l thiencarbazone methyl + 150 g/l cyprosulfamide, %25 tritosulfuron + %50 dicamba, 452.42 g/l 2,4-D EHE + 6.25 g florasulam, 40 g/l nicosulfuron, and two check treatments, namely weed-free and weedy check. In total, 50 survey sites were visited during the months of June and July in Iğdir Center (34) and its districts Karakoyunlu (13), Aralık (2), and Tuzluca (1), based on the maize production areas in 2017. The surveys revealed the presence of 25 weed species belonging to 11 families in the maize fields. Therefore, the conducted survey of the maize fields in Igdir Province identified 25 weed species belonging to 11 different families. The top three largest families found in the maize fields were Poaceae (8 species), Fabaceae (4 species), and Asteraceae (3 species). Among the weed species identified, 13 of them were found to have a frequency of more than 10 percent. The top 5 species determined in terms of frequency were Sorghum halepense (L.) Pers. (94%), Portulaca oleracea L. (68%), Xanthium strumarium L. (62%), Amaranthus retroflexus L. (38%), Convolvulus arvensis L. (28%). The evaluation of maize yield and its components, such as the number of rows of cobs, the length and diameter of the cob, the height of the plant, and the thousand grain weight, showed a significant increase in all treatments compared to the weedy check. The percentage increase in these yield component results showed a 98% increase in the yield, a 31.3% increase in the number of rows of cobs, a 38.5% increase in the length of the cob, a 19.8% increase in the diameter of the cob, a 66.2% increase in the height of the plant, and a 64,8% increase in the thousand grain weight. The increase in the thousand grain weight suggests that the herbicides may have also helped to improve the overall quality of the maize crop. The results of this study provide valuable information for developing effective weed management strategies that can help to improve maize yield and quality in the region.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Zea mays
• herbicide
• weeds
• survey
• frequency

Proje Numarası

Proje No: 2017 FBE L29

Kaynakça

1. Absy, R. (2019). Weed Control Efficiency of some Pre-and Post-Emergence Herbicides in Maize. Journal of Plant Production, 10(12), 1037-1042.
2. Alptekin, H., Ozkan, A., Gurbuz, R., & Kulak, M. (2023). Management of Weeds in Maize by Sequential or Individual Applications of Pre-and Post-Emergence Herbicides. Agriculture, 13(2), 421.
3. Anonymous, (2017). Meteorological Service (MS). Available online: https://www.mgm.gov.tr/
4. Anonymous, (2020). https://hracglobal.com/files/HRAC_Revised_MOA_Classification_Herbicides_Poster.pdf)
5. Arslan, Z.F., (2018). Density and Frequency of Weeds in Corn Fields in Şanlıurfa Province and Suggestions for Management Problems. Turkish Journal of Agriculture-Food Science and Technology, 6(10), 1322-1328.
6. Baghestani, M. A., Zand, E., Soufizadeh, S., Eskandari, A., PourAzar, R., Veysi, M., & Nassirzadeh, N. (2007). Efficacy evaluation of some dual purpose herbicides to control weeds in maize (Zea mays L.). Crop Protection, 26(7), 936-942.
7. Böcker, T., Britz, W., & Finger, R. (2018). Modelling the effects of a glyphosate ban on weed management in silage maize production. Ecological Economics, 145, 182-193.
8. Daniel, A. I., Fadaka, A. O., Gokul, A., Bakare, O. O., Aina, O., Fisher, S., & Klein, A. (2022). Biofertilizer: the future of food security and food safety. Microorganisms, 10(6), 1220.

9. Delchev, G. (2022). Productivity of duo system and conventional grain maize (Zea mays L.) By influence of some herbicides andherbicide tank mixtures. Agron. J, 1, 283-288.
10. Erenstein, O., Jaleta, M., Sonder, K., Mottaleb, K., & Prasanna, B. M. (2022). Global maize production, consumption and trade: trends and R&D implications. Food Security, 14(5), 1295-1319.
11. Eymirli, S. & Uygur, F.N. (2011) Çukurova’da mısır ekim alanlarında yaygın olarak kullanılan foramsulfuron, nicosulfuron, ve 2,4 D aminin etkili minimum dozlarının saptanması. Çukurova Üniversitesi Fen ve Mühendislik Bilim. Derg. 29, 18–26.
12. Eymirli, S., (2011). Çukurova’da Mısır Ekim Alanlarında Yaygın Olarak Kullanılan Herbisitlerin Etkili Minimum Dozlarının Saptanması. Doktora Tezi, Çukurova Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Adana. 293-295.
13. Food and Agricultural Organization (FAO). 2021. Available online: http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QC (accessed on 2 January 2023).
14. Gharde, Y., Singh, P. K., Dubey, R. P., & Gupta, P. K. (2018). Assessment of yield and economic losses in agriculture due to weeds in India. Crop Protection, 107, 12-18.
15. Green, T. R., Kipka, H., David, O., & McMaster, G. S. (2018). Where is the USA Corn Belt, and how is it changing?. Science of the Total Environment, 618, 1613-1618.
16. Güncan A, & Karaca M (2018). Yabancı Ot Mücadelesi. Güncellenmiş ve ilaveli 4. Baskı. Selçuk Üniversitesi Basımevi. 334 s. ISBN: 975 448 178 4.
17. Güngör, M., 2005. Adana İli Mısır Ekim Alanlarında Yabancı Otlara Karşı Uygulanan Kimyasal Mücadelenin Önemi ve Ortaya Çıkan Sorunların Araştırılması. Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Çukurova Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Adana. 193.
18. Hançerli, L., & Uygur, F. N. (2017). Çukurova bölgesi mısır ekim alanlarındaki yabancı ot türleri. Turk J Weed Sci, 20(2), 55-60.
19. Harker, K. N., & O'Donovan, J. T. (2013). Recent weed control, weed management, and integrated weed management. Weed Technology, 27(1), 1-11.
20. Idziak, R., Waligóra, H., & Szuba, V. (2022). The influence of agronomical and chemical weed control on weeds of corn. Journal of Plant Protection Research, 215-222.
21. Imoloame, E. O. (2017). Evaluation of herbicide mixtures and manual weed control method in maize (Zea mays L.) production in the Southern Guinea agro-ecology of Nigeria. Cogent Food & Agriculture, 3(1), 1375378.
22. Jabran, K., & Chauhan, B. S. (2018). Overview and significance of non-chemical weed control. In Non-chemical weed control (pp. 1-8). Academic Press.
23. Kakade, S. U., Deshmukh, J. P., Thakare, S. S., & Solanke, M. S. (2020). Efficacy of pre-and post-emergence herbicides in maize. Indian Journal of Weed Science, 52(2), 143-146.
24. Kalogiannidis, S., Kalfas, D., Chatzitheodoridis, F., & Papaevangelou, O. (2022). Role of crop-protection technologies in sustainable agricultural productivity and management. Land, 11(10), 1680.
25. Kitiş, Y. E. (2011). Yabancı ot mücadelesinde malç ve solarizasyon uygulamaları. GAP VI. Tarım Kongresi Bildiri Kitabı, 463-468.
26. Koç, M., & Karaca, M. (2022). The Effect of Some Pre-Emergence Herbicides on Weeds and Corn Yield. Selcuk Journal of Agriculture and Food Sciences. (2022) 36, (13-22). DOI: 10.15316/SJAFS.2022.071
27. Kudsk, P., & Streibig, J. C. (2003). Herbicides–a two‐edged sword. Weed research, 43(2), 90-102.
28. Landau, C. A., Hager, A. G., Tranel, P. J., Davis, A. S., Martin, N. F., & Williams, M. M. (2021). Future efficacy of pre‐emergence herbicides in corn (Zea mays) is threatened by more variable weather. Pest Management Science, 77(6), 2683-2689.
29. Mennan, H., & Işık, D. (2003). Samsun ili mısır ekim alanlarında son 30 yılda yabancı ot florasında görülen değişiklikler ve bunların nedenlerinin araştırılması. Türkiye Herboloji Derg., 6(1), 1-7.
30. Mitkov, A., Yanev, M., Neshev, N., Tityanov, M., & Tonev, T. (2019). Herbicide control of the weeds in maize (Zea mays L.). Agronomy Series of Scientific Research/Lucrari Stiintifice Seria Agronomie, 61(2), 168-173.
31. Odum, E. P., & Barrett, G. W. (1971). Fundamentals of ecology (Vol. 3, p. 5). Philadelphia: Saunders.
32. Oerke, E. C., & Dehne, H. W. (2004). Safeguarding production—losses in major crops and the role of crop protection. Crop protection, 23(4), 275-285.
33. Özer, Z., Kadıoğlu, İ., Önen, H., & Tursun, N., 2001. Herboloji (Yabancı Ot Bilimi). Genişletilmiş 3. Baskı. Gaziosmanpaşa Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Yayınları No: 20. Kitaplar Serisi No:10. GOP. Üniversitesi Basımevi. Tokat. ISBN:975.7328.16.2.
34. Pandey, A. K., Prakash, V., Singh, R. D., & Mani, V. P. (2001). Integrated weed management in maize (Zea mays). Indian journal of Agronomy, 46(2), 260-265.
35. Şahin, B. U., & Kadıoğlu, İ. (2021). Bazı Herbisitlerin Mısır ve Yabancı Otlar ile Kültür Bitkileri Üzerindeki Etkilerinin Belirlenmesi. Journal of the Institute of Science and Technology, 11(3), 1817-1830.
36. Şahin, S., Gürbüz, R., & Çoruh, İ. (2020). Iğdır ili pamuk üretim alanlarında görülen yabancı ot türlerinin belirlenmesi ve bazı herbisitlerin yabancı otlanma ile pamuk verimine olan etkilerinin araştırılması. Journal of Agriculture, 3(2), 40-48.
37. Smith, C. W., Betrán, J., & Runge, E. C. (Eds.). (2004). Corn: origin, history, technology, and production (Vol. 4). John Wiley & Sons.
38. Sönmez, K., Özlem, A. L. A. N., Kinaci, E., Kinaci, G., Kutlu, İ., Başçiftçi, Z. B., and Evrenosoğlu, Y. (2013). Bazı şeker mısır çeşitlerinin (Zea mays saccharata Sturt) bitki, koçan ve verim özellikleri. Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, 8(1), 28-40.
39. Swinton, S. M., & B. Van Deynze. 2017. Hoes to herbicides: Economics of evolving weed management in the United States. The European Journal of Development Research 29 (3):560–574. doi:https://doi.org/10.1057/s41287-017-0077-4.
40. Tepe, I. 1998. Türkiye’de Tarım ve Tarım Dışı Alanlarda Sorun Olan Yabancı Otlar ve Mücadeleleri; Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi Yayınları: Van, Türkiye, 1998; No: 32, Van, 237.
41. Tesfay, A., Amin, M., & Mulugeta, N. (2014). Management of weeds in maize (Zea mays L.) through various pre and post emergency herbicides. Adv Crop Sci Tech, 2(5), 151-155.
42. Tülek, C., Gürbüz, R., & Alptekin, H. (2022). Organik Malç Materyallerinin Domates (Solanum lycopersicum L.)’te Yabancı Ot Kontrolüne Etkisi. Journal of Agriculture, 5(2), 86-101.
43. Turkish Statistical Institute, (TÜİK). 2022. Available online: https://www.tuik.gov.tr/Start.do (accessed on 20 December 2022).
44. Tursun, N., Sakınmaz, M. S., & Kantarcı, Z. (2016). Mısır varyetelerinde yabancı ot kontrolü için kritik periyotların belirlenmesi. Tarla Bitkileri Merkez Araştırma Enstitüsü Dergisi, 25(ÖZEL SAYI-1), 58-63.
45. Uysal, B., 2012. Farklı Dozlarda Kullanılan Bazı Herbisitlerin Mısırda Yabancı Otlanmaya Etkisi. Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Gaziosmanpaşa Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Tokat. 3-36.
46. Yavuz, R., Esmeray, M., & Vesile, U. R. İ. N. (2017). Bazı herbisitlerin mısır ve yabancı ot biyomasına etkisi. Bahri dağdaş Bitkisel araştırma dergisi, 6(2), 1-6.
47. Zaremohazabieh, S., & Ghadiri, H. (2011). Effects of rimsulfuron, foramsulfuron and conventional herbicides on weed control and maize yield at three planting dates. Journal of Biological and Environmental Sciences, 5(14).
48. Zhang, J., Zheng, L., Jäck, O., Yan, D., Zhang, Z., Gerhards, R., & Ni, H. (2013). Efficacy of four post-emergence herbicides applied at reduced doses on weeds in summer maize (Zea mays L.) fields in North China Plain. Crop Protection, 52, 26-32.