DigitalNatives, Social Networks and the Future of Libraries

Yıl 2009, Cilt: 23 Sayı: 4, 742 - 768, 01.10.2009

Yaşar Tonta

Öz

Facebook,MySpace,Flickrand YouTube are currently among the most frequentlyvisitedwebsiteswithWeb 2.0 features. They are used not onlyforsocialnetworkingandentertainmentbutalsofor access to information, forlearning and for carryingoutprofessionalwork. Social networkscommonlyhave Web2.0 features, offer personalizedservicesandallowusersto incorporate theirowncontenteasilyand describe, organize and share itwith others,therebyenrichingusers' experience. Some users tendto “live” onthosesocial networks andexpect informationproviding organizationsto offersimilarservices. They wantlibraries to beas accessible, flexible,opento collaboration and sharing asthat of social networksand heightentheexpectationsfrom suchinstitutions. Thefuture oflibraries is closely associatedwithhow successfully theymeet the demands of digital users.Otherwise, the“netgeneration” orthe“digitalnatives” grownupwiththeWeb, Google andFacebookwouldsee libraries asoutdatedinstitutions and “taketheirbusinesselsewhere”tosatisfytheirinformationneeds.Inthis paper,theimpactof thetechnologicalconvergenceon informationproviding organizationsis reviewed and the challenges andopportunitiesfacing libraries in the digital environmentare discussed

Anahtar Kelimeler

digitallibraries, digitalnatives, social networks, convergence, Web 2.0, Library2.0

Dijital Yerliler, Sosyal Ağlar ve Kütüphanelerin Geleceği

Öz

Facebook, MySpace, Flickr ve YouTube gibi Web 2.0 özelliklerine sahip sosyal ağlar en çok ziyaret edilen web siteleri arasında yer almaktadır. Sosyal ağlar sadece sosyalleşmek ve eğlenmek amacıyla değil, bilgiye erişmek, öğrenmek ve profesyonel iş yapmak amacıyla da kullanılmaktadır. Sosyal ağların sağladığı işbirliği, kişiselleştirme, kullanıcı destekli içerik ekleme ve üst veri gibi özellikler kullanıcı deneyimini zenginleştirmekte ve bu web sitelerini daha çekici kılmaktadır. Kütüphanelerin de sosyal ağlar kadar erişilebilir, esnek, işbirliği ve paylaşıma açık olmasını bekleyen kullanıcılar, yoğun olarak kullandıkları sosyal ağlar aracılığıyla kütüphanelere de erişmek istemektedirler. Kütüphanelerin geleceği dijital kullanıcıların bilgi gereksinimlerini başarılı bir biçimde sağlamalarıyla yakından ilgilidir. Aksi takdirde Web, Google ve Facebook ile yetişen “ağ kuşağı” ya da “dijital yerliler” kütüphaneleri modası geçmiş kuruluşlar olarak görecek ve bilgi gereksinimlerini karşılamak için başka kuruluşlara ya da ortamlara yöneleceklerdir. Bu çalışmada Web 2.0 gibi bazı yeni teknolojilerin ve teknolojik yakınsamanın kullanıcılar ve kütüphaneler üzerindeki etkileri İncelenmekte, dijital çağda bilgi profesyonellerinin karşı karşıya kaldığı yeni meydan okumalar ve fırsatlar tartışılmaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

dijital kütüphaneler, dijital yerliler, sosyal ağlar, yakınsam, Web 2.0, Library 2.0

Kaynakça

• Not: Kaynakçada yer alan tüm çevrimiçi adreslere 23 Ekim 2009 tarihinde erişilmiştir.
• Alpert, J., veHajaj, N. (2008, July 25). We knewtheweb wasbig. http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2008/07/we-knew-web-was-big.html.
• Bayne, S.,ve Ross, J. (2007). The‘digital native' and ‘digitalimmigrant': a dangerous opposition. Paper presentedattheAnnualConferenceoftheSociety forResearch intoHigherEducation (SRHE) December2007. http://www.malts.ed.ac.uk/staff/sian/natives_final.pdf.
• Carr, N. (2008,July/August). IsGoogle makingus stupid?AtlanticMonthly, http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/200807/google.
• Dempsey, L. (2008,March2).Thetwo ways ofWeb 2.0. http://orweblog.oclc.org/archives/001556.html.
• Dempsey, L. (2009,January5).Always on:Libraries in a world ofpermanent connectivity. First Monday,14(1). http://firstmonday.org/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/fm/article/viewArticle/2291/ 2070.
• Doucet,M.(2007). Library and ArchivesCanada: A case studyofanational library, archives,and museummerger. RBM: A Journal of Rare Books, Manuscripts, and CulturalHeritage,8, 61-66. http://www.ala.org/ala/mgrps/divs/acrl/publications/rbm/8-1/doucet07.pdf.
• Dupont,C. (2007). Libraries, archives, and museums in the twenty-first century: Intersecting missions,convergingfutures? RBM: AJournalofRare Books, Manuscripts, and CulturalHeritage,8, 13-19. http://www.ala.org/ala/mgrps/divs/acrl/publications/rbm/8-1/dupont07.pdf.
• EuropeanCommission(2005).Staff working document. Annex to theCommunication from theCommission“i2010: Digital Libraries.”COM(2005) 465. http://ec.europa.eu/information_society/activities/digital_libraries/doc/communicati on/annex1_en.pdf.
• Gantz,J.F. ve diğerleri (2008 March).The diverse and explodingdigitaluniverse: An updatedforecast of worldwideinformation growth through 2011. (AnIDCWhite Paper -sponsoredby EMC)http://www.emc.com/collateral/analyst-reports/diverse- exploding-digital-universe.pdf.
• Haier, R.J., Karama, S.,Leyba,L.ve Jung, R.E.(2009 September 1). MRIassessment of cortical thickness andfunctional activity changesin adolescent girls following threemonths ofpractice on avisual-spatial task. BMCResearch Notes,2: 174. http://www.biomedcentral.com/content/pdf/1756-0500-2-174.pdf.
• Johnson,L., Levine,A., ve Smith,R. (2009). The2009Horizon Report. Austin, TX: TheNew Media Consortium. http://net.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/CSD5612.pdf.
• Lagoze,C. (2000 November).Business unusual:how“event-awareness” may breathe lifeinto the catalog? Paper prepared forBicentennial ConferenceonBibliographic Control for theNewMillennium, Library of Congress. http://www.cs.cornell.edu/lagoze/papers/lagozelc.pdf
• Law, D. (2009). Academic digital libraries ofthefuture:an environmentscan.New Review of AcademicLibrarianship,15,53-67.
• Lynch,C.A. (2001a).Personalization andrecommender systems inthelargercontext: Newdirectionsandresearch questions. Keynotepaper presentedat SecondDELOS Network of ExcellenceWorkshop onPersonalisationandRecommender Systems in Digital Libraries, Dublin, Ireland, June 18-20,2001. http://www.ercim.org/publication/ws- proceedings/DelNoe02/CliffordLynchAbstract.pdf.
• Lynch,C.A. (2001b).The battletodefinethefuture ofthebook in the digital world. First Monday, 6(6). http://firstmonday.org/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/864/773.
• Martin,R.S.(2007). Intersecting missions, converging practices. RBM:AJournal of Rare Books, Manuscripts, and Cultural Heritage,8,80-88. http://www.ala.org/ala/mgrps/divs/acrl/publications/rbm/8-1/martin07.pdf.
• Miller, P. (2005). Web 2.0:BuildingtheNew Library.Ariadne, No.45. http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue45/miller/intro.html.
• Murray,R.(2006).systems: synthesise, specialise, mobilise. Ariadne, No.48. http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue48/murray/.
• Nicholas, D., Rowlands,I., ve Huntington, P. (2007, June22).Student information­ seeking behaviour in context:Key findings from CIBER logstudies. http://www.jisc.ac.uk/media/documents/programmes/reppres/ggworkpackageiv.pdf.
• Ohene-Djan,J.veFernandes, A.A.A. (2003). Personalisingelectronic books,Journal of Digital Information, 3(4),[Online].http://journals.tdl.org/jodi/article/view/88/87.
• O'Reilly,T. (2005,September30).What Is Web 2.0:Design patternsandbusiness models forthenext generationof software. http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/a/oreilly/tim/news/2005/09/30/what-is-web- 20.html?page=1.
• Prensky, M.(2001a,September/October). Digitalnatives,digital immigrants. Onthe Horizon 9(5): 1-6.http://www.marcprensky.com/writing/Prensky%20- %20Digital%20Natives,%20Digital%20Immigrants%20-%20Part1.pdf.
• Prensky, M. (2001b, November/December). Digital natives, digital immigrants,Part II: Dothey reallythink differently? OntheHorizon 9(6):1-6. http://d.scribd.com/docs/25yfw2gwramobinjk3vt.pdf.
• Prensky, M.(2009).H.Sapiens Digital:Fromdigitalimmigrantsand digital natives to digitalwisdom. Innovate:Journal of Online Education, 5(3). http://www.innovateonline.info/index.php?view=article&id=705&action=article.
• Qualman, E. (2009).Socialnomics:Howsocialmedia transforms theway we live and dobusiness. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
• Social networksarethe new Webportals.(2009, 23January).TheIndyChannel. http://www.businessweek.com/technology/content/jan2009/tc20090121_557202.ht m.
• Springer, M. vediğerleri. (2008, October30).For thecommon good: TheLibrary of Congress Flickr Pilot Project. http://www.loc.gov/rr/print/flickr_report_final.pdf.
• Stein,F.(2007).Digital immigrants, digitalnativesand the InformationAge.MITRE (sunuşslaytları).
• Tapscott,D. (1998). Growing up digital: Theriseofthenetgeneration. New York: McGraw-Hill.
• Tapscott,D. (2009). Grown updigital: How thenetgeneration is changing your world. NewYork:McGraw-Hill.
• Toffler, A. veToffler,H.(2006).Zenginlik devrimi: Nasılyaratılacak ve hayatınızı nasıldeğiştirecek.Çev. Selim Yeniçeri.İstanbul: KoridorYayıncılık.
• Tonta,Y. (2003, August).The personalizationof informationservices, Information ManagementReport, ss. 1-6.http://yunus.hacettepe.edu.tr/~tonta/yayinlar/tonta- imr-article-revised.pdf.
• Tonta,Y. (2008a). Libraries andmuseums inthe flat world: Aretheybecomingvirtual destinations? Library Collections, Acquisitions, & Technical Services,32(1): 1-9, 2008. http://yunus.hacettepe.edu.tr/~tonta/yayinlar/tonta-lcats-2008.pdf.
• Tonta,Y. (2008b).Information servicesand Web2.0:New challenges and opportunities. AlexandraVranes &Ljiljana Markovic, Electronic Library: InternationalScientific Conference, Belgrade, September25th-28th,2008. Proceedingsiçinde (ss.237-249).Belgrade: Ministry ofCultureandMinistry of Science.http://yunus.hacettepe.edu.tr/~tonta/yayinlar/tonta-belgrade-2008-full-text- son.pdf
• Tonta,Y. (2009a).Digital nativesandvirtuallibraries: What doesthefuture hold for libraries? InternationalConferenceon Librariesand Their Clients:Free orFee ServicesSupporting Social CommunicationintheDigital Era, 1-2June2009, Krakow, Poland.http://yunus.hacettepe.edu.tr/~tonta/yayinlar/tonta-krakow-2009- full-text.pdf.
• Tonta,Y. (2009b).Preservationof scientific and culturalheritageinBalkancountries, Program:ElectronicLibrary and InformationSystems, 43,419-429. http://yunus.hacettepe.edu.tr/~tonta/yayinlar/tonta-balkan-2009.pdf.
• VanSlyke, T. (2003, May/June).Digital natives, digitalimmigrants:Somethoughts from thegenerationgap.TheTechnologySource, http://www.wisc.edu/depd/html/TSarticles/Digital%20Natives.htm.
• Weinberger, D. (2007). Everything is miscellaneous:Thepowerofthenewdigital disorder. New York:Holt.
• WhoareiProfessionals? (2009). http://www.ischools.org/site/alumni/.
• Wythe,D.(2007). New technologies and convergence of libraries,archives and museums. RBM: AJournal ofRareBooks,Manuscripts, and Cultural Heritage, 8, 51-55. http://www.ala.org/ala/mgrps/divs/acrl/publications/rbm/8-1/wythe07.pdf.