Science Indicators of Turkey: 1997-2006

Yıl 2009, Cilt: 23 Sayı: 1, 4 - 21, 01.01.2009

Bülent Karasözen , Özlem Gökkurt Bayram Burcu Umut Zan

Öz

In this article, the rapid increase of publications and citations of publications from Turkey is analyzed for the period 1997-2006 using ISI's Essential Science Indicators. Specialization and citation impact according to scientific disciplines, the internationally co-authored publications are given using bibliometric in dicators. The importance of bibliometric analysis for the research evaluation and science and technology indicators is also emphasized

Anahtar Kelimeler

essential science indicators, citation impact, specialization index, in­ternationallyco-autored publications, research evaluation

1997-2006 Türkiye Bilim Göstergeleri Analizi

Öz

Bu makalede Türkiye’nin 1997-2006 yılları arasında, Thomson ISI firmasının TBG Temel Bilimsel Göstergeler veritabanına göre yayınlar ve atıflar açısından dünyadaki konumu, yayınlar ve atıflar açısından hangi alanlarda uzmanlaştığı gösterilmiş, Web of Science veritabanındaki son on yılda Türkiye’nin uluslararası ortak yazarlı yayınların yıllara göre dağılımına yer verilmiştir. Ma­kalede ayrıca bilimsel araştırmaların değerlendirmesinde ve ülkelerin bilim ve teknoloji göstergelerinin hazırlanmasında bibliyometrik göstergelerin kullanımı üzerinde durulmuştur.

Anahtar Kelimeler

web of science, bibliyometri, yayın ve atıf sayıları, uluslararası ortak yazarlı yayınlar

Kaynakça

• Al, U., Şahiner, M. ve Tonta, Y. (2006).Arts and humanities literature: Bibliometric characteristics of contributions by Turkish authors. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, (57), 1011-1022.
• Archambault, E. ve Vignola Gagne, E.V. (2004). Science metrix,final report, the use ofbibliometrics in the social sciences and humanities. 03.12.2008 tarihinde www.science-metrix.com adresinden erişildi.
• Ball, R. and Tunger, D. (2006). Bibliometric analysis-Anew business area for information professionals in libraries?. Scientometrics, 66 (3), 561-577.
• FIN. (2003). Scientific Research in Finland, A Review ofIts Quality and Impact in the Early 2000s. 03.12.2008 tarihinde http://www.aka.fi/Tiedostot/Tiedostot/Julkaisut/SUTI2003%20tiivistelm%C3%A4%20englanti.pdf adresinden erişildi.
• FRA. (2006). Key Figures on Science and Technology, 2006, The Observatoire des Sciences et des Techniques. 03.12.2008 tarihinde http://www.obsost.fr/fileadmin/medias/tx_ostdocuments/OST_CC_2006OK.pdf adresinden erişildi.
• Glanzel, W. (2008). Turkey on the way to the European Union? On a scientific power rising next door. International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics (ISSI) Newsletter, 4, 10-17.
• Glanzel, W., Debackere, K. ve Meyer, M. (2008). ‘Triad' or ‘tetrad'? On global changes in a dynamic world. Scientometrics, 74 (1), 71-88.
• Glanzel, W. (2003). Bibliometrics as a researchfield, course on theory and application of bibliometric indicators. 03.12.2008 tarihinde http://www.norslis.net/2004/Bib_Module_KUL.pdf adresinden erişildi.
• Gökçeoğlu, C., Okay, A.I. ve Sezer E. (2008). International earth science literature from Turkey- 1970-2005: Trends and possible causes. Scientometrics, 74 (3), 409-423.
• Gülgöz, S., Yedekcioglu, O.A. ve Yurtsever, E. (2002). Turkey's output in social science publications: 1970-1999. Scientometrics, 55 (1), 103-121.
• İnönü, E. ve Kurnaz, L. (2002). Observations on the growth characteristics of the research output of Turkish physicists based on a selective citation analysis. Scientometrics, 55 (3), 437-444.
• Karasözen, B. ve Bayram (Gökkurt), Ö. (2007). 1997-2006 Türkiye Bilim Göstergeleri Analizi. Ankara: Yüksek Öğretim Kurumu, 03.12.2008 tarihinde www.yok.gov.tr/bilimselgostergeler/bilimselanaliz.pdf adresinden erişildi.
• Meho, L.I. ve Yang, K. (2007). Anew era in Citation and bibliometric analyses: Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar. Journal ofthe American SocietyforInformation Science and Technology, 58 (13), 2105-2125.
• Moed, H. F. (2005). Citation Analysis in Research Evaluation. Springer.
• Moed, H. F. (2006). Bibliometric rankings ofworld universities. 03.12.2008 tarihinde http://www.cwts.nl/hm/bibl_rnk_wrld_univ_full.pdf adresinden erişildi
• NSF. (2008). Science and engineering indicators 2008. 03.12.2008 tarihinde http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/seind08/ adresinden erişildi.
• Önder, Ç., Şevkli, M., Altınok, T. ve Tavukçuoğlu, C. (2008). Institutional change and scientific research: A preliminary bibliometric analysis of institutional influences on Turkey's recent social science publications. Scientometrics, 76 (3), 540-560.
• OECD. (2007). Main science and technology indicator. 03.12.2008 tarihindehttp://www.oecd.org/document/26/0,3343,en_2649_33703_ 1901082_1_1_1_1,00.html adresinden erişildi.
• OECD. (2007a). OECD science, technology and Industry scoreboard 2007. 03.12.2008 tarihinde http://puck.sourceoecd.org/vl=3161989/cl=22/nw=1/ rpsv/sti2007/a-2.htm adresinden erişildi.
• Uzun, A. (2006). Science and technology policy in Turkey. National strategies for innovation and change during the 1983-2003 period and beyond. Scientometrics, 66 (2), 551-559.
• Weingart, P. (2005). Impact of bibliometrics upon the science system: Inadvertent consequences?. Scientometrics, 62 (1), 117-131.