System Justification Theory from the Perspective of Spiritual Counseling and Care: Applications and Possibilities

Öz

This article aims to analyze system justification theory from the perspective of spiritual counseling and care. A review of the relevant literature indicates that system justification theory posits individuals have a tendency to rationalize and support the existing social order. It has been argued that people are inclined to perceive the system as just due to various psychological motivations, such as the desire to avoid uncertainty, achieve psychological security, and maintain a sense of belonging. While this belief may offer short-term psychological comfort, it has been suggested that, in the long term, it can hinder social change and limit individuals’ capacity to resist injustice. Notably, disadvantaged groups may be more likely to conform to systemic injustices rather than actively challenge them. Spiritual counseling and care, as a domain concerned with fostering spiritual well-being, is thought to enhance individuals’ spiritual resilience by supporting their search for meaning. Spiritual resilience is asserted to strengthen individuals’ ability to cope with adversity, thereby contributing to overall psychological well-being. This study also explores how spiritual counseling and care helps individuals make sense of their relationship with the existing system and examines the extent to which system-justifying tendencies may either support psychological well-being or impose certain limitations. Within this framework, the study investigates how spiritual counseling and care influences individuals’ adaptation to the status quo or their inclination to challenge it. It is proposed that spiritual counseling and care supports individuals in recognizing cognitive dissonance, questioning systemic injustices, and engaging in intentional processes of change. This process is seen not only as a means of achieving personal psychological relief but also as a pathway to fostering greater societal awareness. Furthermore, spiritual counseling and care is posited to assist individuals not only in adapting psychologically to the prevailing system but also in actively contributing to the pursuit of social justice. In doing so, individuals may develop a critical awareness of systemic legitimacy and make informed decisions grounded in spiritual and ethical values. In conclusion, this study suggests that, through the lens of System Justification Theory, spiritual counseling and care contributes to individuals’ internal equilibrium, promotes awareness of social inequities, and facilitates adaptation to transformative processes when necessary. By examining the intersection of these two frameworks, the study offers concrete recommendations for reshaping individuals’ perceptions of systemic justice.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Spiritual counseling and care
• System justification theory
• Cognitive dissonance theory
• Spiritual resilience
• Spirituality

Manevi Danışmanlık ve Rehberlik Perspektifinden Sistem Haklılaştırma Teorisi: Uygulama Alanları ve İmkânı

Öz

Bu makalede, sistem haklılaştırma teorisinin manevi danışmanlık ve rehberlik perspektifinden analiz edilmesi amaçlanmıştır. Konuya ilişkin oluşturulan literatüre bakıldığında sistem haklılaştırma teorisinde, bireylerin mevcut toplumsal düzeni rasyonelleştirme ve destekleme eğiliminde oldukları savunulmuştur. Bireylerin belirsizlikten kaçınma, psikolojik güvenlik ve aidiyet ihtiyacı gibi güdülerle mevcut sistemin adil olduğuna inanma eğiliminde oldukları belirtilmiştir. Ancak, bu inancın kısa sürede psikolojik rahatlama sağlarken, uzun dönemde toplumsal değişimi engelleyebileceği ve bireylerin haksızlıklara karşı mücadele etme potansiyellerini sınırlayabileceği ifade edilmiştir. Özellikle dezavantajlı grupların, sistemin adaletsizliklerine rağmen ona uyum sağlamayı tercih edebildikleri vurgulanmıştır. Manevi danışmanlık ve rehberliğin, bireylerin manevi iyi oluşlarını destekleyen bir danışmanlık alanı olduğu düşünüldüğünde bireylerin anlam arayışlarını merkeze alarak, manevi dayanıklılıklarını artırmalarına yardımcı olduğu belirtilmiştir. Manevi dayanıklılığın, bireyin zorluklarla başa çıkma becerilerini güçlendirerek ruhsal iyilik halini artırabileceği ileri sürülmüştür. Ayrıca makalede, manevi danışmanlık ve rehberliğin bireyin mevcut sistemle olan ilişkisini anlamlandırmasına, sistem haklılaştırma eğiliminin hangi noktalarda psikolojik refaha katkı sağladığını ve hangi noktalarda bireyi sınırladığını değerlendirmesine olanak tanıyabileceği ifade edilmiştir. Bu bağlamda, manevi danışmanlık ve rehberliğin bireyin statükoya uyum sağlama veya onu sorgulama süreçlerini nasıl şekillendirdiği ele alınmıştır. Manevi danışmanlık ve rehberliğin danışanların bilişsel çelişkilerini fark etmelerine, adaletsizlikleri sorgulamalarına ve bilinçli değişim süreçlerine yönlendirilmesine destek olabileceği belirtilmiştir. Bu süreçte, bireylerin manevi dayanıklılığının artırılarak sadece bireysel psikolojik rahatlama sağlamak yerine, toplumsal farkındalık kazanmalarının da teşvik edilebileceği vurgulanmıştır. Manevi danışmanlık ve rehberlik, bireyin sadece mevcut düzenle psikolojik uyum sağlamasını değil, aynı zamanda toplumsal adalet arayışına katkıda bulunmasını da destekleyebilir. Böylece birey, sistemin haklı olup olmadığına dair farkındalık geliştirerek, manevi ve etik değerler çerçevesinde bilinçli kararlar alabilir. Sonuç olarak adı geçen bu teori kapsamında manevi danışmanlık ve rehberliğin bireylerin içsel denge sağlamasına, toplumsal eşitsizliklere karşı bilinç geliştirmesine ve gerektiğinde dönüşüm süreçlerine uyum sağlamasına katkı sunabileceği ifade edilmiştir. Ayrıca sistem haklılaştırma teorisi ile manevi danışmanlık ve rehberliğin kesişim noktalarının incelendiği bu makalede, bireylerin sistemsel adalet algılarını dönüştürmeye yönelik bazı somut öneriler sunulmuştur.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Manevi danışmanlık ve rehberlik
• Sistem haklılaştırma teorisi
• Bilişsel çelişki teorisi
• Manevi dayanıklılık
• Maneviyat

Kaynakça

1. Ağılkaya-Şahin, Z. (2024). Navigating interreligious differences in spiritual/pastoral care: An empirical study on Turkish Muslim and German Christian spiritual/pastoral caregivers. Religions, 15(5), 571.
2. Altop, E., & Solak, N. (2021). Düşük sosyo-ekonomik statüdeki er-genlerde psikolojik iyi oluş: Sistemi meşrulaştırıcı inançların, öfke ve hayranlık duygularının rolü. AYNA Clinical Psychology Journal, 8(3), 444-488.
3. Anderson, L., & Nichols, M. D. (2022). A qualitative exploration of women’s self-knowledge and perception surrounding their reproducti-ve bodies. Journal of International Women’s Studies, 24(5), 1-15.
4. Antmen, D. (2023). Explaining the justification of violence against women based on the system justification theory. Nesne Psikoloji Dergisi, 11(29), 503-518.
5. Asadzandi, M., Mazandarani, H. A., Saffari, M., & Khaghanizadeh, M. (2022). Effect of spiritual care based on the sound heart model on spiritual experiences of hemodialysis patients. Journal of Religion & Health, 61(3), 2056-2071.
6. Asgeirsdottir, G. H., Sigurbjörnsson, E., Traustadottir, R., Sigur-dardottir, V., Gunnarsdottir, S., & Kelly, E. (2013). “To cherish each day as it comes”: A qualitative study of spirituality among persons rece-iving palliative care. Supportive Care in Cancer, 21(5), 1445-1451.
7. Bahamondes, J., Sengupta, N. K., Sibley, C. G., & Osborne, D. (2021). Examining the relational underpinnings and consequences of system‐justifying beliefs: Explaining the palliative effects of system justification. British Journal of Social Psychology, 60(3), 1027-1050.
8. Belen, F. Z. (2022). Manevi danışmanlıkta bibliyoterapi tekniği ve uygulanması. Grafiker Yayınları.

9. Blasi, G., & Jost, J. T. (2006). System justification theory and research: Implications for law, legal advocacy, and social justice. California Law Review, 94(4), 1119-1168.
10. Cetin, Z., & Ozen, B. (2024). Investigating spiritual care perceptions and religious coping methods among the relatives of terminally ill patients during the COVID-19 pandemic: The case of Turkey. BMC Pallia-tive Care, 23(1), 1-11.
11. Cook, C. C. H., & White, N. H. (2018). Resilience and the role of spirituality. https://durham-repository.worktribe.com.
12. Cortis, N., Foley, M., & Williamson, S. (2022). Change agents or defending the status quo? How senior leaders frame workplace gender equality. Gender, Work and Organization, 29(1), 205-221.
13. De Cristofaro, V., Pellegrini, V., Giacomantonio, M., Livi, S., & van Zomeren, M. (2021). Can moral convictions against gender inequality overpower system justification effects? Examining the interaction between moral conviction and system justification. British Journal of Social Psychology, 60(4), 1279-1302.
14. Dong, Z., Yang, T., Hou, Y., Cao, Y., & Feng, M. (2024). System-justifying belief alleviates online privacy concerns: The mediating role of relatedness satisfaction and general trust. Computers in Human Behavior, 154.
15. Duran, S., Avci, D., & Esim, F. (2020). Association between spiri-tual well-being and resilience among Turkish hemodialysis patients. Journal of Religion & Health, 59(6), 3097-3109.
16. Essien, I., Calanchini, J., & Degner, J. (2021). Moderators of intergroup evaluation in disadvantaged groups: A comprehensive test of predictions from system justification theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 120(5), 1204-1230.
17. Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford University Press.
18. Freire, P., & Macedo, D. (2000). Pedagogy of the oppressed, 30th anniversary edition. (M. B. Ramos, Çev.). Continuum.
19. Gholamhosseini, M., Dehghan, M., Azzizadeh Forouzi, M., Mangolian shahrbabaki, P., & Roy, C. (2022). Effectiveness of spiritual counseling on the enhancement of hope in Iranian Muslim patients with myocardial infarction: A two-month follow-up. Journal of Religion & Health, 61(5), 3898-3908.
20. Güler Ünal, A. G. (2022). Hastanelerde manevi destek uygulamaları: Türkiye ve Almanya’da mukayeseli bir araştırma. [Doktora tezi]. Sivas Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi.
21. Gündüz, E. S., Avci, D., & Kiraz, N. (2023). The relationship between spiritual well-being and post-traumatic growth in Turkish patients undergoing solid organ transplantation. Journal of Religion & Health, 62(6), 4436-4450. Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. John Wiley & Sons Inc.
22. Jost, J., & Andrews, R. (2012). System justification theory. [içinde] D. Christie (ed.), Encyclopedia of peace psychology-2. (ss. 1092-1096). Wiley-Blackwell.
23. Jost, J., & Hunyady, O. (2003). The psychology of system justifica-tion and the palliative function of ideology. European Review of Social Psychology, 13(1), 111-153.
24. Jost, J. T. (2019). A quarter century of system justification theory: Questions, answers, criticisms, and societal applications. British Journal of Social Psychology, 58(2), 263-314.
25. Jost, J. T. (2020). A theory of system justification. Harvard University Press.
26. Jost, J. T., & Banaji, M. R. (1994). The role of stereotyping in system-justification and the production of false consciousness. British Journal of Social Psychology, 33(1), 1-27.
27. Jost, J. T., Banaji, M. R., & Nosek, B. A. (2004). A decade of system justification theory: Accumulated evidence of conscious and unconscious bolstering of the status quo. Political Psychology, 25(6), 881-919.
28. Jost, J. T., Bertin, J. A., Javeed, A., Liaquat, U., & Rivera Pichardo, E. J. (2023). Rejoinder to Rubin, Owuamalam, Spears, and Caricati (2023): Ideology is not accuracy; identity is not everything; and the social identity model of social attitudes does not explain system justification, it presupposes it. European Review of Social Psychology, 34(2), 244-267.
29. Karaba, F. (2024). 'I can only do my best and leave the rest to God": Religious/spiritual coping strategies of African nurses in the UK. Journal of Business Ethics, 194(4), 789-808.
30. Karaca, F., & Acar, M. (2016). Bireysel psikolojik danışma sürecinde danışanın dini kaynaklarının kullanılması üzerine bir vaka örneği. [içinde] Manevi Danışmanlık ve Rehberlik-1. (ss. 157-167). Dem Yayınları.
31. LaRocca-Pitts, M. (2024). The bidimensional spirit and mattering: A continuum of spiritual care interventions. Spirituality in Clinical Practice. https://doi.org/10.1037/scp0000377
32. Lerner, M. J. (with Internet Archive). (1980). The belief in a just world: A fundamental delusion. New York : Plenum Press.
33. Liaquat, U., Jost, J. T., & Balcetis, E. (2023). System justification motivation as a source of backlash against equality‐promoting policies—And what to do about it. Social Issues and Policy Review, 17(1), 131-154.
34. Liekefett, L., & Becker, J. C. (2022). Low system justification is associated with support for both progressive and reactionary social change. European Journal of Social Psychology, 52(7), 1015-1030. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2883
35. Lima, B. P. B., de Souza, L. E. C., & Jost, J. T. (2025). System justification, subjective well-being, and mental health symptoms in members of disadvantaged minority groups. Clinical Psychology Review, 115.
36. Liviatan, I., & Jost, J. T. (2011). Special issue: System justification theory: Motivated social cognition in the service of the status quo. Social Cognition, 29(3), 231-237.
37. Maslow, A. H. (1943). A theory of human motivation. Psychological Review, 50(4), 370-396.
38. Mehta, N. H., Prajapati, M., Aeleti, R., Kinariwala, K., Ohri, K., McCabe, S., Buller, Z., Leskinen, S., Nawabi, N. L., Bhatt, V., Yerigeri, K., & Babaria, V. (2024). The Power of a Belief System: A Systematic Qualitative Synthesis of Spiritual Care for Patients with Brain Tumors. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 13(16), 4871.
39. Mendenhall, T. J., McIntosh, D., & Hottinger, D. (2022). Walking-the-walk: Attending to the “spiritual” in medical family therapy’s biopsychosocial/spiritual care. Contemporary Family Therapy: An International Journal, 44(1), 44-54.
40. Miller, M., Clark, J., & Jehle, A. (2015). Cognitive dissonance theory (Festinger). https://doi.org/10.1002/9781405165518.wbeosc058.pub2.
41. Mosso, C., Briante, G., Aiello, A., & Russo, S. (2013). The role of legitimizing ideologies as predictors of ambivalent sexism in young people: Evidence from Italy and the USA. Social Justice Research, 26(1), 1-17.
42. Muehlhausen, B. L., Chappelle, C., DeLaney, A., Peacock, D., Stratton, R. G., & Fitchett, G. (2024). Providing spiritual care to cancer patients in the outpatient context: A pilot study. Journal of Health Care Chaplaincy, 30(3), 153-166.
43. Napier, J. L., Suppes, A., & Bettinsoli, M. L. (2020). Denial of gender discrimination is associated with better subjective well‐being among women: A system justification account. European Journal of Social Psychology, 50(6), 1191-1209.
44. Napier, J. L., Thorisdottir, H., & Jost, J. T. (2010). The joy of sexism? A multinational investigation of hostile and benevolent justifications for gender inequality and their relations to subjective well-being. Sex Roles, 62(7-8), 405-419.
45. Nejati-Zarnaqi, B., Khorasani-Zavareh, D., Sohrabizadeh, S., Ghaffari, M., Sabour, S., Nouri, F., & Mohammadi, R. (2024). Factors affecting the spiritual rehabilitation of people affected by natural disasters: A systematic review. Journal of Injury & Violence Research, 16(2), 159-168.
46. Nelson-Becker, H., & Thomas, M. (2020). Religious/spiritual struggles and spiritual resilience in marginalised older adults. Religions, 11(9), Article 9.
47. Oman, D. (2013). Defining religion and spirituality. [içinde] Hand-book of the psychology of religion and spirituality. (ss. 23-47). The Guilford Press.
48. Özoğul, A. (2020). Manevi danışmanlık ve rehberlikte logoterapinin uygulanabilirliği. [Yüksek lisans tezi]. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi.
49. Peres, J. F. P., Moreira-Almeida, A., Nasello, A. G., & Koenig, H. G. (2007). Spirituality and resilience in trauma victims. Journal of Religion and Health, 46(3), 343-350.
50. Peterson, C., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2004). Character strengths and vir-tues: A handbook and classification. American Psychological Association.
51. Price-Blackshear, M. A., & Bettencourt, B. A. (2023). Trait mindfulness decouples the association between system justification and racial outgroup attitudes. Race & Social Problems, 15(4), 359-375.
52. Quinn, B., & Connolly, M. (2023). Spirituality in palliative care. BMC Palliative Care, 22(1).
53. Rao, N., & Power, S. A. (2021). “Communities change when individuals change”: The sustainability of system‐challenging collective action. European Journal of Social Psychology, 51(3), 525-537.
54. Rubin, M., Kevin Owuamalam, C., Spears, R., & Caricati, L. (2023). A social identity model of system attitudes (SIMSA): Multiple explanations of system justification by the disadvantaged that do not depend on a separate system justification motive. European Review of Social Psychology, 34(2), 203-243.
55. Rubin, M., Owuamalam, C. K., Spears, R., & Caricati, L. (2023). Social identity explanations of system justification: Misconceptions, criti-cisms, and clarifications. European Review of Social Psychology, 34(2), 268-297.
56. Salari, N., Kazeminia, M., Abdi, A., Abdolmaleki, A., Abdoli, N., Mohammadi, M., & Shohaimi, S. (2023). Effects of counselling and spiritual care program on anxiety in patients with chronic diseases: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Current Psychology, 42(12), 9943-9952.
57. Schipani, D. S. (2024). Navigating religious difference in spiritual care. Religions, 15(1), 41.
58. Schwalm, F. D., Zandavalli, R. B., de Castro Filho, E. D., & Lucchetti, G. (2022). Is there a relationship between spiritua-lity/religiosity and resilience? A systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. Journal of Health Psychology, 27(5), 1218-1232.
59. Sichel, C. E., Javdani, S., & Yi, J. (2022). Perceiving fairness in an unfair world: System justification and the mental health of girls in de-tention facilities. American Journal of Community Psychology, 69(3-4), 451-462.
60. Sidanius, J., & Pratto, F. (1999). Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. Cambridge University Press.
61. Silva, W. A. D., & Pereira, C. R. (2023). Do people see the way things are as they should be? Measuring the individual differences in system justification. Current Psychology, 42(21), 17805-17824.
62. Smith, J., Charles, G., & Hesketh, I. (2015). Developing understanding of the spiritual aspects to resilience. International Journal of Public Leadership, 11(1), 34-45.
63. Solak, N., Tamir, M., Sümer, N., Jost, J. T., & Halperin, E. (2021). Expressive suppression as an obstacle to social change: Linking system justification, emotion regulation, and collective action. Motivation and Emotion, 45(5), 661-682.
64. Szabó, Z. P., Lönnqvist, J.-E., Lantos, N. A., & Valtonen, J. (2024). Right-wing authoritarianism, social dominance, system justification, and conservative political ideology as predictors of mental health stigma: The Hungarian case. International Journal of Social Psychiatry, 70(8), 1505-1515.
65. Şentürk, H., & Çetin, G. K. (2020). Hastanelerde manevi danışmanlık hizmetleri ihtiyacı üzerine pilot bir araştırma: Sdü hastanesi örneği. Journal of Social Sciences Research / Sosyal Bilimler Arastirmalari Dergisi, 10(2), 373-396.
66. Tan, H. (1992). Psikolojik yardım ilişkileri: Danışma ve psikoterapi. Milli Eğitim Basımevi.
67. Thomas, B. J., & Harris, S. (2021). A new, established approach to managing misbehavior: System justification theory. Personnel Review, 50(7), 1582-1598.
68. Titus, C. S. (2011). Resilience and the virtue of fortitude. Catholic University of America Press.
69. Travaglino, G. A., & Moon, C. (2022). The dependency–counterdependency dynamic: Interactive effects of system justification and power‐distance orientation on radicalization against the political system. Political Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12863
70. Uğurlu Bakar, S. (2016). Dini danışmanlık eğitimi: AAPC akreditasyon kriterlerinin Türkiye açısından değerlendirilmesi. [içinde] Manevi Danışmanlık ve Rehberlik-1. (ss. 259-280). Dem Yayınları.
71. Uzun, U., Başar, S., & Saritaş, A. (2024). Spiritual needs of family caregivers in palliative care. BMC Palliative Care, 23(1), 1-8.
72. Ünal, A. G. G. (2024). Din psikolojisi perspektifinden sistem haklılaştırma teorisi: Uygulama konuları ve imkânı. Türk Din Psikolojisi Dergisi, 10, 13-34.
73. Ünal, A. G. G., & Yılmaz, S. (2023). Methods used in spiritual counseling and guidance services for patients/patients’ relatives in Turkey and Germany: A qualitative approach. Spiritual Psychology and Counseling, 8(3), Article 3.
74. Vargas Salfate, S., Spielmann, J., & Briley, D. A. (2024). Supporting the status quo is weakly associated with subjective well-being: A com-parison of the palliative function of ideology across social status groups using a meta-analytic approach. Psychological Bulletin, 150(11), 1318-1346.
75. Weedman, M., Al-Kire, R. L., & Tsang, J.-A. (2024). Hostile and prosocial reactions to Christian privilege in the United States: A registered report. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality. https://doi.org/10.1037/ rel0000545
76. Weiner, B. (1985). An attributional theory of achievement motivation and emotion. Psychological Review, 92(4), 548-573.
77. Wilkinson-Ryan, T. (2020). Justifying bad deals. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 169(1), 193-240.
78. Yılmaz, S. (2016). Bibliyoterapinin hastalara manevi bakım yöntemi olarak uygulanması: Sivas Devlet Hastanesi örneği. [içinde] Manevi Danışmanlık ve Rehberlik-1. (ss. 459-479). Dem Yayınları.