EVALUATION OF THORACOLUMBAR INJURIES IN TRAKYA UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE ACCORDING TO AOSPINE CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM

Yıl 2020, Cilt: 7 Sayı: 1, 11 - 19, 29.02.2020

Gonca Aksu Sercan Saran Mahmut Sami Oflaz Mert Çiftdemir

Öz

Aims: This study aims to classify the thoracolumbar spinal injuries that were treated in Trakya University School of Medicine
according to the recent Thoracolumbar AOSpine injury score and crosscheck the classified data with categorical modifiers such
as gender, trauma type and treatment type. Methods: AOSpine Classification System was used to classify thoracolumbar spinal
injuries. Classes were compared with patients’ gender, age, trauma energy and treatment type. Pearson Chi-Squared test and Shapiro-Wilk test were used for statistical analysis. Results: The total number of patients was 248. One hundred fifty-two (61.3%)
were male and 96 (38.7%) were female. One hundred and three (86.6%) patients had high-energy trauma and 16 (13.4%) patients
had low-energy trauma in a total of 119 operated patients. Relationship between treatment type and AOSpine Classification System statistically significant. There was also a significant difference between trauma energy and AOSpine Classification System
types. Conclusion: As a conclusion, gender and trauma energy were found to have a relationship and higher energy traumas were
most likely to cause spinal fractures. In addition, AOSpine classification system may be one of the confounding factors regarding
the choice of treatment. Keywords: Classification, spine, injury

Anahtar Kelimeler

Classification, spine, injury

Kaynakça

• 1. Mohamadi A, Googanian A, Ahmadi A et al. Comparison of surgical or nonsurgical treatment outcomes in patients with thoracolumbar fracture with Score 4 of TLICS: a randomized, single-blind, and single-central clinical trial. Medicine (Baltimore) 2018;97(6):e9842. 2. Kim BG, Dan JM, Shin DE. Treatment of thoracolumbar facture. Asian Spine Journal 2015;9(1):133-46. 3. Azam MQ, Sadat-Ali M. The concept of evolution of thoracolumbar fracture classifications helps in surgical decisions. Asian Spine J 2015;9(6):984–94. 4. Denis F. The three column spine and its significance in the classification of acute thoracolumbar spinal injuries. Spine 1983;8(8):817- 31. 5. Gomleksiz C. Thoracolumbar fractures: a review of classifications and surgical methods. Journal of Spine 2015;04:250. 6. Vaccaro AR, Oner C, Kepler CK et al. AOSpine thoracolumbar spine injury classification system: fracture description, neurological status, and key modifiers. Spine 2013;38(23):2028-37. 7. Vaccaro AR, Schroeder GD, Kepler CK et al. The surgical algorithm for the AOSpine thoracolumbar spine injury classification system. Eur Spine J 2016;25(4):1087-94. 8. Kepler CK, Vaccaro AR, Koerner JD et al. Reliability analysis of the AOSpine thoracolumbar spine injury classification system by a worldwide group of naïve spinal surgeons. European Spine Journal 2015;25(4):1082–86. 9. Cheng J, Liu P, Sun D et al. Reliability and reproducibility analysis of the AOSpine thoracolumbar spine injury classification system by Chinese spinal surgeons. European Spine Journal 2016;26(5):1477- 82. 10. Azimi P, Mohammadi HR, Azhari S et al. The AOSpine thoracolumbar spine injury classification system: a reliability and agreement study. Asian J Neurosurg 2015;10:282-5. 11. Abedi A, Mokkink LB, Zadegan SA et al. Reliability and validity of the AOSpine thoracolumbar injury classification system: a systematic review. Global Spine J 2019;9(2):231–42. 12. Reinhold M, Audigé L, Schnake KJ et al. AO spine injury classification system: a revision proposal for the thoracic and lumbar spine. Eur Spine J. 2013;22(10):2184–201. 13. Dodwad SN, Dodwad SJ, Wisneski R et al. Retrospective analysis of thoracolumbar junction injuries using the thoracolumbar injury severity and classification score, American spinal injury association class, injury severity score, age, sex and length of hospitalization. Journal of Spinal Disorders and Techniques 2015;28(7):410-6. 14. Schousboe JT. Epidemiology of vertebral fractures. Journal of Clinical Densitometry 2016;19(1):8-22. 15. Sidon E, Stein M, Ramalingam G et al. Gender differences in spinal injuries: causes and location of injury. Journal of Women’s Health 2018;27(7):946-51. 16. Hernlund E, Svedbom A, Ivergård M et al. Osteoporosis in the European Union: medical management, epidemiology and economic burden. A report prepared in collaboration with the International Osteoporosis Foundation (IOF) and the European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industry Associations (EFPIA). Archives of Osteoporosis 2013;8:136. 17. Hoy D, Brooks P, Blyth F et al. The epidemiology of low back pain. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 2010;24(6):769–81. 18. Rajasekaran S, Vaccaro AR, Kanna RM et al. The value of CT and MRI in the classification and surgical decision-making among spine surgeons in thoracolumbar spinal injuries. Eur Spine J 2017;26(5):1463–9. 19. Kepler CK, Vaccaro AR, Schroeder GD et al. The thoracolumbar AOSpine injury score. Global Spine Journal 2016;6(4):329-34. 20. Jordan KM, Cooper C. Epidemiology of osteoporosis. Best Practice & Research Clinical Rheumatology 2002;16(5):795-806. 21. Melton III LJ, Thamer M, Ray NF et al. Fractures attributable to osteoporosis: report from the National Osteoporosis Foundation. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research 1997;12(1):16-23.