Research Article

DISHONESTY IN ONLINE LEARNING: DISTANCE LEARNING PERSPECTIVES DURING PANDEMIC

Volume: 24 Number: 2 April 1, 2023
EN

DISHONESTY IN ONLINE LEARNING: DISTANCE LEARNING PERSPECTIVES DURING PANDEMIC

Abstract

Academic dishonesty has become a serious concern, particularly during the Covid-19 pandemic era, where online learning is left as a single option in almost all academic activities. Lack of graduate ethics has an impact on attitudes in the workplace. Therefore, it is important to introduce academic integrity to students in higher education to foster an attitude of honesty in the world of work, especially ethics. Online lectures encourage students to violate academic integrity due to the lack of direct interaction and administration. This study aims to see the level of academic dishonesty that occurs during online lectures. The research was conducted by the Faculty of Economics and Business, public and private universities. The number of samples is 431 students of economics and business. We examine the effect of lecture administration, lecturerstudent interaction, and learning satisfaction on the impact of academic dishonesty. The results showed that clear administration and good interaction between lecturers and students would increase student learning satisfaction and reduce academic dishonesty. But the satisfaction that students want to achieve does not have a significant effect on the level of academic dishonesty. Implications for practice are discussed and future research directions are offered.

Keywords

Academic dishonesty, administration, Lecturer-student Interaction, learning satisfaction, Distance learning

References

  1. Alismail, H. A., & McGuire, P. (2015). 21 St Century Standards and Curriculum: Current Research and Practice. Journal of Education and Practice, 6(6), 150–155. http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1083656.pdf
  2. Alqurashi, E. (2019). Predicting student satisfaction and perceived learning within online learning environments. Distance Education, 40(1), 133–148. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2018.1553562
  3. Baber, H. (2020). Determinants of students’ perceived learning outcome and satisfaction in online learning during the pandemic of COVID19. Journal of Education and E-Learning Research, 7(3), 285–292. https://doi.org/10.20448/JOURNAL.509.2020.73.285.292
  4. Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16(1), 074–094.
  5. Bashir, H., & Bala, R. (2018). Development and Validation of Academic Dishonesty Scale (ADS): Presenting a Multidimensional Scale. International Journal of Instruction, 11(2), 57–74. https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2018.1125a
  6. Benson, L., Rodier, K., Enström, R., & Bocatto, E. (2019). Developing a university-wide academic integrity e-learning tutorial: A Canadian case. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 15(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40979-019-0045-1
  7. Bickle, M., Rucker, R., & Burnsed, K. A. (2019). Online Learning: Examination of Attributes That Promote Student Satisfaction. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 22(1), 1–7.
  8. Brown, B. S., & Choong, P. (2005). A Investigation of Academic Dishonesty among Business Students at Public and Private United Sates Universities. International Journal of Management, 22(2), 201–214.
  9. Bunn, D. N., Caudill, S. B., & Gropper, D. M. (1992). Crime in the classroom: An economic analysis of undergraduate student cheating behavior. Journal of Economic Education, 23(3), 197–207. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220485.1992.10844753
  10. Burton, J. H., Talpade, S., & Haynes, J. (2011). Religiosity and test-taking ethics among Business School Students. Journal of Academic and Business Ethics, 4, 1–8. http://search.proquest.com/docview/876279468?accountid=14549%5Cnhttp://hl5yy6xn2p.search.serialssolutions.com/?genre=article&sid=ProQ:&atitle=Religiosity+and+test-taking+ethics+among+Business+School+students&title=Journal+of+Academic+and+Business+Ethics&i
APA
Putra, P. D., Zaınal, A., & Thohırı, R. (2023). DISHONESTY IN ONLINE LEARNING: DISTANCE LEARNING PERSPECTIVES DURING PANDEMIC. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 24(2), 108-119. https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.1022365
AMA
1.Putra PD, Zaınal A, Thohırı R. DISHONESTY IN ONLINE LEARNING: DISTANCE LEARNING PERSPECTIVES DURING PANDEMIC. TOJDE. 2023;24(2):108-119. doi:10.17718/tojde.1022365
Chicago
Putra, Pasca Dwi, Andri Zaınal, and Roza Thohırı. 2023. “DISHONESTY IN ONLINE LEARNING: DISTANCE LEARNING PERSPECTIVES DURING PANDEMIC”. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education 24 (2): 108-19. https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.1022365.
EndNote
Putra PD, Zaınal A, Thohırı R (April 1, 2023) DISHONESTY IN ONLINE LEARNING: DISTANCE LEARNING PERSPECTIVES DURING PANDEMIC. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education 24 2 108–119.
IEEE
[1]P. D. Putra, A. Zaınal, and R. Thohırı, “DISHONESTY IN ONLINE LEARNING: DISTANCE LEARNING PERSPECTIVES DURING PANDEMIC”, TOJDE, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 108–119, Apr. 2023, doi: 10.17718/tojde.1022365.
ISNAD
Putra, Pasca Dwi - Zaınal, Andri - Thohırı, Roza. “DISHONESTY IN ONLINE LEARNING: DISTANCE LEARNING PERSPECTIVES DURING PANDEMIC”. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education 24/2 (April 1, 2023): 108-119. https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.1022365.
JAMA
1.Putra PD, Zaınal A, Thohırı R. DISHONESTY IN ONLINE LEARNING: DISTANCE LEARNING PERSPECTIVES DURING PANDEMIC. TOJDE. 2023;24:108–119.
MLA
Putra, Pasca Dwi, et al. “DISHONESTY IN ONLINE LEARNING: DISTANCE LEARNING PERSPECTIVES DURING PANDEMIC”. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, vol. 24, no. 2, Apr. 2023, pp. 108-19, doi:10.17718/tojde.1022365.
Vancouver
1.Pasca Dwi Putra, Andri Zaınal, Roza Thohırı. DISHONESTY IN ONLINE LEARNING: DISTANCE LEARNING PERSPECTIVES DURING PANDEMIC. TOJDE. 2023 Apr. 1;24(2):108-19. doi:10.17718/tojde.1022365