Research Article

INDIVIDUAL AND CONTEXTUAL PREDICTORS OF ENGAGEMENT IN ONLINE LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS

Volume: 26 Number: 4 October 1, 2025

INDIVIDUAL AND CONTEXTUAL PREDICTORS OF ENGAGEMENT IN ONLINE LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS

Abstract

This mixed-methods study examined factors that influence student engagement in online learning environments at public universities in Turkiye setting. Quantitative data were collected from 429 undergraduate students enrolled in distance learning programs and MOOCs at these universities, while 385 of the participants also provided qualitative data. The Instructional Motivation Survey and Volitional Competence Scales were used to collect the quantitative data. There were no significant gender differences in course completion or dropout rates, although educational level was positively associated with course completion. Qualitative findings supported this, identifying personal motivation for success and development as key drivers of engagement. In addition, students who were more motivated by the course had better completion rates. Environmental factors, including external support and reliable access to technology, were also significant, demonstrating the complex interaction between personal and contextual factors in shaping online learning outcomes.

Keywords

Motivation, Online learning, Engagement, MOOCs, Distance education

References

  1. Avci, D. (2019). Effectiveness of the college adjustment program developed for college freshmen [Doctoral dissertation, Hacettepe University]. National Thesis Center.
  2. Aydin, I. E., & Yazici, M. (2020). Drop-out in MOOCs. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology- TOJET, 19(3), 9–17. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1261605.pdf
  3. Azhar, K. A., Iqbal, N., Shah, Z., & Ahmed, H. (2024). Understanding high dropout rates in MOOCs: A qualitative case study from Pakistan. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 61(4), 764–78. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2023.1234567
  4. Bean, J. P., & Metzner, B. S. (1985). A conceptual model of nontraditional undergraduate student attrition. Review of Educational Research, 55(4), 485–540. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543055004485
  5. Braxton, J. (2000). Reworking the student departure puzzle. Vanderbilt University Press.
APA
Kurtoglu, Y., & Dursun, O. O. (2025). INDIVIDUAL AND CONTEXTUAL PREDICTORS OF ENGAGEMENT IN ONLINE LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 26(4), 94-108. https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.1619046
AMA
1.Kurtoglu Y, Dursun OO. INDIVIDUAL AND CONTEXTUAL PREDICTORS OF ENGAGEMENT IN ONLINE LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS. TOJDE. 2025;26(4):94-108. doi:10.17718/tojde.1619046
Chicago
Kurtoglu, Yasemin, and Ozcan Ozgur Dursun. 2025. “INDIVIDUAL AND CONTEXTUAL PREDICTORS OF ENGAGEMENT IN ONLINE LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS”. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education 26 (4): 94-108. https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.1619046.
EndNote
Kurtoglu Y, Dursun OO (October 1, 2025) INDIVIDUAL AND CONTEXTUAL PREDICTORS OF ENGAGEMENT IN ONLINE LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education 26 4 94–108.
IEEE
[1]Y. Kurtoglu and O. O. Dursun, “INDIVIDUAL AND CONTEXTUAL PREDICTORS OF ENGAGEMENT IN ONLINE LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS”, TOJDE, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 94–108, Oct. 2025, doi: 10.17718/tojde.1619046.
ISNAD
Kurtoglu, Yasemin - Dursun, Ozcan Ozgur. “INDIVIDUAL AND CONTEXTUAL PREDICTORS OF ENGAGEMENT IN ONLINE LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS”. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education 26/4 (October 1, 2025): 94-108. https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.1619046.
JAMA
1.Kurtoglu Y, Dursun OO. INDIVIDUAL AND CONTEXTUAL PREDICTORS OF ENGAGEMENT IN ONLINE LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS. TOJDE. 2025;26:94–108.
MLA
Kurtoglu, Yasemin, and Ozcan Ozgur Dursun. “INDIVIDUAL AND CONTEXTUAL PREDICTORS OF ENGAGEMENT IN ONLINE LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS”. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, vol. 26, no. 4, Oct. 2025, pp. 94-108, doi:10.17718/tojde.1619046.
Vancouver
1.Yasemin Kurtoglu, Ozcan Ozgur Dursun. INDIVIDUAL AND CONTEXTUAL PREDICTORS OF ENGAGEMENT IN ONLINE LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS. TOJDE. 2025 Oct. 1;26(4):94-108. doi:10.17718/tojde.1619046