Developing Web-oriented Homework System to Assess Students’ Introductory Physics Course Performance and Compare to Paper-based Peer Homework

Year 2006, Volume: 7 Issue: 3, 105 - 119, 01.09.2006

Neset Demırcı

Abstract

The World Wide Web influences education and our lives in many ways. Nowadays, Web-based homework has been becoming widespread practice in physics courses and some other courses as well. Although are some disputes whether this is an encouraging or risky development for student learning, there is limited research assessing the pedagogical effect of changing the medium from written, hand-graded homework to online oriented, computer-graded homework. In this study, web-oriented homework system is developed to assess students’ introductory physics course performance. Later on, these results are compared with paper-based (peer) homework performance for mid enrollment physics courses. One of two identical sections of introductory physics course students received paper-based, hand graded group homework while the other received the individual web-based homework. Then two groups’ on conceptual and problem-solving performance measures are compared. No significant differences were found in students’ Force Concept Inventory (FCI) test scores; however, average homework performance scores were significant that could be attributed to the homework method used in favor of paper-based peer homework group.

Keywords

Physics Assessment; Web-Based Homework; Paper-Based Homework; FCI.

References

• BILLINGTON, H. L. (1997). Poster presentations and peer assessment: Novel forms of evaluation and assessment. Journal of Biological Education, 31, 218–220.
• BONHAM, S.W., Deardorff, D.L. & Beichner, R. J. (2001). Comparison of Student Performance Using Web and Paper-Based Homework in College-Level Physics.The Physics Teacher, 39.
• BONHAM, S.W., Deardorff, D.L. & Beichner, R. J. (2003). Comparison of student performance using web and paper-based homework in college-level physics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40, 1050–1071.
• BUECHE, F. J., & Jerde, D.A. (1995). Principals of Physics (Turkish Translation by Palme Press), Ankara, 2003.
• COOPER, H. (1989). Synthesis of research on homework. Educational Leadership, 47(3), 85-91.
• DUFRESNE, R., Mestre, J., M. Hart, M. D., & Rath, K. A. (2002). The Effect of Web- Based Homework on Test Performance in Large Enrollment Introductory Physics Courses. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 21(3), 229- 251.
• FALCHIKOV, N., & Boud, D. (1989). Student self-assessment in higher education: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 59, 395–430.
• FRAENKEl, J.R., & Wallen, N.E. (1996). How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education, Mc-Graw-Hill press.
• HELLER, J. I. & Reif, F. (1984). Prescribing effective human problem solving processes: Problem description in physics. Cognition and Instruction, 1, 177–216.
• HELLER, P., & Hollabaugh, M. (1992). Teaching problem solving through cooperative grouping. Part 2: Designing problems and structuring groups. American Journal of Physics, 60, 637–644.
• HUGHES, I. E., & Large, B. J. (1993). Staff and peer-group assessment of oral communication skills. Studies in Higher Education, 18(3), 379–385.
• Gibson, J. W., Tesone, D. V., & Blachwell, C. W. (2001).The Journey to Cyberspace: Reflections from Three On-line Business Professors. S.A.M. Advanced Management Journal, 66(1), 30-34.
• KEITH, T. Z. (1982). Time spent on homework and high school grades: A large sample path analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 74(2), 248-253.
• KOTAS, P.M., & Finck, J.E. (2002). Collaborative Learning and Other Successful Strategies for On-line Homework. Proceedings of the International Conference on Computers in Education (ICCE’02)
• MALONEY, D. P. (1994). Research on problem solving: Physics. In Gabel, D.L. (Ed.), Handbook of research on science teaching and learning (pp.559). New York: Mcmillan.
• MAGIN, D., & Helmore, P. (2001). Peer and teacher assessments of oral presentation skills: How reliable are they? Studies in Higher Education, 26, 287– 298.
• ORSMOND, P.; Merry, S;, & Reiling, K. (2000). The use of student derived marking criteria in peer and self-assessment. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 25, 23–38.
• OGILVE, C. (2000). Effectiveness of different course components in driving gains in conceptual understanding, Cambridge, Internal report, Department of Physics at MIT [online] URL: http://torrseal.mit.edu/effedtech
• PARIS, S. G., & Paris, A. H. (2001). Classroom applications of research on self- regulated learning. Educational Psychologist, 36, 89–101.
• PASCHAL, R.A., Weinstein, T., & Walberg, H.J. (1984). The effects of homework on learning: A quantitative synthesis. Journal of Educational Research, 78(2), 97-104.
• SHEPARD, L. A. (2000). The role of assessment in a learning culture. Educational Researcher, 29, 4–14.
• SUNG, Y-T., Chang K-E., Chiou S-K., & Hou, H-T. (2005). The design and application of a web-based self- and peer-assessment system. Computers & Education, 45, 187–202.
• THOENNESSEN, M., & Harrison, M. (1996). Computer-assisted assignments in a large physics class. Computers Education, 27(2), 141-147.
• TITUS, A., Martin, L., & Beichner, R. (1998). Web-based testing in physics education: Methods and opportunities. Computers in Physics, 12, 117-123.
• TOPPING, K. J. (1998). Peer assessment between students in colleges and universities. Review of Educational Research, 68, 249–276.
• TYMMS, P.B., & Fitzgibbon, C.T. (1992). The relationship between homework to A- level results. Educational Research, 34(1), 3-10.