THE USE OF OPEN EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES IN ONLINE LEARNING: A Study of Students’ Perception

Yıl 2015, Cilt: 16 Sayı: 3, 74 - 87, 06.07.2015

Meirani Harsası

https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.46469

Cited By: 12

Öz

Universitas Terbuka (UT) is Indonesia’s higher education institution which implements distance education system. The term distance implies that learning is not performed face-to-face but there is geographically separation between students and teacher. Therefore, UT must provide many kinds of learning modes and learning support. To facilitate students in their learning process, UT provides an e-learning system named online tutorial. This tutorial is provided for all courses which are designed in 8 sessions of virtual class. Students can learn, discuss, and ask to the teacher via this mode of learning. As the development of methods in e-learning, the use of open educational resources (OER) has increasing these days. Learning materials can be taken easily and freely from internet. UT also utilize OER in it’s learning process, especially in e-learning. The aim of this study was to collect data from students about their acceptance of integrating OER into e-learning. The use of OER is perceived by students as something interesting because it’s new for them and can help them to have a better understanding about a topic. The results also showed that video has found as the most interesting OER for students. Other results, limitation and suggestion from students about integrating OER into e-learning also will be discussed in this paper. 

Anahtar Kelimeler

distance education, e-learning, OER

Kaynakça

• Arendt, A.M., & Shelton, B. (2009). Incentives and disincentives for the use of open course ware. International Review of Research in Open & Distance Learning, 10 (5), 1-25.
• Bissell, A. N. (2009). Permission granted: open licensing for educational resources. Open Learning, 29(1), 97-106.
• D'Antoni, S. (2009). Open Educational Resources: reviewing initiatives and issues. Open
• Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance, and e-Learning, 24(1), 3-10. Guri-Rosenblit, S. (2005). Distance education and e-Learning: not the same thing. Higher Education, 49(4), 467-493.
• MacDowell, E., A. (2010). Using open educational resources to help students understand the sub-prime lending crisis. Journal of Business Education, 3(11), 85-92.
• Ormrod, J.E. (2008). Educational psychology: developing learners (5th ed.) Uppersaddle
• River, New Jersey, NJ: Pearson/Merrill Prentice Hall. Rosenberg , M. (2001). E-Learning: strategies for delivering knowledge in the digital age. New York: McGraw-Hill.
• Ruiz, J., G., Mintzer, M., J., & Leipzig, R., M. (2006). The impact of e-learning in medical education. Academic Medicine, Vol. 81, No. 3.
• Steinweg, S. B., Williams, S. C., & Warren, S. H. (2006). Reaching through the screen: using a Tablet PC to provide feedback in online classes. Rural Special Education Quarterly, Vol. 25, No. 2, pp. 8-12.
• UNESCO (2002). UNESCO Promotes new initiative for free educational resources on the internet. http://www.unesco.org/education/news_en/080702_free_edu_ress.shtml (Accessed 26 March 2014)
• Yuan, L., MacNeill, S., & Kraan, W. (2008). Open educational resources – ppportunities and challenges for Higher Education. http://wiki.cetis.ac.uk/images/6/6d/OER_Briefing_Paper_CETIS_without_recommendat ions_with_cover_page_.pdf (Accessed 26 March 2014)