The Motivation Impact of Open Educational Resources Utilization on Physics Learning Using Quipper School App

Yıl 2017, Cilt: 18 Sayı: 4, 120 - 128, 01.10.2017

Dwi Sulısworo Eko Nur Sulıstıyo Rifai Nur Akhsan

https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.340399

Cited By: 3

Öz

The distribution of the education quality in Indonesia is relatively uneven. This affects the

quality of secondary school graduates. On the other hand, the national growth of

Information Communication Technology usage in Indonesia is very high, including the

use of mobile technology. This is an opportunity for the application of OER (Open

Educational Resources) in learning. This study aims to look at the impact of the

application of the concept of blended learning OER to motivate students, especially in

learning physics. The LMS used is Quipper School. This research is the quasy experiment

using post test only for control group design. ARCS (Attention, Relevance, Confidence,

and Satisfaction) models used in this study to observe the attention factor, relevance,

confidence, and satisfaction. The analysis technique used is the analysis of variance

(ANOVA). From this research, it is known that the application of the concept of OER in

learning, will increase the motivation on the aspects of attention, relevance, and the

confidence of the students. Meanwhile, the aspect of satisfaction on learning tends to be

the same between applying the concept of OER when compared to the conventional

learning face-to-face in the classroom. These findings indicate a positive impact of the

application of the concept of OER in learning to student motivation

Anahtar Kelimeler

Motivation, OER, blended learning, ARCS model, education, mobile technology

Kaynakça

• Ahmad, A., & Setyaningsih, E. (2016). Teacher Professionalism: A Study on Teachers’ Professional and Pedagogic Competence at Junior, Senior, and Vocational High Schools in Banyumas Regency, Central Java, Indonesia. SOSIOHUMANIKA, 5(1), 96- 106. Algers, A. & Silva-Fletcher, A. (2015) Teachers’ Perceived Value, Motivations for and Adoption of Open Educational Resources in Animal and Food Sciences. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 10(2), 35-45. Alhazbi, S. (2015, July). ARCS-based tactics to improve students' motivation in computer programming course. In Computer Science & Education (ICCSE), 2015 10th International Conference on (pp. 317-321). IEEE. Al-Sharqi, L. M., Hashim, K., & Ahmed, H. A. (2016). Perceptions of social media as a learning tool: a comparison between arts and science students.International Journal of Social Media and Interactive Learning Environments,4(1), 92-108. Atenas, J., Havemann, L., & Priego, E. (2015). Open Data as Open Educational Resources: Towards transversal skills and global citizenship, Open Praxis, 7(4), 377–389. Bodrogini, P. W., & Rinaldi, M. (2016). CHAPTER The Promise of Open Educational Resources in Indonesia. Open Educational Resources: Policy, Costs and, 105. Chang, N. C., & Chen, H. H. (2015). A motivational analysis of the ARCS model for information literacy courses in a blended learning environment. Libri,65(2), 129-142. Dutta, I. (2016). Open Educational Resources (OER): Opportunities and Challenges for Indian Higher Education. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education-TOJDE, 17(2), 110- 121. Grimus, M. (2016). Mobile Learning and Educational Resources. From a Global as well as from a Sub-Saharan Africa Perspective. Holz, O., Aleksandrovich, M., Zoglowek, H. (eds).Current Trends in Higher Education in Europe. LIT Erziehungswissenschaft Bd. 75, 163-180. Guo, Y., Zhang, M., Bonk, C. J., & Li, Y. (2015). Chinese Faculty Members’ Open Educational Resources (OER) Usage Status and the Barriers to OER Development and Usage. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 10(5), 59-65. Harsasi, M. (2015). The use of open educational resources in online learning: A Study of Students’ Perception. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education-TOJDE, 16(3), 74- 87. Islim, O. F., Koybasi, N. A. G., & Cagiltay, K. (2016). Use of Open Educational Resources: How, Why and Why Not?. Executive Editor, 28(2), 230-240. 128 Islim, O. F., & Cagiltay, K. (2016). The Impact of OER on Instructional Effectiveness: A Case Study. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 12(3), 559- 567. Kim, E. H., & Yang, H. S. (2015). The Use of the ARCS Motivation Model in Mobile Learning Apps Design. Journal of Digital Convergence, 13(4), 69-79. Krajcso, Z. (2016). Classification and quality criteria for Open Educational Resources in the field of foreign language learning. Journal of Language and Cultural Education, 4(1), 48-59. Liu, X., Jiang, Z., & Gao, L. (2015, August). Scientific information understanding via open educational resources (OER). In Proceedings of the 38th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (pp. 645-654). ACM. Mitchell, C., & Chu, M. (2014). Open education resources: The new paradigm in academic libraries. Journal of Library Innovation, 5(1), 13-29. Obradovic, I., Stankovic, R., Kitanovic, O., & Vorkapic, D. (2016). Building learning capacity by blending different sources of knowledge. International Journal of Learning and Intellectual Capital, 13(2-3), 135-148. Ozturk, H. T. (2015). Examining value change in MOOCs in the scope of Connectivism and Open Educational Resources movement. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 16(5). Piedra, N., Chicaiza, J., Lopez, J., & Tovar, E. (2015). Seeking Open Educational Resources to Compose Massive Open Online Courses in Engineering Education An Approach based on Linked Open Data. Journal of Universal Computer Science, 21(5), 679-711. Sinclair, J., & Kalvala, S. (2016). Student engagement in massive open online courses. International journal of learning technology. InPress. Spring, K. J., Graham, C. R., & Hadlock, C. A. (2016). The current landscape of international blended learning. International Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning, 8(1), 84- 102. Strang, K. D. (2016). Can online student performance be forecasted by learning analytics?. International Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning, 8(1), 26-47. Strang, K.D. (2016a). Exploring the link between e-learning and performance through a learning analytics lens. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 27(2), 125-152. Sulisworo, D. (2016). The Contribution of the Education System Quality to Improve the Nation’s Competitiveness of Indonesia. Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn), 10(2), 127-138. Sulisworo, D., Agustin, S. P., & Sudarmiyati, E. (2016). Cooperative-blended learning using Moodle as an open source learning platform. International Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning, 8(2), 187-198. Sulisworo, D., & Supadmi, R. (2016). A Pedagogical Critical Review of Online Learning System. International Journal of Languages Education and Teaching, 4(2), 27-36. Sulisworo, D., & Toifur, M. (2016). The role of mobile learning in the learning environment shifting at the high school in Indonesia. International Journal of Mobile Learning and Organisation, 10(3), 159-170. Tabuenca, B., Kalz, M., Ternier, S., & Specht, M. (2014). Mobile authoring of open educational resources for authentic learning scenarios. Universal Access in the Information Society, 1- 15. Thakran, A., & Sharma, R. C. (2016). Meeting the challenges of higher education in India through Open Educational Resources: Policies, practices, and implications. Education policy analysis archives, 24, 37. Zancanaro, A., Todesco, J. L., & Ramos, F. (2015). A bibliometric mapping of open educational resources. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 16(1).