The Effectiveness of Using Wiziq Interaction Platform on Students’ Achievement, Motivation and Attitudes

Year 2020, Volume: 21 Issue: 1, 19 - 30, 01.01.2020

Abdelrahman Mohamed Ahmed , Mohamed Eltahir Osman

https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.690112

Cited By: 7

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to assess the effects of using WiziQ platform as a virtual classroom on students’ achievement, motivation and attitudes. The sample of this study consists of 42 students enrolled in the course of “Educational and Information technology” at the college of education, Sultan Qaboos University. The participating students were assigned randomly to a control and experimental group (17 and 25 students respectively). Data collection tools included: an academic achievement test, motivation scale and attitude scale. The results of the study showed that there is a significant difference in the mean scores of the post-test between the control group and experimental group in favor of experimental group. The results also indicated that students in the experimental group developed positive attitude towards using WiziQ virtual classroom in their learning. In addition, the findings showed that students in the experimental group were more engaged and motivated to learn compared to their counterparts in the control group.

Keywords

Academic achievement, WiziQ platform, e-learning, motivation, attitude

References

• Agrawal, N., Kumar, S., Balasubramaniam, S., Bhargava, S., Sinha, P., Bakshi, Bh. & Sood, B. (2016). Effectiveness of virtual classroom training in improving the knowledge and key maternal neonatal health skills of general nurse midwifery students in Bihar, India: A pre- and post-intervention study. Nurse Education Today, (36), pp. 293-297. Arum, R., & Roska, J. (2010). Academically Adrift: Limited Learning on College Campuses.Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Baird, E., & Fisher, M. (2005). Neomillennial user experience design strategies: utilizing social networking media to support “always on” learning styles. Journal of Educational technology systems, 34(1) 5-32. Barker, J., & Gossman, P. (2013). The learning impact of a virtual learning environment: students’ views. Teacher Advancement Network Journal, 5(2). Barr, B., & Tagg, J. (1995). From teaching to learning: A new paradigm for undergraduate education. Change, 27(6), pp. 12-25 Bonk, C., & Graham, C. (2006). The handbook of blended learning: Global perspectives, local designs. San Francisco: Pfeiffer. Bostan, G. (2011, April). Teaching/learning physics on Wiziq platform. In The 7 th International Scientific Conference eLearning and Software for Education Bucharest. Capshew, T. F. (2005). Motivating social work students in statistic courses. Social Work Education. 24(8), 857-868. Chircu, S., & Neacsu, I. (2015). Using E-Learning Tools in The Growth of Students’ Motivation Regarding Formal Education. The 11th International Scientific Conference eLearning and Software for Education Bucharest, April 23-24, 2015. 10.12753/2066-026X-15-108. Coates, H., James, R., & Baldwin, G. (2005). A critical examination of the effects of learning management systems on university teaching and learning. Tertiary Education Management, 11(1), pp. 19-36. Colakoglu, O. & Akdemir, O. (2010). Motivational measure of the Instruction compared: Instruction Based on the ARCS Motivation Theory v.s. Traditional Instruction in Blended Courses, Turkish Online Journal Of Distance Education-TOJDE , 11 (2), 1302-6488. Davis, I. (2005). Talis, Web 2.0 and All That. Accessed on 14 January 2018, Retrieved from: http://blog. iandavis.com//2005/07/talis-web-20-and-all-that. Accessed 20 April 2017. Dikmenli, Y., & Unaldi, U. (2013). Effect of the blended learning environment and the application of virtual class upon the achievement and the attitude against the geography course. Mevlana International Journal of Education, 3(2), 43-56. Dilani, S., John. P. and Wright, N. (2013). An analysis of Moodle in facilitating asynchronous activities in a fully online university course. International Journal of Science and Applied Information Technology (IJSAIT), 2(2), pp.06-10. Durmus, S., & Karakirik, E. (2006). Virtual manipulatives in Mathematics education: A theoretical framework. The Turkish Journal of Educational Technology, 5(1). 117-123. Falloon, G. (2011). Exploring the Virtual Classroom: What Students Need to Know (and Teachers Should Consider). Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 7(4), pp 439-451. Fisher, D. (2012). Warming Up to MOOC’s. ProfHacker. The Chronicle of Higher Education. Accessed on 13 April 2018, Retrieved from: http://chronicle.com/blogs/profhacker/warming-up-tomoocs/44022 Gedera, D. S. P. (2014). Tool mediation and learner engagement: An Activity Theory perspective. In B. Hegarty, J. McDonald, & S.-K. Loke (Eds.), Rhetoric and Reality: Critical perspectives on educational. Hampel, Regine and Pleines, Christine (2013). Fostering Student Interaction and Engagement in a Virtual Learning Environment: An Investigation into Activity Design and Implementation. The CALICO Journal, 30(3) pp. 342–370. 30 Hortos, K., Sefcik, D., Wilson, S., McDaniel, J. & Zemper, E. (2013). Synchronous videoconferencing: impact on achievement of medical students, Teach Learn Med, 25 (2013), pp. 211–215 Hrastinski, S. (2008). Asynchronous and synchronous e-learning. EDUCAUSE Quarterly, 31, 4, 51–55. Huang, B., & Hew, Kh. (2016). Measuring Learners’ Motivation Level in Massive Open Online Courses. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 6(10), pp. 759-764. DOI: 10.7763/ IJIET.2016.V6.788. Kaosaiyaporn, O., Atisabda, W., Plodkaew, J., & Promrak’s J. (2015). Factors of Virtual Classroom to Enhance Online Learning in Multicultural Society for Pre-Service Teacher Students. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 5(7), pp. 502-506. Keller, J. (2008). First principles of motivation to learn and e-learning. Distance Education, 29(2), 175-185. LeShea, A. (2013). The effects of synchronous class sessions on students’ academic achievement and levels of satisfaction in an online introduction to computers course. Doctoral dissertation, unpublished, Liberty University. Moodle Website, accessed on 26 March 2018, Retrieved from: https://moodle.org/, Penjor, S., & Zander, P. (2016). Predicting virtual learning environment adoption: A case study. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 15(1), 69-81. Serrano, M. & Sanchez, M. (2011). Improving Social Interactions in Virtual Learning Environments: Guidance on Spatial Factors for Online Teachers. US-China Education Review, (16), pp. 471-480. Smirnova, L., & Deutsch, N. (2014, June). Addressing Contextual Adaptation in the Dissemination of Online Technologies: Using Moodle and WizIQ for Professional Development Training. In EdMedia: World Conference on Educational Media and Technology (Vol. 2014, No. 1, pp. 1205- 1211). Stevens, V. (2007). Who’s in charge here? WiZiQ and Elluminate. The Electronic Journal for English as a Second Language (TESL-EJ), 11(3). Suziki, K., Nishibuchi, A., Yamamoto, H., and Keller, J. M. (2004). Development and evaluation of a website to check instructional design based on the ARCS Motivation Model. Journal of the Japanese Society for Information and Systems in Education, 2(1), 63-69. Tatli, Z. & Ayas, A. (2013). Effect of virtual chemistry laboratory on students’ achievement. Educational Technology and Society, 16(1), 159-170. Taylor, C. (2010). Crisis on Campus: A Bold Plan for Reforming Our Colleges and Universities. New York: Knopf. Testa, A. (2011). Experiences of Online Learning: An Evaluation of First-year Sport Sciences University Students’ Attitudes towards the Use of U-Link. International Education Studies, 4(4), 13-21. doi:10.5539/ies.v4n4p13 Velagapudi, M. (2013). 18 FREE Web 2.0 Tools for Teachers. A publication of WizIQ, Inc. Accessed on 14 January 2017, Retrieved from: https://www.wiziq.com/whitepaper/59-18-free-web-2-0-tools-forteachers/ Yilmaz, O. (2015). The effects of “live virtual classroom” on students’ achievement and students’ opinions about “live virtual classroom” at distance education. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 14(1), pp. 108-115.