Interrogating the Teaching and Learning of English in Nigeria: Still in Search of an Enabling Principle

Yıl 2016, , 75 - 84, 17.05.2016

Kingsley Ugwuanyi , Matthias Chukwu

https://doi.org/10.32959/tojelt.229318

Öz

With the understanding that effective communication is the central goal in any second language situation, this paper examines how best to achieve this in the light of the current curriculum for the teaching of English in Nigeria. The way the English language is taught at all the levels of education in Nigeria leaves a lot to be desired, and therefore does not hold a promise of actualising the very end of language teaching and learning, which is the development of learners’ communicative competence. The teaching and learning of English in Nigeria today is largely grammar-based, so that learners only take grammar lessons, leaving out the colour of language, which is literature. If literature is the colour of its language, teaching any language without its literature is teaching a bleached language. Any teaching method that adopts this antiseptic learning of the target language may not achieve much, as literature presents the best examples or manifestations of language use, and would serve as a veritable point of encounter with the language. The position of this work is that the divorce between ‘language’ and ‘literature’ in our educational curriculum is an anathema. 

Keywords: Second language teaching,  communicative competence, teaching method(s), Grammar, English in Nigeria   

Anahtar Kelimeler

Second language teaching, communicative competence, teaching method(s), grammar, English in Nigeria

Kaynakça

• Adichie, C. (2013). Americanah. Lagos: Kachifo.
• Aitchison, J. (2003). Teach yourself linguistics. London: Hodder.
• Akindele, F. & Wale, A. (1999). The sociology and politics of English in Nigeria: An introduction. Ile-Ife: Obafemi Awolowo University Press.
• Akwanya, A.N. (2005). Language and habits of thought (3rd edn). Enugu: New Generation Books.
• Akwanya, A.N. (2007a). Semantics and discourse: Theories of meaning and textual analysis (Revised edn). Enugu: Acena.
• Akwanya, A.N. (2007b). English language learning in Nigeria: In search of an enabling principle. Nsukka: University of Nigeria Press.
• Akwanya, A.N. (2010). Foreword. In P. A. Ezema, Strategies for writing effective essays: A guide in essay writing for students in secondary and tertiary institutions. Enugu: Snaap Press.
• Al-Darwish, S. H. & Shuqair, K. M. (2015). The use of literature in an EFL classroom. British Journal of Education, 3(7), 71–82.
• Canale, M. & Swain, M. (1980). Theoretical bases of communicative approaches to second language teaching and testing. Applied Linguistics, 1 (1), 1-47.
• Carpio, K. D. & Carpio, P. D. (2015). The importance of considering students’ cultural and linguistic backgrounds: Languages are friends, not enemies! Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 6(3), 467-474.
• Edwards, M. & Csizer, K. (2004). Developing pragmatic competence in the EFL classroom. English Teaching Forum, 16 – 21.
• Hall, G. (2005). Literature in language education. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
• Halliday, M.A.K. (2004). An introduction to functional grammar (3rd edn). Revised by M. I. M. Matthiessen. London: Hodder.
• Hodges, J. C. & Whitten, M. E. (1982). Harbrace college handbook. New York: Harcourt Brace.
• Hymes, Dell (1972). On communicative competence. In J.B. Pride and J. Holmes (Eds.), Sociolinguistics: Selected readings. Harmondsworth: Pengiun.
• Kachru, B. (1988). ESP and non-native varieties of English: Towards a shift in paradigm. In Dick Chamberlain and Robert J. Baumgardner (eds.), ESP in the classroom: Practice and evaluation. Oxford: Modern English Publications, 9-28.
• Khansir, A. A. (2012). Error analysis and second language acquisition. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 2(5), 1027-1032.
• Kramsch, C. (1985). Literary texts in the classroom: A discourse. Modern Language Journal, 69 (4), 356-366.
• Krashen, S. D. (1982). Principles and practice in second language acquisition. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
• Leech, G & Svartvik, J. (2002). A communicative grammar of English. (3rd edn). London: Pearson.
• Littlewood, W. (1985). Learning grammar. Institute of Language in Education Journal, 1(1), 40-48.
• Mohammed, A (1995). Communicative competence acquisition in infelicitous environments: The problem with SSS English in Nigeria. In Ayo Bamgbose, Ayo Banjo and Andrew Thomas (Eds.), New Englishes: A West African perspective. Ibadan: Mosuro, 130-152.
• O’Connor, J. D. (1989). Better English pronunciation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Oji, N. (2001). English grammar for advanced students (New edn). Obosi: Pacific.
• Otagburuagu, E. J. (2007). Literature in language teaching. In E. J. Otagburuagu, T. Y. Obah, S. M. Onuigbo and R. I. Okorji (Eds.), Teaching English language skills. Nsukka: Anyi-P and Sons Printing Press, 194-198.
• Paulston, B. C. (1992). Linguistic and communicative competence: Topics in ESL. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
• Quirk, R. & Greenbaum, S. (2004). A university grammar of English. New Delhi: Pearson.
• Rai, A. (2012). Use of literature in teaching English. International Journal of Educational Research and Technology, 3(3), 71–80.
• Richards, J. (2006). Communicative language teaching today. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Rutherford, W. E. (2014). Second language grammar: learning and teaching. London: Routledge.
• Shazu, R.I. (2014). Use of literature in language teaching and learning: A critical assessment. Journal of Education and Practice, 5(7), 29–35.
• Shehadeh, A. (2005). Task-based language learning and teaching: Theories and applications. In Corony Edwards and Jane Willis (Eds). Teachers exploring tasks in English Language teaching. New York: Palgrave, 13-30.
• Waldhorn, A. & Zeiger, A. (2001). English made simple: A complete step-by-step guide to better language skills. New York: Doubleday.
• Widdowson, H. G. (1990). Aspects of language teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.