2015 TESOL International Convention was “Crossing Borders, Building Bridges.”

Yıl 2016, Cilt: 1 Sayı: 2, 43 - 56, 17.05.2016

Yilin Sun

https://doi.org/10.32959/tojelt.229331

Öz

Building Bridges, Crossing Borders: Journey to a Better Future for TESOL

Öz

This paper stems from the presidential keynote speech I gave at the 2015 TESOL International Convention with in Toronto, Canada last year.  The theme for the 2015 TESOL International Convention was “Crossing Borders, Building Bridges.”

Anahtar Kelimeler

2015 TESOL International Convention , Crossing Borders , Building Bridges

Kaynakça

• Allen, J. P. B. & Widdowson, H.G. ( 1974). Teaching the communicative use of English in International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching (IRAL). 12 (1-4).
• Belcher, D., & Lukkarila, L. (2011). Identity in the ESP context. In D. Belcher, A. Johns, & B.
• Paltridge (Eds.), New directions for English for specific purposes research. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.
• Belcher, D. (2006). English for specific purposes teaching to perceived needs and imagined futures in worlds of work, study, and everyday life. TESOL Quarterly, 40(1), 133–156.
• Bhatt, R.M. (2001). World Englishes. Annual Review of Anthropology, 30, 527-550.
• Brown, H. D. (2007). Teaching by principles. New York, New York: Pearson Longman.
• Byram, M. (1997). Teaching and assessing intercultural communicative competence. Multilingual Matters.
• Byram, M. (2009). The intercultural speaker and pedagogy of foreign language education. In D. K. Deardorff (Ed.) The Sage handbook of intercultural competence (pp. 321-332). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
• Corbett, J. (2003). An Intercultural Approach to English Language Teaching. Multilingual Matters.
• Cook, V. (2012). Multi-competence. Retrieved from http://homepage.ntlworld.com/vivian.c/Writings/Papers/MCentry.htm
• Darling-Hammond, L. et al (2002). Building instructional quality: Inside-out, bottom-up, and top-down perspectives on San Diego’s school reform, unpublished manuscript for AERA annual meeting. Page:3 Retrieved from https://depts.washington.edu/ctpmail/PDFs/InProgress/SDCS- Reform-AERAdraft.pdf
• Ewer, J. R. & Hughes-Davies, E. (1971). Further notes on developing an English programme for students of science and technology. English Language Teaching, 26, 3, 269-273.
• Flowerdew, L. (2011). ESP and Corpus Studies. In D. Belcher, A. Johns, & B. Paltridge (Eds.), New directions for English for specific purposes research. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press. 222-251.
• Flowerdew, J. (2011). Reconciling contrasting approaches to genre analysis: The whole can equal more than the sum of the parts. In D. Belcher, A. Johns, & B. Paltridge (Eds.), New directions for English for specific purposes research. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.119-144.
• Flowerdew, J. (2000). Discourse community, legitimate peripheral participation, and the nonnative-English-speaking scholar. TESOL Quarterly 34. 127-150.
• Geertz, C. (1973). Local knowledge: Foreign essays in interpretive anthropology. New York: Basic Books.
• Hutchinson, T. & Waters, A. (1983). ESP at the crossroads. In Swales (ed.) (1988) Episode in ESP: A sources and reference book on the development of English for Science and Technology. New York: Prentice-Hall. (pp. 174-87).
• Hyland, K. (2011). Disciplinary specificity: Discourse, Context, and ESP. In D. Belcher, A. Johns, & B. Paltridge (Eds.), New directions in English for Specific Purposes Research. Ann Arbor: Michigan University Press, 6-24.
• Johns, A. & Makalela, L (2011). Needs analysis, critical ethnography, and context: Perspectives from the client and the consultant. In D. Belcher, A. M. Johns & B. Paltridge (eds), New directions for English for specific purposes research. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.
• Kandil, M., & Belcher, D. (2011). ESP and corpus-informed critical discourse analysis. In D. Belcher, Johns, & B. Paltridge (Eds.), New directions in English for specific purposes research. Ann Arbor: Michigan University Press, 94-117.
• Kumaravadivelu, B. (2001). Towards a postmethod pedagogy. TESOL Quarterly, 35(4), 537-560.
• http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3588427
• Kumaravadivelu, B. (2006). Understanding language teaching: From method to postmethod.New York, NY: Routledge.
• Kohn, K. (2013, March 15). Intercultural communicative competence: An English as a lingua franca perspective [PowerPoint]. TESOL Arabia, 14-16 March 2013. Available at
• http://www.sprachlernmedien.de/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/Kohn-2013_ICC-an- ELFperspective_TESOL-Arabia_STZ.pdf
• Larsen-Freeman, D. (2000). Techniques and principles in language teaching (2nd ed.). Oxford,
• England: Oxford University Press
• Mellow, J. D. (2002). Towards principled eclecticism in language teaching: The two dimensional
• model and the centring principle. TESL-EJ, 5(4), 1-19. Retrieved from
• http://tesl-ej.org/ej20/a1.html
• Lillis, T. (2008). Ethnography as Method, Methodology, and "Deep Theorizing": Closing the Gap
• Between Text and Context in Academic Writing Research. Written Communication, 25(3), 353-388.
• Mauranen, A. (2011). English as the Lingua Franca of the Academic World. In Belcher, Diane, Johns, Ann. M., Paltridge, Brian (eds). New Directions in English for Specific Purposes Research. Ann Arbor: Michigan University Press, 94-117.
• Mellow, J. D. (2002). Towards principled eclecticism in language teaching: The two dimensional
• model and the centring principle. TESL-EJ, 5(4), 1-19. Retrieved from
• http://tesl-ej.org/ej20/a1.html
• Paltridge, B. & Wang, W. (2011). Contextualizing ESP research: media discourses in China and Australia. In D. Belcher, A. Johns, & B. Paltridge (Eds.), New directions in English for Specific Purposes Research. Ann Arbor: Michigan University Press, 94-117.
• Selinker, L., Lackstrom, J. & Trimble, L. (1972). Grammar and technical English, English Teaching Forum, Sept.-Oct. 1972, 3–14.
• Selinker, L., Tarone, E., & Hanzeli, V. (Eds.). (1981). English for academic and technical purposes: Studies in honor of Louis Trimble. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
• Starfield, S. (2011). Doing critical ethnographic research into academic writing: The theory of the methodology. In D. Belcher, A. M. Johns & B. Paltridge (eds), New directions for English for specific purposes research. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.
• Sun, Y. (2014). Major trends in the global ELT field: A Non-Native English-Speaking Professional's Perspective. Language Education in Asia, 5( 1), 1-19.
• Swales, J. M. 2004. Research genres: explorations and applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Widdowson, H. (1983). Learning purpose and language use. Oxford: Oxford University Press.