Frequent testing: What are the real impacts of frequent quizzes on students, teachers, and instruction?

Yıl 2017, Cilt: 2 Sayı: 1, 1 - 19, 30.01.2017

Gamze Öncül

Öz

Frequent testing in education has been a popular research topic since the beginning of the 20th century, but it has rarely been discussed in the field of English as a Foreign Language. The review of the literature illustrates that the studies done on frequent testing in other fields mostly highlight the benefits of frequent testing while some of the findings suggest several drawbacks. This paper aims to look into teachers’ and students’ perceptions of frequent testing in an EFL setting, at Middle East Technical University, Northern Cyprus Campus, School of Foreign Languages' Preparatory program. The data are collected with student and teacher questionnaires where the respondents are expected to evaluate the given perception on a five-point Lickert scale and interviews with volunteer teachers. The aim is to cross check the major conclusions on the benefits and drawbacks of frequent testing with students’ and teachers’ perceptions of frequent quizzes to find whether those conclusions can be considered valid in an EFL context. The results show that the teachers’ perceptions of frequent quizzes at METU, NCC, SFL, Preparatory Program are in line with the literature, and the respondent teachers do not have big problems with the frequency of quizzes as far as their quality and effectiveness are assured. The students, on the other hand, admit that frequent quizzes positively affect their learning and retention skills, but they do not agree that frequent quizzes help with exam anxiety or make any contribution to their attendance or study habits, and their performance

Anahtar Kelimeler

language assessment, test frequency, testing effect, frequent testing, quizzes

Kaynakça

• Addison, W. E. (1995). Consequences of missing post exam review sessions. Teaching of Psychology. 22, 121–23.
• Azorlosa, J. L., & Renner, C. H. (2006). The effect of announced quizzes on exam performance. Journal of Instructional Psychology. 33, 278–83.
• Bangert-Drowns, R. L., Kulik, J. A., & Kulik, C. L. C. (1991). Effects of frequent classroom testing. The 10.1080/00220671.1991.10702818 of Educational
• Research, 85(2), 89-99. doi:
• Black, P., & Dylan, W. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice. 5(1). 7-74. doi: 10.1080/0969595980050102
• Davison, C., & Leung, C. (2009). Current Issues in English Language Teacher-Based Assessment. http://www.jstor.org/stable/27785027 Quarterly, 43(3), 393-415. Retrieved from
• Fitch, M. L., Drucker, A. J., & Norton, J. A. (1951). Frequent testing as a motivating factor in large lecture classes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 42, 1- 20.
• Galassi, J. P., Frierson, Jr. H. T., & Siegel, R. G. (1984). Cognitions, test anxiety, and test performance: A closer look. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 52, 319–20.
• Graham, R. B. (1999). Unannounced quizzes raise test scores selectively for mid-range students. Teaching of Psychology. 26, 271– 73.
• Hovell, M. F., Williams, R. L., & Semb, G. (1979). Analysis of undergraduates’ attendance at class meetings with and without grade-related contingencies: A contrast effect. Journal of Educational Research, 73, 50-53.
• Kika, F. M., McLaughlin, T. F., & Dixon, J. (1992). Effects of frequent testing of secondary algebra students. Journal of Educational Research. 85, 159–62
• Kling, N., McCorkle, D., Miller, C., & Reardon, J. (2005). The impact of testing frequency on student performance in a marketing course. Journal of Education for Business. 81, 67–72.
• Kuo, T., & Simon, A. (2009). How many tests do we really need? College Teaching, 57(3), 156- 160. doi: 10.3200/CTCH.57.3.156-160
• Landrum, R. E. (2007). Introductory psychology student performance: Weekly quizzes followed by a cumulative final exam. Teaching of Psychology. 34, 177–80.
• Leeming, F. C. (2002). The exam-a-day procedure improves performance in psychology classes. Teaching of Psychology. 29, 210–12.
• Marchant, G. J. (2002). Student reading of assigned articles: Will this be on the test? Teaching of Psychology. 29, 49–51.
• Marso, R. N. (1970). Classroom testing procedures, test anxiety, and achievement. Journal of Experimental Education. 38, 54–58.
• Mawhinney, V. T., Bostow, D. E., Laws, D. R., Blumenfeld, G. J. & Hopkins, B. L. (1971). A comparison of students studying: Behavior produced by daily, weekly, and three-week testing schedules. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis. 4, 257–64.
• Prodromou, L. (2006). The backwash effect: from testing to teaching. Readings in Methodology (pp. 209-214). Retrieved from: https://btk.ppke.hu/uploads/articles/671983/file/Somogyi- Toth2006%20Readings.pdf (Reprinted from ELT journal, 1995, 49(1), 13-25)
• Roediger III, H. L., Putnam, A. L., & Smith, M. A. (2011). Chapter One: Ten Benefits of Testing and Their Applications to Educational Practice. Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 1-36. doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-387691-1.00001-6
• Tan, C. M. (1992). An Evaluation of the Use of Continuous Assessment in the Teaching of Physiology. http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF00145016 Education, (3). 255-272. Retrieved from
• Taylor, C. S., & Nolen, S. B. (2008). Classroom assessment: Supporting teaching and learning in real classrooms. (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, N.J. : Pearson/Merrill/Prentice Hall.
• Wilder, D. A., Flood, W. A., & Stromsnes, W. (2001). The use of random extra credit quizzes to increase student attendance. Journal of Instructional Psychology. 28, 17-20.