Öznel Zindeliğin Psikolojik Sağlamlık Üzerindeki Etkisinde Zihnin İstemli Ve İstemsiz Gezinmesinin Aracılık Rolu

Öz

Bu araştırma, öznel zindeliğin psikolojik sağlamlık üzerindeki etkisinde zihnin istemli ve istemsiz gezinmesinin rolünü belirlemeyi amaçlamıştır. Araştırmada nicel araştırma modellerinden ilişkisel tarama yöntemi kullanılmıştır. Araştırmanın örneklemini spor bilimleri fakültesinde öğrenim gören basit tesadüfi örneklem yöntemi ile seçilmiş 303 öğrenci oluşturmaktadır. Araştırmada veri toplama aracı olarak öznel zindelik ölçeği, kısa psikolojik sağlamlık ölçeği, zihnin istemli gezinme ölçeği ve zihnin istemsiz gezinme ölçeği kullanılmıştır. Yapılan araştırmada, öznel zindeliğin istemsiz zihin gezinmesini azalttığı ancak öznel zindeliğin psikolojik sağlamlığı arttırdığı ortaya çıkmıştır. Yapılan araştırmada, zihnin istemsiz gezinmesinin psikolojik sağlamlığı azalttığı ortaya çıkmıştır. Zihnin istemli gezinmesinin psikolojik sağlamlığa anlamlı bir etkisi bulunmamaktadır. Araştırmada istemsiz zihin gezinmesi aracılık rolünde; öznel zindeliğin psikolojik sağlamlığı arttırıcı etkisinin olduğunun yanı sıra bireylerde zihnin istemsiz gezinmesi durumunun yüksek olması halinde psikolojik sağlamlığa ciddi düzeyde düşürücü etkisinin olduğu görülmektedir. Zihnin istemli gezinmesinin aracılık rolü bulunmamaktadır

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Öznel zindelik
• istemli ve istemsiz zihin gezinmesi
• psikolojik sağlamlık

The Mediating Role of Intentional And Intentional Mind Wandering in The Effect of Subjectıve Vitality on Psychological Residency

Öz

This research aimed to determine the role of voluntary and involuntary wandering of the mind in the effect of subjective vitality on resilience. Relational survey method, one of the quantitative research models, was used in the research. The sample of the study consists of 303 students selected by simple random sampling method studying at the faculty of sports sciences. Subjective vitality scale, short psychological resilience scale, voluntary mind wandering scale and mind involuntary wandering scale were used as data collection tools in the research. In the research, it was revealed that subjective vitality reduces involuntary mind wandering, but subjective vitality increases resilience. Research has shown that involuntary wandering of the mind reduces resilience. Voluntary wandering of the mind has no significant effect on resilience. In the role of involuntary mind wandering in the research; In addition to the fact that subjective vitality has an increasing effect on psychological resilience, it is seen that it has a serious reducing effect on psychological resilience if the involuntary wandering of the mind is high. The voluntary wandering of the mind has no mediating role.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Subjective Vitality
• Voluntary and İnvoluntary Mind Wandering
• Psychological Resilience

Kaynakça

1. Akın, A. (2012). The relationships between Internet addiction, subjective vitality, and subjective happiness: A structural equation modeling. Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking, 15, 404–410.
2. Akın, A., & Akın, U. (2015). Friendship quality and subjective happiness: The mediator role of subjective vitality. Eğitim ve Bilim, 40(177).
3. Altunışık, R., Coşkun, R., Bayraktaroğlu, S., & Yıldırım, E. (2010). Sosyal bilimlerde araştırma yöntemleri. Sakarya: Sakarya Yayıncılık.
4. Bonanno, G. A. (2004). Loss, trauma, and human resilience: Have we underestimated the human capacity to thrive after extremely aversive events? The American Psychologist, 59, 20-8. https://doi.org/10.1037/1942-9681.S.1.101
5. Bostic, T. J., Rubio. D. M. & Hood. M. A. (2000). Validation of the subjective vitality scale using structural equation modeling. Social Indicators Research, 52(3), 313-319.
6. Buchanan, M., & Keats, P. (2011). Coping with traumatic stress in journalism: A critical ethnographic study. International Journal of Psychology, 46, 127– 135. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207594.2010.532799
7. Burcusa, S. L., & Lacono, W. G. (2007). Risk for recurrence in depression. Clinical Psychology Review, 27, 959– 985.
8. Carver, C.S., Scheier, M. F., & Segerstrom, S.C.(2010). Optimism. Clinical Psychology Review, 30, 879– 889.

9. Chiorri, C., & Vannucci, M. (2019). Replicability of the psychometric properties of traitlevels measures of spontaneous and deliberate mind wandering. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 35(4), 459–468. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000422
10. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2018). Akış: Mutluluk bilimi (3. baskı). (B. Satılmış, Çev.). Ankara: Buzdağı.
11. de Terte, I., Becker, J., & Stephens, C. (2009). An integrated model for understanding and developing resilience in the face of adverse events. Journal of Pacific Rim Psychology, 3, 20– 26.
12. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The" what" and" why" of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological inquiry, 11(4), 227-268.
13. Doğan, T. (2015). Kısa psikolojik sağlamlık ölçeği’nin türkçe uyarlaması: geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. The Journal of Happiness & Well-Being, 3(1), 93-102.
14. Dupertuis, L. L., Aldwin, C. M., & Bosse, R. (2001). Does the source of social support matter for different health outcomes. Journal of Aging and Health, 13, 494– 510.
15. Fini, A. A. S., Kavousian, J., Beigy, A., & Emami, M. (2010). Subjective vitality and its anticipating variables on students. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 5, 150–156.
16. Fresco, D. M., Moore, M. T., Walt, L., & Craighead, L. W. (2009). Self-administered optimism training: Mechanisms of change in a minimally supervised psychoeducational intervention. Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy: An International Quarterly, 23, 350– 367.
17. Gazzaley, A., & Rosen, L. D. (2019). Dağınık zihin: İleri teknoloji dünyasında kadim beyinler (1. basım). (A. Babacan, Çev.). İstanbul: Metis.
18. Graber, R., Pichon, F., & Carabine, E. (2015). Psychological resilience. London: Overseas Development Institute.
19. Grinker, R.R., & Spiegal, J.P. (1963). Under Stress. Blakiston: Philadelphia, PA, USA.
20. Gürbüz, S., & Şahin, F. (2014). Sosyal bilimlerde araştırma yöntemleri. Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık
21. Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis. NewYork, NY: Guilford Press.
22. Healey, J. (2012). Respectful relationships. Issues in society. Thirroul, N.S.W.: Spinney Press.
23. Heaphy, E. D., & Dutton, J. E. (2008). Positive social interactions and the human body a work: linking organizations and physiology. Academy of Management Review, 33, 137-162.
24. İlhan, M., & Çetin, B. (2014). Comparison of results related to structural equality model (sem) analyses performed using LISREL and AMOS programs. Journal of Measurement and Evaluation in Education and Psychology, 5(2), 26-42.
25. Karakaş, G. & Kaya, E. (2016). Üniversite Öğrencilerinin Serbest Zaman Aktivitelerine Katılım Durumları ile Öznel Zindelik ve Temel Psikolojik İhtiyaçlarının Belirlenmesi. ERPA Internatıonal Congresses On Educatıon, 2-4 Haziran, 2016. Saraybosna/Bosna Hersek 763-772.
26. Karaırmak, Ö., & Siviş-Çetinkaya, R. (2011). Benlik saygısının ve denetim odağının psikolojik sağlamlık üzerine etkisi: Duyguların aracı rolü. Türk Psikolojik Danışma ve Rehberlik Dergisi, 4(35), 30-43.
27. Kaşıkçı, F., & Peker, A. (2022). The Mediator Role of Resilience in the Relationship between Sensation-Seeking, Happiness and Subjective Vitality. International Journal of Contemporary Educational Research, 9(1), 115-129.
28. Killingsworth, M. A., & Gilbert, D. T. (2010). A wandering mind is an unhappy mind. Science, 330 (6006), 932-932.
29. Leipold, B., & Greve, W. (2009). Resilience: A conceptual bridge between coping and development. European Psychologist, 14, 40– 50. https://doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040.14.1.40
30. Liao, W. (1990). T'chi chi classics. Boston: Shambhala Publications, Inc.
31. MacCallum, R. C., Browne, M. W., & Sugawara, H. M. (1996). Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling. Psychological methods, 1(2), 130.
32. Mankin, B., Gürkan, G. Ç., & Çetin, O. (2019). The effect of emotional labor and introspective motivation on employee creativity: a study in the banking sector. Journal of Management of Entrepreneurship and Innovation, 8(2), 126-156.
33. Masten, A.S. (2001). Ordinary magic: Resilience processes in development. American Psychologist, 56, 227–238.
34. Masten, A. S., & Reed, M. G. J. (2002). Resilience in development. Handbook of positive psychology, 74, 88.
35. Mavilidi, M. F., Mason, C., Leahy, A. A., Kennedy, S. G., Eather, N., Hillman, C. H., ... & Lubans, D. R. (2021). Effect of a time-efficient physical activity intervention on senior school students’ on-task behaviour and subjective vitality: the ‘Burn 2 Learn’cluster randomised controlled trial. Educational psychology review, 33, 299-323.
36. Mayer, J. D., & Salovey, P. (1997). What is emotional intelligence? In P. Salovey & D. J. Sluyter (Eds.), Emotional development and emotional intelligence: Educational implications (pp. 3– 31). New York: Basic Books.
37. Meevissen, Y. M. C., Peters, M. L., & Alberts, H. J. E. M. (2011). Become more optimistic by imaging a best possible self: Effects of a two week intervention. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 42, 371– 378. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbtep.2011.02.012
38. Meredith, L. S., Sherbourne, C. D., Gaillot, S. J., Hansell, L., Ritschard, H. V., Parker, A. M., & Wrenn, G. (2011). Promoting psychological resilience in the US military. Rand health quarterly, 1(2).
39. Meydan, C. M., & Şeşen, H. (2015). Structural equality modeling AMOS applications. Detail Publishing.
40. Moos, R. H., & Holahan, C. J. (2003). Dispositional and contextual perspectives on coping: Toward an integrative framework. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 59, 1387– 1403.
41. Mowlem, F. D., Skirrow, C., Reid, P., Maltezos, S., Nijjar, S. K., Merwood, A., ... & Asherson, P. (2019). Validation of the mind excessively wandering scale and the relationship of mind wandering to impairment in adult ADHD. Journal of attention disorders, 23(6), 624-634.
42. Neria, Y., & Koenen, K. C. (2003). Do combat stress reactions and posttraumatic stress disorder relate to physical health and adverse health practices? An 18-year follow-up of Israeli war veterans. Anxiety, Stress, and Coping, 16, 227– 239. https://doi.org/10.1080/10615806.2003.10382975
43. Niemiec, CP, Ryan, RM, Patrick, H., Deci, EL, & Williams, GC (2010). The energization of health-behavior change: examining the associations among autonomous self-regulation, subjective vitality, depressive symptoms, and tobacco abstinence. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 5(2), 122–138.
44. Nix, G.A., Ryan, R.M., Manly, J.B., & Deci, E.L. (1999). Revitalization through self-regulation: The effects of autonomous and controlled motivation on happiness and vitality. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 35(3), 266–284.
45. Parker, J. D. A. (2005). The relevance of emotional intelligence for clinical psychology. In R. Schulze & R. D. Roberts (Eds.), Emotional intelligence: An international handbook (pp. 271– 287). Cambridge, MA: Hogrefe & Huber.
46. Paton, D., Violanti, J. M., Johnston, P., Burke, K. J., Clarke, J., & Keenan, D. (2008). Stress shield: A model of police resiliency. International Journal of Emergency Mental Health, 10, 95– 108.
47. Peterson, C. (2000). The future of optimism. American Psychologist, 55, 44– 55.
48. Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing ındirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 879-891.
49. Reis, H. T., & Collins, N. (2000). Measuring relationship properties and interactions relevant to social support. In S. Cohen, L. G. Underwood, & B. H. Gottlieb (Eds.), Social support measurement and intervention: A guide for health and social scientists (pp. 136– 192). New York: Oxford University Press.
50. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000).Self-determinations theory and the faccilitation of untrinsic motivation, social development and wellbeing. American Psychologist, 55, 68-78.
51. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2008). From ego depletion to vitality. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2, 702–717. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2008.00098.x
52. Ryan, R. M., & Frederick, C. (1997). On energy, personality, and health: Subjective vitality as a dynamic reflection of well‐being. Journal of personality, 65(3), 529-565.
53. Saarni, C. (1999). The development of emotional competence. New York: Guilford Press.
54. Salama–Younes, M. (2011) Positive mental health, subjective vitality, and satisfaction with life for French physical education students. World Journal of Sport Sciences, 4(2), 90–97.
55. Scheier, M. F., & Carver, C. S. (1992). Effects of optimism on psychological and physical well-being: Theoretical overview and empirical update. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 16, 201– 228.
56. Schermelleh, K., Moosbrugger, H., & Müller, H. (2003). Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: tests of significance and descriptive goodness-offit measures. MPR-Online, 8, 23-74.
57. Schroevers, M. J., Helgeson, V. S., Sanderman, R., & Ranchor, A. V. (2010). Type of social support matters for prediction of posttraumatic growth among cancer survivors. Psycho-Oncology, 19, 46– 53. https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.1501
58. Seeman, T. E., Lusignolo, T. M., Albert, M., & Berkman, L. (2001). Social relationships, social support, and patterns of cognitive aging in healthy, high-functioning older adults: MacArthur studies of successful aging. Health Psychology, 20, 243– 255.
59. Sezgin, S., & Yüksel, G. (2020). Zihin gezinmesi ölçeklerinin Türkçeye uyarlanması: Bir geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Türk Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 18(1), 456-482.
60. Shalev, A. Y., Bleich, A., & Ursano, R. J. (1990). Posttraumatic stress disorder: Somatic comorbidity and effort tolerance. Psychosomatics, 31, 197– 203.
61. Shi, H.-J., Nakamura, K., & Takano, T. (2004). Health values and health-information-seeking in relation to positive change of health practice among middle-aged urban men. Preventive Medicine, 39, 1164– 1171.
62. Simon, D., Kriston, L., Loh, A., Spies, C., Scheibler, F., Wills, C., & Harter, M. (2010), Confirmatory factor analysis and recommendations for improvement of the autonomy‐preference‐index (API). Health Expectations, 13(3), 234-243.
63. Sinclair, V. G., & Wallston, K. a. (2004). The Development and Psychometric Evaluation of the Brief Resilient Coping Scale. Assessment, 11, 94– 101. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191103258144
64. Smallwood J., & Schooler J. W. (2015). The science of mind wandering: Empirically navigating the stream of consciousness. Annual Review of Psychology, 66, 487-518.
65. Smallwood, J. M., & Schooler, J. W. (2006). The restless mind. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 946-958.
66. Smith, B. W., Dalen, J., Wiggins, K., Tooley, E., Christopher, P., & Jennifer Bernard, J. (2008). The brief resilience scale: Assessing the ability to bounce back. International Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 15, 194–200.
67. Şahin, F., & Gürbüz, S. (2017). Sosyal bilimlerde araştırma yöntemi (3rd ed.). Seçkin Yayıncılık.
68. Tabachnick, B.G., & Fidell, L.S. (2013). Using multivariate statistics (sixth ed.). Boston.
69. Uğur, E., Kaya, Ç., & Özçelik, B. (2019). Subjective vitality mediates the relationship between respect toward partner and subjective happiness on teachers. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 7(1), 126–132.
70. Uysal, R., Sarıçam, H., & Akın, A. (2014). Öznel Zindelik Ölçeği. Türkçe formunun psikometrik özellikleri. Muğla Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, (33), 136-146.
71. Vanistendael, S., & Lecomte, J. (2000). Le bonheur est toujours possible: construire la résilience. Bayard.
72. Weger, U., Wagemann, J., & Meyer, A. (2018). Researching mind wandering from a firstperson perspective. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 32(3), 298–306. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3406
73. Williams, J., & MacKinnon, D. P. (2008). Resampling and distribution of the product methods for testing indirect effects in complex models. Structural equation modeling: a multidisciplinary journal, 15(1), 23-51.
74. Woods, V. (2005). Work-related musculoskeletal health and social support. Occupational Medicine, 55, 177– 189. https://doi.org/10.1093/occmed/kqi085